Skip to content

[rocRAND][Code Coverage] Increase rocRAND code coverage#173

Closed
NguyenNhuDi wants to merge 14 commits into
ROCm:release-staging/rocm-rel-7.0from
NguyenNhuDi:zenguyen-rocrand/increase-code-coverage-rs-7.0
Closed

[rocRAND][Code Coverage] Increase rocRAND code coverage#173
NguyenNhuDi wants to merge 14 commits into
ROCm:release-staging/rocm-rel-7.0from
NguyenNhuDi:zenguyen-rocrand/increase-code-coverage-rs-7.0

Conversation

@NguyenNhuDi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@umfranzw umfranzw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this looks good, I just have a few minor comments.

Comment thread projects/rocrand/library/src/rocrand.cpp Outdated
Comment thread projects/rocrand/test/internal/test_normal_distribution.cpp Outdated
Comment thread projects/rocrand/test/internal/test_normal_distribution.cpp Outdated
Comment thread projects/rocrand/test/internal/test_log_normal_distribution.cpp Outdated
{ \
std::cerr << "Encountered ROCRAND error: " << status << "at line" << __LINE__ \
<< " in file " << __FILE__ << "\n"; \
exit(-1); \
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since we know the error here (status), could we pass that to exit instead of -1?
Eg. exit(status)?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes I believe we could. I will update this

Comment thread projects/rocrand/test/internal/test_uniform_distribution.cpp
Comment thread projects/rocrand/test/internal/test_uniform_distribution.cpp
Comment thread projects/rocrand/test/internal/test_log_normal_distribution.cpp Outdated
@NguyenNhuDi NguyenNhuDi requested a review from a team as a code owner June 24, 2025 18:29
amd-jnovotny
amd-jnovotny previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2025
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@amd-jnovotny amd-jnovotny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changelog OK.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented Jun 26, 2025

Welcome to Codecov 🎉

Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests.

Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️

@NguyenNhuDi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Closing to rebase to develop on pr #409

NguyenNhuDi added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2025
This PR is recreated to merge into develop instead of release staging
branch. Previous PR is #173.
NguyenNhuDi added a commit to NguyenNhuDi/rocm-libraries that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2025
This PR is recreated to merge into develop instead of release staging
branch. Previous PR is ROCm#173.
shahamed pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2025
This PR is recreated to merge into develop instead of release staging
branch. Previous PR is #173.
eidenyoshida pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2025
[rocRAND][Code Coverage] Increase Code Coverage for rocRAND (#409)

This PR is recreated to merge into develop instead of release staging
branch. Previous PR is #173.
ammallya pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2025
* Cleanup frontend POC graph and node attribute access patterns

* Pointwise node use getters

* Uncomment
ammallya pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2025
* Cleanup frontend POC graph and node attribute access patterns

* Pointwise node use getters

* Uncomment

[ROCm/hipDNN commit: a7a5ab5]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants