Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make workBench live with toollkit #2

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 10, 2012
Merged

make workBench live with toollkit #2

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 10, 2012

Conversation

sjmiles
Copy link
Contributor

@sjmiles sjmiles commented Oct 10, 2012

We agree repos need to be atomic, the only questions are "what's atomic". We decided source files don't need to be atomic in the raw, for production you will always need some kind of build output.

@ghost ghost assigned sorvell Oct 10, 2012
@sorvell
Copy link
Contributor

sorvell commented Oct 10, 2012

LGTM

sorvell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2012
make workBench live with toollkit
@sorvell sorvell merged commit 1281934 into Polymer:master Oct 10, 2012
nevir referenced this pull request in nevir/polymer Nov 19, 2014
minimal repair to annotation system to account for scoping.
kaste added a commit to kaste/polymer that referenced this pull request May 2, 2016
* For efficiency do not process `items.length` changes
* Ensure observing `foo` is not triggered by a `foobar` etc.
* Ensure assignments like `items.Polymer#2` etc. will trigger a resort/-filter

Fixes Polymer#3626.
kaste added a commit to kaste/polymer that referenced this pull request May 2, 2016
* For efficiency do not process `items.length` changes
* Ensure observing `foo` is not triggered by a `foobar` etc.
* Ensure assignments like `items.Polymer#2` etc. will trigger a resort/-filter

Fixes Polymer#3626.
dfreedm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2016
@nicolasr75 nicolasr75 mentioned this pull request Apr 26, 2017
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants