-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
fix: go back to version 0.11.0 because it was never released #77
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request involves a version downgrade of the project from "0.12.0" to "0.11.0" in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Warning Rate limit exceeded@MantisClone has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 37 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)
Line range hint
11-11: Align Next.js related package versionsThere's a version mismatch between Next.js packages:
- next: 14.2.3 (fixed)
- @next/third-parties: ^14.2.5 (floating)
- eslint-config-next: 14.2.3 (fixed)
Consider aligning all Next.js related packages to the same version for better compatibility.
- "@next/third-parties": "^14.2.5", + "@next/third-parties": "14.2.3",Also applies to: 24-24, 35-35
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
package.json(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (2)
3-3: Verify version history and publishing status
Let's confirm the version history to ensure a clean downgrade process.
✅ Verification successful
Version downgrade is safe to proceed
This is a private package that hasn't been published to any registry, and there are no git tags or changelog entries. The version downgrade from 0.12.0 to 0.11.0 won't cause any external impact since:
- Package is marked as private in package.json
- No versions have been published to npm or GitHub registry
- No git tags exist for any versions
- No changelog entries found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check npm registry for published versions
# Check if 0.12.0 or 0.11.0 were published
npm view request-network-template versions --json 2>/dev/null || echo "Package not found in registry"
# Check if this is a private package in GitHub registry
gh api -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" /packages/npm/request-network-template/versions 2>/dev/null || echo "Package not found in GitHub registry"
Length of output: 680
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if this is a private package by examining package.json
cat package.json | jq '.private, .name'
# Check if there are any git tags for versions
git tag -l "v*"
# Look for any changelog entries
fd -g "CHANGELOG*" -x cat {}
Length of output: 124
Line range hint 14-19: Verify @RequestNetwork packages compatibility
The @RequestNetwork packages have different major/minor versions:
- create-invoice-form: 0.11.0
- invoice-dashboard: 0.10.0
- payment-detection: 0.45.1
- request-client.js: 0.50.0
- web3-signature: 0.8.1
Please ensure these versions are compatible with each other.
✅ Verification successful
@RequestNetwork packages appear to be correctly integrated
Based on the codebase analysis:
- The packages are used together in a cohesive way in
utils/initializeRN.tswhererequest-client.js,web3-signature, andpayment-detectionare properly integrated invoice-dashboardandcreate-invoice-formare used as React components through dynamic imports- The types are properly imported and used across files, suggesting type compatibility
- No runtime errors or version conflicts are visible in the implementation
The different version numbers appear to be intentional as these packages serve different purposes and are maintained separately within the @RequestNetwork ecosystem. The integration pattern shown in the codebase follows the expected usage of these packages.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for documented version compatibility between @requestnetwork packages
# Look for compatibility documentation
rg -l --type md "compatibility|version" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "@requestnetwork.*version" "$file" || true
done
Length of output: 56
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for package.json files in the repository that might have @requestnetwork dependencies
fd package.json --type f --exec sh -c 'echo "=== {} ==="; cat {} | grep -A 10 -B 10 "@requestnetwork"'
# Look for any potential README or documentation in node_modules/@requestnetwork
fd "README.md|CHANGELOG.md" --type f | grep -i "requestnetwork" || true
# Check if there are any TypeScript/JavaScript files importing multiple @requestnetwork packages
rg "@requestnetwork" --type ts --type js -C 5
Length of output: 4155
Summary by CodeRabbit
@requestnetwork/create-invoice-formpackage to version 0.11.1 for improved compatibility.