Webflow v2 migration 2024 12 11 #14841
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces extensive updates across multiple files in the Webflow integration, primarily changing the import references from Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 19
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (16)
components/webflow/actions/get-collection-item/get-collection-item.mjs (1)
Line range hint
37-41: Consider adding error handlingWhile the API interaction is correctly simplified, consider adding try-catch error handling to provide more informative error messages to users when API calls fail.
async run({ $ }) { + try { const response = await this.app.getCollectionItem(this.collectionId, this.itemId); $.export("$summary", "Successfully retrieved collection item"); return response; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to retrieve collection item: ${error.message}`); + } },components/webflow/sources/new-ecommerce-order/new-ecommerce-order.mjs (2)
17-20: Hardcoded limit of 10 inlistOrdersmay restrict initial event emission.In the
deployhook, thelimitparameter is hardcoded to10when retrieving historical orders. This might limit the number of historical events emitted upon deployment. If users need to retrieve more than 10 historical orders, consider making thelimitconfigurable.Consider reintroducing a
propsparameter or setting a higher default limit to allow users to specify the number of historical events to retrieve.
15-15: Use consistent logging mechanism instead ofconsole.log.Consider using the platform's standard logging utility instead of
console.logto maintain consistency in log outputs.Apply this diff to use the appropriate logging method:
- console.log("Retrieving historical events..."); + this.logger.info("Retrieving historical events...");components/webflow/actions/list-collection-items/list-collection-items.mjs (1)
1-1: Consider renaming the app file for consistencyThe import uses 'app' but the file is still named 'webflow.app.mjs'. Consider renaming the file to align with the new convention.
components/webflow/actions/refund-order/refund-order.mjs (1)
Line range hint
1-30: Overall migration quality looks goodThe changes successfully migrate this component to Webflow v2 while:
- Maintaining consistent structure with other migrated files
- Improving code maintainability
- Enhancing documentation clarity
Consider adding a comment about the response structure expected from the v2 API to help with future maintenance.
components/webflow/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs (1)
Line range hint
1-29: Consider adding migration documentation.Since this is part of a larger v2 migration with breaking changes, consider adding or updating migration guides to help users transition from v1 to v2.
Would you like me to help draft a migration guide that covers these changes?
components/webflow/actions/update-collection-item/update-collection-item.mjs (2)
53-58: Refactor nested ternary operators for improved readabilityThe nested ternary operators in the
descriptionproperty reduce code readability. Consider using if-else statements or a mapping function for clarity.Apply this refactor to enhance readability:
props[field.slug] = { type: "string", label: field.name, - description: - field.slug === "name" - ? "Name given to the Item." - : field.slug === "slug" - ? "URL structure of the Item in your site. Note: Updates to an item slug will break all links referencing the old slug." - : "See the documentation for additional information about [Field Types & Item Values](https://developers.webflow.com/reference/field-types-item-values).", + description: (() => { + if (field.slug === "name") { + return "Name given to the Item."; + } else if (field.slug === "slug") { + return "URL structure of the Item in your site. Note: Updates to an item slug will break all links referencing the old slug."; + } else { + return "See the documentation for additional information about [Field Types & Item Values](https://developers.webflow.com/reference/field-types-item-values)."; + } + })(), optional: true, };
Line range hint
68-77: Use 'this.app' for consistency in 'run' methodIn the
runmethod,appis destructured fromthisand used directly. For consistency with theadditionalPropsmethod and to enhance readability, usethis.appinstead.Apply this diff to adjust the
runmethod:const { - app, - // eslint-disable-next-line no-unused-vars - siteId, collectionId, itemId, name, slug, ...customFields } = this; - const item = await app.getCollectionItem(collectionId, itemId); + const item = await this.app.getCollectionItem(collectionId, itemId); - const response = await app.updateCollectionItem(collectionId, itemId, { + const response = await this.app.updateCollectionItem(collectionId, itemId, {components/webflow/actions/update-order/update-order.mjs (1)
43-45: Consider filtering unused props from the data object.The spread operator
...datamight include props that are no longer supported by the v2 API. Consider explicitly selecting only the supported fields.-const { - app, siteId, orderId, ...data -} = this; +const { + app, siteId, orderId, + // Add only supported fields here +} = this; +const data = { + // Include only supported fields +};components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs (4)
Line range hint
68-73: Ensure consistent options format in orders mapping function.In the
ordersoptions function, the mapping returns an array oforderIds directly without the requiredlabelandvalueproperties. For consistency and proper functionality, the options should return an array of objects withlabelandvalue.Apply this diff to correct the mapping:
- return items.map((item) => item.orderId); + return items.map((item) => ({ + label: `Order ${item.orderId}`, + value: item.orderId, + }));
86-90: Add error handling for API calls in webhook methods.Consider adding error handling (e.g., try-catch blocks) to the
createWebhookandremoveWebhookmethods to gracefully handle potential API call failures.Apply this diff as an example:
async createWebhook(siteId, data) { - return this.webflowClient().webhooks.create(siteId, data); + try { + return await this.webflowClient().webhooks.create(siteId, data); + } catch (error) { + // Handle error appropriately + throw new Error(`Failed to create webhook: ${error.message}`); + } }, async removeWebhook(webhookId) { - return this.webflowClient().webhooks.delete(webhookId); + try { + return await this.webflowClient().webhooks.delete(webhookId); + } catch (error) { + // Handle error appropriately + throw new Error(`Failed to remove webhook: ${error.message}`); + } },
95-103: Add error handling for API calls in listOrders method.In the
listOrdersmethod, consider implementing error handling to manage potential failures when fetching orders from the API.Example implementation:
async listOrders({ page: offset = 0, siteId, status, }) { - const response = await this.webflowClient().orders.list(siteId, { - offset, - status, - }); - return response?.orders; + try { + const response = await this.webflowClient().orders.list(siteId, { + offset, + status, + }); + return response?.orders; + } catch (error) { + // Handle error appropriately + throw new Error(`Failed to list orders: ${error.message}`); + } },
127-133: Add error handling for API calls in listCollectionItems method.To ensure robustness, add error handling to the
listCollectionItemsmethod to handle potential API errors.Example adjustment:
async listCollectionItems(page = 0, collectionId) { if (!collectionId) return []; - const response = await this.webflowClient().collections.items.listItems(collectionId, { - limit: constants.LIMIT, - offset: page, - }); - return response?.items; + try { + const response = await this.webflowClient().collections.items.listItems(collectionId, { + limit: constants.LIMIT, + offset: page, + }); + return response?.items; + } catch (error) { + // Handle error appropriately + throw new Error(`Failed to list collection items: ${error.message}`); + } },components/webflow/actions/list-orders/list-orders.mjs (1)
32-32: Improve response handling in summary messageThe summary message now includes the response length, but we should handle potential undefined responses.
- $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${response?.length} orders`); + const count = Array.isArray(response) ? response.length : 0; + $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${count} orders`);components/webflow/actions/delete-collection-item/delete-collection-item.mjs (1)
37-40: Consider adding validation for required parametersWhile the props system ensures parameters are provided, explicit validation would improve error messages.
async run({ $ }) { const { collectionId, itemId, } = this; + if (!collectionId || !itemId) { + throw new Error("Both collectionId and itemId are required"); + } const response = await this.app.deleteCollectionItem(collectionId, itemId);components/webflow/actions/get-collection/get-collection.mjs (1)
6-7: Document breaking changes for v2.0.0The version bump to 2.0.0 indicates breaking changes. Consider adding migration notes or updating the description to highlight any breaking changes from v1.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
-
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (31)
-
components/webflow/actions/create-collection-item/create-collection-item.mjs(2 hunks) -
components/webflow/actions/delete-collection-item/delete-collection-item.mjs(3 hunks) -
components/webflow/actions/fulfill-order/fulfill-order.mjs(2 hunks) -
components/webflow/actions/get-collection-item/get-collection-item.mjs(3 hunks) -
components/webflow/actions/get-collection/get-collection.mjs(2 hunks) -
components/webflow/actions/get-item-inventory/get-item-inventory.mjs(3 hunks) -
components/webflow/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs(1 hunks) -
components/webflow/actions/get-site/get-site.mjs(1 hunks) -
components/webflow/actions/list-collection-items/list-collection-items.mjs(2 hunks) -
components/webflow/actions/list-collections/list-collections.mjs(1 hunks) -
components/webflow/actions/list-orders/list-orders.mjs(1 hunks) -
components/webflow/actions/list-sites/list-sites.mjs(1 hunks) -
components/webflow/actions/publish-site/publish-site.mjs(2 hunks) -
components/webflow/actions/refund-order/refund-order.mjs(1 hunks) -
components/webflow/actions/unfulfill-order/unfulfill-order.mjs(1 hunks) -
components/webflow/actions/update-collection-item/update-collection-item.mjs(3 hunks) -
components/webflow/actions/update-item-inventory/update-item-inventory.mjs(3 hunks) -
components/webflow/actions/update-order/update-order.mjs(2 hunks) -
components/webflow/package.json(2 hunks) -
components/webflow/sources/changed-collection-item/changed-collection-item.mjs(1 hunks) -
components/webflow/sources/changed-ecommerce-inventory/changed-ecommerce-inventory.mjs(1 hunks) -
components/webflow/sources/changed-ecommerce-order/changed-ecommerce-order.mjs(1 hunks) -
components/webflow/sources/common/common.mjs(3 hunks) -
components/webflow/sources/new-collection-item/new-collection-item.mjs(1 hunks) -
components/webflow/sources/new-deleted-collection-item/new-deleted-collection-item.mjs(1 hunks) -
components/webflow/sources/new-ecommerce-order/new-ecommerce-order.mjs(1 hunks) -
components/webflow/sources/new-form-submission/new-form-submission.mjs(1 hunks) -
components/webflow/sources/new-site-published/new-site-published.mjs(1 hunks) -
components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs(2 hunks) -
components/webflow_v2/package.json(0 hunks) -
components/webflow_v2/webflow_v2.app.mjs(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- components/webflow_v2/package.json
- components/webflow_v2/webflow_v2.app.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
components/webflow/sources/changed-collection-item/changed-collection-item.mjs
[warning] 6-6:
Source names should start with "New". See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#source-name
components/webflow/sources/new-site-published/new-site-published.mjs
[warning] 6-6:
Source names should start with "New". See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#source-name
components/webflow/sources/changed-ecommerce-inventory/changed-ecommerce-inventory.mjs
[warning] 6-6:
Source names should start with "New". See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#source-name
components/webflow/sources/new-deleted-collection-item/new-deleted-collection-item.mjs
[warning] 6-6:
Source names should start with "New". See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#source-name
components/webflow/sources/changed-ecommerce-order/changed-ecommerce-order.mjs
[warning] 6-6:
Source names should start with "New". See https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#source-name
🔇 Additional comments (58)
components/webflow/actions/get-collection-item/get-collection-item.mjs (2)
Line range hint 10-34: Props configuration looks good
The prop definitions are well-structured with proper dependency chaining from site to collection to item. The migration to using app is consistent throughout all prop definitions.
1-1: Verify import path consistency across the codebase
The version bump to 2.0.0 correctly reflects this breaking change. However, let's verify that the import path ../../webflow.app.mjs is consistent with other migrated files.
Also applies to: 6-7
✅ Verification successful
Import path is consistent with the codebase migration
The import path ../../webflow.app.mjs is correctly used across all files in the Webflow component, with most files using the app alias. Only one file (collection-common.mjs) uses the webflow alias, but the relative path remains consistent. The import path and structure align with the v2 migration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency in webflow.app.mjs imports across the codebase
# Expect: All imports should follow the same pattern
# Search for all import statements referencing webflow.app.mjs
rg -t js -t mjs "import.*webflow\.app\.mjs"
Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all import statements referencing webflow.app without file extension restriction
rg "import.*webflow\.app"
# Also search for files named webflow.app with any extension
fd "webflow.app"
Length of output: 2152
components/webflow/sources/new-site-published/new-site-published.mjs (1)
19-21: Ensure unique event IDs in generateMeta
The id field is constructed using ${siteId}-${publishedOn}. If multiple publish events occur at the same timestamp for the same site, this could lead to duplicate IDs. Consider incorporating a unique identifier or using Date.now() to ensure event IDs are unique.
components/webflow/actions/publish-site/publish-site.mjs (2)
Line range hint 10-25: LGTM! Props configuration maintains proper dependencies.
The props configuration correctly maintains the relationship between sites and domains while adapting to the new app-based structure.
Line range hint 27-33: Verify error handling in the app-level implementation.
The simplified implementation looks good, but since it relies on app-level error handling, let's verify the error cases are properly handled.
Let's check the error handling implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try another search strategy to verify the error handling implementation.
Let me check the webflow-api client's implementation to understand the error handling.
Based on the code analysis, I can now provide the final response:
Error handling is properly implemented through the SDK
The implementation relies on the webflow-api SDK's error handling through the WebflowClient. The client method sites.publish() is called through the app's wrapper, which maintains consistent error propagation. The Pipedream platform will automatically handle and display any errors thrown by the SDK.
- The
publishSitemethod inwebflow.app.mjsproperly forwards all parameters to the SDK - The action's simplified implementation maintains the error handling chain
- No additional try-catch blocks are needed as errors will propagate up to the platform level
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify error handling in the app-level publishSite method
# Expect: Proper error handling in the app implementation
# Check for error handling in the app file
rg -A 5 'publishSite.*=.*async' components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Check for error types or custom error handling
rg -g '*.{mjs,js}' 'throw.*Error' components/webflow/
Length of output: 236
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the app.mjs file content directly to analyze the publishSite implementation
cat components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Also check for any HTTP error handling patterns in the app
rg -A 3 "catch.*{" components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
Length of output: 5359
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the package.json to find the webflow-api version
cat package.json
# Let's also check if there are any error handling patterns in the action file
rg -A 3 "try.*{" components/webflow/actions/publish-site/publish-site.mjs
Length of output: 2554
components/webflow/sources/changed-collection-item/changed-collection-item.mjs (2)
1-1: Verify the common module migration
Let's ensure the migration from collection-common.mjs to common.mjs is consistent across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the content of both modules to ensure the migration is correct.
Import change is correct and properly structured
The import change is valid as both files exist and are properly structured:
-
collection-common.mjsitself imports fromcommon.mjsand extends it with collection-specific functionality -
common.mjscontains the base implementation - The import in
changed-collection-item.mjscorrectly references the common module
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the common module migration and its usage
# Check if old module still exists and is referenced
echo "Checking for old module references..."
rg -l "collection-common.mjs" components/webflow/
# Verify the new common.mjs exists and exports expected methods
echo "Verifying new module..."
rg -l "common.mjs" components/webflow/
Length of output: 900
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of collection-common.mjs
echo "=== Content of collection-common.mjs ==="
cat components/webflow/sources/common/collection-common.mjs
# Check if there's a common.mjs file
echo -e "\n=== Searching for common.mjs ==="
fd "common.mjs" components/webflow/sources/
# If common.mjs exists, show its content
if [ -f "components/webflow/sources/common/common.mjs" ]; then
echo -e "\n=== Content of common.mjs ==="
cat components/webflow/sources/common/common.mjs
fi
Length of output: 2764
16-23: Verify data structure changes with Webflow v2 API
The method has been refactored to use a different data structure. Let's ensure these changes align with Webflow v2's webhook payload format:
- Using
lastUpdatedinstead ofupdated-on - Using
idinstead of_id - New
fieldDatastructure for item properties
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the Webflow webhook payload structure and related changes.
Let me check the common code and related collection item handlers to better understand the data structure consistency.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Data structure changes are consistent with Webflow v2 API
The changes in the generateMeta method are verified to be correct and consistent with other collection item handlers in the codebase:
- The
fieldDatastructure is consistently used across multiple files (new-collection-item, changed-collection-item, and app.mjs) - The timestamp handling aligns with other sources (using specific event timestamps like
lastUpdatedfor changed items andcreatedOnfor new items) - The fallback pattern
fieldData?.slug ?? fieldData?.name ?? idis consistently implemented across handlers
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for similar data structure usage in other Webflow v2 files
# Check for consistent usage of the new data structure
echo "Checking data structure usage..."
ast-grep --pattern 'const { id, fieldData, lastUpdated } = $_' components/webflow/
# Verify webhook payload handling
echo "Checking webhook payload handling..."
rg -A 5 "collection_item_changed" components/webflow/
Length of output: 1220
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Webflow webhook payload handling and data structure
echo "Checking webhook data structure in tests and examples..."
rg -l "webhook" components/webflow/
echo "Checking for related files and documentation..."
fd . components/webflow/ -e md -e json
echo "Checking other usages of fieldData and lastUpdated..."
rg "fieldData|lastUpdated" components/webflow/
echo "Checking for API version references..."
rg -i "webflow.*v2|v2.*api" components/webflow/
Length of output: 2620
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check common code and collection item handlers
echo "Checking common webhook handling code..."
cat components/webflow/sources/common/common.mjs
echo "Checking new collection item source..."
cat components/webflow/sources/new-collection-item/new-collection-item.mjs
echo "Checking deleted collection item source..."
cat components/webflow/sources/new-deleted-collection-item/new-deleted-collection-item.mjs
Length of output: 3385
components/webflow/actions/update-item-inventory/update-item-inventory.mjs (2)
59-64: Verify if siteId parameter is needed
The siteId parameter is marked as unused. Let's verify if it's needed for the API call or can be removed from the props.
1-1:
Version downgrade breaks semantic versioning
The version has been downgraded from "1.0.1" to "0.0.5". This breaks semantic versioning principles and might cause issues with dependency management. Consider:
- For a major version change (v1 to v2), increment the major version number
- For breaking changes, use version "2.0.0"
Additionally, verify if the import path should be updated for consistency with v2 migration.
Also applies to: 7-7
components/webflow/sources/changed-ecommerce-inventory/changed-ecommerce-inventory.mjs (2)
16-22: LGTM! Code improvements enhance readability
The changes to generateMeta are well-structured:
- Destructuring
idimproves code clarity - Consistent timestamp handling
- More concise summary format
12-14: Verify webhook trigger type compatibility with Webflow v2
Please ensure that the webhook trigger type ecomm_inventory_changed is still valid in Webflow v2 API.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the Webflow webhook types to verify compatibility.
Let me search specifically for Webflow webhook documentation and migration-related information.
Let me try a different approach to search for Webflow webhook information.
Based on the codebase analysis, I can now provide a definitive response about the webhook trigger type compatibility.
The webhook trigger type ecomm_inventory_changed is valid and compatible with Webflow v2
The code review shows that this webhook trigger type is properly implemented in the v2.0.0 version of the component and is documented in the official Webflow v2 API reference (as noted in the source code comment: [See the documentation](https://developers.webflow.com/data/reference/webhooks/events/ecomm-inventory-changed)).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any other usages or definitions of this webhook type
# to ensure consistency across the codebase
rg -l "ecomm_inventory_changed" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg -A 2 -B 2 "ecomm_inventory_changed" "$file"
done
Length of output: 511
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for webhook trigger types in the codebase to understand the pattern and any migration changes
rg -A 2 -B 2 "getWebhookTriggerType|webhookTriggerType" --type js --type mjs
# Also check for any migration guides or documentation
fd -e md -e txt | xargs rg -l "webhook|trigger|migration|v2"
Length of output: 59357
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Webflow webhook or trigger type documentation
rg -A 5 -B 5 "webhook.*type|trigger.*type" components/webflow/
Length of output: 64
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for webhook-related code in the Webflow component
fd . components/webflow/ -t f -e mjs -e js | xargs cat
# Also check for any migration documentation
fd . components/webflow/ -t f -e md | xargs cat
Length of output: 32911
components/webflow/sources/new-ecommerce-order/new-ecommerce-order.mjs (2)
9-9: Ensure breaking changes are documented due to version bump to 2.0.0.
Since the version is being updated to 2.0.0, which signifies breaking changes, please ensure that these changes are well-documented and communicated to users to avoid unexpected issues.
7-8: Verify the updated documentation URL is correct and accessible.
Please ensure that the new documentation link provided in the description property is accurate and directs users to the correct resource.
Run the following script to check the status of the URL:
Expected Output: 200
✅ Verification successful
Documentation URL is accessible and valid
The documentation URL https://developers.webflow.com/data/reference/webhooks/events/ecomm-new-order returns a 200 status code, confirming it's accessible and correctly points to the Webflow documentation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the documentation URL is accessible (HTTP status 200).
# Test: Send a HEAD request and check if the status code is 200.
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" -I "https://developers.webflow.com/data/reference/webhooks/events/ecomm-new-order"
Length of output: 125
components/webflow/actions/list-collection-items/list-collection-items.mjs (3)
6-7: Verify documentation URL accessibility
The version bump to 2.0.0 correctly reflects the breaking changes. Let's verify the new documentation URL is accessible.
✅ Verification successful
Documentation URL is accessible and valid
The documentation URL is accessible and returns a successful HTTP 200 response with proper HTML content, confirming it's a valid endpoint in the Webflow developers documentation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the documentation URL is accessible
curl -I "https://developers.webflow.com/data/reference/cms/collection-items/bulk-items/list-items"
Length of output: 1447
28-30: Verify the listCollectionItems method signature
The hardcoded '0' parameter needs clarification. Let's verify the method signature and its expected parameters.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the '0' parameter or making it configurable through props if it represents a meaningful value (e.g., pagination offset).
✅ Verification successful
The 0 parameter is a valid default page offset
The listCollectionItems method implementation shows that the first parameter is a pagination offset that defaults to 0, and it's correctly used with the Webflow API. The method signature is:
async listCollectionItems(page = 0, collectionId)The implementation passes this value as the offset parameter to the Webflow API client along with a constant LIMIT value for pagination. This is a standard pagination pattern, and the hardcoded 0 value in the action is appropriate as it fetches the first page of results.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the listCollectionItems method implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'async listCollectionItems($_, $_) {
$$$
}' components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
Length of output: 101
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search pattern to find the method definition
ast-grep --pattern 'listCollectionItems' components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Also search for any references to this method
rg "listCollectionItems" --type js -A 3 -B 3
# Let's also check if there's any documentation or type definitions
fd "webflow.app" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 5336
Line range hint 10-24: Verify propDefinitions in app file
The props configuration looks correct. Let's verify that the referenced propDefinitions exist in the app file.
✅ Verification successful
Props configuration is correctly defined in app file
The verification confirms that both sites and collections prop definitions exist in components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs with their corresponding options implementations. The props are properly configured with:
-
sitesprop withlistSites()method for options -
collectionsprop withlistCollections(siteId)method for options, correctly accepting thesiteIdparameter
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the propDefinitions exist in the app file
ast-grep --pattern 'export const propDefinitions = {
$$$
sites: $_,
collections: $_,
$$$
}' components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
Length of output: 136
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find prop definitions
# First, let's check if the file exists
ls -l components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Then search for prop definitions with more context
rg "sites|collections" components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs -B 2 -A 2
# Also search with ast-grep using a simpler pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'sites: {
$$$
}'
# And for collections
ast-grep --pattern 'collections: {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 2697
components/webflow/sources/changed-ecommerce-order/changed-ecommerce-order.mjs (2)
7-8: LGTM: Documentation and version updates
The documentation link is more specific and the version bump to 2.0.0 appropriately reflects breaking changes in the v2 migration.
15-20: LGTM: Method implementation improvements
The changes improve code clarity through:
- Parameter destructuring
- More semantic variable naming ('ts' for timestamp)
- Clearer meta object structure
Let's verify that this change pattern is consistent across other Webflow components:
✅ Verification successful
These commands should help us verify:
- The overall generateMeta implementation patterns
- Timestamp variable naming conventions
- Meta object structure consistency
across Webflow components.
Method changes align with component patterns
The changes in the generateMeta method are consistent with patterns found across other Webflow components:
- Parameter destructuring is used consistently (e.g., in new-site-published.mjs)
- All components follow the same meta object structure with
id,summary, andtsfields - Timestamp handling is consistent, using
Date.parse()for ISO strings orDate.now()for current time
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar generateMeta implementations in other Webflow components
ast-grep --pattern 'generateMeta({ $_ }) {
$$$
return {
id: `${$_}-${$_}`,
summary: $$$,
ts: $$$
};
}'
Length of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for generateMeta implementations in Webflow components
rg -U "generateMeta.*?\{.*?return.*?\}" --type js -A 5 components/webflow/
Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Also search for timestamp variable usage patterns
rg "const (ts|now) = Date\.now\(\)" --type js components/webflow/
Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for meta object return patterns
rg "return\s+\{[\s\n]*id:.*summary:.*ts[,}]" --type js -A 3 components/webflow/
Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching with .mjs extension and simpler patterns
rg "generateMeta" --type js components/webflow/ -B 2 -A 5
Length of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all Webflow source files to understand the scope
fd "\.mjs$" components/webflow/sources/
Length of output: 818
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for meta object patterns with more lenient matching
rg "id:|summary:|ts[,}]" --type js components/webflow/sources/ -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of a few similar source files to compare patterns
cat "components/webflow/sources/new-ecommerce-order/new-ecommerce-order.mjs" "components/webflow/sources/new-form-submission/new-form-submission.mjs" "components/webflow/sources/new-site-published/new-site-published.mjs"
Length of output: 2536
components/webflow/actions/refund-order/refund-order.mjs (3)
Line range hint 24-30: Verify error handling and response structure for v2
The simplified implementation looks good, but we should ensure:
- The
refundOrdermethod in the app includes proper error handling - The response structure matches v2 API specifications
✅ Verification successful
Error handling is managed by the Webflow API client
The implementation is correct and safe. The code uses the official webflow-api client library (WebflowClient), which handles error cases internally. The refundOrder method is a thin wrapper around webflowClient().orders.refund(), following the same pattern as all other API methods in the file. The response structure is determined by the official client library, ensuring compatibility with Webflow's v2 API.
Key observations:
- Error handling is delegated to the
WebflowClientinstance - Response structure is managed by the official client library
- Implementation follows the consistent pattern used across all API methods in the file
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify error handling and method implementation
# Check the refundOrder method implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'async refundOrder($_) {
$$$
}' "components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs"
# Look for error handling patterns
rg "try.*catch" "components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs" -A 5
Length of output: 147
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the refundOrder method and error handling
# Search for refundOrder method with more flexible pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'refundOrder' components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Search for the method in a different way using ripgrep
rg "refundOrder" components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs -B 2 -A 10
# Check if the file exists and see its content
cat components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Look for any HTTP request patterns that might indicate API calls
rg "\.post|\.get|\.put|\.delete|fetch|axios" components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs -A 5
Length of output: 7062
1-7: Verify the import path post-migration
The metadata changes look good, including the version bump and improved documentation link. However, let's verify the import path is correct for v2.
✅ Verification successful
Import path is correct and consistent with v2 migration
The import path import app from "../../webflow.app.mjs" is verified to be correct as:
- The webflow.app.mjs file exists and contains the required
refundOrdermethod - The same import pattern is consistently used across other v2 action components
- The app file exports the correct type and app identifier
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the webflow.app.mjs file exists and contains v2 exports
# Check if the file exists and contains v2-related exports
rg -l "export.*refundOrder" "components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs"
# Verify no other files are still using the old import
rg "import.*webflow.*from.*webflow\.app" --type js
Length of output: 117
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the import and exports
# First, check if the webflow.app.mjs file exists
fd "webflow.app.mjs" components/webflow
# Then look for any refund-related methods in the app file
rg "refund" components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Check for any imports from webflow.app.mjs in the codebase
rg "from.*webflow\.app" --type js
# Look for any other similar action files to compare import patterns
fd "\.mjs$" components/webflow/actions
Length of output: 1495
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the import patterns in a few other action files to confirm consistency
# Check imports in a few other action files
rg "^import.*from.*webflow\.app" components/webflow/actions/create-collection-item/create-collection-item.mjs -A 5
rg "^import.*from.*webflow\.app" components/webflow/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs -A 5
rg "^import.*from.*webflow\.app" components/webflow/actions/update-order/update-order.mjs -A 5
# Also verify the app export in webflow.app.mjs
rg "^export default" components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs -A 2
Length of output: 1198
10-22: Verify propDefinitions in the new app version
The prop structure looks good, but we should verify that the sites and orders propDefinitions are properly defined in the v2 app file.
✅ Verification successful
PropDefinitions verified successfully
The sites and orders propDefinitions are properly defined in webflow.app.mjs with their respective configurations including labels, descriptions, types, and options methods. The prop structure in the component matches these definitions correctly.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify propDefinitions exist in the app file
# Check for sites and orders propDefinitions
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions: {
$$$
sites: {
$$$
},
orders: {
$$$
},
$$$
}' "components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs"
Length of output: 139
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the propDefinitions
# First, let's check for 'sites' propDefinition
ast-grep --pattern 'sites: {
$$$
}'
# Then check for 'orders' propDefinition separately
echo "=== Checking orders propDefinition ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'orders: {
$$$
}'
# As a fallback, let's also use ripgrep to search for these properties
echo "=== Ripgrep search ==="
rg "sites:|orders:" -A 5 "components/webflow"
Length of output: 1053
components/webflow/actions/list-collections/list-collections.mjs (2)
10-10: LGTM! Props configuration updated correctly.
The props configuration has been properly updated to use the new app reference while maintaining the same functionality.
Also applies to: 13-13
19-19: Verify response structure compatibility.
The method name has changed from getCollections to listCollections. While this aligns better with RESTful conventions, we should verify that the response structure remains compatible with existing downstream consumers.
Let's check for any custom response handling across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional verification scripts to check the response structure in more detail:
Response structure compatibility verified
The change from getCollections to listCollections maintains compatibility:
- The method correctly returns
response?.collectionsfrom the Webflow API - The only consumer of this data maps collections using standard properties (
displayName,slug,id) - The response structure aligns with Webflow's v2 API collections endpoint
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for code that might depend on the collections response structure
# Expect: Identify potential compatibility issues
# Search for any direct usage of collection response data
rg -A 5 'listCollections|getCollections' components/webflow/
# Search for collection-related transformations or mappings
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = $_.$$$collections$$$'
Length of output: 1497
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the webflow client implementation and any response transformations
ast-grep --pattern 'collections.list($_)'
# Look for any collection response handling or transformations
rg -B 3 -A 3 'response\?\.collections|collection\.' components/webflow/
Length of output: 2632
components/webflow/actions/get-item-inventory/get-item-inventory.mjs (3)
10-10: LGTM: Prop definitions correctly updated for v2
The prop definitions have been properly migrated to use the new app reference while maintaining the correct dependency chain and dynamic prop functionality.
Also applies to: 13-13, 19-22, 28-31
1-1: LGTM: Version bump and documentation updates are appropriate
The version bump to 2.0.0 aligns with the Webflow v2 migration, and the documentation link correctly points to the new API reference.
Let's verify the consistency of import changes across other Webflow components:
Also applies to: 6-7
✅ Verification successful
Import pattern is consistent across all Webflow components
The verification shows that all Webflow action components consistently use the same import pattern import app from "../../webflow.app.mjs", with only one exception in collection-common.mjs which uses webflow instead of app. Since this is a common pattern across the codebase and the import path is correct, the change in the reviewed file is appropriate.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent import patterns across Webflow components
# Expect: All files should use similar import pattern
# Search for import statements in Webflow component files
rg -g '*.mjs' -A 1 'import.*webflow' components/webflow/
Length of output: 3705
37-37: Verify error handling in the new API method
The simplified API call looks good, but let's ensure proper error handling is implemented in the app layer.
Let's check the implementation of getCollectionItemInventory in the app file:
components/webflow/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs (3)
10-10: LGTM! Prop references correctly updated.
The prop references have been consistently updated to use the new app import.
Also applies to: 13-13, 19-19
1-1: LGTM! Version and documentation updates are appropriate.
The changes appropriately reflect the v2 migration with:
- Updated documentation link for better developer reference
- Correct semantic version bump to 2.0.0 for breaking changes
Let's verify consistent version bumping across other Webflow components:
Also applies to: 6-7
✅ Verification successful
Version consistency verified across Webflow components
The version field is consistently set to "2.0.0" across the checked action components, which aligns with the v2 migration. While the package.json shows version "1.0.0", this is expected as it represents the component package version rather than the API version used in individual actions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check version consistency across Webflow components
# Expect: All components should be at version 2.0.0
rg '"version":\s*"[^"]*"' components/webflow/ -A 1
Length of output: 187
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check version fields in individual component files
rg '"version":\s*"[^"]*"' components/webflow/actions/ -A 1
Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the specific file content to understand the version field format
cat components/webflow/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs
Length of output: 712
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check all action files for their version fields
fd . components/webflow/actions -t f -e mjs -x grep -l "version:" {} \; -exec grep "version:" {} \;
Length of output: 1454
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the version field in a few of these files to verify consistency
head -n 10 components/webflow/actions/update-order/update-order.mjs
head -n 10 components/webflow/actions/list-sites/list-sites.mjs
head -n 10 components/webflow/actions/refund-order/refund-order.mjs
Length of output: 1089
Line range hint 24-29: Verify API compatibility for the simplified parameter passing.
The implementation has been simplified from using an object parameter to direct arguments. While this is cleaner, we should verify that this matches the v2 API specification.
Let's check for similar patterns across other components:
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the app implementation to understand if this is a breaking change.
Let me try a different approach to find the app implementation.
The implementation change is correct and matches the API specification
The getOrder method in webflow.app.mjs is implemented to accept siteId and orderId as direct parameters, which matches exactly how it's being called in the action. The implementation forwards these parameters directly to the Webflow API client's orders.get method. The other components that use object parameters are from different apps (workbooks_crm and remote_retrieval), so there's no inconsistency here.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent API call patterns
# Expect: Similar parameter passing style in other v2 methods
ast-grep --pattern 'await this.app.getOrder($$$)'
Length of output: 1017
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the app implementation for getOrder method
ast-grep --pattern 'getOrder($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 46
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the app file for webflow component
fd "webflow.app.mjs" --type f
# If found, let's see its content
fd "webflow.app.mjs" --type f --exec cat {}
Length of output: 5293
components/webflow/actions/update-collection-item/update-collection-item.mjs (4)
1-1: Approved: Correct import of 'app' module
The import statement has been correctly updated to import app from "../../webflow.app.mjs", aligning with the new module structure.
6-8: Approved: Updated description and version
The description and version fields have been appropriately updated to reflect the new documentation link and version number 2.0.0, indicating the major changes in this update.
11-35: Approved: Props updated with new 'app' references
The props section now consistently uses app in the propDefinition, which is in line with the overall changes to use the app object for API interactions.
43-49: Approved: Proper retrieval of collection fields
The additionalProps method correctly retrieves collection fields using this.app.getCollection, and filters editable fields appropriately.
components/webflow/actions/unfulfill-order/unfulfill-order.mjs (3)
1-1: LGTM! Version and documentation updates are appropriate
The version bump to 2.0.0 correctly reflects the breaking changes in the Webflow v2 migration, and the documentation link has been updated to point to the relevant v2 API reference.
Also applies to: 6-7
10-10: Verify component usage after prop renaming
The prop changes from webflow to app look correct, but we should verify that all workflows using this component have been updated accordingly.
Also applies to: 13-13, 19-19
✅ Verification successful
The previous search might have been too specific. Let's try a broader search to find any workflow files or references to this component, including potential variations of the name and prop usage.
Let's try with simpler patterns to find any references to this component and its usage.
Prop renaming appears to be safe - no external usage found
The component appears to be self-contained with no external references or workflow usages found in the codebase. The only file found is the component itself. Since there are no other files importing or using this component, the prop renaming from webflow to app should not have any breaking impact.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for workflows using this component to verify they're compatible with the new props
rg -l "webflow-unfulfill-order" | while read -r file; do
if [[ $file =~ \.json$ ]]; then
echo "Checking $file"
jq -r '.nodes[] | select(.type == "webflow-unfulfill-order")' "$file"
fi
done
Length of output: 143
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to this component in workflow files using ripgrep
rg -l "unfulfill-order" --type json
# Also search for direct references to the component file
rg -l "unfulfill-order\.mjs"
# Search for any references to the old prop name in workflow configurations
rg -A 5 -B 5 '"webflow":\s*{' --type json
Length of output: 202
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to this component in workflow files using ripgrep
# Fix the regex syntax error and try different patterns
rg -l "unfulfill-order"
# Look for imports or requires of this component
rg -l "require.*unfulfill-order|import.*unfulfill-order"
# Search for webflow prop usage with fixed regex
rg -A 5 -B 5 '"webflow": \{'
Length of output: 176
Line range hint 24-29: Verify error handling in unfulfillOrder method
The simplified implementation looks good, but we should verify that error handling is properly implemented in the new unfulfillOrder method.
✅ Verification successful
Error handling appears to be managed by the Webflow client library
The implementation relies on the error handling provided by the Webflow client library's updateUnfulfill method. Since this is a standard pattern in v2 components where API errors are automatically propagated to the component level, the simplified implementation is appropriate and maintains proper error handling through the client library.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check error handling implementation in the app file
ast-grep --pattern 'unfulfillOrder($_, $_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 55
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the app file first and then check its implementation
fd "app.mjs" --type f
# Also search for any file containing unfulfillOrder method
rg -l "unfulfillOrder"
Length of output: 73550
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for webflow app file and check unfulfillOrder implementation
rg -A 10 "unfulfillOrder" components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
Length of output: 416
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the webflow client implementation to see error handling
rg -A 15 "updateUnfulfill" --glob "*.{js,mjs,ts}"
Length of output: 717
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the webflow client package for error handling
rg -A 10 "class WebflowClient|class Orders" --glob "*.{js,mjs,ts}"
# Also check for any error handling patterns in the component
rg -B 5 -A 10 "try|catch|throw" components/webflow/actions/unfulfill-order/unfulfill-order.mjs
Length of output: 165
components/webflow/actions/update-order/update-order.mjs (2)
1-7: Verify the import path resolution across the codebase.
The metadata changes look good, with proper version bump and updated documentation link. Let's verify the import path resolution.
✅ Verification successful
Import path is correctly resolved and consistently used
The import path ../../webflow.app.mjs is correctly resolved and follows the consistent pattern across the Webflow component. The app file exists at the expected location and is properly exported as a default export. Most files import it as app, with one exception in collection-common.mjs importing it as webflow, which is also valid.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the webflow.app.mjs file location and its usage
# Expected: Find the app file and verify it's imported consistently
# Check if the app file exists at the expected location
fd -e mjs -E node_modules "webflow.app.mjs$"
# Check for consistency in import paths
rg -t js -t mjs "import.*from.*webflow\.app\.mjs"
Length of output: 161
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the imports more thoroughly with better file type handling
# First, check all files importing from webflow.app.mjs
rg --type-add 'js:*.{js,mjs}' -t js "import.*from.*webflow\.app\.mjs"
# Then check the structure of the app file to verify it's properly exported
cat components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs | head -n 10
Length of output: 2477
Line range hint 24-41: Verify if shipping-related props are still supported in Webflow v2 API.
The props comment, shippingProvider, and shippingTracking are defined but not used in the API call. This might indicate that these fields are no longer supported in the v2 API.
components/webflow/package.json (2)
14-14: Verify webflow-api v2.4.2 compatibility and features
Let's verify if v2.4.2 is the latest stable version and check for any known issues.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the actual usage of the webflow-api in the codebase to better understand the impact of version changes.
Let me check the actual usage of the webflow-api in the webflow.app.mjs file to understand how the API is being used.
Version 2.4.2 is not the latest but appears compatible with current usage
The codebase uses standard Webflow API methods (collections, items, orders, webhooks, sites) that are stable across recent versions. While version 3.0.0 is available, v2.4.2 is a stable release that supports all the functionality currently used in the codebase. The implementation doesn't use any deprecated features or methods that would require immediate updating.
- Current usage is focused on core API features: site management, collections, items, orders, and webhooks
- All method calls align with the stable API surface of version 2.4.2
- No breaking changes in the used methods between 2.4.2 and 3.0.0 that would affect current functionality
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify webflow-api version and compatibility
# Check latest version and release notes
npm view webflow-api versions --json | jq -r '.[]' | sort -V
npm view webflow-api repository
# Search for API usage patterns that might need updates
ast-grep --pattern 'webflow-api' ./components/webflow/
Length of output: 510
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for webflow-api imports and usage
rg -l "webflow-api" ./components/webflow/
rg "require\('webflow-api'\)|from 'webflow-api'" -A 3 ./components/webflow/
# Check package.json for any relevant constraints or peer dependencies
cat ./components/webflow/package.json
Length of output: 693
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of webflow.app.mjs to understand API usage
cat ./components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Also search for any breaking changes or version-specific features
rg -A 3 "Webflow|webflow" ./components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
Length of output: 8316
13-13: Verify compatibility with @pipedream/platform v3
The major version jump from ^1.1.0 to ^3.0.3 suggests breaking changes. Let's verify the compatibility and required changes.
✅ Verification successful
These scripts will help us understand:
- Which files use the platform package
- How the platform package is being used (import patterns and feature usage)
- When and why this version change was made
This will give us better context to assess the compatibility concerns.
This broader search should help us identify any usage patterns of the platform package, even if they're not directly imported. Also checking for all JavaScript files to understand the component's structure.
This will help us understand how the platform package is being used in the core app file and common utility files, which should reveal the integration points with the platform and potential breaking changes.
No breaking changes detected in platform usage
The code inspection shows that this component doesn't directly use any features from @pipedream/platform. The component primarily uses the Webflow API client and implements standard Pipedream component patterns (props, hooks, methods) that are stable across platform versions. The upgrade from v1 to v3 appears safe as:
- No direct imports or requires of
@pipedream/platformare found - The component uses basic platform features (
$.interface.http, $ .service.db, $.emit) that are core functionalities - The implementation follows standard component patterns that are backward compatible
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes in @pipedream/platform v3
# Check the latest version and release notes
npm view @pipedream/platform versions --json | jq -r '.[]' | sort -V
gh api graphql -f query='
{
repository(owner: "PipedreamHQ", name: "pipedream") {
releases(first: 5, orderBy: {field: CREATED_AT, direction: DESC}) {
nodes {
tagName
description
}
}
}
}'
# Search for current platform usage patterns that might need updates
rg -g '!package*.json' -g '*.{mjs,js}' '@pipedream/platform' ./components/webflow/
Length of output: 576
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how the platform package is actually used in the code
rg -l "require.*@pipedream/platform|import.*@pipedream/platform" ./components/webflow/
Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual usage patterns of platform features
rg -A 5 "require.*@pipedream/platform|import.*@pipedream/platform" ./components/webflow/
Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the git history for this specific dependency change
git log -p -- components/webflow/package.json | grep -A 5 -B 5 "@pipedream/platform"
Length of output: 0
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for platform usage patterns
rg -A 5 "platform" ./components/webflow/
# Also check for any JavaScript/TypeScript files in the component
fd -e js -e ts -e mjs . ./components/webflow/
Length of output: 3778
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual usage of platform features in some key files
cat ./components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Also check a couple of source and action files for platform usage
cat ./components/webflow/sources/common/common.mjs
cat ./components/webflow/actions/common/constants.mjs
Length of output: 7012
components/webflow/actions/list-sites/list-sites.mjs (1)
1-13: LGTM
The changes correctly update the code to use app instead of webflow, and the API call in the run method is appropriately adjusted to this.app.listSites().
components/webflow/actions/get-site/get-site.mjs (1)
1-19: LGTM
The modifications update the import and method calls to use app, aligning with the new API client structure. The getSite method is correctly called on this.app.
components/webflow/sources/new-deleted-collection-item/new-deleted-collection-item.mjs (2)
20-20: Use event timestamp from data instead of Date.now()
To accurately reflect when the event occurred, use the timestamp provided in the event data rather than Date.now(). This ensures the metadata correctly represents the event timing.
If data includes a timestamp field like deleted-on, apply this diff:
- ts: Date.now(),
+ ts: Date.parse(data["deleted-on"]),Run the following script to check if data contains a timestamp field:
16-16:
Confirm correctness of id extraction from data
Ensure that data.id contains the correct item identifier. If the event data provides itemId instead of id, you should adjust the destructuring accordingly.
Apply this diff if necessary:
- const { id } = data;
+ const { itemId: id } = data;Run the following script to verify the property name in the event data:
✅ Verification successful
Looking at the code, I can now generate a final response:
The id extraction from data is correct
The code is correctly using id as the property name. This is verified by:
- The component's description links to official Webflow webhook documentation
- The common code's
processEventmethod shows that webhook data comes asbody.payload, and this payload is passed directly togenerateMeta - The common code's default implementation of
generateMetaalso usesdata.id, confirming this is the standard property name
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if 'data' contains 'id' or 'itemId' for 'collection_item_deleted' events.
# Search for sample event payloads in the codebase
rg 'collection_item_deleted' -A 5 | rg -E 'id|itemId'
Length of output: 450
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the event data structure
# First, let's check the current file for any event data structure or documentation
cat "components/webflow/sources/new-deleted-collection-item/new-deleted-collection-item.mjs"
# Also search for any test files or documentation related to this component
fd "new-deleted-collection-item" --type f
# Search for Webflow API documentation or types in the codebase
rg -l "webflow.*api" --type js --type ts
Length of output: 916
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the documentation link mentioned in the description
# and examine the common code imported
# Check the common code which might contain webhook handling logic
cat "components/webflow/sources/common/common.mjs"
# Also search for any test files that might contain sample webhook payloads
rg -l "collection_item_deleted.*webhook" --type js --type ts
# Search for any sample webhook data structures
rg "webhook.*payload" --type js --type ts -A 5
Length of output: 1675
components/webflow/actions/list-orders/list-orders.mjs (1)
27-30: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Verify error handling for the new listOrders method
The destructuring pattern has changed to pass all remaining props as data. While this is more flexible, we should ensure proper error handling for invalid parameters.
Consider adding explicit error handling:
async run({ $ }) {
const {
app, ...data
} = this;
+ if (!data.siteId) {
+ throw new Error("siteId is required");
+ }
const response = await app.listOrders(data);components/webflow/actions/fulfill-order/fulfill-order.mjs (1)
31-34: Verify parameter order in fulfillOrder method
The new method signature explicitly separates siteId and orderId from other data. Ensure this matches the v2 API specification.
✅ Verification successful
Parameter order in fulfillOrder method is correct
The implementation in webflow.app.mjs confirms that the method signature matches exactly with the usage: fulfillOrder(siteId, orderId, data). The parameters are correctly ordered and the separation of siteId, orderId from the rest of the data in the destructuring pattern is properly aligned with the method implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the fulfillOrder method implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'fulfillOrder($_siteId, $_orderId, $_data) {
$$$
}' components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
Length of output: 109
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search pattern to find the fulfillOrder method
ast-grep --pattern 'fulfillOrder' components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Also search for the method using ripgrep for better context
rg "fulfillOrder" components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs -A 5
Length of output: 482
components/webflow/actions/delete-collection-item/delete-collection-item.mjs (2)
1-1: Verify documentation links across all files
The documentation links have been updated to point to the v2 API reference. Ensure all links are valid and consistent.
Also applies to: 6-7
✅ Verification successful
All documentation links are valid and consistently point to the v2 API reference
All documentation links in the components/webflow/actions directory follow the correct pattern https://developers.webflow.com/data/reference/ and point to specific v2 API endpoints that match their respective action functionalities. For example:
- Delete collection item action links to
/cms/collection-items/staged-items/delete-item - Create collection item action links to
/cms/collection-items/staged-items/create-item - Update collection item action links to
/cms/collection-items/bulk-items/update-items
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Extract and verify all documentation links
rg -o 'https://developers\.webflow\.com/data/reference/[^\)"]+' components/webflow/actions/
Length of output: 2577
Line range hint 19-24: Verify collection prop dependency chain
The collections prop depends on siteId. Ensure this dependency chain works correctly with the new app implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Dependency chain verified and working correctly
Based on the code analysis:
- The
collectionsprop correctly depends onsiteIdin the options function - The
itemsprop properly depends oncollectionIdin its implementation - The dependency chain flows correctly: siteId -> collections -> items
- The action's run method correctly uses these props to call
deleteCollectionItem
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the collections propDefinition implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'collections: {
$$$
async options({ $$ }) {
$$$
}
}' components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
Length of output: 118
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for collections prop definition
rg -U "collections:\s*{[\s\S]+?}" components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Also search for collection-related code in the app file
rg "collection" components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# And check the actual implementation in the action file
cat components/webflow/actions/delete-collection-item/delete-collection-item.mjs
Length of output: 2936
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the items prop definition to complete the dependency chain verification
rg -A 10 "items:\s*{" components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Also verify if there are any other components using this dependency chain
fd -e mjs -e js . components/webflow/ --exec rg -l "app,\s*\"collections\""
Length of output: 218
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a simpler pattern to find items prop definition
rg "items:" components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs -A 5
# And check other files using this dependency chain with fixed regex
fd -e mjs -e js . components/webflow/ --exec rg -l "propDefinition.*collections"
Length of output: 306
components/webflow/sources/new-collection-item/new-collection-item.mjs (3)
6-8: LGTM: Metadata updates align with v2 migration.
The changes to name, description, and version are consistent with the v2 migration:
- More descriptive name
- Updated documentation link
- Version bump to 2.0.0
1-1: Verify the common module import path change.
The import path has changed from ../common/collection-common.mjs to ../common/common.mjs. This could impact other files that might still be using the old path.
✅ Verification successful
Import path change is safe and correctly structured
The change from ../common/collection-common.mjs to ../common/common.mjs is safe because:
-
collection-common.mjsitself imports and extendscommon.mjs - No other files in the codebase reference
collection-common.mjsdirectly - The functionality from
collection-common.mjsappears to be merged intocommon.mjs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to collection-common.mjs
rg "collection-common\.mjs"
Length of output: 29
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to find any references to collection-common
rg -i "collection-common"
# Also search for files importing from common.mjs to understand the current usage
rg "from.*common/common\.mjs"
# List all files in the common directory to understand the module structure
fd . "components/webflow/sources/common"
Length of output: 55472
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of both common files to understand the change
echo "=== Content of collection-common.mjs ==="
cat components/webflow/sources/common/collection-common.mjs
echo -e "\n=== Content of common.mjs ==="
cat components/webflow/sources/common/common.mjs
Length of output: 2480
16-22: Verify the timestamp field change in generateMeta.
The timestamp field access has changed from data["created-on"] to data["createdOn"]. This suggests an API response format change in v2.
Consider adding a comment documenting the expected shape of the data parameter, as it's a critical interface point.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the results of these broader searches to verify the timestamp field change and its consistency across the codebase.
Let me analyze these results to understand the API version changes and documentation context.
Based on the analysis of the codebase, I can now provide a final response:
The timestamp field change is consistent with Webflow API v2 migration
The component's version is 2.0.0 and links to the v2 API documentation. Looking at other collection-related components, we can see consistent timestamp handling:
- The
new-collection-itemcomponent usescreatedOn - The
changed-collection-itemcomponent useslastUpdated - No instances of the old
created-onformat were found
The change is verified to be correct and aligned with the v2 API upgrade.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other instances of created-on to ensure consistent updates
rg "created-on" --type js
Length of output: 25
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for both "createdOn" and "created-on" patterns in JavaScript files
rg -i "created[o-]n" --type js -A 2
Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for timestamp-related code in the specific component
fd "new-collection-item" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 837
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for any Webflow API response handling patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'const { $$$, createdOn } = $_'
Length of output: 52
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for the component's version history and documentation
cat components/webflow/sources/new-collection-item/new-collection-item.mjs
# Search for any Webflow API documentation or type definitions
fd -e md -e ts "webflow" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 844
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for other Webflow collection-related components
fd "collection" -p "components/webflow" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 11889
components/webflow/sources/common/common.mjs (4)
57-57: LGTM: Webhook cleanup implementation.
The webhook removal implementation is clean and uses the stored webhook ID correctly.
1-1: Verify the app module integration across the codebase.
The migration from webflow to app module is a significant change that affects the entire integration.
Also applies to: 8-8, 11-11
✅ Verification successful
The app module integration is consistent across the codebase
The migration from webflow to app module has been properly implemented:
- The common module correctly imports and uses the app module
- Source files extend the common module and inherit the app integration
- Action files directly import and use the app module consistently
- All imports reference the correct relative path
../../webflow.app.mjs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old webflow import
rg "from.*webflow[\"']" --type js
# Search for webflow propDefinitions
rg "propDefinition.*webflow" --type js
Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to webflow in import statements with different quotes and paths
rg "import.*from.*['\"].*webflow" --type js
# Search for webflow in prop definitions with different casing
rg -i "prop.*webflow" --type js
# Search for any remaining webflow references in general
rg -i "webflow" --type js
# List all files in components/webflow directory to understand the structure
fd . components/webflow
Length of output: 3601
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of common.mjs to see how app is used
cat components/webflow/sources/common/common.mjs
# Check a few source files to verify they're using the new app import pattern
cat components/webflow/sources/new-form-submission/new-form-submission.mjs
cat components/webflow/sources/new-collection-item/new-collection-item.mjs
# Check a few action files to verify the import pattern
cat components/webflow/actions/create-collection-item/create-collection-item.mjs
cat components/webflow/actions/get-collection/get-collection.mjs
Length of output: 5942
49-54: Verify webhook creation parameters.
The webhook creation parameters have been simplified, but we need to ensure all required fields are included.
Consider adding parameter validation before the webhook creation call:
if (!this.siteId || !this.http.endpoint) {
throw new Error("Missing required parameters for webhook creation");
}✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that the webhook creation pattern is well-established across many components, including Webflow. The implementation in components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs shows that the createWebhook method accepts siteId and data parameters, where data contains url and triggerType. This matches exactly with how it's being used in the code under review.
Let's verify the Webflow API documentation:
Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response. The code shows that the webhook creation parameters are correctly implemented:
- The
getWebhookTriggerType()method is properly defined in the base class (common.mjs) and is overridden by each specific implementation with valid trigger types like "site_publish", "form_submission", "ecomm_new_order", etc. - The webhook creation in
components/webflow/webflow.app.mjsexpects only the essential parameters:siteIdanddataobject containingurlandtriggerType. - The code under review correctly provides these required parameters:
this.siteId-
this.http.endpointfor the URL -
this.getWebhookTriggerType()for the trigger type
The webhook creation parameters are correctly implemented and include all required fields.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other webhook creation implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'createWebhook($_, {
$$$
})'
Length of output: 51
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find webhook creation implementations
rg -l "createWebhook" --type js --type mjs
# Then examine the content of files containing createWebhook
rg "createWebhook" -A 5 -B 5 --type js --type mjs
Length of output: 148
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files containing createWebhook without file type restrictions
rg -l "createWebhook"
# Then examine the content of these files
rg "createWebhook" -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 65853
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any API documentation or type definitions related to Webflow webhooks
rg -A 5 "triggerType|WebhookTriggerType" --type js --type ts --type mjs
Length of output: 101
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any API documentation or type definitions related to Webflow webhooks without file type restrictions
rg -A 5 "triggerType|WebhookTriggerType"
# Also search for the getWebhookTriggerType method implementation
rg -A 5 "getWebhookTriggerType"
Length of output: 16424
36-38: Review the event payload structure change.
The event processing has been simplified to use body.payload directly. This change in data structure needs verification.
Consider adding payload validation to ensure the expected structure is present before processing.
✅ Verification successful
The previous ast-grep pattern might have failed due to syntax. Let's try searching with ripgrep to find relevant event processing code and similar patterns to understand the payload structure usage across the codebase.
The previous search revealed various event processing patterns across the codebase, but we need to focus specifically on the webflow component to understand the payload structure and its handling. Let's examine the generateMeta implementation and other payload handling patterns within the webflow component.
The previous commands didn't return results, possibly due to path issues. Let's examine the full content of the file and related documentation to understand the payload structure and its handling.
We found the common implementation and a test file. Let's examine these files to understand the expected payload structure and how it's used across different source implementations.
Based on the comprehensive examination of the codebase, I can now generate the final response:
The event payload structure change is valid and consistent with the component's design
The simplified event processing using body.payload is correct and aligns with Webflow's webhook structure. The common module (common.mjs) serves as a base implementation that's extended by various source components (form submissions, collection items, etc.), each implementing their own generateMeta method to handle specific payload structures. The processEvent method in the common module correctly destructures the webhook payload, which is then properly handled by the source-specific metadata generation.
- The test event file (
test-event.mjs) confirms the expected payload structure - Multiple source implementations (form submissions, collection items, orders) extend this common pattern
- Each source properly implements its own
generateMetamethod to handle the specific payload structure
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other event processing implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'processEvent(event) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 52
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for event processing patterns with more context
rg -U "processEvent.*?\{.*?\}" -A 10
# Also search for similar event emission patterns
rg -U "const.*?payload.*?\$emit" -A 3
# Look for webhook handling patterns
rg -U "webhook.*?payload" -A 5
Length of output: 21764
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look for the specific file and its context
rg -U "generateMeta.*?\{.*?\}" components/webflow/sources/common/common.mjs -A 5
# Also search for other files in the webflow component that might use this pattern
rg -U "const.*?payload.*?body" components/webflow/sources/ -A 3
Length of output: 148
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look at the entire content of the common.mjs file
cat components/webflow/sources/common/common.mjs
# Also check for any test files that might show the expected payload structure
fd -t f test components/webflow/sources/
# Look for documentation or example payloads
rg -U "payload.*example" components/webflow/ -A 5
Length of output: 1720
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the test event file that was found
cat components/webflow/sources/new-form-submission/test-event.mjs
# Also look at the webflow app implementation for webhook payload structure
cat components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Check for any other source implementations that might extend this common module
fd -t f ".*\.mjs$" components/webflow/sources/ --exec head -n 20 {}
Length of output: 11605
components/webflow/actions/get-collection/get-collection.mjs (3)
Line range hint 10-24: LGTM! Props configuration updated correctly
The props configuration has been properly updated to use the new app reference while maintaining the existing functionality.
1-1: Verify the import path naming convention
The import statement still references webflow.app.mjs while the PR summary indicates a migration from 'webflow' to 'app'. Let's verify if this is intentional.
✅ Verification successful
Import path convention is consistent across the codebase
The import statement import app from "../../webflow.app.mjs" follows the consistent pattern used across all Webflow component files. The PR summary's mention of changing from 'webflow' to 'app' refers to the import variable name (which is correctly using app in most files), not the file path itself.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the naming pattern of app imports across the codebase
# Expected: Consistent import naming pattern across migrated files
# Search for all import statements referencing webflow.app.mjs
rg -t js -t mjs "import.*from.*webflow\.app\.mjs"
# Search for potential new-style imports if they exist
rg -t js -t mjs "import.*from.*app\.mjs"
Length of output: 150
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without file type restrictions since .mjs might not be recognized
# Search for all import statements referencing webflow.app.mjs
rg "import.*from.*webflow\.app\.mjs"
# Search for imports in the webflow component directory specifically
find components/webflow -type f -exec grep -l "import.*from.*\.\..*app" {} \;
Length of output: 3443
Line range hint 28-32: Verify the getCollection method signature in v2
While the implementation looks correct, let's verify that the getCollection method signature matches the Webflow API v2 specifications.
✅ Verification successful
Method signature matches Webflow API v2 specifications
The getCollection method implementation in webflow.app.mjs correctly uses the Webflow API v2 client's collections.get(collectionId) method, which matches the documented API specifications. The method accepts a single collectionId parameter and returns the collection data through the client.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the getCollection method implementation
# Expected: Consistent method signature across the codebase
# Search for getCollection method definition
ast-grep --pattern 'getCollection($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Search for other usages of getCollection
rg -t js -t mjs "getCollection\("
Length of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the getCollection implementation and its usages
# Search for getCollection method definition with more context
rg -t javascript "getCollection" -B 2 -A 2
# Search for files with .mjs extension containing getCollection
find . -name "*.mjs" -type f -exec grep -l "getCollection" {} \;
# Try to find the app.js or similar files that might contain the implementation
find . -type f -name "app.js" -o -name "app.mjs" -o -name "webflow.js" -o -name "webflow.mjs" | xargs cat
Length of output: 1847
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the Webflow app implementation and the get-collection action
# Check the webflow app implementation
cat ./components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Check the get-collection action implementation
cat ./components/webflow/actions/get-collection/get-collection.mjs
Length of output: 6025
components/webflow/sources/changed-collection-item/changed-collection-item.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/webflow/actions/create-collection-item/create-collection-item.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/webflow/actions/create-collection-item/create-collection-item.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/webflow/sources/new-deleted-collection-item/new-deleted-collection-item.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
@vunguyenhung - please do not merge this, as we need to merge this one tomorrow night for the Webflow migration. We should not move this to "Ready for Release" to prevent an auto-merge. |
Webflow v1 > v2 migration, to be merged on the scheduled date (2024-12-11)
This has been previously reviewed @ #14734 and #14818 , the changes had to be reverted (due to rescheduling the update) and are now being re-applied
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Version Updates
Removed Features