[geomin12]

bump TheRock ref to d528760 (2026-08-18)

[therock-pr-bot]

❌ PR Check — Action Required

Check	Status	Details
📝 PR Description	❌ Fail	Error: PR description must reference a JIRA ID, ISSUE ID, or a GitHub closing keyword. Expected: include a JIRA ID / ISSUE ID line (separator : or -, or omitted; value may be a JIRA key, a number with/without #, or a link), OR a closing keyword + issue reference. Accepted examples: • JIRA ID : TESTAUTO-6039 • JIRA ID - #330 • JIRA ID #330 • JIRA ID (on separate line) ROCM-25757 • ISSUE ID : TESTUTO-3334 • ISSUE ID #3334 • ISSUE ID - TESTAUTO-3433 • ISSUE ID (on separate line) AIRUNTIME-2352 • ISSUE ID : https://github.com/<org_name>/<repo_name>/issues/1234 • Closes #10 • Fixes octo-org/octo-repo#100 • Resolves: #123 • #123 • https://github.com/<org_name>/<repo_name>/issues/123 Current: no valid JIRA/ISSUE/closing-keyword reference found
⛔ Forbidden Files	✅ Pass	—
🧪 Unit Test	✅ Pass	PR does not contain code files — Unit Test auto-passed
🔎 pre-commit	⏳ Pending	⏳ Still running…
🚫 Draft PR	🔜 To Be Enabled	—
🚩 Feature Flag	🔜 To Be Enabled	—
📊 Code Coverage	🔜 To Be Enabled	—

⚠️ 1 policy check(s) failed. Please address the issues above before this PR can be Reviewed.

🚫 Please fix the failed policies

• ❌ PR Description

The Not ready to Review label was added to this PR. Once all policies pass, the label is removed automatically.

📖 Need help? See the Policy FAQ for details on every check and how to fix failures.

🙋 Wish to Override Policy?

[therock-pr-bot]

🚫 Please fix the failed policies before requesting reviews.

The following policy checks failed:

• ❌ PR Description

The Not ready to Review label has been added to this PR.
Once all policies pass, the label will be removed automatically.

[JeniferC99]

lgtm, but looks like it's superseded by #10317.

I feel like there's a reason why, but is there a reason why not use @main instead?

[geomin12]

lgtm, but looks like it's superseded by #10317.

I feel like there's a reason why, but is there a reason why not use @main instead?

i'm going to land this as this includes those commits! we don't use main, because if a break was introduced, it would impact ALL of ROCm development. it's safer to pin to a hash