Skip to content

Bump rocm-systems from a08170b to 256dd19 - #2520

Closed
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/submodules/main/rocm-systems-256dd19
Closed

dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/submodules/main/rocm-systems-256dd19

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Dec 11, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps rocm-systems from a08170b to 256dd19.

Commits
  • 256dd19 [hip] Docs: Overhaul HW implementation page (#1994)
  • 9e06ea8 [SWDEV-564696] Structure size mismatch in SOC pstate/XGMI PLPD (#2207)
  • caecbb4 [SWDEV-354749] Added CPU Performance Tests (#2173)
  • e39fe03 [SWDEV-488296] Implemented API Performance test case (#1903)
  • 0835f2e rocrtst: Updated CMakeFiles to find_package instead of hardcoded (#2095)
  • 70562eb Add ROCm 7.1 to workflows (#2256)
  • 3895aad SWDEV-558849 - Make ROCR path in Windows more stable (#2181)
  • 1d6b26f SWDEV-556684 - HSAIL Cleanup re-apply commit 4abdfe5: (#2024)
  • d4fe3f1 [hip-tests] Update API coverage report generator (#1932)
  • 0c1f87a SWDEV-558848 - vmm api support for rocr on windows (#1761)
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot dependabot Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file submodules Pull requests that update submodules code labels Dec 11, 2025
@marbre
marbre requested review from ScottTodd and marbre December 11, 2025 10:48
Comment thread rocm-systems

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess the new CODEOWNERS changes missed this... maybe due to the trailing /?

# Regularly updated submodules
/rocm-libraries/ @ROCm/TheRockInfra
/rocm-systems/ @ROCm/TheRockInfra

I'll test that more thoroughly.

@jayhawk-commits

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Note that TheRock CI checks showed up on the main page of this dependabot update too... I'm not finding the pattern on when it decides to show up.

@geomin12

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

A lot of these failures were due to GitHub's network outage. retrying the jobs and seeing the status

Bumps [rocm-systems](https://github.com/ROCm/rocm-systems) from `a08170b` to `256dd19`.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/ROCm/rocm-systems/releases)
- [Commits](ROCm/rocm-systems@a08170b...256dd19)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: rocm-systems
  dependency-version: 256dd19
  dependency-type: direct:production
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot
dependabot Bot force-pushed the dependabot/submodules/main/rocm-systems-256dd19 branch from c332dfc to fdff76b Compare December 12, 2025 09:02
@dependabot @github

dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Dec 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Superseded by #2533.

@dependabot dependabot Bot closed this Dec 12, 2025
@dependabot
dependabot Bot deleted the dependabot/submodules/main/rocm-systems-256dd19 branch December 12, 2025 10:35
ScottTodd added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2025
Follow-up to #2487. See
#2520 (comment) - this
was not assigning reviewers as expected.

I'm not sure how to test this...
subodh-dubey-amd pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2025
Follow-up to #2487. See
#2520 (comment) - this
was not assigning reviewers as expected.

I'm not sure how to test this...
@idass1990
idass1990 restored the dependabot/submodules/main/rocm-systems-256dd19 branch December 17, 2025 18:42
@ROCm ROCm deleted a comment from ci-buildbot Dec 18, 2025
@ROCm ROCm deleted a comment from ci-buildbot Dec 18, 2025
@ci-buildbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

UCICD Test Results Summary

GPU Target Platform Result Total Tests Passed Failed Skipped Error Unknown
gpu_navi3x windows ❌ FAILURE 12 8 4 0 0 0
gpu_navi4x windows ⚠️ SKIPPED 13 0 0 13 0 0
igpu_stxh windows ❌ FAILURE 12 8 4 0 0 0
gpu_navi3x ubuntu ❌ FAILURE 29 21 8 0 0 0
gpu_navi4x ubuntu ⚠️ SKIPPED 41 0 0 41 0 0
igpu_stxh ubuntu ❌ FAILURE 29 7 22 0 0 0

TheRock Run IDs:

S3 Logs:

benrichard-amd pushed a commit to benrichard-amd/TheRock that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2026
Follow-up to ROCm#2487. See
ROCm#2520 (comment) - this
was not assigning reviewers as expected.

I'm not sure how to test this...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file submodules Pull requests that update submodules code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants