Skip to content

Conversation

@MantisClone
Copy link
Member

@MantisClone MantisClone commented Nov 22, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Downgraded project version from 0.12.0 to 0.11.0.
    • Updated the @requestnetwork/create-invoice-form package to version 0.11.1 for improved compatibility.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request involves a version downgrade of the project from "0.12.0" to "0.11.0" in the package.json file. It also includes an update to the dependency @requestnetwork/create-invoice-form, changing its version from "0.11.0" to "0.11.1". No other changes to scripts or additional dependencies are included.

Changes

File Change Summary
package.json - Version downgraded from "0.12.0" to "0.11.0".
- Updated @requestnetwork/create-invoice-form to "0.11.1".

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • sstefdev
  • rodrigopavezi
  • aimensahnoun

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@MantisClone has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 37 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a204f2a and b494c7f.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a204f2a and b494c7f.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • package.json

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)

Line range hint 11-11: Align Next.js related package versions

There's a version mismatch between Next.js packages:

  • next: 14.2.3 (fixed)
  • @next/third-parties: ^14.2.5 (floating)
  • eslint-config-next: 14.2.3 (fixed)

Consider aligning all Next.js related packages to the same version for better compatibility.

-    "@next/third-parties": "^14.2.5",
+    "@next/third-parties": "14.2.3",

Also applies to: 24-24, 35-35

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 08fda75 and a204f2a.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (2)

3-3: Verify version history and publishing status

Let's confirm the version history to ensure a clean downgrade process.

✅ Verification successful

Version downgrade is safe to proceed

This is a private package that hasn't been published to any registry, and there are no git tags or changelog entries. The version downgrade from 0.12.0 to 0.11.0 won't cause any external impact since:

  • Package is marked as private in package.json
  • No versions have been published to npm or GitHub registry
  • No git tags exist for any versions
  • No changelog entries found
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check npm registry for published versions

# Check if 0.12.0 or 0.11.0 were published
npm view request-network-template versions --json 2>/dev/null || echo "Package not found in registry"

# Check if this is a private package in GitHub registry
gh api -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" /packages/npm/request-network-template/versions 2>/dev/null || echo "Package not found in GitHub registry"

Length of output: 680


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if this is a private package by examining package.json
cat package.json | jq '.private, .name'

# Check if there are any git tags for versions
git tag -l "v*"

# Look for any changelog entries
fd -g "CHANGELOG*" -x cat {}

Length of output: 124


Line range hint 14-19: Verify @RequestNetwork packages compatibility

The @RequestNetwork packages have different major/minor versions:

  • create-invoice-form: 0.11.0
  • invoice-dashboard: 0.10.0
  • payment-detection: 0.45.1
  • request-client.js: 0.50.0
  • web3-signature: 0.8.1

Please ensure these versions are compatible with each other.

✅ Verification successful

@RequestNetwork packages appear to be correctly integrated

Based on the codebase analysis:

  • The packages are used together in a cohesive way in utils/initializeRN.ts where request-client.js, web3-signature, and payment-detection are properly integrated
  • invoice-dashboard and create-invoice-form are used as React components through dynamic imports
  • The types are properly imported and used across files, suggesting type compatibility
  • No runtime errors or version conflicts are visible in the implementation

The different version numbers appear to be intentional as these packages serve different purposes and are maintained separately within the @RequestNetwork ecosystem. The integration pattern shown in the codebase follows the expected usage of these packages.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for documented version compatibility between @requestnetwork packages

# Look for compatibility documentation
rg -l --type md "compatibility|version" | while read -r file; do
  echo "=== $file ==="
  rg -A 5 -B 5 "@requestnetwork.*version" "$file" || true
done

Length of output: 56


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for package.json files in the repository that might have @requestnetwork dependencies
fd package.json --type f --exec sh -c 'echo "=== {} ==="; cat {} | grep -A 10 -B 10 "@requestnetwork"'

# Look for any potential README or documentation in node_modules/@requestnetwork
fd "README.md|CHANGELOG.md" --type f | grep -i "requestnetwork" || true

# Check if there are any TypeScript/JavaScript files importing multiple @requestnetwork packages
rg "@requestnetwork" --type ts --type js -C 5

Length of output: 4155

@MantisClone MantisClone merged commit 353eeb3 into main Nov 22, 2024
2 checks passed
@MantisClone MantisClone deleted the go-back-to-version-11 branch November 22, 2024 22:14
This was referenced Dec 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants