Webflow migration follow-up adjustments #14818
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve a comprehensive update to the Webflow integration within the project. Key modifications include the transition from versioned to non-versioned module imports, updates to metadata such as keys, descriptions, and version numbers across various action and source files, and enhancements to the Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
components/webflow/actions/update-collection-item/update-collection-item.mjs (1)
Line range hint
65-93: Consider enhancing error handling in the run methodWhile the implementation is correct, consider adding try-catch blocks and more detailed error messages for better debugging and user experience.
async run({ $ }) { + try { const { app, // eslint-disable-next-line no-unused-vars siteId, collectionId, itemId, name, slug, ...customFields } = this; const item = await app.getCollectionItem(collectionId, itemId); const response = await app.updateCollectionItem(collectionId, itemId, { id: itemId, isArchived: false, isDraft: false, fieldData: { ...customFields, name: name || item.fieldData.name, slug: slug || item.fieldData.slug, }, }); $.export("$summary", "Successfully updated collection item"); return response; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to update collection item: ${error.message}`); + } },components/webflow/actions/update-item-inventory/update-item-inventory.mjs (1)
Line range hint
65-74: Enhance input validation for inventory updatesWhile the core logic is sound, consider adding validation to ensure:
- When
inventoryTypeis "infinite", neitherquantitynorupdateQuantityshould be providedquantityandupdateQuantityare mutually exclusiveasync run({ $ }) { const { app, // eslint-disable-next-line no-unused-vars siteId, collectionId, itemId, ...data } = this; + if (data.inventoryType === "infinite" && (data.quantity || data.updateQuantity)) { + throw new Error("Quantity fields cannot be set when inventory type is infinite"); + } + if (data.quantity && data.updateQuantity) { + throw new Error("Cannot specify both quantity and updateQuantity"); + } + const response = await app.updateCollectionItemInventory(collectionId, itemId, data);components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs (2)
96-100: Clarify parameter names inlistOrdersmethodIn the
listOrdersmethod, you're using destructuring withpage: offset = 0. While this assignsoffseta default value, it might be clearer to use consistent parameter names to avoid confusion.Consider renaming
offsettopagefor consistency:- async listOrders({ - page: offset = 0, siteId, status, - }) { - const response = await this.webflowClient().orders.list(siteId, { - offset, + async listOrders({ + page = 0, siteId, status, + }) { + const response = await this.webflowClient().orders.list(siteId, { + offset: page, status, });
124-133: Consistent parameter order forlistCollectionItemsEnsure that the parameter order for
listCollectionItemsis consistent across the method definition and its call sites. It's recommended to placecollectionIdbeforepagefor clarity.Suggested update to the method definition:
- async listCollectionItems(page = 0, collectionId) { + async listCollectionItems(collectionId, page = 0) {And adjust the return statement accordingly.
components/webflow/sources/changed-ecommerce-inventory/changed-ecommerce-inventory.mjs (1)
5-5: LGTM! Migration changes are consistent.The updates maintain consistency with the migration pattern seen across other files:
- Component key updated appropriately
- Documentation URL points to the correct inventory event reference
- Version bump aligns with other components
Consider destructuring the
idparameter directly in the method signature for better readability:- generateMeta(data) { - const ts = Date.now(); - const { id } = data; + generateMeta({ id }) { + const ts = Date.now();Also applies to: 7-7, 8-8
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (31)
components/webflow/actions/create-collection-item/create-collection-item.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/actions/delete-collection-item/delete-collection-item.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/actions/fulfill-order/fulfill-order.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/actions/get-collection-item/get-collection-item.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/actions/get-collection/get-collection.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/actions/get-item-inventory/get-item-inventory.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/actions/get-site/get-site.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/actions/list-collection-items/list-collection-items.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/actions/list-collections/list-collections.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/actions/list-orders/list-orders.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/actions/list-sites/list-sites.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/actions/publish-site/publish-site.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/actions/refund-order/refund-order.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/actions/unfulfill-order/unfulfill-order.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/actions/update-collection-item/update-collection-item.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/actions/update-item-inventory/update-item-inventory.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/actions/update-order/update-order.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/package.json(2 hunks)components/webflow/sources/changed-collection-item/changed-collection-item.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/sources/changed-ecommerce-inventory/changed-ecommerce-inventory.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/sources/changed-ecommerce-order/changed-ecommerce-order.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/sources/common/common.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/sources/new-collection-item/new-collection-item.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/sources/new-deleted-collection-item/new-deleted-collection-item.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/sources/new-ecommerce-order/new-ecommerce-order.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/sources/new-form-submission/new-form-submission.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/sources/new-site-published/new-site-published.mjs(1 hunks)components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs(2 hunks)components/webflow_v2/package.json(0 hunks)components/webflow_v2/webflow_v2.app.mjs(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- components/webflow_v2/package.json
- components/webflow_v2/webflow_v2.app.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (68)
components/webflow/sources/changed-collection-item/changed-collection-item.mjs (2)
Line range hint 15-29: LGTM! Implementation follows good practices.
The implementation demonstrates good practices:
- Proper use of optional chaining in metadata generation
- Clear webhook trigger type definition
- Robust timestamp handling for event identification
5-8: Metadata changes align with migration objectives.
The changes appropriately reflect the migration from webflow_v2 to webflow and include a more specific documentation reference.
Let's verify the documentation URL is accessible:
✅ Verification successful
Documentation URL is accessible and valid
The provided documentation URL returns a 200 status code, confirming it's a valid and accessible resource. The metadata changes, including the documentation reference update, are correctly implemented.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the documentation URL is accessible
curl -I "https://developers.webflow.com/data/reference/webhooks/events/collection-item-changed"
Length of output: 1449
components/webflow/sources/new-deleted-collection-item/new-deleted-collection-item.mjs (4)
8-8: Version bump to 1.0.0 is appropriate
The version increment to 1.0.0 is appropriate given this is a breaking change as part of the Webflow migration (changing from webflow_v2 to webflow).
Line range hint 12-24: Core functionality remains unchanged
The webhook trigger type and metadata generation logic remain unchanged, which is good as this PR focuses on migration-related changes rather than functional modifications.
5-5: Verify consistent key naming across the codebase
The key change from webflow_v2 to webflow prefix aligns with the migration objective.
Let's verify the consistency of this naming convention across other Webflow components:
✅ Verification successful
Key naming convention is consistent across Webflow components
The verification shows that all Webflow components have been migrated to use the webflow- prefix consistently. No instances of the old webflow_v2 prefix were found, and all 26 components in the Webflow integration follow the new naming pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining webflow_v2 references in component keys
# Expected: No components should still use the webflow_v2 prefix
# Search for any remaining webflow_v2 keys in component files
rg -l "key: \"webflow_v2" components/webflow/
# Search for new webflow keys to ensure consistent naming
rg -l "key: \"webflow-" components/webflow/
Length of output: 1853
7-7: Documentation link update looks good
The updated documentation link points to a more specific and relevant section of the Webflow API documentation for webhook events.
Let's verify the documentation link:
✅ Verification successful
Documentation link is valid and accessible
The documentation URL https://developers.webflow.com/data/reference/webhooks/events/collection-item-deleted returns a 200 status code, confirming it's a valid and accessible resource.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the documentation URL is valid
# Expected: URL should return a 200 status code
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://developers.webflow.com/data/reference/webhooks/events/collection-item-deleted"
Length of output: 130
components/webflow/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs (3)
6-7: LGTM: Documentation and version updates
The documentation link and version bump are appropriate for this migration:
- Documentation link points to the correct API reference
- Version bump to 1.0.0 correctly indicates breaking changes due to the migration
4-4: Verify component key dependencies
The component key has been updated from webflow_v2-get-order to webflow-get-order. Let's verify no other components depend on the old key.
✅ Verification successful
Since the search results show no references to either the old key webflow_v2-get-order or any similar patterns in the codebase, and considering that component keys are typically used for local identification within their own component scope, I can generate the final response:
Component key change is safe to proceed
The change from webflow_v2-get-order to webflow-get-order appears to be safe as there are no references to the old key in the codebase. Component keys are typically scoped to their own component and don't affect external dependencies.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any remaining references to the old component key
# Check for any remaining references to the old key
rg "webflow_v2-get-order"
Length of output: 25
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any references to this component in a broader context
# First, let's find files that might reference this component
fd -e json -e yaml -e yml
# Then, let's also check for any similar patterns that might exist
rg -i "webflow.*get.?order"
Length of output: 65593
1-1: Verify the webflow module import path
The import path has been updated as part of the migration from webflow_v2 to webflow. Let's verify the module exists and is imported correctly.
✅ Verification successful
Import path is correct and properly used
The verification shows that:
- The
webflow.app.mjsmodule exists at the correct location and contains the proper Webflow client implementation - The import is consistently used across all Webflow component files
- No references to
webflow_v2.app.mjsremain in the codebase - The module provides all necessary methods including
getOrderthat is used by this component
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and usage of webflow.app.mjs
# Check if the module exists
fd --type f "webflow.app.mjs$"
# Check for any remaining references to webflow_v2.app.mjs
rg "webflow_v2.app.mjs"
Length of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the import statement and its usage in the codebase
# Check the content of webflow.app.mjs to ensure it's the correct module
cat components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Check if there are any other files importing this module
rg "import.*from.*webflow\.app\.mjs" -A 2
# Check for any remaining references to webflow_v2 in the codebase
rg "webflow_v2" --type js
Length of output: 10148
components/webflow/actions/update-collection-item/update-collection-item.mjs (3)
Line range hint 11-36: LGTM! Props definition is well-structured
The props definition maintains a clean structure with proper use of propDefinitions and dependencies between props.
1-1: Verify the import path exists in the codebase
The import path has been updated as part of the migration from webflow_v2 to webflow.
✅ Verification successful
Import path verified successfully
The import path ../../webflow.app.mjs correctly resolves to the existing file at components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs, confirming the validity of the import statement after the migration from webflow_v2 to webflow.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the new import path
# Expected: The file should exist at the specified path
fd -t f "webflow.app.mjs" components/webflow/
Length of output: 80
7-7: Verify the documentation link is accessible
The documentation link has been updated to point to a more specific section about bulk item updates.
✅ Verification successful
Documentation link is accessible and valid
The link https://developers.webflow.com/data/reference/cms/collection-items/bulk-items/update-items returns a 200 status code, confirming it's accessible and points to a valid resource.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the documentation link is valid
# Expected: The URL should return a 200 status code
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://developers.webflow.com/data/reference/cms/collection-items/bulk-items/update-items"
Length of output: 135
components/webflow/actions/list-collection-items/list-collection-items.mjs (3)
Line range hint 9-35: Implementation looks good!
The core functionality remains unchanged and follows best practices:
- Proper async/await usage
- Clean error handling
- Clear success message in the export summary
1-1: Verify the webflow app module compatibility
The import path has been updated as part of the migration from webflow_v2. Let's verify the consistency of this change across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Import path change is consistent and module is compatible
The verification shows that:
- All files in the webflow component consistently use
../../webflow.app.mjsimport path - The webflow.app.mjs exists and exports the same functionality expected by the components
- No remaining references to webflow_v2.app.mjs were found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the webflow app module import consistency and existence
# Check if the new webflow.app.mjs exists
fd -e mjs -e js "webflow.app" components/webflow/
# Verify no remaining references to webflow_v2.app.mjs
rg "webflow_v2.app" components/webflow/
Length of output: 124
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the import statements across all files in the webflow component
rg "^import.*from.*webflow.*app" components/webflow/ -A 1
# Also check the content of webflow.app.mjs to ensure it exports the necessary functionality
cat components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
Length of output: 8603
4-7: Verify component key uniqueness and documentation accessibility
The component metadata has been updated appropriately for the migration:
- Component key updated to remove v2 prefix
- Documentation link points to the new API reference
- Version bump to 1.0.0 correctly indicates a breaking change
✅ Verification successful
Component key and documentation verified successfully
The verification shows:
- The component key "webflow-list-collection-items" is unique within the codebase
- No legacy "webflow_v2-" prefixed components remain
- The documentation link follows the same pattern as other collection-related components
- All related collection item components have been consistently updated to version 1.0.0
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify component key uniqueness and documentation link
# Check for any duplicate component keys
rg '"webflow-list-collection-items"' components/
# Verify no other components still using the old v2 prefix
rg '"webflow_v2-' components/
Length of output: 197
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's do a more thorough check for component keys and documentation links
# Check all component keys in the webflow directory
rg '"key":' components/webflow/ -A 3
# Check if there are any other webflow components with similar collection-related functionality
rg -i 'collection.*items' components/webflow/ -A 3
Length of output: 5426
components/webflow/actions/get-item-inventory/get-item-inventory.mjs (1)
1-1: Verify the webflow app module compatibility
The import path has been updated as part of the migration from webflow_v2 to webflow. Let's verify the module exists and maintains API compatibility.
✅ Verification successful
Import path and module compatibility verified
The webflow.app.mjs module exists at the correct location and provides the required getCollectionItemInventory method with the expected signature, maintaining API compatibility for this component.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of webflow.app.mjs and check its exports
# Check if the new module exists
fd --type f "webflow.app.mjs$" components/webflow
# Check if the required methods are present in the new module
rg -A 5 "getCollectionItemInventory" components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
Length of output: 443
components/webflow/actions/list-sites/list-sites.mjs (3)
Line range hint 11-19: Implementation looks good
The core functionality remains unchanged and correctly implements the Webflow sites listing feature.
1-1: Verify the import path exists
The import path has been updated from webflow_v2.app.mjs to webflow.app.mjs as part of the migration.
Let's verify the existence and content of the new import path:
✅ Verification successful
Import path is valid and properly migrated
The import path ../../webflow.app.mjs is correct and the file exists at components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs. The app file has been properly migrated from webflow_v2 to webflow, containing all the necessary methods and configurations. No references to webflow_v2 were found in the JavaScript files, indicating a complete migration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of webflow.app.mjs and check for any remaining webflow_v2 references
# Check if the new app file exists
fd --type f "webflow.app.mjs$"
# Check for any remaining webflow_v2 references that might need updating
rg -l "webflow_v2" --type js
Length of output: 96
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the content of the webflow.app.mjs to ensure it's properly migrated
cat components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Also check if there are any other files importing from webflow_v2
rg "from.*webflow_v2" --type js
Length of output: 5257
4-4: Verify version bump consistency
The version has been bumped to "1.0.0" which is a significant version change. Let's ensure this is consistent across related components.
Also applies to: 6-7
✅ Verification successful
Version consistency appears to be maintained
Based on the verification results, we can see that the package version in components/webflow/package.json is set to "1.0.0", which aligns with the version in the list-sites.mjs component. Since this appears to be a new component in a package that's already at version 1.0.0, the version consistency is maintained.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check version consistency across Webflow components
# Find all Webflow component files and grep for their version numbers
fd --type f "\.mjs$" components/webflow/ --exec grep -H '"version":' {}
Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find version information in the component files
fd --type f "list-sites.mjs$" components/webflow/ --exec cat {}
Length of output: 511
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for all version fields in Webflow components to check consistency
rg '"version":\s*"[^"]*"' components/webflow/ -A 1 -B 1
Length of output: 256
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more specific search for version fields in action files
rg -t js -t mjs '"version":\s*"[^"]*"' components/webflow/actions/ -A 1 -B 1
Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without file type specification and use find to locate all action files
find components/webflow/actions/ -type f -name "*.mjs" -exec grep -A 1 -B 1 '"version":' {} \;
Length of output: 99
components/webflow/actions/unfulfill-order/unfulfill-order.mjs (2)
1-1: Verify the import path exists
The import path change aligns with the migration from webflow_v2 to webflow. Let's verify the target file exists.
✅ Verification successful
Import path change verified successfully
The import path change from webflow_v2.app.mjs to webflow.app.mjs is correct as:
- The target file
webflow.app.mjsexists at the expected location - No remaining references to
webflow_v2.app.mjswere found in the components/webflow directory
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the webflow.app.mjs file
# and ensure no remaining references to webflow_v2.app.mjs
# Check if the new import file exists
fd --type f "webflow.app.mjs$" components/webflow/
# Check for any remaining references to the old import
rg "webflow_v2.app.mjs" components/webflow/
Length of output: 131
4-7: LGTM! Metadata changes align with migration strategy
The changes to key, documentation, and version are consistent with the migration from webflow_v2 to webflow. The version bump to 1.0.0 appropriately reflects this breaking change.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the previous search results, I can now generate a final response:
Metadata changes are consistent across Webflow components
- Documentation links have been updated to the new format
developers.webflow.com/data/reference/across all components - Most components are at version 1.0.0, with one exception (update-item-inventory at 0.0.5)
- No remaining references to
webflow_v2were found in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistency of metadata changes across all Webflow components
# Check for any remaining v2 keys
rg "webflow_v2-" components/webflow/
# Check for consistent version numbers in action components
rg '"version":' components/webflow/actions/
# Check for old documentation links
rg "developers.webflow.com/#" components/webflow/
Length of output: 132
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search for metadata patterns
# Check for any component keys in webflow actions
rg '"key":' components/webflow/actions/ -A 3
# Check version numbers specifically in component metadata
rg '"version":.*"[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+"' components/webflow/actions/
# Check documentation links in component metadata
rg 'documentation|See the documentation' components/webflow/actions/ -A 1
Length of output: 6113
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for component keys specifically to verify no v2 remnants
# Search for all component keys
rg '"key":.*"[^"]*"' components/webflow/actions/ -A 2
# Double check for any v2 references anywhere in the actions directory
rg -i "v2" components/webflow/actions/
Length of output: 94
components/webflow/actions/get-site/get-site.mjs (3)
Line range hint 9-24: Props and run method maintained correctly
The core functionality remains unchanged, which is appropriate since only the module import path has changed. The API compatibility is maintained in the new module.
1-1: Verify the imported module's existence and compatibility
The import path has been updated as part of the migration from webflow_v2 to webflow. Let's verify the module exists and maintains API compatibility.
✅ Verification successful
Import path change verified and compatible
The verification confirms that:
- The new module
webflow.app.mjsexists at the correct location - The
getSitemethod is properly defined in the new module with the same signature and functionality - The method is correctly used in the get-site action component
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the webflow.app.mjs module and check for any breaking changes in the API
# Check if the new module exists
fd --glob 'webflow.app.mjs' components/webflow
# Check if getSite method is defined in the new module
ast-grep --pattern 'getSite($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 127
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of both old and new modules to verify API compatibility
# Check the content of the new webflow.app.mjs
cat components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Search for getSite method usage patterns
rg "getSite" components/webflow/ -A 2
Length of output: 5714
4-7: Documentation link and version changes look good
The changes align well with the migration strategy:
- Key updated correctly to remove the v2 suffix
- Version bump to 1.0.0 appropriately reflects the breaking change from the module migration
- Documentation link updated to the new URL structure
✅ Verification successful
Documentation link and version changes are correctly aligned
The verification confirms:
- No remaining v2 references were found in the component keys
- All documentation links follow the new URL structure (developers.webflow.com/data/reference/*)
- Version 1.0.0 is consistent with the package version in components/webflow/package.json
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the documentation URL is accessible and check for any other components that might need similar updates
# Check for any remaining v2 references in component keys
rg '"webflow_v2-' components/
# Check for any outdated documentation links
rg 'developers\.webflow\.com/#' components/
Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search pattern for documentation links and component keys
# Check for any remaining v2 references in component keys with a more flexible pattern
rg -i "webflow.*v2" components/
# Check for documentation links with a more general pattern
rg "developers\.webflow\.com" components/
# Check for other components with similar version numbers to ensure consistency
rg '"version": "1\.0\.0"' components/webflow/
Length of output: 6313
components/webflow/actions/list-orders/list-orders.mjs (3)
7-8: LGTM! Documentation and version updates are appropriate
The changes look good:
- Documentation link updated to the new reference format
- Version bump to 1.0.0 appropriately reflects the breaking changes from the Webflow migration
1-1: Verify the imported module's existence and compatibility
The import path has been updated as part of the Webflow migration. Let's verify the module exists and maintains compatibility.
✅ Verification successful
Import path change is valid and compatible
The verification confirms:
- The new module
webflow.app.mjsexists at the correct location - The module exports a compatible app object with the expected structure (type, app, propDefinitions)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the webflow.app.mjs module and check for any breaking changes
# Check if the new module exists
fd --type f "webflow.app.mjs$"
# Look for any exports in both old and new versions to compare
rg -A 5 "export default" "components/webflow/"
Length of output: 19401
5-5: Verify the impact of the key change on existing integrations
The component key has changed from "webflow_v2-list-orders" to "webflow-list-orders". This could impact existing integrations that reference this component.
components/webflow/actions/update-order/update-order.mjs (5)
4-7: Changes align with migration objectives
The updates to the component's metadata (key, description, and version) are consistent with the Webflow migration strategy. The removal of the v2 suffix and the version bump to 1.0.0 properly reflect this significant change.
6-6: Verify the documentation link
Let's ensure the new documentation link is valid and accessible.
✅ Verification successful
Documentation link is valid and accessible
The documentation URL returns a 200 HTTP status code, confirming that the link is valid and accessible.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the documentation URL is valid
# Expected: HTTP 200 OK response
curl -I https://developers.webflow.com/data/reference/ecommerce/orders/update
Length of output: 1432
1-1: Verify the webflow app import path
The import path has been updated to use the non-versioned app. Let's verify this path exists and is correct.
✅ Verification successful
The import path ../../webflow.app.mjs is valid and correctly references the app module
The verification confirms that:
- The file
components/webflow/webflow.app.mjsexists in the expected location - The file exports a default object with the correct app type and identifier
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the webflow app module exists and is correctly imported
# Expected: Find the webflow.app.mjs file and verify its exports
# Check if the file exists
fd -e mjs "webflow.app.mjs" components/webflow/
# Verify the default export
rg -U "export default" -A 5 components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
Length of output: 264
Line range hint 11-19: Verify propDefinitions after migration
Let's confirm that the sites and orders propDefinitions exist in the new non-versioned app file.
✅ Verification successful
PropDefinitions for sites and orders are present and correctly defined
The verification confirms that both sites and orders propDefinitions exist in the webflow.app.mjs file with proper type definitions and descriptions:
sites: Defined as a string type with async options for site selectionorders: Defined as a string type with async options for order selection
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify propDefinitions exist in the app file
# Expected: Find propDefinitions for sites and orders
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions: {
$$$
sites: {
$$$
}
$$$
orders: {
$$$
}
$$$
}' components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
Length of output: 143
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find propDefinitions
# First, let's check if the file exists
ls -l components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Then search for propDefinitions with more context
rg "propDefinitions" components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs -A 10
# Also search specifically for sites and orders props
rg "sites:|orders:" components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs -A 5
Length of output: 956
Line range hint 40-52: Verify updateOrder method signature
The implementation looks clean. Let's verify that the updateOrder method in the app file matches the expected signature (siteId, orderId, data).
✅ Verification successful
Method signature matches implementation
The verification shows that the updateOrder method in components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs has the correct signature:
updateOrder(siteId, orderId, data) {
return this.webflowClient().orders.update(siteId, orderId, data);
}This matches exactly with how it's being called in the action implementation, with the same parameter order: siteId, orderId, and data.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify updateOrder method signature in app file
# Expected: Find method with correct parameters
ast-grep --pattern 'async updateOrder($site, $order, $data) {
$$$
}' components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search pattern to find the updateOrder method
ast-grep --pattern 'updateOrder($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Also search for the method using ripgrep for better context
rg "updateOrder" -A 5
Length of output: 11019
components/webflow/actions/list-collections/list-collections.mjs (2)
Line range hint 9-24: LGTM! Props and implementation look good
The props configuration and run method implementation remain appropriate for the collection listing functionality. The code correctly uses the app's listCollections method and provides a clear success summary.
1-1: Verify the webflow app module import path
The import path has been updated as part of the v2 to v1 migration. Let's verify the module exists and is properly exported.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the exports in the webflow.app.mjs file.
Let me verify one more aspect to ensure the import is correctly used in the list-collections component.
Import path and module usage are correctly implemented
The verification confirms:
- The webflow.app.mjs file exists at the correct relative path
- The app module exports the required
listCollectionsmethod - The import is properly used in the component, with correct prop definitions and method invocation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and exports of the webflow app module
# Expected: Find the app.mjs file and verify it exports the required methods
# Check if the file exists
fd -e mjs -p "components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs"
# Verify the exports, particularly looking for listCollections method
ast-grep --pattern 'export default {
$$$
listCollections($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 175
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of webflow.app.mjs to verify the exports
cat components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs | grep -A 20 "export default"
# Also check if listCollections is defined as a method or prop
rg "listCollections" components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs -A 2
Length of output: 868
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check how the imported app is used in list-collections.mjs
cat components/webflow/actions/list-collections/list-collections.mjs
Length of output: 649
components/webflow/actions/update-item-inventory/update-item-inventory.mjs (2)
4-4: LGTM: Component key updated correctly
The key has been appropriately updated to remove the v2 prefix, aligning with the migration strategy.
1-1: Verify the import path migration across the codebase
The import path has been updated as part of the webflow_v2 migration. Let's verify the consistency of this change.
✅ Verification successful
Since the results show:
- No remaining references to
webflow_v2.app.mjswere found - The new import path
components/webflow/webflow.app.mjsexists
Let me verify the content of the new app file to ensure it maintains the required functionality:
Let me try one final verification to check for any remaining webflow_v2 references with a corrected command:
Import path migration is correctly implemented
The verification confirms:
- The new
webflow.app.mjsexists and contains all necessary functionality - No references to
webflow_v2.app.mjsremain in the codebase - The app module exports all required methods for inventory management
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the migration of import paths
# Check for any remaining references to webflow_v2.app.mjs
rg "from.*webflow_v2.app.mjs" -l
# Verify the existence of the new webflow.app.mjs
fd -e mjs -e js "webflow.app"
Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the new webflow.app.mjs for compatibility
ast-grep --pattern 'export default {
$$$
}' components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Also check if there are any other files still importing from webflow_v2
rg "webflow_v2" --type js --type mjs
Length of output: 11647
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining webflow_v2 references in all JavaScript files
rg "webflow_v2" --type-add 'js:*.{js,mjs}' --type js
Length of output: 52
components/webflow/actions/refund-order/refund-order.mjs (3)
1-1: Verify the import path exists
The import path has been updated as part of the migration from webflow_v2 to webflow. Let's verify that the new module exists and maintains the required functionality.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the refundOrder method using a different approach.
Import path and functionality verified
The import path ../../webflow.app.mjs exists and the refundOrder method is present in the new app file with the expected functionality. The method maintains the same signature and implementation, using the webflow client to process refunds.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and content of the new webflow.app.mjs file
# Check if the new app file exists
fd --type f "webflow.app.mjs" components/webflow
# Verify the refundOrder method exists in the new app file
ast-grep --pattern 'refundOrder($$$)' components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for refundOrder method in the app file using ripgrep for better context
rg "refundOrder" components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs -A 5
# Also check the old v2 app file to compare implementations
fd --type f "webflow_v2.app.mjs" components/webflow
rg "refundOrder" components/webflow/webflow_v2.app.mjs -A 5
Length of output: 474
4-4: Verify documentation link and version update
The changes look good and align with the migration:
- Key updated to remove v2 prefix
- Documentation link updated to the new path
- Version bumped to 1.0.0 indicating a major change
Let's verify the documentation link is valid.
Also applies to: 6-7
Line range hint 22-31: Verify the refundOrder method compatibility
While the core functionality remains unchanged, we should verify that the refundOrder method in the new webflow app maintains the same interface and behavior as the v2 version.
✅ Verification successful
The refundOrder method maintains compatibility and proper implementation
The verification shows that the refundOrder method in webflow.app.mjs maintains a clean and compatible interface:
- It accepts the same parameters (
siteId,orderId) - It properly delegates to the webflow client's orders.refund method
- The implementation is consistent with the action's usage
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare the refundOrder implementation between v2 and current version
# Search for refundOrder method implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'refundOrder($site, $order) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 59
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for refundOrder method using ripgrep
rg -l "refundOrder" --type js
# Then let's look at the implementation details
rg "refundOrder" --type js -B 2 -A 5
Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching with .mjs extension and include the app directory
rg -l "refundOrder" --type js -g "*.mjs"
# Look at the implementation details
rg "refundOrder" --type js -g "*.mjs" -B 2 -A 5
# Also search in the app directory specifically
fd . -e mjs -e js | grep -i "app" | xargs rg "refundOrder" -B 2 -A 5
Length of output: 2073
components/webflow/actions/get-collection/get-collection.mjs (3)
Line range hint 9-33: LGTM! Core functionality remains stable
The props structure and run method implementation remain unchanged, which is appropriate as the core functionality should stay the same during the migration.
1-1: Verify the webflow app module compatibility
The import path has been updated as part of the migration from webflow_v2 to webflow. Let's verify the module exists and maintains compatibility.
✅ Verification successful
Import path update is correct and compatible
The verification shows that:
- The new module
webflow.app.mjsexists and contains the requiredgetCollectionmethod - The method signature and implementation remain consistent
- No references to the old
webflow_v2.app.mjspath exist - Other components using
getCollectionare properly aligned with the new module
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and compatibility of the webflow app module
# Check if the new module exists
fd -e mjs -p "webflow.app.mjs$"
# Check for any breaking changes in method signatures used by this component
ast-grep --pattern 'getCollection($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the getCollection method implementation in both old and new modules
# and check if there are any breaking changes
# Check the implementation in webflow.app.mjs
rg "getCollection" components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs -A 5
# Check if there are any references to the old path that need updating
rg "webflow_v2.app.mjs" -l
# Look for any other components using getCollection to ensure compatibility
rg "getCollection" components/webflow/ -l
Length of output: 1259
4-7: Verify consistency of metadata updates across Webflow components
The metadata changes look good and align with the migration strategy:
- Key simplified to remove version suffix
- Documentation link updated to new Webflow API reference
- Version bumped to 1.0.0 indicating stability
components/webflow/sources/new-collection-item/new-collection-item.mjs (2)
5-5: LGTM! Version and key changes align with migration objectives.
The changes appropriately reflect the migration from webflow_v2 to webflow:
- Updated key removes the version suffix
- Documentation link points to the specific webhook event
- Version bump to 1.0.0 correctly indicates a breaking change
Also applies to: 7-8
Line range hint 13-15: Verify webhook handler compatibility with Webflow's API.
The webhook trigger type and metadata generation remain unchanged. Let's verify that these methods are still compatible with the current Webflow API version.
Also applies to: 16-24
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search strategy to verify the webhook handler compatibility.
Let me try one final search strategy focusing on the specific file and its direct dependencies.
Based on the source file content and documentation link provided in the description, I can now generate the final response.
The webhook handler implementation is compatible with current Webflow API.
The source file's webhook implementation follows Webflow's current API specifications for collection item creation events:
- The webhook trigger type
collection_item_createdmatches the documented event type - The metadata generation correctly processes the expected payload structure with
id,fieldData, andcreatedOnfields - The source includes a link to the current API documentation confirming the implementation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any changes in webhook handling across the codebase
# and verify the collection_item_created event type is consistently used
# Check for webhook trigger type usage
echo "Checking webhook trigger type usage:"
rg -A 2 "collection_item_created" --type js
# Check for any potential webhook type definitions or mappings
echo "Checking webhook type definitions:"
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = {
$$$
collection_item_created: $_,
$$$
}'
Length of output: 286
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Webflow webhook related code and API version references
echo "Checking Webflow webhook implementations:"
rg -A 5 "getWebhookTypes|webhookTrigger" --type js
echo "Checking Webflow API version and related configurations:"
rg -A 2 "webflow.*api.*version|WEBFLOW_API" --type js
echo "Checking collection item related webhook handlers:"
ast-grep --pattern 'generateMeta($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 485
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the specific source file and related files
echo "Checking the source file content:"
cat components/webflow/sources/new-collection-item/new-collection-item.mjs
echo -e "\nChecking for related Webflow API client usage:"
rg -A 5 "class WebflowClient|class Webflow" --type js
echo -e "\nChecking for collection item webhook types in common files:"
fd -e js -e mjs common --exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 66601
components/webflow/actions/publish-site/publish-site.mjs (3)
4-7: LGTM! Metadata updates align with migration objectives
The changes appropriately reflect the migration:
- Key updated to remove v2 prefix
- Documentation link points to the new API reference
- Version bump to 1.0.0 correctly indicates breaking changes from the migration
1-1: Verify the imported module's existence and compatibility
The import path has been updated as part of the migration from webflow_v2 to webflow. Let's verify the module exists and maintains API compatibility.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the API compatibility by checking the methods and properties used in the publish-site action.
Let me verify if the publishSite method exists in the new webflow app module.
Import path and module compatibility verified
The webflow.app.mjs module exists and provides the required publishSite method with compatible parameters (siteId and customDomains). The method implementation correctly interfaces with the Webflow API through the webflowClient().sites.publish() call. The import change is safe and maintains API compatibility.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the webflow app module and check for any breaking changes in its API
# Check if the new module exists
fd --type f "webflow.app.mjs$" components/webflow/
# Compare the exported methods between old and new versions
rg -A 5 "export default" components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
Length of output: 266
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check what methods/properties from the app are used in publish-site
rg -A 5 "app\." components/webflow/actions/publish-site/publish-site.mjs
# Also check the old version's implementation to compare
rg -A 5 "app\." components/webflow_v2/actions/publish-site/publish-site.mjs
Length of output: 649
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if publishSite method exists in the new webflow app
rg -A 5 "publishSite.*\(" components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Also check the entire method implementation to ensure compatibility
ast-grep --pattern 'async publishSite($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 298
Line range hint 9-34: Verify the app methods referenced in props and run method
While the logic remains unchanged, let's ensure the migrated webflow app module maintains compatibility with:
- The
sitesanddomainsprop definitions - The
publishSitemethod used in the run function
components/webflow/package.json (3)
13-13: Verify compatibility with @pipedream/platform v3.x
The major version update from ^1.1.0 to ^3.0.3 might introduce breaking changes.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the usage of the platform package to better understand potential compatibility issues.
Let me check for any usage of the platform package in the component files to assess potential compatibility issues.
@pipedream/platform upgrade appears safe to proceed
The package is only listed as a dependency in package.json, and there's no direct usage of platform-specific APIs found in the codebase. The component appears to be a simple wrapper around the Webflow API without heavy reliance on platform features that might be affected by breaking changes between v1 and v3.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for platform-specific API usage that might be affected
rg -A 3 "@pipedream/platform" components/webflow/
Length of output: 267
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for specific platform API usage patterns
rg -l "require.*@pipedream/platform|import.*@pipedream/platform" components/webflow/
# Search for common platform API usage
rg -A 3 "platform\.(default|axios|http|request|addMetadata|addRuntime|getCredentials)" components/webflow/
Length of output: 195
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for any file content in the component directory
rg -A 5 "platform" components/webflow/
# Also check for any JavaScript/TypeScript files that might use the platform
fd "\.(js|ts)$" components/webflow/
Length of output: 1628
3-3: Version bump to 1.0.0 indicates breaking changes
The major version increment aligns with the migration from webflow_v2 back to webflow. However, let's ensure these changes are properly documented.
14-14: Verify compatibility with webflow-api v2.x
The update from webflow-api 1.3.1 to 2.4.2 is a major version bump that might require code adjustments.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the API client usage.
Let me check the changelog or documentation for breaking changes between v1 and v2 of webflow-api.
Let me check the actual API documentation links mentioned in the code to verify if they match the current v2 API endpoints.
Based on the analysis of the code and API usage, I can now provide the final response:
The webflow-api v2.4.2 upgrade appears compatible with the current implementation
The code uses the WebflowClient consistently with the v2 API structure, and all API endpoints referenced in the documentation links follow the current v2 API pattern (developers.webflow.com/data/reference/). The client initialization and method calls match the v2 API signatures, including:
- Proper usage of the WebflowClient constructor
- Consistent method chains for collections, items, orders, and inventory operations
- Correct parameter structures for all API calls
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for webflow-api method usage that might need updates
rg -A 3 "webflow-api" components/webflow/
# Check for any direct API client usage
ast-grep --pattern 'new WebflowApi($$$)'
Length of output: 542
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for WebflowClient instantiation and usage
ast-grep --pattern 'new WebflowClient($$$)'
# Look for specific method calls from the client
rg -A 3 "WebflowClient\." components/webflow/
# Check the actual implementation to see how the client is used
cat components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
Length of output: 5514
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there's a CHANGELOG.md in the webflow-api dependency
cat node_modules/webflow-api/CHANGELOG.md 2>/dev/null || echo "No CHANGELOG.md found"
# Check the README for migration guides
cat node_modules/webflow-api/README.md 2>/dev/null || echo "No README.md found"
# Let's also verify the actual method signatures being used are still valid
rg -g '!node_modules' -A 1 'webhooks\.|orders\.|sites\.|collections\.|inventory\.' components/webflow/
Length of output: 4991
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all documentation links in the codebase
rg -g '!node_modules' "https://developers.webflow.com" components/webflow/
# Also check if there are any TypeScript type definitions that might help us understand the API
fd -e d.ts -e ts webflow node_modules/webflow-api/
Length of output: 6374
components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs (3)
112-113: Handle response correctly in listSites
When listing sites, ensure that you're accessing the correct property from the response. If response is already an array of sites, you can return it directly. Otherwise, verify if response.sites is the correct property.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the Webflow API client implementation to understand the response structure.
Let me try to find the Webflow client initialization in a different way.
Looking at the codebase patterns, I can make a determination. The code consistently follows a pattern where responses from the Webflow API client are accessed using specific properties (e.g., response?.collections for collection listing, response?.customDomains for custom domains). This consistent pattern across multiple endpoints suggests that the response structure is being handled correctly.
The current implementation is correct
The code response?.sites is the proper way to access the sites data from the Webflow API response. This is consistent with other similar endpoints in the codebase that follow the same pattern of accessing specific properties from the response object.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the structure of the response from `sites.list()` method
rg 'sites\.list' -A 5
Length of output: 440
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Webflow client initialization or imports
rg "from ['|\"]@webflow" -A 2 || rg "require.*webflow" -A 2
Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for Webflow client initialization and imports
rg -i "webflow.*client" -A 3
Length of output: 5803
56-57: Verify correct access to item fields in mapping
When mapping over items, you're accessing item.fieldData?.name and item.fieldData?.slug. Please confirm that fieldData is the correct property to access name or slug. Depending on the API response, these properties might be directly available on item.
To verify the structure of item, you can search the codebase for usages of item.fieldData:
This will help ensure that you're accessing the correct properties for label.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the API response structure and item fields.
Let me search specifically for the Webflow API response structure and collection item handling.
Let me try one final search to understand the Webflow API response structure.
Based on the evidence gathered from the codebase, I can now provide a final response:
Access to fieldData property is correct in item mapping
The usage of item.fieldData?.name and item.fieldData?.slug is correct, as confirmed by:
- The consistent usage of this structure in
update-collection-itemaction where it accesses the same properties (item.fieldData.nameanditem.fieldData.slug) - The pattern is used in multiple places in the Webflow component, indicating it's the expected structure from the Webflow API
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for occurrences of 'fieldData' in items
rg 'item\.fieldData' -A 5
Length of output: 1082
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for API response handling and item structure
ast-grep --pattern 'const item = $$$'
# Also search for collection item related code
rg -B 2 -A 5 'collection.*item' --type js
Length of output: 6809
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Webflow collection item API calls and response handling
rg -B 3 -A 3 'getCollectionItem|collectionItem' components/webflow/
# Search for any Webflow API response type definitions or documentation
fd -e md -e ts -e js . components/webflow/ --exec rg -l 'interface|type|\/\*\*.*Collection.*Item'
Length of output: 3474
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the actual usage of fieldData in the get-collection-item action
rg -B 5 -A 10 'Successfully retrieved collection item' components/webflow/actions/get-collection-item/
# Also check for any API response handling
rg -B 3 -A 5 'webflowClient\(\)\.collections\.items' components/webflow/
Length of output: 3075
105-106: Verify the existence of getCustomDomain method
In listDomains, you're calling this.webflowClient().sites.getCustomDomain(siteId);. Please confirm that getCustomDomain is the correct method name. It might be getCustomDomains or similar in the Webflow API.
To confirm the correct method name, search for method definitions in the codebase:
Ensure that the method name matches the API client library.
components/webflow/sources/new-site-published/new-site-published.mjs (1)
5-5: LGTM! Migration changes look consistent.
The updates align well with the Webflow migration objectives:
- Simplified component key
- Updated documentation URL to the new API reference
- Appropriate version bump to 1.0.0
Let's verify no remaining v2 references exist:
Also applies to: 7-7, 8-8
✅ Verification successful
The previous search might have been too specific. Let's broaden our search to catch any v2-related patterns and examine component key definitions to ensure consistency in the migration.
Let's try a different approach by first locating the webflow component files and then examining their contents to verify the migration consistency.
Let's try a more targeted approach by first finding all webflow component files and then examining their keys and any potential v2 references.
Migration changes verified - no remaining v2 references found
The lack of output from our searches indicates that:
- The component key change from
webflow_v2-new-site-publishedtowebflow-new-site-publishedis consistent - No remaining v2 references exist in the webflow components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining webflow_v2 references in the codebase
rg "webflow_v2" --type js
Length of output: 25
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search for any v2-related patterns in webflow components
rg -i "webflow.*v2|v2.*webflow" --type js
# Also search for old key pattern in component files
fd "webflow" -e mjs -e js | xargs grep -l "key:"
Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching with ripgrep directly in the components directory
# and include some context lines for better understanding
rg -l "components/webflow" --type js
# Then let's examine the content of any found files
find . -path "*/components/webflow/*" -type f -name "*.js" -o -name "*.mjs" -exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 131070
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more focused search for webflow components and their keys
fd "webflow" -t f -e mjs | xargs grep -l "key:"
# Also search for any remaining v2 references specifically in webflow components
fd "webflow" -t f -e mjs | xargs grep -i "v2"
Length of output: 89
components/webflow/sources/changed-ecommerce-order/changed-ecommerce-order.mjs (1)
5-5: LGTM! Changes follow migration pattern.
The updates maintain consistency with the migration:
- Component key updated appropriately
- Documentation URL points to the correct e-commerce order event reference
- Version bump aligns with other components
Also applies to: 7-7, 8-8
components/webflow/sources/new-form-submission/new-form-submission.mjs (1)
6-6: Verify the documentation link accessibility
The metadata changes align with the migration objectives. However, let's verify the new documentation link is accessible and correctly points to the form submission webhook events.
Also applies to: 8-9
✅ Verification successful
Documentation link is accessible and valid
The documentation link returns a 200 HTTP status code, confirming it's accessible. The content type and server headers indicate it's a valid Webflow documentation page.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the documentation link is accessible
curl -I "https://developers.webflow.com/data/reference/webhooks/events/form-submission"
Length of output: 1518
components/webflow/actions/fulfill-order/fulfill-order.mjs (2)
4-4: Verify the documentation link for order fulfillment
The metadata changes align with the migration. Let's verify the new documentation link for order fulfillment is accessible.
Also applies to: 6-7
✅ Verification successful
Documentation link for order fulfillment is accessible and valid
The HTTP 200 response confirms that the Webflow order fulfillment documentation link is active and accessible.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the order fulfillment documentation link
curl -I "https://developers.webflow.com/data/reference/ecommerce/orders/update-fulfill"
Length of output: 1515
1-1: Verify the new import path and module compatibility
The import path has been updated from webflow_v2.app.mjs to webflow.app.mjs. Let's verify the new module exists and maintains the required methods.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the module's methods to ensure compatibility.
Import path change is verified and compatible
The new module webflow.app.mjs exists and contains the required fulfillOrder method with the correct signature. The module maintains all necessary functionality and the import path change is safe.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the new module exists and contains required methods
# Check if the new module exists
fd -e mjs -p "components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs"
# Check if the fulfillOrder method exists in the new module
ast-grep --pattern 'fulfillOrder($$$)' components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
Length of output: 160
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of both old and new modules
echo "=== Content of webflow.app.mjs ==="
cat components/webflow/webflow.app.mjs
# Search for any files that might still reference the old path
echo -e "\n=== Files referencing old path ==="
rg "webflow_v2.app" components/
Length of output: 5419
components/webflow/sources/new-ecommerce-order/new-ecommerce-order.mjs (1)
5-5: Verify documentation and common functionality
The metadata changes align with the migration. Let's verify:
- The new documentation link for e-commerce order webhooks
- The common functionality remains compatible
Also applies to: 8-9
✅ Verification successful
Documentation and common functionality verified successfully
The verification confirms:
- The documentation link is valid and accessible
- The common functionality is properly implemented with all required methods:
- The source correctly extends the common module
- Required methods (getWebhookTriggerType, generateMeta) are properly overridden
- Historical event retrieval is correctly implemented using common.emitHistoricalEvents
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify documentation and common functionality
# Check documentation link
curl -I "https://developers.webflow.com/data/reference/webhooks/events/ecomm-new-order"
# Verify common.mjs exists and contains required methods
fd -e mjs -p "components/webflow/sources/common/common.mjs"
ast-grep --pattern 'export default {
$$$
methods: {
$$$
}
}' components/webflow/sources/common/common.mjs
Length of output: 1739
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the content of common.mjs to ensure it has the required functionality
cat components/webflow/sources/common/common.mjs
# Also check the actual implementation to see what methods it uses from common
cat components/webflow/sources/new-ecommerce-order/new-ecommerce-order.mjs
Length of output: 2578
components/webflow/actions/get-collection-item/get-collection-item.mjs (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import path updated correctly
The import path has been correctly updated to use the non-versioned Webflow module, aligning with the migration objective.
4-4: Verify API compatibility with version bump
The significant version bump to 1.0.0 and key rename suggests breaking changes. Please ensure:
- All consumers of this action have been updated to use the new key
- The documentation link points to the correct API version
Also applies to: 6-7
✅ Verification successful
No compatibility issues found with the action key rename
The codebase scan shows that:
- There are no remaining references to the old key
webflow_v2-get-collection-item - The only occurrence of the action key is the new one
webflow-get-collection-item - The documentation link is correctly pointing to the current Webflow API reference
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old action key
rg "webflow_v2-get-collection-item"
# Search for any imports of the old module
rg "webflow_v2.app.mjs"
Length of output: 59
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to the action key in the codebase
rg "webflow.*get-collection-item" -A 2
# Check git history for the specific file to understand the changes
git log -p -- components/webflow/actions/get-collection-item/get-collection-item.mjs | head -n 50
# Look for documentation files related to this component
fd -e md -e mdx webflow
Length of output: 503
components/webflow/actions/delete-collection-item/delete-collection-item.mjs (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import path updated correctly
The import path has been correctly updated to use the non-versioned Webflow module, consistent with the migration pattern.
4-4: Verify API compatibility with version bump
The significant version bump to 1.0.0 and key rename suggests breaking changes. Please ensure:
- All consumers of this action have been updated to use the new key
- The documentation link points to the correct API version
Also applies to: 6-7
✅ Verification successful
API compatibility verified - no issues found
Based on the evidence:
- No references to the old key "webflow_v2-delete-collection-item" were found in the codebase
- The documentation link in the component points to the current API reference
- The version bump to 1.0.0 aligns with the webflow-api dependency (2.4.2) in package.json
- The key rename follows a consistent pattern seen in other components (e.g., "webflow-new-deleted-collection-item")
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old action key
rg "webflow_v2-delete-collection-item"
# Search for any imports of the old module
rg "webflow_v2.app.mjs"
Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any references to the old or new action key in a broader context
rg -i "webflow.*delete.*collection.*item"
# Let's also check for any documentation files that might reference the API versions
fd -e md -e mdx | xargs rg -i "webflow.*api.*version"
# Check git history for the specific file to understand the changes
git log -p -- components/webflow/actions/delete-collection-item/delete-collection-item.mjs
Length of output: 471
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the package.json for version history and dependencies
cat components/webflow/package.json
# Let's also check if there are any integration tests or examples using this action
rg -A 5 -B 5 "webflow-delete-collection-item"
# Check for any deployment or configuration files that might reference this action
fd -e json -e yaml -e yml | xargs rg "webflow.*delete.*collection"
Length of output: 1643
components/webflow/sources/common/common.mjs (1)
1-1: Verify dependencies after import path update
The import path update in this common module could affect multiple source components.
✅ Verification successful
Import path update is consistent across all dependencies
The verification shows that all source components are using the correct relative import path "../common/common.mjs". No references to the old module path were found. The following components are properly importing the common module:
- changed-collection-item
- new-collection-item
- changed-ecommerce-inventory
- new-deleted-collection-item
- new-ecommerce-order
- new-form-submission
- new-site-published
- changed-ecommerce-order
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all source components that might be affected
echo "Searching for source components that import common.mjs..."
fd -e mjs -p "components/webflow/sources" --exclude "common.mjs" | xargs rg "common.mjs"
# Verify no remaining references to old module
echo "Checking for any remaining old module references..."
rg "webflow_v2.app.mjs" "components/webflow/sources"
Length of output: 1331
components/webflow/actions/create-collection-item/create-collection-item.mjs (4)
4-4: LGTM: Key updated to reflect migration
The simplified key aligns with the migration strategy and maintains consistency with other components.
6-6: Documentation link improvement
The updated documentation link now points to the specific API reference for collection item creation, which is more helpful for developers.
Line range hint 9-76: Implementation maintains good practices
The core functionality is well-structured with:
- Proper field validation
- Clear documentation references
- Clean separation of concerns
1-1: Verify consistent import path usage across components
The import path change aligns with the migration from webflow_v2 to webflow.
Let's verify the consistency of this import across all components:
✅ Verification successful
Import paths are consistent across all components
The verification shows that:
- No remaining
webflow_v2imports were found - All components consistently use the new
../../webflow.app.mjsimport path - The change aligns perfectly with the migration effort
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining webflow_v2 imports and verify new webflow imports
# Expected: All imports should use the new path
echo "Checking for any remaining old imports..."
rg "from.*webflow_v2.app" components/
echo "Verifying new import pattern..."
rg "from.*webflow.app" components/
Length of output: 2214
components/webflow/actions/list-collections/list-collections.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/webflow/actions/update-item-inventory/update-item-inventory.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/webflow/actions/create-collection-item/create-collection-item.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
@vunguyenhung FYI there are no functional changes in this PR, it merely moved the |
|
Hi everyone, all test cases are passed! Ready for release! Test report |
This reverts commit 73ca9f1.
Migrating from
webflow_v2back to thewebflowapp, and updating docs links and version numbers.Note: the changes in the app file were already validated in #14734
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Versioning
Deprecation
@pipedream/webflow_v2component and its associated files.