feat(connect-react): prep preview of @pipedream/connect-react #14718
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several changes to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Warning Rate limit exceeded@dylburger has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 11 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
tjk
changed the title
tjk
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 56
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (104)
packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/Makefile (1)
1-4: Consider adding error handling between stepsThe current implementation doesn't check for errors between critical steps. A failed build could result in running the dev server with stale or broken code.
Consider adding error checking:
dev: - cd .. && pnpm i && pnpm run build && cd - - pnpm i - pnpm exec next dev + cd .. && \ + pnpm i || exit 1 && \ + pnpm run build || exit 1 && \ + cd - || exit 1 && \ + pnpm i || exit 1 && \ + pnpm exec next devpackages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/layout.tsx (2)
1-13: Consider adding metadata configuration.While the basic layout implementation is correct, consider adding metadata configuration to demonstrate Next.js best practices in this example. This is especially important as this is part of a preview package that others will learn from.
+import type { Metadata } from 'next' + +export const metadata: Metadata = { + title: 'Pipedream Connect React Example', + description: 'Example implementation of @pipedream/connect-react with Next.js', +} + export default function RootLayout({ children, }: Readonly<{
7-11: Enhance accessibility attributes.Consider adding recommended accessibility attributes to improve the example implementation.
- <html lang="en"> - <body> + <html lang="en" suppressHydrationWarning> + <body suppressHydrationWarning> {children} </body> </html>The
suppressHydrationWarningattribute helps prevent hydration mismatch warnings that can occur with dynamic content, which is common when using form components.packages/connect-react/src/components/Alert.tsx (2)
8-8: Address the XXX comment about customization.The comment indicates missing customization features. Let's track this properly.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the implementation of:
useCustomizehook for alert customizationgetClassNamesutility for consistent class name generation?
7-10: Consider using a styling solution with theme support.Since this is a reusable component that's part of a form system, consider using a more robust styling solution:
- CSS-in-JS or CSS Modules for style encapsulation
- Theme support for consistent alert styling across different contexts
- Design token system for maintaining consistent colors and spacing
This would make the component more maintainable and customizable for different applications.
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-apps.tsx (3)
10-13: Consider adding React Query configuration options.The query configuration could benefit from additional options to handle common scenarios:
- Retry configuration for failed requests
- Stale time to prevent unnecessary refetches
- Error handling for failed requests
Consider updating the configuration:
const query = useQuery({ queryKey: ["apps", input], queryFn: () => client.apps(input), + retry: 3, + staleTime: 1000 * 60 * 5, // 5 minutes + onError: (error) => { + console.error('Failed to fetch apps:', error) + } })
11-11: Make query key more specific to prevent cache collisions.The current query key might be too generic if used in a larger application.
Consider making it more specific:
- queryKey: ["apps", input], + queryKey: ["@pipedream/connect-react", "apps", input],
15-19: Add type safety for the return value.The return value could benefit from explicit typing to ensure type safety throughout the application.
Consider adding a return type:
-export const useApps = (input?: GetAppsOpts) => { +export const useApps = (input?: GetAppsOpts): { + apps: App[] | undefined; + isLoading: boolean; + isError: boolean; + error: Error | null; +} => {packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-components.tsx (1)
5-7: Enhance documentation and optimize the default value.
- The documentation should include:
- Parameter description
- Return value details
- Usage example
- The empty array default should be memoized to prevent unnecessary rerenders
/** * Get list of components + * @param {GetComponentOpts} input - Optional configuration for component filtering + * @returns {Object} Query result object containing: + * - components: Array of fetched components (empty array if no data) + * - isLoading: Boolean indicating if the query is loading + * - error: Any error that occurred during fetching + * @example + * const { components, isLoading } = useComponents({ app: { name_slug: 'github' } }); */ export const useComponents = (input?: GetComponentOpts) => { const client = useFrontendClient() + const emptyArray = useMemo(() => [], []) const query = useQuery({ queryKey: ["components", input], queryFn: () => client.components(input), }) return { ...query, - components: query.data?.data || [], + components: query.data?.data || emptyArray, } }Also applies to: 15-18
packages/connect-react/src/components/ErrorBoundary.tsx (4)
3-6: Consider using a more specific error type.The
fallbackprop usesanytype for the error parameter, which reduces type safety. Consider usingError | undefinedinstead.type Props = { children: React.ReactNode - fallback: (err: any) => React.ReactNode + fallback: (err: Error | undefined) => React.ReactNode }
8-10: Add explicit type for the state.Consider adding an interface for the state to improve type safety and documentation.
+interface State { + err: Error | undefined; +} + -export class ErrorBoundary extends Component<Props> { +export class ErrorBoundary extends Component<Props, State> { state = {err: undefined}
15-17: Update error parameter type for consistency.The error parameter type should match the state type definition.
- static getDerivedStateFromError(err: any) { + static getDerivedStateFromError(err: Error) { return {err} }
8-26: Consider adding error logging capabilities.The error boundary could benefit from implementing
componentDidCatchlifecycle method for error logging or analytics tracking.export class ErrorBoundary extends Component<Props, State> { state = {err: undefined} static getDerivedStateFromError(err: Error) { return {err} } + componentDidCatch(error: Error, errorInfo: React.ErrorInfo) { + // Log the error to an error reporting service + console.error('Error caught by boundary:', error, errorInfo); + } render() { // ... existing render code } }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 11-13: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
packages/connect-react/vite.config.mts (2)
1-3: Consider using specific path importInstead of importing all exports from 'path', consider importing only the specific functions needed (e.g., resolve).
-import * as path from "path"; +import { resolve } from "path";
6-8: Consider environment-specific minificationThe minification is currently always enabled. Consider making it environment-dependent for better development experience:
build: { - minify: true, + minify: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production',packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-app.tsx (3)
5-7: Enhance JSDoc documentation.The current documentation is minimal. Consider adding more details about parameters, return value, and usage examples.
/** * Get details about an app + * + * @param slug - The unique identifier for the app + * @param opts - Optional configuration for the query behavior + * @returns Object containing query result and the app data + * + * @example + * ```tsx + * const { app, isLoading, error } = useApp('slack'); + * ``` */
8-14: Consider adding error handling and retry configuration.The current implementation might benefit from explicit error handling and retry configuration for better reliability.
export const useApp = (slug: string, opts?:{ useQueryOpts?: Omit<UseQueryOptions<AppRequestResponse>, "queryKey" | "queryFn">}) => { const client = useFrontendClient() const query = useQuery({ queryKey: ["app", slug], queryFn: () => client.app(slug), + retry: (failureCount, error) => failureCount < 3, + staleTime: 5 * 60 * 1000, // Consider data fresh for 5 minutes ...opts?.useQueryOpts, })
16-20: Consider adding loading state handling guidance.The hook returns the raw query state without guidance on handling loading states, which could lead to inconsistent implementations across the application.
Consider creating a wrapper component or utility function to standardize loading state handling:
type AppState = { isLoading: boolean; isError: boolean; error: Error | null; app: AppRequestResponse['data'] | null; }; export const useAppState = (slug: string): AppState => { const { app, isLoading, isError, error } = useApp(slug); return { isLoading, isError, error: error as Error | null, app: app || null, }; };packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-component.tsx (2)
1-3: Consider importing specific error types for better type safety.To improve error handling and type safety, consider importing and utilizing specific error types from
@pipedream/sdk.import { useQuery, type UseQueryOptions } from "@tanstack/react-query" -import type { ComponentRequestResponse } from "@pipedream/sdk" +import type { ComponentRequestResponse, ComponentRequestError } from "@pipedream/sdk" import { useFrontendClient } from "./frontend-client-context"
8-24: Add explicit return type and memoize query options.The hook's implementation could benefit from:
- Explicit return type definition
- Memoization of query options to prevent unnecessary re-renders
+type UseComponentResult = { + component?: ComponentRequestResponse['data']; +} & UseQueryResult<ComponentRequestResponse>; export const useComponent = ( { key }: { key?: string }, opts?: {useQueryOpts?: Omit<UseQueryOptions<ComponentRequestResponse>, "queryKey" | "queryFn">} -) => { +): UseComponentResult => { const client = useFrontendClient(); + const queryOptions = useMemo(() => ({ + queryKey: ["component", key] as const, + queryFn: () => { + if (!key) throw new Error("Component key is required"); + return client.component({ key }); + }, + enabled: !!key, + ...opts?.useQueryOpts, + }), [key, client, opts?.useQueryOpts]); + - const query = useQuery({ - queryKey: ["component", key], - queryFn: () => client.component({ key: key! }), - enabled: !!key, - ...opts?.useQueryOpts, - }); + const query = useQuery(queryOptions); return { ...query, component: query.data?.data, }; };packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlBoolean.tsx (2)
6-9: Add error handling for missing context.The component assumes the form field context will always be available. Consider adding error handling to gracefully handle cases where the context is missing.
export function ControlBoolean() { const props = useFormFieldContext<ConfigurablePropBoolean>() + if (!props) { + throw new Error('ControlBoolean must be used within a FormFieldContext') + } const {id, value, onChange } = props const { getProps } = useCustomize()
16-17: Improve readability and accessibility of the checkbox input.The current implementation could benefit from:
- Breaking down the JSX into multiple lines
- Adding proper aria attributes
- Extracting the event handler
- return <input id={id} type="checkbox" {...getProps("controlBoolean", baseStyles, props)} checked={value ?? false} onChange={(e) => onChange(e.target.checked)} /> + const handleChange = (event: React.ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => { + onChange(event.target.checked) + } + + return ( + <input + id={id} + type="checkbox" + role="checkbox" + aria-checked={value ?? false} + {...getProps("controlBoolean", baseStyles, props)} + checked={value ?? false} + onChange={handleChange} + /> + )packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-accounts.tsx (2)
1-3: Consider importing error types for better error handlingWhile the basic types are imported, consider importing error types from
@pipedream/sdkto properly type the error responses in the query hook.import { useQuery, UseQueryOptions } from "@tanstack/react-query" -import type { GetAccountOpts, AccountsRequestResponse } from "@pipedream/sdk" +import type { + GetAccountOpts, + AccountsRequestResponse, + PipedreamApiError +} from "@pipedream/sdk" import { useFrontendClient } from "./frontend-client-context"
5-16: Enhance documentation and type definitionsThe current documentation could be more comprehensive, and the type definitions could be simplified for better maintainability.
Consider these improvements:
/** * Retrieves the list of accounts associated with the project. + * @param input - The options for fetching accounts + * @param opts - Additional query options for customizing the request + * @returns An object containing the query result and accounts array */ +type UseAccountsOptions = { + useQueryOpts?: Omit<UseQueryOptions<AccountsRequestResponse>, "queryKey" | "queryFn">; +}; + export const useAccounts = ( input: GetAccountOpts, - opts?: { - useQueryOpts?: Omit< - UseQueryOptions<AccountsRequestResponse>, - "queryKey" | "queryFn" - >; - } + opts?: UseAccountsOptions ) => {packages/connect-react/src/components/ComponentForm.tsx (1)
20-26: Consider adding error boundaries and performance optimizations.While the implementation is clean, consider these improvements:
- Wrap with an error boundary to handle rendering errors
- Add prop validation
- Memoize the component to prevent unnecessary re-renders
Here's a suggested improvement:
+import { memo } from 'react' +import { ErrorBoundary } from '../components/ErrorBoundary' -export function ComponentForm(props: ComponentFormProps) { +export const ComponentForm = memo(function ComponentForm(props: ComponentFormProps) { + if (!props.component) { + throw new Error('Component is required') + } + return ( - <FormContextProvider props={props}> - <InternalComponentForm /> - </FormContextProvider> + <ErrorBoundary> + <FormContextProvider props={props}> + <InternalComponentForm /> + </FormContextProvider> + </ErrorBoundary> ) -} +})packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-field-context.tsx (3)
4-15: Improve type definitions for better type safety.The type definitions are well-structured, but there's room for improvement in type safety:
Consider this enhanced version:
-export type FormFieldContextExtra<T extends ConfigurableProp> = T extends ConfigurablePropApp ? { - app?: AppInfo -} : {} +export type FormFieldContextExtra<T extends ConfigurableProp> = T extends ConfigurablePropApp + ? { app?: AppInfo } + : Record<string, never> export type FormFieldContext<T extends ConfigurableProp> = { id: string prop: T idx: number - value: PropValue<T["type"]> | undefined + value: PropValue<T["type"]> | undefined onChange: (value: PropValue<T["type"]> | undefined) => void extra: FormFieldContextExtra<T> }The changes:
- Replace
{}withRecord<string, never>for a more explicit empty object type- Improved readability with better type formatting
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 6-6: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
17-27: Enhance type safety and error handling in context implementation.The context and hook implementation is solid but could be improved:
Consider these enhancements:
-export const FormFieldContext = createContext<FormFieldContext<any> | undefined>(undefined) +export const FormFieldContext = createContext<FormFieldContext<ConfigurableProp> | undefined>(undefined) export const useFormFieldContext = <T extends ConfigurableProp>() => { const context = useContext(FormFieldContext) if (!context) { - throw new Error("Must be used inside FormFieldContext.Provider") + throw new Error( + "useFormFieldContext must be used within a FormFieldContext.Provider" + ) } return context as FormFieldContext<T> }The changes:
- Replace
anywithConfigurablePropfor better type safety- More descriptive error message that includes the hook name
1-27: Add JSDoc documentation for better developer experience.While the implementation is solid, adding documentation would improve maintainability and usability:
Consider adding JSDoc comments:
+/** + * Extra context properties for form fields based on their type + * @template T The configurable property type + */ export type FormFieldContextExtra<T extends ConfigurableProp> = ... +/** + * Context for managing form field state and interactions + * @template T The configurable property type + */ export type FormFieldContext<T extends ConfigurableProp> = ... +/** + * React Context for form field state management + */ export const FormFieldContext = ... +/** + * Hook to access form field context + * @template T The configurable property type + * @throws {Error} When used outside of FormFieldContext.Provider + * @returns {FormFieldContext<T>} The form field context + */ export const useFormFieldContext = ...🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 6-6: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
packages/connect-react/src/components/Label.tsx (2)
18-24: Adjust non-standard font-weight value.The
fontWeight: 450is a non-standard value. CSS font-weight typically uses multiples of 100 from 100 to 900. Consider using 400 (normal) or 500 (medium) instead.const baseStyles: CSSProperties = { color: theme.colors.neutral90, - fontWeight: 450, + fontWeight: 500, gridArea: "label", textTransform: "capitalize", lineHeight: "1.5", }
26-28: Enhance accessibility and text handling.Consider these improvements:
- Add aria-label for better screen reader support
- Consider sanitizing the text prop to prevent XSS if the input is user-generated
return ( - <label htmlFor={id} {...getProps("label", baseStyles, props)}>{text}</label> + <label + htmlFor={id} + aria-label={text} + {...getProps("label", baseStyles, props)} + > + {text} + </label> )packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlAny.tsx (2)
1-3: Add TypeScript interfaces for better type safety.Consider adding explicit type definitions for the component and its context usage.
import { useFormFieldContext } from "../hooks/form-field-context" import { useCustomize } from "../hooks/customization-context" import type { CSSProperties } from "react" + +interface ControlAnyProps { + id: string + value: unknown + onChange: (value: string) => void +} + +export function ControlAny(): JSX.Element {
22-22: Address the XXX comment about component complexity.The comment indicates that this component needs to be more complex. Please clarify the requirements and implementation plan.
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track the needed improvements?
packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/page.tsx (2)
15-17: Consider making the initial message configurableThe default message is currently hardcoded. Consider making it configurable through props or environment variables for better flexibility.
+ const defaultMessage = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_DEFAULT_MESSAGE || "hello slack!" const [configuredProps, setConfiguredProps] = useState({ - text: "hello slack!", + text: defaultMessage, })
22-29: Make the component key configurableThe Slack component key is hardcoded. Consider making it configurable to support different component types.
+ const componentKey = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_COMPONENT_KEY || "slack-send-message" <ComponentFormContainer userId={userId} - componentKey="slack-send-message" + componentKey={componentKey} configuredProps={configuredProps} onUpdateConfiguredProps={setConfiguredProps} />packages/connect-react/src/components/ComponentFormContainer.tsx (4)
4-6: Document the planned key format change.The comment indicates a future change in the key format. Consider creating an issue to track this planned enhancement and document it in the README to set proper expectations for package users.
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track the planned key format enhancement?
18-20: Improve the error message for missing componentKey.The error message could be more descriptive to help developers understand the context.
- throw new Error("componentKey required") + throw new Error("ComponentFormContainer: componentKey prop is required")
22-24: Enhance loading and error states with better UX.Consider using proper loading and error components instead of basic paragraph elements. This would provide a more consistent and polished user experience.
- return <p>Loading...</p> + return <LoadingSpinner message="Loading component..." /> - return <p>Error: {error.message}</p> + return <ErrorMessage error={error} /> - return <p>Component not found</p> + return <ErrorMessage message={`Component '${props.componentKey}' not found`} />Also applies to: 26-28, 30-32
11-36: Consider performance and error handling improvements.Two architectural suggestions:
- Wrap the component with
React.memo()to prevent unnecessary re-renders when parent components update- Consider integrating with an error boundary for better error handling of the component loading process
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlSubmit.tsx (1)
14-28: Consider improvements to the styles implementation.The current styles implementation could be enhanced for better consistency and maintainability:
- Consider using a fixed or full width instead of "fit-content" for better form layout consistency
- Use theme spacing values for margin instead of hardcoded values
- Use theme typography for font size
- Simplify the padding calculation
const baseStyles: CSSProperties = { - width: "fit-content", + width: "100%", textTransform: "capitalize", backgroundColor: theme.colors.primary, color: theme.colors.neutral0, - padding: `${theme.spacing.baseUnit * 1.75}px ${ - theme.spacing.baseUnit * 16 - }px`, + padding: `${theme.spacing.baseUnit}px ${theme.spacing.baseUnit * 2}px`, borderRadius: theme.borderRadius, boxShadow: theme.boxShadow?.button, cursor: "pointer", - fontSize: "0.875rem", + fontSize: theme.typography?.fontSize?.base || "0.875rem", opacity: submitting ? 0.5 : undefined, - margin: "0.5rem 0 0 0", + marginTop: theme.spacing.baseUnit, }packages/connect-react/src/components/Errors.tsx (2)
28-30: Address TODO comments regarding async loading.The comments suggest incomplete implementation for different field types and async loading. This should be addressed before the preview version release.
Would you like me to help implement the async loading functionality or create a GitHub issue to track this task?
19-22: Consider responsive design for error messages.The current grid layout might need adjustments for different screen sizes. Consider adding responsive styles through the theme.
Example enhancement:
const baseStyles: CSSProperties = { color: theme.colors.danger, gridArea: "errors", maxWidth: "100%", wordBreak: "break-word", margin: theme.spacing?.error || "0.5rem 0", }packages/connect-react/src/hooks/frontend-client-context.tsx (2)
5-7: Consider adding type assertion for better type safetyWhile the context works as is, you can make it more type-safe by using type assertion in the creation.
-const FrontendClientContext = createContext<BrowserClient | undefined>( - undefined -) +const FrontendClientContext = createContext<BrowserClient | undefined>(undefined as BrowserClient | undefined)
21-41: Consider making query options configurableThe current implementation hardcodes query options like
staleTime. Consider making these configurable through props to support different use cases.type FrontendClientProviderProps = { children: React.ReactNode client: BrowserClient + queryOptions?: { + staleTime?: number + refetchOnWindowFocus?: boolean + } }packages/connect-react/src/components/SelectComponent.tsx (1)
32-32: Address the TODO comment regarding default component fetching.The comment indicates a need to fetch the default component to display the proper name.
Would you like me to help implement the default component fetching logic or create a GitHub issue to track this task?
packages/connect-react/src/components/OptionalFieldButton.tsx (2)
1-9: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments.The imports and type definitions are well-structured. Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the props interface for better developer experience.
+/** + * Props for the OptionalFieldButton component + * @property {ConfigurableProp} prop - The configurable property to toggle + * @property {boolean} enabled - Whether the field is currently enabled + * @property {() => void} onClick - Callback function when button is clicked + */ export type OptionalFieldButtonProps = { prop: ConfigurableProp enabled: boolean onClick: () => void }
14-28: Consider extracting styles for better maintainability.The inline styles object is quite large and could be moved outside the component for better maintainability and reusability.
+const getBaseStyles = (theme: Theme): CSSProperties => ({ + color: theme.colors.neutral60, + display: "inline-flex", + alignItems: "center", + padding: `${theme.spacing.baseUnit}px ${theme.spacing.baseUnit * 1.5}px ${ + theme.spacing.baseUnit + }px ${theme.spacing.baseUnit * 2.5}px`, + border: `1px solid ${theme.colors.neutral30}`, + borderRadius: theme.borderRadius, + cursor: "pointer", + fontSize: "0.8125rem", + fontWeight: 450, + gap: theme.spacing.baseUnit * 2, + textWrap: "nowrap", +}) export const OptionalFieldButton = (props: OptionalFieldButtonProps) => { const { prop, enabled, onClick } = props const { getProps, theme } = useCustomize() - const baseStyles: CSSProperties = { - // ... current styles - } + const baseStyles = getBaseStyles(theme) // ... rest of the componentpackages/connect-react/src/components/InternalField.tsx (3)
18-19: Address the TODO comment regarding error handling.Error handling for app data fetching should be implemented to ensure robust behavior.
Would you like me to help implement proper error handling for the app data fetching?
20-25: Document the suspense behavior.The comment about suspense behavior suggests some complexity. Consider adding more detailed documentation about why this configuration is necessary.
} = useApp(appSlug || "", { useQueryOpts: { enabled: !!appSlug, - suspense: !!appSlug, // this seems to work (this overrides enabled so don't just set to true) + // Suspense must be conditionally enabled based on appSlug to prevent unnecessary suspense + // when no app data is needed. This overrides the 'enabled' option. + suspense: !!appSlug, }, });
27-27: Consider more robust field ID generation.The current field ID generation might cause conflicts if formId contains "pd". Consider using a more unique prefix or a more robust ID generation method.
- const fieldId = `pd${formId}${prop.name}` // id is of form `:r{d}:` so has seps + const fieldId = `pipedream_field_${formId}_${prop.name}`packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/actions.ts (3)
16-44: Consider refactoring environment variable validation for better maintainability.While the validation is thorough, the repetitive validation blocks could be refactored into a helper function.
Consider this approach:
-if (!NODE_ENV) { - throw new Error("NODE_ENV is required") -} - -if (!PIPEDREAM_ALLOWED_ORIGINS) { - throw new Error("PIPEDREAM_ALLOWED_ORIGINS is required") -} - +const validateEnvVars = (vars: Record<string, string | undefined>) => { + Object.entries(vars).forEach(([key, value]) => { + if (!value) throw new Error(`${key} is required`); + }); +}; + +validateEnvVars({ + NODE_ENV, + PIPEDREAM_ALLOWED_ORIGINS, + PIPEDREAM_CLIENT_ID, + PIPEDREAM_CLIENT_SECRET, + PIPEDREAM_PROJECT_ID, +});🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 17-18: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 21-22: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 24-25: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 26-27: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 28-29: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 31-32: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 35-36: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 39-40: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 43-44: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
55-60: Consider aligning parameter naming with SDK conventions.The function works correctly, but for consistency with the SDK's snake_case convention in the request payload, consider using the same naming in the parameter type.
-export async function fetchToken(opts: { externalUserId: string }) { +export async function fetchToken(opts: { external_user_id: string }) { return await client.createConnectToken({ - external_user_id: opts.externalUserId, + external_user_id: opts.external_user_id, allowed_origins: allowedOrigins, }) }🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 55-55: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 59-60: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
55-60: Consider adding tests for token generation.Given that this function handles authentication tokens, it would be beneficial to add unit tests to verify the behavior with various inputs and error conditions.
Would you like me to help create a test suite for this functionality?
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 55-55: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 59-60: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
packages/connect-react/src/components/Description.tsx (3)
14-15: Address the XXX comment about component naming.The comment raises a valid architectural concern about component naming and context requirements. Consider renaming to
FieldDescriptionfor clarity and consistency.Would you like me to create an issue to track this architectural improvement?
33-36: Complete the TODO for app type handling.The current implementation provides a static message. Consider enhancing this with more detailed information about credential encryption.
Would you like me to help implement a more comprehensive message for app type credentials?
24-31: Consider extracting base styles to a theme constant.The base styles could be moved to a theme constant for better maintainability and reuse.
+const DESCRIPTION_BASE_STYLES: CSSProperties = { + color: theme.colors.neutral50, + fontWeight: 400, + fontSize: "0.75rem", + gridArea: "description", + textWrap: "balance", + lineHeight: "1.5", +} export function Description<T extends ConfigurableProp>(props: DescriptionProps<T>) { // ... - const baseStyles: CSSProperties = { - color: theme.colors.neutral50, - fontWeight: 400, - fontSize: "0.75rem", - gridArea: "description", - textWrap: "balance", - lineHeight: "1.5", - } + const baseStyles = DESCRIPTION_BASE_STYLESpackages/connect-react/src/components/SelectApp.tsx (4)
6-9: Consider strengthening the type definitions.The current type definition could be more precise to prevent potential runtime issues:
type SelectAppProps = { - value?: Partial<AppResponse> & { name_slug: string } + value?: Pick<AppResponse, 'name_slug' | 'name' | 'id'> - onChange?: (app?: AppResponse) => void + onChange?: (app: AppResponse | undefined) => void }This change:
- Uses
Pickto explicitly define required fields- Makes the callback parameter type more explicit
12-12: Consider using Select's internal state.The XXX comment raises a valid point. React-select maintains its internal input value state, which could be accessed via ref, potentially eliminating the need for a separate state variable.
- const [q, setQ] = useState("") // XXX can we just use Select ref.value instead? + const selectRef = useRef<any>(null)Then update the Select component:
<Select + ref={selectRef} instanceId={instanceId} // ... other props - onInputChange={(v) => setQ(v)} + onInputChange={(v) => { + const inputValue = selectRef.current?.inputRef.value + // Use inputValue directly in useApps + }} />
30-37: Replace inline styles with proper CSS classes.Consider using proper CSS classes for styling to maintain consistency and improve maintainability.
- <div style={{ display: "flex", gap: 10 }}> + <div className="flex items-center gap-2.5"> <img src={`https://pipedream.com/s.v0/${props.data.id}/logo/48`} - style={{ height: 24, width: 24 }} + className="h-6 w-6" alt={props.data.name} /> - <span style={{ whiteSpace: "nowrap" }}>{props.data.name}</span> + <span className="whitespace-nowrap">{props.data.name}</span> </div>
32-32: Extract the logo URL to a constant.The hardcoded URL should be moved to a constant or configuration value for better maintainability.
+const APP_LOGO_URL = 'https://pipedream.com/s.v0' + export function SelectApp({ value, onChange }: SelectAppProps) { // ... <img - src={`https://pipedream.com/s.v0/${props.data.id}/logo/48`} + src={`${APP_LOGO_URL}/${props.data.id}/logo/48`}packages/connect-react/src/index.ts (2)
1-2: Document polyfills and consider removing ESLint overridePlease consider:
- Adding a comment explaining which polyfills are being imported and why they're necessary
- Removing the ESLint override if possible by formatting exports consistently
+// Import polyfills for <list specific features> to support <list browser versions> import "./polyfills"; -/* eslint-disable object-curly-newline */🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 1-2: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
3-23: Consider exporting type definitionsFor better TypeScript support, consider explicitly exporting types for the components' props and any other public interfaces.
+// Add at the top of the file +export type { AlertProps } from "./components/Alert"; +export type { ComponentFormProps } from "./components/ComponentForm"; +// ... other type exportspackages/connect-react/src/components/ControlInput.tsx (2)
10-20: Consider adding focus state styles for better accessibility.The base styles look good, but adding focus state styles would improve keyboard navigation and accessibility.
Consider adding these focus styles to
baseStyles:const baseStyles: CSSProperties = { color: theme.colors.neutral60, display: "block", border: "1px solid", borderColor: theme.colors.neutral20, padding: 6, width: "100%", borderRadius: theme.borderRadius, gridArea: "control", boxShadow: theme.boxShadow.input, + "&:focus": { + outline: "none", + borderColor: theme.colors.primary, + boxShadow: `0 0 0 2px ${theme.colors.primary}20`, + }, }
37-41: Address the TODO comment and enhance secret field security.The TODO comment about value reification needs to be addressed. Additionally, consider adding these security enhancements for secret fields:
- Prevent value caching
- Clear the input value on blur
- Add
spellcheck="false"to prevent data leakageWould you like me to help implement these security enhancements and address the TODO comment about value reification?
packages/connect-react/src/components/Field.tsx (2)
13-19: Consider implementing the component override patternThe XXX comment indicates a need for component override support, which is crucial for component customization. This would allow users to extend the default Field component behavior.
Would you like me to help implement this override pattern or create a GitHub issue to track this enhancement? I can provide a detailed implementation that includes:
- A higher-order component for override support
- Example implementation of the override pattern
- Documentation for users
24-34: Consider extracting grid styles to a constant or themeThe base styles define a complex grid layout that might be reused. Consider extracting these styles to a constant or theme object for better maintainability and consistency.
+const FIELD_GRID_STYLES = { + boolean: { + gridTemplateAreas: `"control label" "description description" "error error"`, + }, + default: { + gridTemplateAreas: `"label label" "control control" "description description" "error error"`, + }, +} as const; export function Field<T extends ConfigurableProp>(props: FieldProps<T>) { // ... const baseStyles: CSSProperties = { display: "grid", - gridTemplateAreas: - field.prop.type == "boolean" - ? `"control label" "description description" "error error"` - : `"label label" "control control" "description description" "error error"`, + gridTemplateAreas: FIELD_GRID_STYLES[field.prop.type === "boolean" ? "boolean" : "default"].gridTemplateAreas, gridTemplateColumns: "min-content auto", gap: "0.25rem 0", alignItems: "center", fontSize: "0.875rem", }packages/connect-react/README.md (5)
1-7: Add a brief package descriptionConsider adding a concise description of what
@pipedream/connect-reactdoes and its main benefits right after the title. This would help users quickly understand the package's purpose.
17-43: Enhance security guidance for environment variablesConsider adding:
- A note about using
.env.localin the.gitignore- Instructions for different environments (development/staging/production)
- A warning about not committing sensitive values
138-153: Enhance ComponentForm props documentationConsider adding:
- Example values for each prop
- Default values where applicable
- Type constraints (e.g., allowed values for
propNames)- Whether props are required or optional
155-354: Make customization guide more accessibleConsider enhancing the documentation with:
- A quick-start customization example
- Common customization recipes
- Visual examples of customized components
- A CodeSandbox demo for live experimentation
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~199-~199: Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ...ty If you're using theclassNamesAPI and you're trying to override some base sty...(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)
[style] ~202-~202: ‘in order for them to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ... tag in the head of your HTML document) in order for them to take precedence. ### The `classNamePre...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_ORDER_FOR_THEM_TO)
361-394: Add examples for each customizable componentThe type definitions are helpful, but consider adding:
- Visual examples of each component
- Common customization scenarios
- Component hierarchy diagram
- Default styling examples
packages/connect-react/src/components/Control.tsx (6)
16-17: Address the TODO regarding Control component overridingThe TODO comments suggest that for easier overriding of
Control*components, additional data might need to be passed in to avoid components reaching into context directly.Would you like assistance in refactoring the code to pass the necessary props to the
Control*components, or should we open a GitHub issue to track this task?
24-26: Generalize special handling of specific 'prop.type' valuesThe condition
prop.type === "$.discord.channel"hardcodes a specific property type. If other types require similar handling, consider generalizing this logic to improve maintainability.You might abstract this condition into a utility function or use a configuration object to map special property types.
36-37: Follow up on pending TODOs for component support and suspense handlingThe TODO comments suggest reviewing the registry component repository for additional support and addressing suspense-related concerns.
Do you need assistance in identifying necessary components to support or implementing suspense handling? I can help with these tasks or create a GitHub issue to ensure they are tracked.
38-41: Handle unsupported property types more gracefullyCurrently, the code throws an error when encountering property types ending with
[][]. This could abruptly break the user experience.Consider handling unsupported property types by displaying a user-friendly message or implementing a fallback UI component instead of throwing an error.
46-63: Ensure all relevant 'prop.type' cases are handledThe
switchstatement covers several property types, but there may be other types that need handling to support all use cases.Review the possible
prop.typevalues and extend theswitchstatement to handle any additional types as needed.
58-58: Correct the typo in 'autoComplet'There's a typo in the comment on line 58: it should be
autoComplete="off"instead ofautoComplet="off".Please correct the typo to improve code clarity.
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlSelect.tsx (1)
9-9: Relate generic typeTtoConfigurablePropfor type safetyThe comment
// XXX T and ConfigurableProp should be relatedindicates a potential improvement. Establishing a relationship between the generic typeTandConfigurablePropcan enhance type safety and ensure that the component behaves as expected with the form field context.Consider defining
Tto extend or be constrained byConfigurablePropor a related type.packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalComponentForm.tsx (6)
80-80: Reminder: Address the TODO comment regarding the error boundary.There's a TODO comment indicating the need to improve the error boundary handling, possibly using the default
Alertcomponent. It's important to finalize this to ensure proper error handling and a consistent user experience.Would you like assistance in refactoring this part to integrate the
Alertcomponent for better error display?
48-61: Ensure consistent form submission behavior even withoutonSubmitprop.The
_onSubmithandler prevents the default form submission only ifonSubmitis provided. This could lead to unexpected behavior whenonSubmitis not passed, as the form may attempt to submit traditionally. Consider always preventing the default behavior to maintain consistency.Apply this diff to always prevent the default submission:
const _onSubmit: FormEventHandler<HTMLFormElement> = async (e) => { - if (onSubmit) { e.preventDefault() + if (onSubmit) { if (isValid) { setSubmitting(true) try { await onSubmit(formContext) } finally { setSubmitting(false) } } } }
63-78: Refactor the loop for constructingshownPropsandoptionalProps.The current loop iterates over
configurablePropsand uses multipleifstatements which can be simplified for better readability and maintainability.Apply this diff to streamline the loop:
const shownProps: [ConfigurableProp, number][] = [] const optionalProps: [ConfigurableProp, boolean][] = [] for (let idx = 0; idx < configurableProps.length; idx++) { const prop = configurableProps[idx] - if (prop.hidden) { - continue - } - if (prop.optional) { - const enabled = optionalPropIsEnabled(prop) - optionalProps.push([prop, enabled]) - if (!enabled) { - continue - } - } - shownProps.push([prop, idx]) + if (!prop.hidden) { + if (prop.optional) { + const enabled = optionalPropIsEnabled(prop) + optionalProps.push([prop, enabled]) + if (enabled) { + shownProps.push([prop, idx]) + } + } else { + shownProps.push([prop, idx]) + } + } }
95-100: Handle state updates correctly within event handlers.In the
onClickhandler forOptionalFieldButton, you're directly using a function inside the JSX attribute. For better performance and to prevent unnecessary re-renders, consider wrapping the handler in auseCallback.Apply this diff to optimize the event handler:
+import { useCallback } from "react" // Inside the component +const handleOptionalFieldClick = useCallback( + (prop: ConfigurableProp, enabled: boolean) => { + optionalPropSetEnabled(prop, !enabled) + }, + [optionalPropSetEnabled] +) {optionalProps.map(([prop, enabled]) => ( <OptionalFieldButton key={prop.name} prop={prop} enabled={enabled} - onClick={() => optionalPropSetEnabled(prop, !enabled)} + onClick={() => handleOptionalFieldClick(prop, enabled)} /> ))}
91-91: Enhance user feedback when loading dynamic properties.Instead of displaying a plain text message, consider using a loading spinner or the customized
Alertcomponent for a more polished user experience.Apply this diff to improve the loading indicator:
{dynamicPropsQueryIsFetching && ( - <p>Loading dynamic props...</p> + <Alert + type="info" + message="Loading dynamic properties..." + /> )}
83-83: Improve the loading fallback component inSuspense.Currently, the fallback displays a simple paragraph which might not align with the overall design. Consider using a more descriptive loading indicator or a skeleton component.
Apply this diff to enhance the fallback:
<Suspense fallback={ - <p>Loading form...</p> + <div style={{ textAlign: "center" }}> + <LoadingSpinner message="Loading form..." /> + </div> }>Ensure that
LoadingSpinneris a component in your project or replace it with an appropriate loading indicator.packages/connect-react/src/components/RemoteOptionsContainer.tsx (3)
59-67: Ensure robust parsing of error messagesWhen setting the error state,
JSON.parse(errors[0])is used without validating iferrors[0]is valid JSON. If parsing fails, it falls back to a generic error message. Consider verifying the format oferrors[0]before parsing or enhancing the error handling to manage different error formats gracefully.
83-90: Simplify nested ternary operators for better readabilityThe nested ternary operators used to determine the
placeholdervalue can be hard to read and maintain. Refactor this logic usingif-elsestatements or extract it into a separate function to enhance readability.Apply this diff to refactor the placeholder assignment:
-const placeholder = error - ? error.message - : disableQueryDisabling - ? "Click to configure" - : !queryEnabled - ? "Configure props above first" - : undefined +let placeholder; +if (error) { + placeholder = error.message; +} else if (disableQueryDisabling) { + placeholder = "Click to configure"; +} else if (!queryEnabled) { + placeholder = "Configure props above first"; +} else { + placeholder = undefined; +}
102-112: Optimize event handlers withuseCallbackto prevent unnecessary re-rendersEvent handlers
onInputChangeandonMenuOpenare defined inline within theselectPropsobject. This can cause unnecessary re-renders because new function instances are created on every render. Wrap these handlers withuseCallbackto memoize them and improve performance.Example:
+import { useCallback } from "react"; ... +const handleInputChange = useCallback((v) => { + if (prop.useQuery) { + setQuery(v); + refetch(); + } +}, [prop.useQuery, setQuery, refetch]); +const handleMenuOpen = useCallback(() => { + if (disableQueryDisabling && !queryEnabled) { + refetch(); + } +}, [disableQueryDisabling, queryEnabled, refetch]); ... <selectProps={{ isLoading: isFetching, placeholder, isDisabled, inputValue: prop.useQuery ? query : undefined, - onInputChange(v) { - if (prop.useQuery) { - setQuery(v) - refetch() - } - }, - onMenuOpen() { - if (disableQueryDisabling && !queryEnabled) { - refetch() - } - }, + onInputChange: handleInputChange, + onMenuOpen: handleMenuOpen, }}packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlApp.tsx (3)
13-13: Avoid using 'any' in 'OptionProps' to enhance type safetyUsing
anyin type parameters reduces type safety and can lead to runtime errors. Consider specifying a more precise type forOptionPropsto improve type checking and maintain code robustness.
14-15: Remove commented out code for a cleaner codebaseThere are blocks of commented-out code in lines 14-15 and 18. If these are no longer needed, please remove them to maintain code clarity and cleanliness.
Also applies to: 18-18
132-132: Update state to reflect loading when connecting a new accountThe comment
// TODO unset / put in loading statesuggests that the UI should reflect a loading state when a new account connection is initiated. Implement this to enhance user experience during asynchronous operations.packages/connect-react/src/theme.ts (10)
1-4: Add missing semicolon at the end of the import statementThe import statement is missing a semicolon at the end, which is required by your ESLint configuration.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
} from "react-select" +;
6-60: Add missing semicolons in the 'Colors' type definitionProperties in the
Colorstype definition are missing semicolons at the end of each line. According to your ESLint rules, each property declaration should end with a semicolon to avoid linting errors.Apply this diff to add semicolons after each property:
primary: string +; primary75: string +; primary50: string +; // Continue adding semicolons for each property🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 12-12: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 13-13: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 15-15: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 17-17: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 20-20: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 23-23: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 29-29: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 31-31: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 34-34: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 40-40: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 42-42: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 47-47: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 49-49: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 52-52: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 53-53: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 58-58: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 59-59: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
62-67: Add missing semicolons in the 'Shadows' type definitionProperties in the
Shadowstype definition are missing semicolons at the end of each line.Apply this diff:
button: string +; input: string +; card: string +; dropdown: string +;🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 63-63: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 64-64: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 65-65: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 66-66: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
69-75: Add missing semicolons in the 'ThemeSpacing' type definitionProperties in the
ThemeSpacingtype definition are missing semicolons at the end of each line.Apply this diff:
baseUnit: number +; controlHeight: number +; menuGutter: number +;🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 70-70: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 72-72: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 74-74: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
77-82: Add missing semicolons in the 'Theme' type definitionProperties in the
Themetype definition are missing semicolons at the end of each line.Apply this diff:
borderRadius?: number | string +; colors: Partial<Colors> +; spacing: ThemeSpacing +; boxShadow: Shadows +;🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 78-78: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 79-79: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 80-80: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 81-81: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
84-90: Add missing semicolons in the 'PartialTheme' type definitionProperties in the
PartialThemetype definition are missing semicolons at the end of each line.Apply this diff:
borderRadius?: Theme["borderRadius"] +; colors?: Partial<Colors> +; spacing?: Partial<ThemeSpacing> +; boxShadow?: Partial<Shadows> +;🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 85-85: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 86-86: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 87-87: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 88-88: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 89-90: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
93-129: Add missing commas and semicolons in thedefaultThemeobjectIn the
defaultThemeobject, some properties are missing commas and semicolons, which are required according to your ESLint configuration.Ensure that you add commas between object properties and semicolons where required. Here's an example:
borderRadius: 4 +, // Add a comma colors: { primary: "#2684FF" +, // Add a comma primary75: "#4C9AFF" +, // Add commas after each property // Continue for the rest of the `colors` properties }, boxShadow: { // Similarly, add commas and semicolons where needed }
131-144: Add missing commas and semicolons in theunstyledThemeobjectSimilar to the
defaultTheme, ensure that theunstyledThemeobject's properties have the appropriate commas and semicolons.Apply this diff:
colors: {} +, // Add a comma spacing: { baseUnit: 4 +; controlHeight: 32 +; menuGutter: 8 +; } +, // Add a comma boxShadow: { button: "none" +; input: "none" +; card: "none" +; dropdown: "none" +; }
146-163: Fix formatting issues in thegetReactSelectThemefunctionThere are several formatting issues in the
getReactSelectThemefunction:
- Missing semicolons at the end of statements.
- Missing trailing commas in multiline parameter lists.
- Expected line breaks in multiline ternary expressions and object literals.
Apply this diff to address these issues:
export function getReactSelectTheme( theme: CustomThemeConfig | undefined +): ReactSelectTheme { if (!theme) return reactSelectDefaultTheme +; const _theme = typeof theme == "function" + ? theme(defaultTheme) + : theme +; const { colors, spacing, borderRadius } = mergeTheme( reactSelectDefaultTheme, _theme + ) +; return { borderRadius: typeof borderRadius !== "number" ? reactSelectDefaultTheme.borderRadius : borderRadius, colors: colors as ReactSelectTheme["colors"], spacing + } +; }🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 147-148: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
[error] 149-150: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 150-150: Expected newline between test and consequent of ternary expression.
(multiline-ternary)
[error] 150-150: Expected newline between consequent and alternate of ternary expression.
(multiline-ternary)
[error] 150-151: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 151-151: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 151-151: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 153-154: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
[error] 154-155: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 162-163: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
165-183: Fix formatting issues in themergeThemefunctionThe
mergeThemefunction has missing semicolons, and object literals need line breaks as per your ESLint rules.Apply this diff:
export function mergeTheme( target: Theme, ...sources: (PartialTheme | undefined)[] +): Theme { const merged = { borderRadius: target.borderRadius, colors: { ...target.colors }, spacing: { ...target.spacing }, boxShadow: { ...target.boxShadow } + } +; for (const source of sources) { if (!source) continue +; merged.borderRadius = source.borderRadius ?? merged.borderRadius +; Object.assign(merged.boxShadow, source.boxShadow) +; Object.assign(merged.colors, source.colors) +; Object.assign(merged.spacing, source.spacing) +; } return merged +; }🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 171-171: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 171-171: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 172-172: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 172-172: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 173-173: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 173-173: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 174-175: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 176-177: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 177-178: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 178-179: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 179-180: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 180-181: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 182-183: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/customization-context.tsx (1)
133-137: Simplify redundant type check inside 'getClassNames' functionInside the
ifblock at line 133, the type checktypeof classNames?.container == "function"is repeated unnecessarily within the ternary operator. Since we are already inside theifblock whereclassNames.containeris confirmed to be a function, you can simplify the code by removing the redundant check.Apply this diff to streamline the code:
if (typeof classNames?.container == "function") { - classNames.container = typeof classNames?.container == "function" - ? (...args) => ([classNames?.container?.(...args), baseClassName]).join(" ") - : () => baseClassName + classNames.container = (...args) => ([classNames.container(...args), baseClassName]).join(" ") }packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx (4)
11-11: Specify generic type parameter forcomponentThe
componentproperty inFormContextis typed asV1Componentwith a comment// XXX <T>. If applicable, consider specifying a generic type parameter<T>forV1Componentto improve type inference and ensure consistency across your codebase.
8-8: Resolve existing TODO and XXX commentsThere are several
TODOandXXXcomments throughout the code (e.g., lines 8, 13, 34, 89, 96, 123, 142-144, 197). Addressing these will enhance the code's completeness and readability.Would you like assistance in addressing these comments or creating GitHub issues to track them?
Also applies to: 13-13, 34-34, 89-89, 96-96, 123-123, 142-144, 197-197
33-35: Enhance the error message inuseFormContextIn
useFormContext, the thrown error message"Must be used inside provider"is generic. Consider improving it by specifying the context or provider name for clearer debugging, such as"useFormContext must be used within a FormContextProvider".
180-206: Review dependencies in theuseEffecthook to prevent unnecessary re-rendersIn the
useEffectstarting at line 180, consider whether additional dependencies should be included in the dependency array. For example, ifconfiguredPropsor other variables influence the effect's execution, adding them can prevent potential bugs and ensure the effect runs as expected.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsonpackages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/favicon.icois excluded by!**/*.icopackages/connect-react/pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yamlpnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (47)
packages/connect-react/.gitignore(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/README.md(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/.gitignore(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/Makefile(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/README.md(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/next.config.ts(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/package.json(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/actions.ts(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/layout.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/page.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/package.json(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/Alert.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ComponentForm.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ComponentFormContainer.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/Control.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlAny.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlApp.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlBoolean.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlInput.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlSelect.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlSubmit.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/Description.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ErrorBoundary.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/Errors.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/Field.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalComponentForm.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalField.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/Label.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/OptionalFieldButton.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/RemoteOptionsContainer.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/SelectApp.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/SelectComponent.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/customization-context.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-field-context.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/frontend-client-context.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-accounts.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-app.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-apps.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-component.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-components.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/polyfills.ts(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/theme.ts(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/vite.config.mts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- packages/connect-react/.gitignore
- packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/.gitignore
- packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/package.json
- packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/tsconfig.json
- packages/connect-react/package.json
- packages/connect-react/tsconfig.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
packages/connect-react/README.md
[uncategorized] ~199-~199: Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ...ty If you're using the classNames API and you're trying to override some base sty...
(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)
[style] ~202-~202: ‘in order for them to’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ... tag in the head of your HTML document) in order for them to take precedence. ### The `classNamePre...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_ORDER_FOR_THEM_TO)
[style] ~358-~358: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...er components The following list shows all of the customizable inner components used in a...
(ALL_OF_THE)
[style] ~397-~397: Consider an alternative adjective to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...omponents except each dropdown supports deeper customization of elements within `react...
(DEEP_PROFOUND)
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/README.md
5-5: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/next.config.ts
[error] 3-3: Unexpected line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 5-5: Unexpected line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/actions.ts
[error] 1-2: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 3-3: Trailing spaces not allowed.
(no-trailing-spaces)
[error] 4-4: Trailing spaces not allowed.
(no-trailing-spaces)
[error] 5-5: Trailing spaces not allowed.
(no-trailing-spaces)
[error] 5-5: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
[error] 6-7: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 14-15: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 17-18: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 21-22: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 24-25: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 26-27: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 28-29: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 31-32: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 35-36: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 39-40: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 43-44: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 53-54: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 55-55: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 59-60: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
packages/connect-react/src/index.ts
[error] 1-2: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
packages/connect-react/src/polyfills.ts
[error] 6-6: Unexpected empty method 'createElement'.
(@typescript-eslint/no-empty-function)
[error] 7-8: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
packages/connect-react/src/theme.ts
[error] 4-5: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 12-12: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 13-13: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 15-15: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 17-17: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 20-20: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 23-23: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 29-29: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 31-31: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 34-34: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 40-40: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 42-42: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 47-47: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 49-49: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 52-52: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 53-53: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 58-58: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 59-59: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 60-61: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 63-63: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 64-64: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 65-65: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 66-66: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 67-68: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 70-70: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 72-72: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 74-74: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 75-76: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 78-78: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 79-79: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 80-80: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 81-81: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 82-83: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 85-85: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 86-86: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 87-87: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 88-88: Expected a semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/member-delimiter-style)
[error] 89-90: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 91-92: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 129-130: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 144-145: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 147-148: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
[error] 149-150: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 150-150: Expected newline between test and consequent of ternary expression.
(multiline-ternary)
[error] 150-150: Expected newline between consequent and alternate of ternary expression.
(multiline-ternary)
[error] 150-151: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 151-151: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 151-151: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 153-154: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
[error] 154-155: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 162-163: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 171-171: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 171-171: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 172-172: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 172-172: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 173-173: Expected a line break after this opening brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 173-173: Expected a line break before this closing brace.
(object-curly-newline)
[error] 174-175: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 176-177: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 177-178: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 178-179: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 179-180: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 180-181: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 182-183: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlApp.tsx
[error] 52-52: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlSelect.tsx
[error] 23-23: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
packages/connect-react/src/components/ErrorBoundary.tsx
[error] 11-13: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
packages/connect-react/src/components/Errors.tsx
[error] 32-32: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.
(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/customization-context.tsx
[error] 29-29: Shouldn't redeclare 'ReactSelectComponents'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'ReactSelectComponents' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-field-context.tsx
[error] 6-6: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
🔇 Additional comments (41)
packages/connect-react/src/components/Alert.tsx (2)
1-5: LGTM! Clean type definitions and imports.
The type definitions are well-structured and follow React+TypeScript best practices.
9-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation and accessibility improvements.
The alert component needs some essential improvements:
- Missing ARIA attributes for accessibility
- No validation for alertType values
- No fallback for undefined content
Consider this implementation:
- return <p className={`pd-alert-${prop.alertType}`}>{prop.content}</p>
+ const alertType = prop.alertType || 'info'
+ return (
+ <p
+ role="alert"
+ aria-live="polite"
+ className={`pd-alert-${alertType}`}
+ >
+ {prop.content || ''}
+ </p>
+ )Let's verify the possible alert types in the SDK:
✅ Verification successful
Accessibility and validation improvements needed with validated alert types
The review suggestion is correct. From the codebase analysis, we found that:
alertTypeis strictly typed as"info" | "neutral" | "warning" | "error"inConfigurablePropAlert- The component lacks essential accessibility attributes
- No fallback handling for undefined content
- No validation for alertType despite having a defined set of valid values
The suggested implementation correctly addresses these issues by:
- Adding ARIA attributes for accessibility
- Providing 'info' as a fallback for undefined alertType
- Adding fallback for undefined content
- Improving code readability with proper formatting
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the ConfigurablePropAlert type definition to understand valid alertType values
rg -t typescript "ConfigurablePropAlert" -A 5
Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the Alert component's props type definition
rg -g "*.ts*" "interface.*Alert.*Props|type.*Alert.*Props" -A 5
# Also search for any enum or type definition related to alert types
rg -g "*.ts*" "type.*alert.*type|enum.*alert.*type" -i -A 5
# Search for actual usage of alert components to understand valid types
rg -g "*.ts*" "pd-alert-" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 2198
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's find the ConfigurablePropAlert type definition
rg -g "*.ts*" "ConfigurablePropAlert" -B 5 -A 5
# Let's also check for any CSS classes or styles related to alerts
rg -g "*.{css,scss,less}" "pd-alert-" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 2310
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-apps.tsx (2)
1-3: LGTM! Clean and well-organized imports.
The imports are properly structured, with clear separation of external dependencies and internal hooks.
9-9: Verify frontend client implementation.
Let's ensure the frontend client context is properly implemented and exported.
✅ Verification successful
Frontend client implementation is properly integrated
The frontend client context and hook are correctly implemented with:
- Context creation with proper typing (
BrowserClient) useFrontendClienthook with error handling for usage outside providerFrontendClientProvidercomponent that properly wraps children with both query client and frontend client context- Example shows correct provider usage with client initialization
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for proper implementation of frontend client context
# Expected: Find the context provider and related implementations
# Check for frontend client context implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'export const FrontendClientContext = createContext' || \
rg -A 5 'export const FrontendClientContext = createContext'
# Check for provider usage
rg -l 'FrontendClientProvider'
Length of output: 254
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation details of the frontend client context and hook
cat packages/connect-react/src/hooks/frontend-client-context.tsx
# Also check the usage in the example to verify proper integration
cat packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/page.tsx
# Check for useFrontendClient hook implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'export function useFrontendClient'
Length of output: 2126
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-components.tsx (1)
1-3: LGTM! Imports are clean and well-organized.
The imports are properly structured with types separated, and all imports are utilized in the implementation.
packages/connect-react/src/components/ErrorBoundary.tsx (1)
19-25: LGTM! Clean and correct implementation of the render logic.
The render method correctly implements the error boundary pattern by conditionally rendering either the fallback UI or children based on the error state.
packages/connect-react/vite.config.mts (1)
8-16: Consider adding hash to output filename for production builds
The current filename pattern doesn't include a hash, which might cause caching issues in production. Consider adding a hash for better cache control.
- fileName: (format) => `connect-react.${format}.js`,
+ fileName: (format) => `connect-react.${format}.[hash].js`,Let's verify the entry point exists:
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-app.tsx (2)
1-3: LGTM! Clean and well-organized imports.
The imports are properly structured with explicit type imports for better tree-shaking.
1-20: Verify consistency with other hooks in the codebase.
Let's ensure this implementation aligns with other hooks in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify the consistency with other hooks, particularly focusing on similar query-based hooks.
Implementation is consistent with other hooks in the codebase
The hook follows the established patterns in the codebase:
- Uses the same structure as other query-based hooks (
useComponent,useApps) - Follows consistent return pattern of spreading query and exposing data via
query.data?.data - Properly handles query options through similar parameter structure
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar hook implementations
echo "Searching for similar hooks..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export const use$_: $_ = ($$$) => {
const client = useFrontendClient()
$$$
}'
# Search for usages of useApp
echo "Searching for usages of useApp..."
rg "useApp\(" -A 3
Length of output: 672
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar react-query based hooks
echo "Searching for similar react-query hooks..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export const use$_ = ($$$) => {
$$$
const query = useQuery({
$$$
})
$$$
}'
# Search for other hooks that return data property
echo "Searching for hooks with similar return patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'return {
...query,
$_: query.data?.data,
}'
Length of output: 1166
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-component.tsx (1)
12-12: Verify frontend client integration and hook usage.
Let's verify the integration with the frontend client and the usage of this hook in components.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
Frontend client integration is properly implemented
The useComponent hook is correctly integrated with the frontend client through the React Context API. The implementation shows:
- Proper usage of
useFrontendClienthook from a well-structured context - Integration with react-query for data fetching
- Correct typing with
ComponentRequestResponsefrom@pipedream/sdk - Proper error handling for missing context
- The hook is documented and used across multiple components in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify frontend client implementation and hook usage
# Check frontend client implementation
echo "Checking frontend client implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
component(params: { key: string }): Promise<$_>;
}'
# Check hook usage in components
echo "Checking hook usage..."
rg -l "useComponent" --type tsx
Length of output: 300
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the frontend client implementation and hook usage
# Check frontend client interface and implementation
echo "Checking frontend client interface..."
rg -A 5 "interface.*Client"
# Check component method in any class or interface
echo "Checking component method..."
ast-grep --pattern 'component($$$): $_'
# Check hook usage without file type restriction
echo "Checking hook usage..."
rg -l "useComponent"
Length of output: 558
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the implementation details
# Check the content of use-component.tsx
echo "Checking use-component.tsx implementation..."
cat packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-component.tsx
# Check the frontend client usage
echo "Checking frontend client type and usage..."
rg -A 5 "useFrontendClient"
# Check README for documentation
echo "Checking documentation..."
cat packages/connect-react/README.md
Length of output: 22231
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the frontend client context and interface
# Check frontend client context implementation
echo "Checking frontend client context..."
cat packages/connect-react/src/hooks/frontend-client-context.tsx
# Check for component method in SDK types
echo "Checking SDK types for component method..."
rg -A 5 "interface.*Client.*{"
Length of output: 1428
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlBoolean.tsx (2)
1-5: LGTM! Well-organized imports.
The imports are properly structured with clear separation between external dependencies and internal hooks.
1-17: Verify integration with the form system.
Let's ensure this component is properly integrated with the form system and customization hooks.
✅ Verification successful
Component is properly integrated with the form system
The verification shows that:
- The
ControlBooleancomponent is correctly integrated into the form system, being used alongside other form controls (ControlInput, ControlSelect, etc.) - It properly uses the
useFormFieldContexthook with the correct typeConfigurablePropBoolean - It's the only component implementing a checkbox control, maintaining consistency
- The component is properly exported and imported where needed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check how ControlBoolean is imported and used
rg -l "ControlBoolean" --type ts --type tsx
# Check for other boolean control implementations to ensure consistency
ast-grep --pattern 'type="checkbox"'
# Look for form field context usage patterns
rg "useFormFieldContext.*ConfigurablePropBoolean" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 211
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check how ControlBoolean is imported and used, using just typescript extension
rg -l "ControlBoolean" --type ts
# Check for form field context usage patterns
rg "useFormFieldContext" --type ts
# Look for checkbox implementations
rg 'type="checkbox"' --type ts
# Check for files with .tsx extension
fd -e tsx
# Look for form field context in tsx files
fd -e tsx -x rg "useFormFieldContext" {}
Length of output: 5090
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-accounts.tsx (1)
17-28: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance query configuration and error handling
The implementation could benefit from more robust error handling and query configuration.
Consider these improvements:
const client = useFrontendClient();
const query = useQuery<AccountsRequestResponse>({
...opts?.useQueryOpts,
- queryKey: ["accounts", input],
+ queryKey: ["pipedream", "accounts", input],
queryFn: () => client.getAccounts(input),
+ retry: (failureCount, error) => {
+ // Retry only for network errors, not for 4xx responses
+ return failureCount < 3 && error.status >= 500;
+ },
+ staleTime: 5 * 60 * 1000, // Consider data stale after 5 minutes
});
return {
...query,
accounts: query.data?.data || [],
+ error: query.error as PipedreamApiError | null,
};Additionally, verify that the frontend client is properly initialized.
✅ Verification successful
Suggested improvements can be simplified
The frontend client is properly initialized with error handling and the QueryClient already has sensible defaults configured at the provider level. The review suggestions can be simplified:
const client = useFrontendClient();
const query = useQuery<AccountsRequestResponse>({
...opts?.useQueryOpts,
- queryKey: ["accounts", input],
+ queryKey: ["pipedream", "accounts", input],
queryFn: () => client.getAccounts(input),
});
return {
...query,
accounts: query.data?.data || [],
+ error: query.error as PipedreamApiError | null,
};- The staleTime is already set globally to 1 hour in the QueryClientProvider
- The retry logic can be handled via useQueryOpts if needed for specific cases
- The queryKey namespace addition is a good practice to prevent collisions
- Adding typed error is beneficial for better error handling
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the frontend client is properly initialized with error handling
ast-grep --pattern 'export const useFrontendClient = () => {
$$$
if ($condition) {
throw new Error($message)
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 131
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the useFrontendClient implementation
rg "useFrontendClient" -A 10
Length of output: 14706
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the frontend-client-context implementation and error handling
cat packages/connect-react/src/hooks/frontend-client-context.tsx
Length of output: 1115
packages/connect-react/src/components/ComponentForm.tsx (1)
1-7: LGTM! Well-organized imports.
The imports are properly structured with clear separation between internal and external dependencies.
packages/connect-react/src/components/Label.tsx (2)
1-6: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and properly typed.
The imports are correctly scoped and provide all necessary types and hooks for the component.
19-19: Verify color token usage.
The color token neutral90 is being used. Please verify that this token is properly defined in the theme system.
✅ Verification successful
Color token neutral90 is properly defined in the theme system
The color token is correctly defined in packages/connect-react/src/theme.ts as neutral90: "hsl(0, 0%, 10%)" and is part of the theme's color system. The usage in Label.tsx is consistent with the theme implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for theme color token definitions
rg -t typescript -t javascript "neutral90" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 87
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for theme color token definitions using ripgrep without file type restrictions
rg "neutral90" -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 1536
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for theme-related files
fd "theme" --type f
Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for color-related files
fd "color" --type f
Length of output: 167
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlAny.tsx (1)
9-15: LGTM! Base styles are well-structured.
The styles are properly typed and utilize the theme system for consistency.
packages/connect-react/src/components/ComponentFormContainer.tsx (2)
1-3: LGTM! Clean imports and type definitions.
The imports are well-organized and the types are properly defined using TypeScript features.
34-35: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Address TODO comment and potential prop collision.
Two issues to address:
- The TODO comment should be tracked in an issue
- The prop spreading could lead to prop collision since
componentis included in both the spread and explicitly passed
Let's verify the potential prop collision:
Suggested fix for prop spreading:
- return <ComponentForm component={component} {...props} />
+ const { componentKey, ...restProps } = props
+ return <ComponentForm component={component} {...restProps} />packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlSubmit.tsx (2)
1-7: LGTM! Clean imports and well-defined props type.
The imports are well-organized and the props type is properly defined with TypeScript.
1-31: Verify form context integration.
Let's verify the form context integration and usage patterns:
✅ Verification successful
Form context integration is properly implemented
The verification confirms:
- The
FormContexttype is well-defined with all necessary properties includingsubmittingstate used byControlSubmit ControlSubmitis correctly used withinInternalComponentFormwith proper form context passing- The component is properly exported and integrated with the customization system
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check FormContext type definition and usage
echo "Checking FormContext type definition:"
ast-grep --pattern 'type FormContext = {
$$$
}'
echo "\nChecking ControlSubmit usage patterns:"
rg -A 5 "ControlSubmit"
Length of output: 6153
packages/connect-react/src/components/Errors.tsx (1)
1-12: LGTM! Well-structured imports and type definitions.
The type definitions and imports are clear, well-organized, and provide proper type safety through generic constraints.
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/frontend-client-context.tsx (2)
9-17: LGTM! Well-implemented hook with proper error handling
The hook follows React best practices with clear error messaging and proper type safety.
1-41: Verify provider usage across the application
Let's ensure the provider is properly implemented at the application root and that all hook usages are within its scope.
✅ Verification successful
Provider and hook usage verified successfully
The verification shows proper implementation:
FrontendClientProvideris correctly used in example code and documented in README.mduseFrontendClienthook is properly used within multiple components and hooks, all within the same package- All hook usages follow the pattern of obtaining the client instance, indicating correct scoping
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for FrontendClientProvider usage
echo "Checking FrontendClientProvider implementation:"
rg -A 5 "FrontendClientProvider" --type tsx --type jsx
# Search for useFrontendClient hook usage
echo "\nChecking useFrontendClient usage:"
rg "useFrontendClient" --type tsx --type jsx
Length of output: 341
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for FrontendClientProvider usage without file type restrictions
echo "Checking FrontendClientProvider implementation:"
rg -A 5 "FrontendClientProvider"
# Search for useFrontendClient hook usage
echo -e "\nChecking useFrontendClient usage:"
rg "useFrontendClient"
Length of output: 6910
packages/connect-react/src/components/SelectComponent.tsx (1)
1-3: LGTM! Clean and well-organized imports.
The imports are properly structured with clear separation between external packages and internal modules.
packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalField.tsx (3)
1-10: LGTM! Well-structured imports and type definition.
The imports are well-organized and the type definition is properly constrained with ConfigurableProp.
42-46: LGTM! Clean component structure.
The component follows React best practices with proper context usage and clean rendering structure.
12-47: Verify component usage patterns.
As this is a new component, let's verify how it's being used across the codebase to ensure consistent implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that the InternalField component is used internally by InternalComponentForm and is properly exported through the package's index file. The component follows a consistent pattern with other form-related components in the codebase, using the shared form context and field context.
Component usage pattern is consistent and properly integrated
The component is:
- Used internally by
InternalComponentFormfor rendering form fields - Properly integrated with the form context system
- Follows the same pattern as other form field components
- Correctly exported through the package's public API
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for InternalField usage patterns
echo "Searching for InternalField usage patterns..."
rg -A 3 "InternalField" --type typescript --type tsx
# Search for FormFieldContext usage to understand the context requirements
echo "Checking FormFieldContext usage..."
rg -A 3 "FormFieldContext" --type typescript --type tsx
Length of output: 358
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for InternalField usage patterns without file type filters
echo "Searching for InternalField usage patterns..."
rg -A 3 "InternalField"
# Search for FormFieldContext usage
echo "Checking FormFieldContext usage..."
rg -A 3 "FormFieldContext"
# Find all TypeScript/TSX files that might use these components
echo "Finding TypeScript files..."
fd "\.(tsx?|jsx?)$"
Length of output: 70074
packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/actions.ts (3)
1-14: LGTM! Clean imports and environment setup.
Good practice separating the type import. The "use server" directive is correctly placed at the top of the file.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 1-2: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 3-3: Trailing spaces not allowed.
(no-trailing-spaces)
[error] 4-4: Trailing spaces not allowed.
(no-trailing-spaces)
[error] 5-5: Trailing spaces not allowed.
(no-trailing-spaces)
[error] 5-5: Missing trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
[error] 6-7: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
24-32: LGTM! Robust JSON parsing validation.
Good error handling for JSON parsing and array type validation of PIPEDREAM_ALLOWED_ORIGINS.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 24-25: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 26-27: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 28-29: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
[error] 31-32: Missing semicolon.
(@typescript-eslint/semi)
46-53: LGTM! Secure client initialization.
The client is properly initialized with validated credentials. The environment type is correctly enforced.
Let's verify the environment type usage:
✅ Verification successful
✓ Client initialization is properly typed and secure
The verification confirms that:
ProjectEnvironmenttype is correctly imported from "@pipedream/sdk/server"- The type is properly used in client initialization with NODE_ENV casting
- The type definition in sdk package ensures environment is restricted to "development" | "production"
- All required environment variables are validated before client initialization
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if ProjectEnvironment type is properly used elsewhere
ast-grep --pattern 'type ProjectEnvironment = $_'
Length of output: 150
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the ProjectEnvironment type is correctly imported and used in the client initialization file
rg -l "ProjectEnvironment" packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/actions.ts
# Check the import statement for ProjectEnvironment
rg "import.*ProjectEnvironment" packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/actions.ts
Length of output: 234
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the entire content of the actions.ts file to see the import statement and usage
cat packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/actions.ts
Length of output: 1448
packages/connect-react/src/components/Description.tsx (1)
1-12: LGTM! Clean imports and well-defined types.
The imports are appropriate and the DescriptionProps type definition is clear with proper generic constraints.
packages/connect-react/src/components/SelectApp.tsx (1)
43-43: Address the initial value fetching TODO.
The comment indicates that the initial value might not have the complete app data, potentially showing only the slug instead of the full name.
Would you like me to help implement the initial value fetching logic?
✅ Verification successful
TODO comment can be safely removed as the component already handles both name and name_slug
The component's getOptionLabel implementation already handles both cases by using the || operator: (o) => o.name || o.name_slug. This means it will show the name if available, falling back to name_slug if name is undefined. The TODO comment appears to be outdated as the functionality is already implemented.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if useApps hook handles initial value fetching
ast-grep --pattern 'export function useApps($_) {
$$$
// Check for initial value loading
$$$
}'
Length of output: 103
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for the useApps hook implementation and its usage
ast-grep --pattern 'export function useApps'
# Also check for any SelectApp component implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'export function SelectApp'
# Look for related files
fd -e ts -e tsx select.*app -i
Length of output: 224
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the SelectApp component implementation
cat packages/connect-react/src/components/SelectApp.tsx
# Also check for any app fetching logic in the same directory
rg -l "getApp" packages/connect-react/src/
Length of output: 1677
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the useApps hook implementation
cat packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-apps.ts
# Also check for any app-related types or interfaces
rg -A 5 "interface AppResponse" packages/connect-react/src/
Length of output: 189
packages/connect-react/src/index.ts (2)
17-18: Review necessity of exposing internal components
Components prefixed with "Internal" (InternalComponentForm, InternalField) suggest they're meant for internal use. Consider:
- Moving these to a separate internal entry point
- Or removing the "Internal" prefix if they're meant to be part of the public API
24-33: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider explicit exports instead of wildcards
Using export * can lead to:
- Unintended exposure of internal utilities
- Reduced tree-shaking effectiveness
- Less clear API surface
Consider replacing wildcard exports with explicit exports:
-export * from "./theme";
+export {
+ defaultTheme,
+ ThemeProvider,
+ // ... other theme exports
+} from "./theme";
-export * from "./hooks/customization-context";
+export {
+ useCustomization,
+ CustomizationProvider,
+ // ... other hook exports
+} from "./hooks/customization-context";
// ... similar changes for other hook exportspackages/connect-react/src/components/ControlInput.tsx (1)
1-8: LGTM! Clean component setup with proper TypeScript usage.
The component follows React best practices with proper hook usage and type safety.
packages/connect-react/src/components/Field.tsx (2)
1-11: LGTM: Clean imports and type definitions
The imports and type definitions are well-structured and appropriate for the component's requirements.
20-62: Verify Field component integration with form system
Let's verify how this component is being used across the codebase to ensure consistent integration.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search strategy to verify the Field component integration.
Let me check one more aspect to verify the complete integration pattern.
Field component is properly integrated with form system
The Field component is correctly integrated within the form system through a well-structured context hierarchy:
- InternalField wraps Field with FormFieldContext.Provider
- Field receives form and field props consistently
- Proper type safety is maintained through generics
- Form state management and change handlers are properly connected
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Field component usage patterns
echo "Searching for Field component usage..."
rg -t tsx -t jsx "Field[^a-zA-Z]" ./packages/connect-react/
# Check for potential form integration patterns
echo "Checking form integration patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'form={$_}' ./packages/connect-react/
Length of output: 320
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Field component usage with ripgrep
echo "Searching for Field component usage..."
rg "import.*Field" ./packages/connect-react/
rg "<Field" ./packages/connect-react/
# Check for form-related components and contexts
echo -e "\nChecking form-related patterns..."
rg "useForm|FormProvider|FormContext" ./packages/connect-react/
Length of output: 7298
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the form field context implementation
echo "Checking form field context implementation..."
cat ./packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-field-context.tsx
# Check InternalField implementation
echo -e "\nChecking InternalField implementation..."
cat ./packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalField.tsx
Length of output: 2512
packages/connect-react/README.md (1)
430-430: Verify documentation links and references
Let's verify the documentation references and links.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate another verification script to check the hooks directory and its contents more thoroughly:
Documentation link is valid and accurate
The referenced hooks directory exists at packages/connect-react/src/hooks/ and contains multiple hook files including:
- use-accounts.tsx
- use-apps.tsx
- use-components.tsx
- use-app.tsx
- use-component.tsx
And several context hooks.
The documentation link See [hooks](./src/hooks) folder for details. correctly points to this directory relative to the README location.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify documentation links and references
# Check if the hooks directory exists
if [ ! -d "./src/hooks" ]; then
echo "Warning: Referenced hooks directory './src/hooks' not found"
fi
# Check if referenced components exist in the codebase
echo "Checking for referenced components..."
for component in "ComponentForm" "ControlApp" "ControlAny" "ControlBoolean" "ControlInput" "ControlSubmit" "Description" "Errors" "Field" "Label" "OptionalFieldButton"; do
rg -l "export.*${component}"
done
# Verify external links
echo "Checking external links in README..."
rg -o 'https?://[^\s\)]+'
Length of output: 106337
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for hooks directory and its contents in the repository
echo "Searching for hooks directory..."
fd hooks packages/connect-react/src
# Check if there are any hook files in the codebase
echo -e "\nSearching for hook files..."
rg -l "^(export )?((function )|(const ))?use[A-Z]" packages/connect-react/src
# Check for any references to hooks in the codebase
echo -e "\nSearching for hook references..."
rg -l "use[A-Z]\w+" packages/connect-react/src
Length of output: 2366
packages/connect-react/src/components/Control.tsx (1)
42-44: Verify that 'ControlSelect' handles array properties correctly
When the property type ends with [], ControlSelect is rendered with isCreatable={true} and an empty options array.
Please confirm that ControlSelect properly handles creatable options with an empty options array. If not, consider providing default options or adjusting the component's logic.
packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalComponentForm.tsx (1)
85-90: Verify the uniqueness of prop.name when using it as a key in lists.
Using prop.name as the key prop in lists assumes that each prop.name is unique. If there's a possibility of duplicate names, this could lead to rendering issues in React. Ensure that prop.name is unique across all configurableProps. If not, consider using a combination of prop.name and idx or another unique identifier.
Run the following script to check for duplicate prop.name values:
✅ Verification successful
Using prop.name as key is safe in this implementation
The code shows that shownProps is derived from configurableProps array by filtering and maintaining the original array index. Each prop is processed sequentially and can only appear once in the shownProps array. The prop.name is inherently unique in this context because:
- Each prop comes from a different index in the source array
- Props are filtered but never duplicated in the process
- The mapping operation preserves the one-to-one relationship
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for duplicate prop names in `configurableProps`.
# Test: List all prop names and count occurrences.
# Expect: Each name should appear only once.
ast-grep --pattern '$F(configurableProps)' --json | jq '.[] | .prop.name' | sort | uniq -c | awk '$1 > 1'
Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the definition and usage of configurableProps
# First, let's find where configurableProps is defined or used
rg -l "configurableProps" --type typescript
# Then, let's examine the actual code structure
ast-grep --pattern 'const configurableProps = $_'
Length of output: 130
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's also check the InternalComponentForm component to understand the data structure
rg -A 10 "InternalComponentForm" --type typescript
Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look for prop.name usage in the codebase
ast-grep --pattern '$_.name' --type typescript
Length of output: 228
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without type specification and look for the files first
rg -l "configurableProps"
# Then look for the component definition
rg -A 10 "InternalComponentForm"
# And check for prop.name usage
ast-grep --pattern 'prop.name'
Length of output: 7764
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine how configurableProps is structured and populated
rg -B 5 -A 10 "configurableProps =" packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalComponentForm.tsx
# Also check how shownProps is derived
rg -B 5 -A 10 "shownProps" packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalComponentForm.tsx
Length of output: 1638
| dev: | ||
| cd .. && pnpm i && pnpm run build | ||
| npm i | ||
| node_modules/.bin/next dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix critical issues with package manager consistency and directory navigation
There are several issues that need to be addressed:
- The Makefile mixes
pnpmandnpmpackage managers, which can lead to dependency conflicts and inconsistent lock files. - The
cd ..command changes directory but never returns, causing subsequent commands to run in the wrong directory.
Apply this diff to fix these issues:
dev:
- cd .. && pnpm i && pnpm run build
- npm i
- node_modules/.bin/next dev
+ cd .. && pnpm i && pnpm run build && cd -
+ pnpm i
+ pnpm exec next dev📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| dev: | |
| cd .. && pnpm i && pnpm run build | |
| npm i | |
| node_modules/.bin/next dev | |
| dev: | |
| cd .. && pnpm i && pnpm run build && cd - | |
| pnpm i | |
| pnpm exec next dev |
💡 Codebase verification
Development setup process needs improvement
The development setup in the Makefile has potential issues:
- The
devscript in package.json correctly points tomake dev, but the Makefile's implementation may cause unnecessary reinstalls and builds - Running
pnpm i && pnpm run buildin parent directory on every dev start is inefficient - The direct use of
node_modules/.bin/next devis unnecessary when next.js is properly configured in dependencies
Suggested improvements:
- Remove the parent directory build step from dev command unless there's a specific reason for rebuilding on every dev start
- Use
next devdirectly since it's available in node_modules/.bin through npm scripts - Consider adding a one-time setup command for initial installation and build
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the development setup process
Let's verify that the development setup process is documented correctly in the README and matches the package.json scripts.
Let me verify the package dependencies and build process to ensure everything is properly configured.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the development setup process is documented consistently
# Check if README.md exists and contains setup instructions
echo "Checking README.md for setup instructions..."
rg -i "make dev|npm run dev|pnpm dev" "packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/README.md"
# Check if package.json has corresponding scripts
echo "Checking package.json for dev script..."
cat "packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/package.json" | jq '.scripts.dev'
Length of output: 363
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json dependencies and devDependencies
echo "Checking package dependencies..."
cat "packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/package.json" | jq '{dependencies, devDependencies}'
# Check if next.js is properly configured
echo "Checking next.js configuration..."
fd "next.config" packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs
# Check if the parent directory's package.json exists and has build script
echo "Checking parent directory's package.json..."
cat "packages/connect-react/package.json" | jq '.scripts.build'
Length of output: 887
| const query = useQuery({ | ||
| queryKey: ["components", input], | ||
| queryFn: () => client.components(input), | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add essential query configurations for better performance and error handling.
The query configuration should include staleTime, error typing, and retry configuration for production readiness.
const query = useQuery({
queryKey: ["components", input],
queryFn: () => client.components(input),
+ staleTime: 5 * 60 * 1000, // 5 minutes
+ retry: (failureCount, error) => {
+ return failureCount < 3 && !isUserError(error)
+ }
})Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| constructor(props: Props) { | ||
| super(props) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unnecessary constructor.
The constructor only calls super(props) without any additional initialization, making it redundant.
- constructor(props: Props) {
- super(props)
- }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| constructor(props: Props) { | |
| super(props) | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 11-13: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
| plugins: [ | ||
| dts({ | ||
| insertTypesEntry: true, | ||
| rollupTypes: true, | ||
| }), | ||
| ], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
TypeScript configuration needs adjustment
The current setup has several issues that need to be addressed:
- The
typesfield in package.json points to./dist/connect-react.umd.d.ts, but this file doesn't exist - The
tsconfig.jsonhas"noEmit": truewhich conflicts with type declaration generation - The
distdirectory doesn't exist or contain any type declaration files
Recommended changes:
- Remove
"noEmit": truefrom tsconfig.json to allow type declaration generation - Update the
typesfield in package.json to point to the correct declaration file (should be./dist/index.d.tsbased on standard conventions) - Add
"declaration": trueto tsconfig.json's compiler options
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify TypeScript configuration and package.json setup
The DTS plugin configuration looks good, but ensure that:
- The package.json includes the correct
typesfield pointing to the generated declarations - Consider adding
tsconfig.jsonvalidation to the DTS plugin
Let's verify the package.json configuration:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json for types field and tsconfig.json existence
if [ -f "packages/connect-react/package.json" ]; then
echo "Package.json types field:"
jq '.types' "packages/connect-react/package.json"
fi
if [ -f "packages/connect-react/tsconfig.json" ]; then
echo "tsconfig.json exists"
else
echo "tsconfig.json not found"
fi
Length of output: 290
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the tsconfig.json content and the actual generated types location
echo "TSConfig content:"
cat packages/connect-react/tsconfig.json
echo -e "\nChecking if the types file exists at the specified location:"
if [ -f "packages/connect-react/dist/connect-react.umd.d.ts" ]; then
echo "Types file exists at the specified location"
else
echo "Types file not found at the specified location"
fi
# Let's also check if there are any other .d.ts files in dist
echo -e "\nAll .d.ts files in dist:"
fd -e d.ts . packages/connect-react/dist
Length of output: 861
| queryKey: ["component", key], | ||
| queryFn: () => client.component({ key: key! }), | ||
| enabled: !!key, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace non-null assertion with proper type guard.
The non-null assertion (!) in queryFn bypasses TypeScript's type checking. Consider adding proper type validation.
-queryFn: () => client.component({ key: key! }),
+queryFn: () => {
+ if (!key) throw new Error("Component key is required");
+ return client.component({ key });
+},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| queryKey: ["component", key], | |
| queryFn: () => client.component({ key: key! }), | |
| enabled: !!key, | |
| queryKey: ["component", key], | |
| queryFn: () => { | |
| if (!key) throw new Error("Component key is required"); | |
| return client.component({ key }); | |
| }, | |
| enabled: !!key, |
| const oauthAppId = undefined // XXX allow customizing | ||
| const { | ||
| isLoading: isLoadingAccounts, | ||
| // TODO error |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Handle errors when fetching accounts
There's a // TODO error comment indicating that error handling is needed when fetching accounts. Implement proper error handling to improve robustness and user experience.
| onError: () => { | ||
| // TODO | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement error handling in the 'onError' callback
The onError callback in startConnectAccount is currently empty. Proper error handling is crucial for debugging and user feedback. Please implement error handling within this callback.
Consider the following addition:
onError: (error) => {
- // TODO
+ console.error('Error connecting account:', error)
+ // Optionally, display an error message to the user
},Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| OptionalFieldButton, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| export type ReactSelectComponents = { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Rename 'ReactSelectComponents' to avoid redeclaration and naming conflicts
The type name ReactSelectComponents is already used when importing components from "react-select" at line 3. Redeclaring it here may lead to confusion or conflicts. It's advisable to rename your custom type to avoid this issue.
Apply this diff to rename the type:
-export type ReactSelectComponents = {
+export type CustomReactSelectComponents = {
controlAppSelect: typeof ControlApp
controlSelect: typeof ControlSelect
}Also, update all references to this type throughout the file accordingly.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export type ReactSelectComponents = { | |
| export type CustomReactSelectComponents = { |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 29-29: Shouldn't redeclare 'ReactSelectComponents'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'ReactSelectComponents' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
| export type FormContext = { | ||
| component: V1Component // XXX <T> | ||
| configurableProps: any[] // dynamicProps.configurable_props || props.component.configurable_props | ||
| configuredProps: Record<string, any> // TODO |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Provide specific types instead of using any
In the FormContext type definition, properties like configurableProps and configuredProps are currently typed as any[] and Record<string, any>. To enhance type safety and maintainability, consider using more specific types based on the expected structure of these properties.
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| if (prop.type === "integer" && typeof value !== "number") { | ||
| newConfiguredProps[prop.name] = undefined // XXX check this deletes |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use the delete operator to remove properties from an object
At line 197, setting newConfiguredProps[prop.name] = undefined may not remove the property from the object as intended. Use the delete operator to properly remove the property:
- newConfiguredProps[prop.name] = undefined // XXX check this deletes
+ delete newConfiguredProps[prop.name]This ensures that the property is fully removed rather than set to undefined.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| newConfiguredProps[prop.name] = undefined // XXX check this deletes | |
| delete newConfiguredProps[prop.name] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
packages/connect-react/src/theme.ts (4)
77-82: Add JSDoc documentation for Theme and PartialTheme types.These types are crucial interfaces for the theming system. Adding comprehensive documentation would help users understand:
- The purpose of each property
- Which properties are required vs optional
- Valid value ranges (especially for borderRadius)
Add documentation like this:
+/** + * Represents the complete theme configuration. + * @property borderRadius - Border radius in pixels or CSS units. Use number for pixels or string for other units. + * @property colors - Color palette configuration + * @property spacing - Layout spacing configuration + * @property boxShadow - Shadow styles for different components + */ export type Theme = { borderRadius?: number | string; colors: Partial<Colors>; spacing: ThemeSpacing; boxShadow: Shadows; }; +/** + * Allows partial override of theme properties. + * All properties are optional and will be merged with the default theme. + */ export type PartialTheme = { borderRadius?: Theme["borderRadius"]; colors?: Partial<Colors>; spacing?: Partial<ThemeSpacing>; boxShadow?: Partial<Shadows>; };Also applies to: 84-89
116-123: Consider extracting shadow values as constants.The shadow values are currently hardcoded. Consider extracting them into named constants for better maintainability and reuse.
+const SHADOWS = { + BUTTON: "rgba(0, 0, 0, 0) 0px 0px 0px 0px, rgba(0, 0, 0, 0) 0px 0px 0px 0px, rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1) 0px 1px 3px 0px, rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1) 0px 1px 2px -1px", + CARD: "0 1px 3px 0 rgb(0 0 0 / 0.1), 0 1px 2px -1px rgb(0 0 0 / 0.1)", + DROPDOWN: "0 4px 6px -1px rgb(0 0 0 / 0.1), 0 2px 4px -2px rgb(0 0 0 / 0.1)", + INPUT: "0 1px 2px 0 rgb(0 0 0 / 0.05)", +} as const; boxShadow: { - button: "rgba(0, 0, 0, 0) 0px 0px 0px 0px, rgba(0, 0, 0, 0) 0px 0px 0px 0px, rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1) 0px 1px 3px 0px, rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1) 0px 1px 2px -1px", - card: "0 1px 3px 0 rgb(0 0 0 / 0.1), 0 1px 2px -1px rgb(0 0 0 / 0.1)", - dropdown: "0 4px 6px -1px rgb(0 0 0 / 0.1), 0 2px 4px -2px rgb(0 0 0 / 0.1)", - input: "0 1px 2px 0 rgb(0 0 0 / 0.05)", + button: SHADOWS.BUTTON, + card: SHADOWS.CARD, + dropdown: SHADOWS.DROPDOWN, + input: SHADOWS.INPUT, },
104-114: Consider using hex colors consistently.The neutral colors use HSL format while other colors use hex. Consider converting to hex for consistency.
- neutral0: "hsl(0, 0%, 100%)", - neutral5: "hsl(0, 0%, 95%)", - neutral10: "hsl(0, 0%, 90%)", - neutral20: "hsl(0, 0%, 80%)", - neutral30: "hsl(0, 0%, 70%)", - neutral40: "hsl(0, 0%, 60%)", - neutral50: "hsl(0, 0%, 50%)", - neutral60: "hsl(0, 0%, 40%)", - neutral70: "hsl(0, 0%, 30%)", - neutral80: "hsl(0, 0%, 20%)", - neutral90: "hsl(0, 0%, 10%)", + neutral0: "#FFFFFF", + neutral5: "#F2F2F2", + neutral10: "#E6E6E6", + neutral20: "#CCCCCC", + neutral30: "#B3B3B3", + neutral40: "#999999", + neutral50: "#808080", + neutral60: "#666666", + neutral70: "#4D4D4D", + neutral80: "#333333", + neutral90: "#1A1A1A",
169-193: Consider enhancing mergeTheme implementation.The current implementation has a few areas for improvement:
- Object.assign could be replaced with spread operator for better readability
- Type validation could be added for borderRadius
export function mergeTheme( target: Theme, ...sources: (PartialTheme | undefined)[] ): Theme { + // Validate borderRadius type + if (target.borderRadius && typeof target.borderRadius !== 'number' && typeof target.borderRadius !== 'string') { + throw new Error('borderRadius must be a number or string'); + } + const merged = { borderRadius: target.borderRadius, - colors: { - ...target.colors, - }, - spacing: { - ...target.spacing, - }, - boxShadow: { - ...target.boxShadow, - }, + colors: { ...target.colors }, + spacing: { ...target.spacing }, + boxShadow: { ...target.boxShadow }, }; for (const source of sources) { if (!source) continue; + if (source.borderRadius && typeof source.borderRadius !== 'number' && typeof source.borderRadius !== 'string') { + throw new Error('borderRadius must be a number or string'); + } merged.borderRadius = source.borderRadius ?? merged.borderRadius; - Object.assign(merged.boxShadow, source.boxShadow); - Object.assign(merged.colors, source.colors); - Object.assign(merged.spacing, source.spacing); + merged.boxShadow = { ...merged.boxShadow, ...source.boxShadow }; + merged.colors = { ...merged.colors, ...source.colors }; + merged.spacing = { ...merged.spacing, ...source.spacing }; } return merged; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
packages/connect-react/.eslintignore(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/next.config.ts(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/actions.ts(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/polyfills.ts(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/theme.ts(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/vite.config.mts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/connect-react/.eslintignore
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/next.config.ts
- packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/actions.ts
- packages/connect-react/src/index.ts
- packages/connect-react/src/polyfills.ts
- packages/connect-react/vite.config.mts
| export function getReactSelectTheme( | ||
| theme: CustomThemeConfig | undefined, | ||
| ): ReactSelectTheme { | ||
| if (!theme) return reactSelectDefaultTheme; | ||
| const _theme = typeof theme == "function" | ||
| ? theme(defaultTheme) | ||
| : theme; | ||
| const { | ||
| colors, spacing, borderRadius, | ||
| } = mergeTheme( | ||
| reactSelectDefaultTheme, | ||
| _theme, | ||
| ); | ||
| return { | ||
| borderRadius: | ||
| typeof borderRadius !== "number" | ||
| ? reactSelectDefaultTheme.borderRadius | ||
| : borderRadius, | ||
| colors: colors as ReactSelectTheme["colors"], | ||
| spacing, | ||
| }; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for invalid theme functions.
The getReactSelectTheme function should handle potential errors from custom theme functions.
export function getReactSelectTheme(
theme: CustomThemeConfig | undefined,
): ReactSelectTheme {
if (!theme) return reactSelectDefaultTheme;
- const _theme = typeof theme == "function"
- ? theme(defaultTheme)
- : theme;
+ let _theme: PartialTheme;
+ try {
+ _theme = typeof theme === "function"
+ ? theme(defaultTheme)
+ : theme;
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Error applying custom theme:', error);
+ return reactSelectDefaultTheme;
+ }
const {
colors, spacing, borderRadius,
} = mergeTheme(
reactSelectDefaultTheme,
_theme,
);
return {
borderRadius:
typeof borderRadius !== "number"
? reactSelectDefaultTheme.borderRadius
: borderRadius,
colors: colors as ReactSelectTheme["colors"],
spacing,
};
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export function getReactSelectTheme( | |
| theme: CustomThemeConfig | undefined, | |
| ): ReactSelectTheme { | |
| if (!theme) return reactSelectDefaultTheme; | |
| const _theme = typeof theme == "function" | |
| ? theme(defaultTheme) | |
| : theme; | |
| const { | |
| colors, spacing, borderRadius, | |
| } = mergeTheme( | |
| reactSelectDefaultTheme, | |
| _theme, | |
| ); | |
| return { | |
| borderRadius: | |
| typeof borderRadius !== "number" | |
| ? reactSelectDefaultTheme.borderRadius | |
| : borderRadius, | |
| colors: colors as ReactSelectTheme["colors"], | |
| spacing, | |
| }; | |
| } | |
| export function getReactSelectTheme( | |
| theme: CustomThemeConfig | undefined, | |
| ): ReactSelectTheme { | |
| if (!theme) return reactSelectDefaultTheme; | |
| let _theme: PartialTheme; | |
| try { | |
| _theme = typeof theme === "function" | |
| ? theme(defaultTheme) | |
| : theme; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Error applying custom theme:', error); | |
| return reactSelectDefaultTheme; | |
| } | |
| const { | |
| colors, spacing, borderRadius, | |
| } = mergeTheme( | |
| reactSelectDefaultTheme, | |
| _theme, | |
| ); | |
| return { | |
| borderRadius: | |
| typeof borderRadius !== "number" | |
| ? reactSelectDefaultTheme.borderRadius | |
| : borderRadius, | |
| colors: colors as ReactSelectTheme["colors"], | |
| spacing, | |
| }; | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx (3)
255-255: Remove commented console.log statementRemove the commented console.log statement as it adds noise to the codebase.
- // console.log("***", configurableProps, configuredProps)
148-162: Simplify state management for queryDisabledIdxThe
updateConfiguredPropsQueryDisabledIdxfunction could be simplified using array methods.Consider refactoring to:
const updateConfiguredPropsQueryDisabledIdx = (configuredProps: Record<string, any>) => { - let _queryDisabledIdx = undefined - for (let idx = 0; idx < configurableProps.length; idx++) { - const prop = configurableProps[idx] - if (prop.hidden || (prop.optional && !optionalPropIsEnabled(prop))) { - continue - } - const value = configuredProps[prop.name] - if (value === undefined && _queryDisabledIdx == null && (prop.type === "app" || prop.remoteOptions)) { - _queryDisabledIdx = idx - break - } - } - setQueryDisabledIdx(_queryDisabledIdx) + const idx = configurableProps.findIndex((prop, idx) => { + if (prop.hidden || (prop.optional && !optionalPropIsEnabled(prop))) { + return false; + } + const value = configuredProps[prop.name]; + return value === undefined && (prop.type === "app" || prop.remoteOptions); + }); + setQueryDisabledIdx(idx === -1 ? undefined : idx); }
34-35: Improve error message with component detailsThe error message for context usage could be more descriptive.
- throw new Error("Must be used inside provider") + throw new Error("useFormContext must be used within a FormContextProvider")
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/connect-react/src/components/ErrorBoundary.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/connect-react/src/components/ErrorBoundary.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx (2)
142-144:
Implement validation for 'app' type properties
The validation logic for properties of type 'app' is incomplete.
123-123:
Clarify number type validation
The comment questions whether the type should be "integer" or "number".
| import { useFrontendClient } from "./frontend-client-context" | ||
| import type { ComponentFormProps } from "../components/ComponentForm" | ||
|
|
||
| export type DynamicProps = { id: string; configurable_props: any } // TODO |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implement proper typing for DynamicProps
The DynamicProps type uses any with a TODO comment. This should be properly typed to ensure type safety.
Consider implementing a proper type definition:
-export type DynamicProps = { id: string; configurable_props: any } // TODO
+export type DynamicProps = {
+ id: string;
+ configurable_props: ConfigurableProp[];
+}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| export type FormContext = { | ||
| component: V1Component // XXX <T> | ||
| configurableProps: any[] // dynamicProps.configurable_props || props.component.configurable_props | ||
| configuredProps: Record<string, any> // TODO | ||
| dynamicProps?: DynamicProps // lots of calls require dynamicProps?.id, so need to expose | ||
| dynamicPropsQueryIsFetching?: boolean | ||
| id: string | ||
| isValid: boolean | ||
| optionalPropIsEnabled: (prop: ConfigurableProp) => boolean | ||
| optionalPropSetEnabled: (prop: ConfigurableProp, enabled: boolean) => void | ||
| props: ComponentFormProps | ||
| queryDisabledIdx?: number | ||
| setConfiguredProp: (idx: number, value: any) => void // XXX would be nice to have type safety here | ||
| setSubmitting: (submitting: boolean) => void | ||
| submitting: boolean | ||
| userId: string | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance type safety in FormContext
The FormContext type contains several any types and an XXX comment about generic types.
Consider the following improvements:
export type FormContext = {
- component: V1Component // XXX <T>
+ component: V1Component<T>
- configurableProps: any[]
+ configurableProps: ConfigurableProp[]
- configuredProps: Record<string, any>
+ configuredProps: Record<string, unknown>
dynamicProps?: DynamicProps
dynamicPropsQueryIsFetching?: boolean
id: string
isValid: boolean
optionalPropIsEnabled: (prop: ConfigurableProp) => boolean
optionalPropSetEnabled: (prop: ConfigurableProp, enabled: boolean) => void
props: ComponentFormProps
queryDisabledIdx?: number
- setConfiguredProp: (idx: number, value: any) => void
+ setConfiguredProp: (idx: number, value: unknown) => void
setSubmitting: (submitting: boolean) => void
submitting: boolean
userId: string
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| const [dynamicProps, setDynamicProps] = useState<DynamicProps>() | ||
| const [reloadPropIdx, setReloadPropIdx] = useState<number>() | ||
| const componentReloadPropsInput: ComponentReloadPropsOpts = { | ||
| userId, | ||
| componentId, | ||
| configuredProps, | ||
| dynamicPropsId: dynamicProps?.id, | ||
| } | ||
| const { | ||
| isFetching: dynamicPropsQueryIsFetching, | ||
| // TODO error | ||
| } = useQuery({ | ||
| queryKey: ["dynamicProps"], | ||
| queryFn: async () => { | ||
| const { dynamic_props } = await client.componentReloadProps(componentReloadPropsInput) | ||
| // XXX what about if null? | ||
| // TODO observation errors, etc. | ||
| if (dynamic_props) { | ||
| setDynamicProps(dynamic_props) | ||
| } | ||
| setReloadPropIdx(undefined) | ||
| return [] // XXX ok to mutate above and not look at data? | ||
| }, | ||
| enabled: reloadPropIdx != null, // TODO or props.dynamicPropsId && !dynamicProps | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling in dynamic props query
The error handling for the dynamic props query is incomplete (marked with TODO comment).
Consider implementing proper error handling:
const {
isFetching: dynamicPropsQueryIsFetching,
- // TODO error
+ error,
+ isError,
} = useQuery({
queryKey: ["dynamicProps"],
queryFn: async () => {
const { dynamic_props } = await client.componentReloadProps(componentReloadPropsInput)
- // XXX what about if null?
+ if (!dynamic_props) {
+ throw new Error('Failed to load dynamic props');
+ }
- // TODO observation errors, etc.
if (dynamic_props) {
setDynamicProps(dynamic_props)
}
setReloadPropIdx(undefined)
- return [] // XXX ok to mutate above and not look at data?
+ return dynamic_props
},
enabled: reloadPropIdx != null,
+ retry: 3,
+ onError: (error) => {
+ console.error('Failed to load dynamic props:', error);
+ // Handle error state appropriately
+ }
})📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const [dynamicProps, setDynamicProps] = useState<DynamicProps>() | |
| const [reloadPropIdx, setReloadPropIdx] = useState<number>() | |
| const componentReloadPropsInput: ComponentReloadPropsOpts = { | |
| userId, | |
| componentId, | |
| configuredProps, | |
| dynamicPropsId: dynamicProps?.id, | |
| } | |
| const { | |
| isFetching: dynamicPropsQueryIsFetching, | |
| // TODO error | |
| } = useQuery({ | |
| queryKey: ["dynamicProps"], | |
| queryFn: async () => { | |
| const { dynamic_props } = await client.componentReloadProps(componentReloadPropsInput) | |
| // XXX what about if null? | |
| // TODO observation errors, etc. | |
| if (dynamic_props) { | |
| setDynamicProps(dynamic_props) | |
| } | |
| setReloadPropIdx(undefined) | |
| return [] // XXX ok to mutate above and not look at data? | |
| }, | |
| enabled: reloadPropIdx != null, // TODO or props.dynamicPropsId && !dynamicProps | |
| }) | |
| const [dynamicProps, setDynamicProps] = useState<DynamicProps>() | |
| const [reloadPropIdx, setReloadPropIdx] = useState<number>() | |
| const componentReloadPropsInput: ComponentReloadPropsOpts = { | |
| userId, | |
| componentId, | |
| configuredProps, | |
| dynamicPropsId: dynamicProps?.id, | |
| } | |
| const { | |
| isFetching: dynamicPropsQueryIsFetching, | |
| error, | |
| isError, | |
| } = useQuery({ | |
| queryKey: ["dynamicProps"], | |
| queryFn: async () => { | |
| const { dynamic_props } = await client.componentReloadProps(componentReloadPropsInput) | |
| if (!dynamic_props) { | |
| throw new Error('Failed to load dynamic props'); | |
| } | |
| if (dynamic_props) { | |
| setDynamicProps(dynamic_props) | |
| } | |
| setReloadPropIdx(undefined) | |
| return dynamic_props | |
| }, | |
| enabled: reloadPropIdx != null, | |
| retry: 3, | |
| onError: (error) => { | |
| console.error('Failed to load dynamic props:', error); | |
| // Handle error state appropriately | |
| } | |
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 19
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (43)
packages/connect-react/src/components/RemoteOptionsContainer.tsx (2)
104-104: Address TODO: Display error message appropriatelyThere's a TODO comment indicating that the error should be shown in a different spot. Consider implementing a user-friendly error display to enhance the user experience.
69-70: Clean up commented-out debugging codeThe commented-out line
// console.log("res", res)appears to be leftover debugging code. It's good practice to remove such code to keep the codebase clean.Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary code:
- // console.log("res", res)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-app.tsx (3)
7-9: Enhance JSDoc documentation for better clarity.The current documentation is minimal. Consider adding more details about parameters, return value, and usage examples.
/** * Get details about an app + * @param slug - The unique identifier for the app + * @param opts - Optional configuration for the query + * @returns Object containing query result and app data + * @example + * const { app, isLoading, error } = useApp("gmail"); */
10-10: Consider improving type readability.The type definition for the opts parameter could be more readable by extracting it to a separate interface.
+interface UseAppOptions { + useQueryOpts?: Omit<UseQueryOptions<AppRequestResponse>, "queryKey" | "queryFn">; +} + -export const useApp = (slug: string, opts?:{ useQueryOpts?: Omit<UseQueryOptions<AppRequestResponse>, "queryKey" | "queryFn">;}) => { +export const useApp = (slug: string, opts?: UseAppOptions) => {
13-18: Consider typing the queryKey for better maintainability.The queryKey structure could benefit from type safety using a const assertion or enum.
+const APP_QUERY_KEY = ["app"] as const; + const query = useQuery({ queryKey: [ - "app", + APP_QUERY_KEY[0], slug, ], queryFn: () => client.app(slug),packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlBoolean.tsx (1)
18-18: Improve code readability and error handling.The JSX could be more readable and robust with the following improvements:
- Split the JSX into multiple lines
- Add error handling for the onChange callback
Consider refactoring to:
- return <input id={id} type="checkbox" {...getProps("controlBoolean", baseStyles, props)} checked={value ?? false} onChange={(e) => onChange(e.target.checked)} />; + return ( + <input + id={id} + type="checkbox" + {...getProps("controlBoolean", baseStyles, props)} + checked={value ?? false} + onChange={(e) => { + try { + onChange(e.target.checked); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error updating checkbox value:', error); + } + }} + /> + );packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-accounts.tsx (3)
24-27: Consider enhancing the query key structure.The current query key might not be sufficiently unique if multiple instances of the hook are used with different contexts. Consider adding a more specific prefix or additional dimensions.
queryKey: [ - "accounts", + "pd-connect-react", + "accounts", input, ],
28-28: Add explicit error handling for getAccounts.While React Query handles errors, consider adding explicit error handling for better error messages and recovery strategies.
- queryFn: () => client.getAccounts(input), + queryFn: async () => { + try { + return await client.getAccounts(input); + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to fetch accounts: ${error.message}`); + } + },
22-29: Consider adding cache configuration options.The query could benefit from explicit cache configuration to optimize performance and reduce unnecessary API calls.
const query = useQuery<AccountsRequestResponse>({ ...opts?.useQueryOpts, queryKey: [ "accounts", input, ], queryFn: () => client.getAccounts(input), + staleTime: 5 * 60 * 1000, // Data considered fresh for 5 minutes + cacheTime: 30 * 60 * 1000, // Cache persists for 30 minutes });packages/connect-react/src/components/ComponentForm.tsx (1)
1-9: Consider organizing imports and adding module documentation.The imports are logically structured but could benefit from organization and documentation.
+/** + * @fileoverview React component for rendering configurable component forms + * @module ComponentForm + */ + +// External dependencies import { FormContextProvider, type FormContext, } from "../hooks/form-context"; + +// Types import type { ConfigurableProps, ConfiguredProps, V1Component, } from "@pipedream/sdk"; + +// Internal components import { InternalComponentForm } from "./InternalComponentForm";packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-field-context.tsx (1)
21-21: Consider using unknown instead of any for better type safety.While the current implementation works, using
anybypasses TypeScript's type checking. Consider:-export const FormFieldContext = createContext<FormFieldContext<any> | undefined>(undefined); +export const FormFieldContext = createContext<FormFieldContext<unknown> | undefined>(undefined);packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlAny.tsx (1)
26-26: Address the XXX comment about component complexity.The comment indicates that this component needs to be more complex. Please clarify the requirements and intended functionality.
Would you like me to help design a more comprehensive implementation or create an issue to track this enhancement?
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/frontend-client-context.tsx (1)
25-45: Consider memoizing the provider valueTo prevent unnecessary re-renders of child components, consider memoizing the context value.
Here's how you can optimize it:
export const FrontendClientProvider: React.FC<FrontendClientProviderProps> = ({ children, client, }) => { + const contextValue = useMemo(() => client, [client]); return ( <QueryClientProvider client={queryClient}> - <FrontendClientContext.Provider value={client}> + <FrontendClientContext.Provider value={contextValue}> {children} </FrontendClientContext.Provider> </QueryClientProvider> ); };Don't forget to add
useMemoto the imports:import { - createContext, useContext, + createContext, useContext, useMemo, } from "react";🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 26-26: 'children' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 27-27: 'client' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
packages/connect-react/src/components/SelectComponent.tsx (2)
7-12: Enhance type specificity for AppResponse.Instead of using
Partial<AppResponse>, consider explicitly defining which fields fromAppResponseare actually used to improve type safety and documentation.type SelectComponentProps = { - app?: Partial<AppResponse> & { name_slug: string; }; + app?: Pick<AppResponse, 'name' | 'description'> & { name_slug: string; }; componentType?: "action" | "trigger"; value?: Partial<V1Component> & { key: string; }; onChange?: (component?: V1Component) => void; };
34-34: Address TODO comment about default component fetching.The TODO comment indicates a need for default component name display. This should be addressed before the preview release.
Would you like me to help implement the default component fetching functionality or create a GitHub issue to track this task?
packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalField.tsx (2)
22-24: Consider extracting app slug logic for clarity.The app slug determination logic could be more explicit. Consider extracting it to a separate function with a descriptive name.
-const appSlug = prop.type === "app" && "app" in prop - ? prop.app - : undefined; +const getAppSlug = (prop: ConfigurableProp) => + prop.type === "app" && "app" in prop ? prop.app : undefined; +const appSlug = getAppSlug(prop);
26-33: Address TODO comment and clarify suspense configuration.There are two issues to address:
- The TODO comment indicates missing error handling
- The suspense configuration comment could be more explicit
Would you like me to help implement proper error handling for the app loading state?
packages/connect-react/src/components/Description.tsx (2)
14-15: Consider addressing the component naming and context requirements.The XXX comment raises valid points about component naming and context requirements. Renaming to
FieldDescriptionwould better indicate the component's dependencies and prevent misuse.Would you like me to help create an issue to track this architectural decision and propose a concrete solution for the component's naming and context requirements?
38-39: Address TODO comment with proper implementation.The TODO comment for app type handling should be implemented with proper messaging and localization support.
Would you like me to help implement a proper message handling system for the app type case?
packages/connect-react/src/components/SelectApp.tsx (2)
8-11: Consider improving type definitions for better type safety.The type definition could be more specific:
- Consider splitting the
valuetype into a dedicated interface- Add JSDoc comments to describe the expected shape and usage
+interface SelectAppValue extends Partial<AppResponse> { + name_slug: string; +} + type SelectAppProps = { - value?: Partial<AppResponse> & { name_slug: string; }; - onChange?: (app?: AppResponse) => void; + /** The currently selected app */ + value?: SelectAppValue; + /** Callback fired when selection changes */ + onChange?: (selectedApp?: AppResponse) => void; };
37-52: Consider using Tailwind classes for consistent styling.The inline styles could be replaced with Tailwind classes for better maintainability and consistency with the design system.
-<div style={{ - display: "flex", - gap: 10, -}}> +<div className="flex gap-2.5"> <img src={`https://pipedream.com/s.v0/${props.data.id}/logo/48`} - style={{ - height: 24, - width: 24, - }} + className="h-6 w-6" alt={props.data.name} /> - <span style={{ - whiteSpace: "nowrap", - }}>{props.data.name}</span> + <span className="whitespace-nowrap">{props.data.name}</span> </div>🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 42-42: 'data' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 42-42: 'data.id' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 47-47: 'data' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 47-47: 'data.name' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 51-51: 'data' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 51-51: 'data.name' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlInput.tsx (1)
43-47: Address TODO and enhance password field security.The password field implementation could be improved:
- The TODO comment about value reification needs to be addressed
- Consider adding additional security attributes for password fields
Would you like help implementing:
- Value reification logic
- Enhanced password field security with attributes like:
if ("secret" in prop && prop.secret) { inputType = "password"; autoComplete = "new-password"; + // Add security attributes + const securityAttrs = { + autoCapitalize: "none", + autoCorrect: "off", + spellCheck: "false", + }; }🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 44-44: 'prop.secret' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
packages/connect-react/src/components/Field.tsx (3)
13-19: Convert implementation notes to proper documentation or issues.The XXX comment describes an important component override pattern that should be properly tracked.
Would you like me to:
- Create a GitHub issue to track this component override feature?
- Convert this into proper JSDoc documentation for the Field component?
28-38: Consider extracting grid styles to a constant or utility function.The grid layout styles are complex and could benefit from being extracted, especially since there are TODOs indicating potential changes based on field types.
const getFieldGridStyles = (fieldType: string): CSSProperties => ({ display: "grid", gridTemplateAreas: fieldType === "boolean" ? "\"control label\" \"description description\" \"error error\"" : "\"label label\" \"control control\" \"description description\" \"error error\"", gridTemplateColumns: "min-content auto", gap: "0.25rem 0", alignItems: "center", fontSize: "0.875rem", });
57-61: Consolidate and prioritize TODOs.There are multiple TODOs about grid layouts, types, and component naming. These should be properly tracked.
Would you like me to create GitHub issues to track these implementation tasks?
packages/connect-react/src/components/Control.tsx (3)
4-4: Remove or implement the commented importThe commented import for
ControlAnysuggests incomplete functionality. This aligns with the commented-out case foranytype handling later in the code.Consider either:
- Removing the commented import if
ControlAnywon't be implemented soon- Creating a GitHub issue to track the implementation of
ControlAny
47-48: Track TODOs in GitHub issuesThese TODOs cover important implementation details:
- Component registry support verification
- Suspense handling
Would you like me to create GitHub issues to track these implementation tasks?
71-72: Consider splitting control componentsThe XXX comment raises a valid point about splitting into specific control components while maintaining shared functionality.
Consider implementing a base control component that handles shared functionality (like
autoComplete="off"), then extend it for specific types:abstract class BaseControl extends React.Component { // Shared functionality } class ControlString extends BaseControl { // String-specific logic } class ControlInteger extends BaseControl { // Integer-specific logic }packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlSelect.tsx (2)
53-61: Improve type checking and array operationsThe value processing logic could be more robust and efficient:
- The type check
options?.[0] && typeof options[0] === "object"could throw if options is empty- The for loop with break can be replaced with Array.find()
Consider these improvements:
- const lvOptions = options?.[0] && typeof options[0] === "object"; - if (lvOptions) { - for (const item of options) { - if (item.value === value) { - ret = item; - break; - } - } - } + if (options?.length > 0 && typeof options[0] === "object") { + ret = options.find(item => item.value === value) ?? ret; + }
84-104: Simplify onChange handler and improve validationThe onChange handler is complex and could benefit from simplification:
- The nested if conditions make the code harder to follow
- The required validation might need to handle empty arrays for multi-select
Consider this simplified approach:
onChange={(o) => { + if (!o) { + if (prop.required && prop.type.endsWith("[]")) { + // Prevent clearing required multi-select + return; + } + onChange(undefined); + return; + } + if (Array.isArray(o)) { - if (typeof o[0] === "object" && "value" in o[0]) { - const vs = []; - for (const _o of o) { - vs.push(_o.value); - } - onChange(vs); - } else { - onChange(o); - } + // Handle multi-select + onChange(o[0]?.value !== undefined + ? o.map(item => item.value) + : o + ); + return; } else if (typeof o === "object" && "value" in o) { + // Handle single select onChange(o.value); - } else { - throw new Error("unhandled option type"); // TODO - } - } else { - onChange(undefined); + return; } + + console.warn("Unhandled option type:", o); }}packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalComponentForm.tsx (5)
33-52: Consider extracting styles to a separate constants file.The styles are well-defined but could be moved to a separate file to improve maintainability and reusability.
Consider creating a new file
styles/form.styles.ts:import { CSSProperties } from 'react'; export const baseFormStyles: CSSProperties = { display: "flex", flexDirection: "column", gap: "1.5rem", }; // ... other styles
54-67: Consider adding specific error handling.While the submission handler properly manages state, it could benefit from more specific error handling.
Consider enhancing error handling:
const _onSubmit: FormEventHandler<HTMLFormElement> = async (e) => { if (!onSubmit) return; e.preventDefault(); if (!isValid) return; setSubmitting(true); try { await onSubmit(formContext); } catch (error) { // Handle specific error types if (error instanceof ValidationError) { // Handle validation errors } else { // Handle other errors } throw error; // Re-throw if needed } finally { setSubmitting(false); } };
69-90: Extract props processing logic into a separate function.The props processing logic is complex and would be more maintainable as a separate function.
Consider refactoring:
function processConfigurableProps( configurableProps: ConfigurableProp[], optionalPropIsEnabled: (prop: ConfigurableProp) => boolean ) { const shownProps: [ConfigurableProp, number][] = []; const optionalProps: [ConfigurableProp, boolean][] = []; configurableProps.forEach((prop, idx) => { if (prop.hidden) return; if (prop.optional) { const enabled = optionalPropIsEnabled(prop); optionalProps.push([prop, enabled]); if (!enabled) return; } shownProps.push([prop, idx]); }); return { shownProps, optionalProps }; }
92-92: Address the TODO comment regarding error boundary implementation.The comment indicates a need to improve the error boundary implementation.
Would you like me to help implement a default Alert component for the error boundary?
97-98: Enhance loading states with more informative feedback.The current loading messages could be more descriptive and consistent with the UI design.
Consider using a consistent loading component:
const LoadingState = ({ message }: { message: string }) => ( <div {...getProps("loadingState", { /* styles */ })}> <LoadingSpinner /> <span>{message}</span> </div> ); // Usage: <Suspense fallback={<LoadingState message="Loading form components..." />}> {/* ... */} {dynamicPropsQueryIsFetching && <LoadingState message="Fetching dynamic properties..." />} </Suspense>Also applies to: 108-108
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlApp.tsx (4)
15-24: Consider implementing the commented image functionalityThere's commented code for displaying app logos. If this feature is intended for future implementation, consider creating a tracking issue.
Would you like me to help create an issue to track the implementation of the app logo display feature?
41-67: Consider extracting style constantsThe styles could be moved to a separate constants file to improve maintainability and reusability.
Consider creating a separate file for styles:
// styles/controlApp.styles.ts export const baseStyles: CSSProperties = { color: theme.colors.neutral60, gridArea: "control", }; export const baseStylesConnectButton: CSSProperties = { borderRadius: theme.borderRadius, border: "solid 1px", borderColor: theme.colors.neutral20, color: theme.colors.neutral60, padding: "0.25rem 0.5rem", gridArea: "control", };🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 59-59: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 59-59: Don't use
{}as a type.{}actually means "any non-nullish value".
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want
objectinstead.- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want
unknowninstead.- If you want a type meaning "empty object", you probably want
Record<string, never>instead.- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want
NonNullable<unknown>instead.(@typescript-eslint/ban-types)
103-117: Add type safety to account selection logicThe iteration over accounts lacks type safety which could lead to runtime errors.
Consider adding type safety:
- for (const item of accounts) { + for (const item of accounts as Array<{ id: string }>) {
119-172: Consider decomposing the render logicThe current implementation uses complex ternary expressions and contains a TODO comment about loading states. Consider breaking this into smaller, more focused components.
Consider splitting into:
- LoadingState component
- AccountSelector component
- ConnectButton component
Example structure:
const LoadingState = ({ app }: { app: AppResponse }) => ( <div>Loading {app.name} accounts...</div> ); const AccountSelector = ({ /* props */ }) => ( <Select /* existing select props */ /> ); const ConnectButton = ({ /* props */ }) => ( <button /* existing button props */ /> ); // Main render return ( <div {...getProps("controlApp", baseStyles, { app, ...formFieldCtx })}> {isLoadingAccounts ? ( <LoadingState app={app} /> ) : accounts.length ? ( <AccountSelector /* props */ /> ) : ( <ConnectButton /* props */ /> )} </div> );🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 125-125: Expected newline between test and consequent of ternary expression.
(multiline-ternary)
[error] 125-127: Expected newline between consequent and alternate of ternary expression.
(multiline-ternary)
[error] 127-127: Expected newline between test and consequent of ternary expression.
(multiline-ternary)
[error] 127-162: Expected newline between consequent and alternate of ternary expression.
(multiline-ternary)
.eslintrc (1)
115-124: Consider additional React-specific ESLint rulesThe React configuration looks good with the essential setup. However, consider adding these commonly used React rules for better code quality:
{ "files": [ "*.tsx" ], "extends": [ - "plugin:react/recommended" + "plugin:react/recommended", + "plugin:react-hooks/recommended" ], "rules": { - "react/react-in-jsx-scope": "off" + "react/react-in-jsx-scope": "off", + "react/prop-types": "off", // Since we're using TypeScript + "react/display-name": "error", + "react-hooks/exhaustive-deps": "warn" } }These additional rules will help:
- Enforce React hooks best practices
- Disable prop-types validation since TypeScript handles type checking
- Ensure components have display names for better debugging
- Warn about missing dependencies in hooks
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/customization-context.tsx (2)
144-151: Simplify class names container logic and add null checksThe class names container logic could be simplified and made more robust.
Consider this improvement:
- if (typeof classNames?.container == "function") { - classNames.container = typeof classNames?.container == "function" - ? (...args) => ([ - classNames?.container?.(...args), - baseClassName, - ]).join(" ") - : () => baseClassName; - } + if (classNames?.container) { + const originalContainer = classNames.container; + classNames.container = (...args) => { + const customClasses = typeof originalContainer === "function" + ? originalContainer(...args) + : originalContainer; + return [customClasses, baseClassName].filter(Boolean).join(" "); + }; + } else { + classNames.container = () => baseClassName; + }
218-223: Consider using type assertion with intersection typeThe type casting could be more explicit and type-safe.
Consider this improvement:
- } as ComponentLibrary; + } as typeof defaultComponents & Partial<CustomComponentsConfig>;packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx (1)
298-298: Remove debug console.log statementDebug console.log statement should be removed before production.
- // console.log("***", configurableProps, configuredProps)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (34)
.eslintrc(2 hunks)packages/connect-react/.eslintignore(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/layout.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/page.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/Alert.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ComponentForm.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ComponentFormContainer.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/Control.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlAny.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlApp.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlBoolean.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlInput.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlSelect.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlSubmit.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/Description.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ErrorBoundary.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/Errors.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/Field.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalComponentForm.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalField.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/Label.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/OptionalFieldButton.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/RemoteOptionsContainer.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/SelectApp.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/SelectComponent.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/customization-context.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-field-context.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/frontend-client-context.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-accounts.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-app.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-apps.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-component.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-components.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (12)
- packages/connect-react/.eslintignore
- packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/layout.tsx
- packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/page.tsx
- packages/connect-react/src/components/Alert.tsx
- packages/connect-react/src/components/ComponentFormContainer.tsx
- packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlSubmit.tsx
- packages/connect-react/src/components/ErrorBoundary.tsx
- packages/connect-react/src/components/Label.tsx
- packages/connect-react/src/components/OptionalFieldButton.tsx
- packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-apps.tsx
- packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-component.tsx
- packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-components.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlAny.tsx
[error] 8-8: 'id' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 8-8: 'onChange' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 8-8: 'value' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlApp.tsx
[error] 59-59: Don't use {} as a type. {} actually means "any non-nullish value".
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want
objectinstead. - If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want
unknowninstead. - If you want a type meaning "empty object", you probably want
Record<string, never>instead. - If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want
NonNullable<unknown>instead.
(@typescript-eslint/ban-types)
[error] 125-125: Expected newline between test and consequent of ternary expression.
(multiline-ternary)
[error] 125-127: Expected newline between consequent and alternate of ternary expression.
(multiline-ternary)
[error] 127-127: Expected newline between test and consequent of ternary expression.
(multiline-ternary)
[error] 127-162: Expected newline between consequent and alternate of ternary expression.
(multiline-ternary)
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlBoolean.tsx
[error] 9-9: 'id' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 9-9: 'value' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 9-9: 'onChange' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlInput.tsx
[error] 8-8: 'id' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 8-8: 'onChange' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 8-8: 'prop' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 8-8: 'value' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 30-30: 'prop.type' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 40-40: 'prop.type' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 44-44: 'prop.secret' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 53-53: 'prop.name' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 58-58: 'prop.min' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 61-61: 'prop.max' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 66-66: 'prop.optional' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlSelect.tsx
[error] 29-29: Don't use {} as a type. {} actually means "any non-nullish value".
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want
objectinstead. - If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want
unknowninstead. - If you want a type meaning "empty object", you probably want
Record<string, never>instead. - If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want
NonNullable<unknown>instead.
(@typescript-eslint/ban-types)
packages/connect-react/src/components/Errors.tsx
[error] 34-34: Missing "key" prop for element in iterator
(react/jsx-key)
packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalComponentForm.tsx
[error] 26-26: 'hideOptionalProps' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 26-26: 'onSubmit' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
packages/connect-react/src/components/RemoteOptionsContainer.tsx
[error] 49-49: 'dynamicPropsId' is assigned a value but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
packages/connect-react/src/components/SelectApp.tsx
[error] 42-42: 'data' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 42-42: 'data.id' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 47-47: 'data' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 47-47: 'data.name' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 51-51: 'data' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 51-51: 'data.name' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/customization-context.tsx
[error] 261-261: 'children' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx
[error] 52-52: 'children' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 52-52: 'props' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 59-59: 'component' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 59-59: 'configuredProps' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 59-59: 'propNames' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 59-59: 'userId' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 61-61: 'component.key' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 93-93: 'onUpdateConfiguredProps' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 94-94: 'onUpdateConfiguredProps' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 133-133: 'component' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 133-133: 'component.configurable_props' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 134-134: 'propNames.length' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 138-138: 'propNames.findIndex' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-field-context.tsx
[error] 10-10: Don't use {} as a type. {} actually means "any non-nullish value".
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want
objectinstead. - If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want
unknowninstead. - If you want a type meaning "empty object", you probably want
Record<string, never>instead. - If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want
NonNullable<unknown>instead.
(@typescript-eslint/ban-types)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/frontend-client-context.tsx
[error] 26-26: 'children' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 27-27: 'client' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlApp.tsx
[error] 59-59: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlSelect.tsx
[error] 29-29: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
packages/connect-react/src/components/Errors.tsx
[error] 34-34: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.
(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/customization-context.tsx
[error] 39-39: Shouldn't redeclare 'ReactSelectComponents'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'ReactSelectComponents' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-field-context.tsx
[error] 10-10: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
🔇 Additional comments (50)
packages/connect-react/src/components/RemoteOptionsContainer.tsx (1)
45-45: Confirm usage of ref.value in componentConfigureInput.query
There's a TODO comment questioning whether ref.value is still supported in the assignment to componentConfigureInput.query. This concern was previously noted and remains valid.
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-app.tsx (3)
1-5: LGTM! Well-structured imports with proper type definitions.
The imports are clean, explicit, and properly organized with clear type definitions.
1-25: Overall implementation looks good with minor enhancement opportunities.
The hook is well-structured and follows React Query best practices. The suggested improvements are mostly about developer experience and maintainability rather than functional issues.
21-24: Add explicit error handling for better DX.
While useQuery handles errors implicitly, consider adding explicit error handling or documentation about error scenarios.
Let's check if there are any existing error handling patterns in the codebase:
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlBoolean.tsx (4)
1-4: LGTM! Clean and well-organized imports.
The imports are properly typed and necessary for the component's functionality.
6-11: LGTM! Well-structured hooks usage with proper typing.
The component correctly uses custom hooks and TypeScript for type safety. The static analysis warnings about prop-types can be safely ignored as TypeScript provides the necessary type checking.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 9-9: 'id' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 9-9: 'value' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 9-9: 'onChange' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
12-17: Enhance accessibility with proper dimensions.
The past review comment about accessibility improvements is still valid. Consider using relative units and ensuring proper touch target sizes.
6-19: Verify integration with form system.
Let's verify how this component is used within the form system.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the form field context implementation and its integration with ControlBoolean.
Integration with form system is properly implemented
The verification confirms that ControlBoolean is correctly integrated within the form system:
- It's properly consuming the FormFieldContext through useFormFieldContext hook
- The context provides all required props (id, value, onChange)
- It's correctly used in the Control component for boolean type props
- The context is properly provided by InternalField with all necessary values
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of ControlBoolean in the codebase
echo "Searching for ControlBoolean usage..."
rg -l "ControlBoolean"
# Search for form context provider implementation
echo "Searching for form context implementation..."
rg "FormFieldContext|useFormFieldContext"
Length of output: 5746
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the form field context implementation
echo "Checking form field context implementation..."
cat packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-field-context.tsx
# Check how ControlBoolean is used in Control.tsx
echo "Checking Control.tsx usage..."
cat packages/connect-react/src/components/Control.tsx
# Check InternalField implementation which provides the context
echo "Checking InternalField implementation..."
cat packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalField.tsx
Length of output: 5404
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 9-9: 'id' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 9-9: 'value' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 9-9: 'onChange' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/use-accounts.tsx (2)
1-7: LGTM! Well-organized imports with explicit type declarations.
The imports are properly structured with explicit type imports, following TypeScript best practices.
12-35: LGTM! Well-structured hook implementation.
The hook is well-implemented with proper TypeScript types, React Query integration, and safe data handling. The return value is properly structured with fallback for undefined data.
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-field-context.tsx (3)
1-6: LGTM! Imports are clean and well-organized.
12-19: LGTM! Well-structured type definition.
The FormFieldContext type is well-designed with appropriate type safety and flexibility through generics.
23-31: LGTM! Hook implementation follows best practices.
The hook is well-implemented with:
- Proper error handling for usage outside Provider
- Correct type assertions for type safety
- Clear error messages
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlAny.tsx (5)
1-4: LGTM! Imports are clean and well-organized.
13-19: LGTM! Styles are well-defined and use theme appropriately.
21-24: Add error handling for JSON stringification.
The previous review comment about adding error handling for JSON stringification is still valid.
28-33: Enhance textarea accessibility.
The previous review comment about adding accessibility attributes to the textarea is still valid.
5-12: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add TypeScript types for form field props.
The component is using TypeScript but lacks proper type definitions for the form field props.
+interface FormFieldProps {
+ id: string;
+ onChange: (value: string) => void;
+ value: unknown;
+}
-export function ControlAny() {
+export function ControlAny(): JSX.Element {
- const props = useFormFieldContext();
+ const props = useFormFieldContext<FormFieldProps>();The previous review comment about adding error handling for missing context is still valid.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 8-8: 'id' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 8-8: 'onChange' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 8-8: 'value' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
packages/connect-react/src/components/Errors.tsx (2)
1-12: LGTM! Well-structured imports and type definitions.
The imports are properly organized and the ErrorsProps type is well-defined with appropriate generic constraints.
33-35: Previous review comments are still applicable.
The issues regarding missing key prop and potential XSS vulnerabilities from the previous review remain valid and should be addressed.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 34-34: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.
(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 34-34: Missing "key" prop for element in iterator
(react/jsx-key)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/frontend-client-context.tsx (3)
1-11: LGTM! Clean context setup with proper typing
The imports are minimal and the context is properly typed with BrowserClient.
13-21: LGTM! Well-implemented custom hook
The hook provides clear error messaging and proper context validation.
29-36:
Move QueryClient initialization outside component
Creating a new QueryClient instance on every render can lead to unnecessary re-renders and potential memory leaks.
Move the QueryClient initialization outside the component:
+const queryClient = new QueryClient({
+ defaultOptions: {
+ queries: {
+ staleTime: 1000 * 60 * 60,
+ refetchOnWindowFocus: false,
+ },
+ },
+});
export const FrontendClientProvider: React.FC<FrontendClientProviderProps> = ({
children,
client,
}) => {
- const queryClient = new QueryClient({
- defaultOptions: {
- queries: {
- staleTime: 1000 * 60 * 60,
- refetchOnWindowFocus: false,
- },
- },
- });packages/connect-react/src/components/SelectComponent.tsx (2)
1-5: LGTM! Imports are well-organized.
The imports are properly structured and include all necessary dependencies.
14-44: Verify component usage and potential duplication.
Let's ensure this component is unique and properly used across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the SelectComponent usage and potential duplication:
Component is appropriately scoped and no duplication exists
The SelectComponent is a specialized wrapper around react-select that's used specifically for component selection within the connect-react package. While there are other select components in the codebase (like ControlSelect, SelectApp), each serves a distinct purpose:
SelectComponent: Handles component selection with specific app/componentType logicControlSelect: Generic form control select componentSelectApp: Specialized for app selection
The implementation follows the established pattern in the codebase of creating purpose-specific select components rather than trying to make a single generic component handle all cases.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for similar select components
echo "Checking for similar select components..."
rg -l "Select.*Component" --type typescript
# Check for usage of this component
echo "\nChecking usage of SelectComponent..."
rg "SelectComponent" --type typescript -A 2 -B 2
# Check for other uses of react-select
echo "\nChecking other uses of react-select..."
rg "from ['|\"]react-select['|\"]" --type typescript
Length of output: 529
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for similar select components without file type restriction
echo "Checking for similar select components..."
rg -l "Select.*Component"
# Check for usage of SelectComponent
echo -e "\nChecking usage of SelectComponent..."
rg "SelectComponent" -A 2 -B 2
# Check for other uses of react-select
echo -e "\nChecking other uses of react-select..."
rg "from ['\"]react-select['\"]"
# Check for Select imports and usage
echo -e "\nChecking Select imports and usage..."
rg "Select" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 100569
packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalField.tsx (4)
1-12: LGTM! Clean imports and type definitions.
The imports are well-organized, and the type definition is properly constrained with generics.
14-20: LGTM! Well-structured component declaration.
The component follows React best practices with proper TypeScript generics and clean prop destructuring.
35-45: LGTM! Well-structured field context implementation.
The field context creation is clean and well-typed, with proper handling of form field state and change events.
Also applies to: 47-48
50-55: LGTM! Clean context provider implementation.
The rendering logic follows React context best practices with proper prop passing.
packages/connect-react/src/components/Description.tsx (2)
1-7: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and necessary.
All imports are being used and properly structured.
8-12: LGTM! Type definition is well-structured.
The DescriptionProps type is properly defined with appropriate constraints and required/optional properties.
packages/connect-react/src/components/SelectApp.tsx (2)
22-24: Previous error handling comment is still valid.
16-19: Consider using Select's internal state management.
The XXX comment suggests uncertainty about state management. The react-select component handles input state internally, which can be accessed through its ref. Consider removing the local state if it's not needed for other purposes.
✅ Verification successful
Keep the local state management for input changes
The q state is actively used in the component to handle input changes via onInputChange callback of the Select component. This state management is necessary as it's used to track user input in real-time, which is a different concern from the selected value state. The XXX comment can be removed as the current implementation is correct.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if q state is used elsewhere in the codebase
rg -l "setQ\(" --type typescript
Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if q state is used elsewhere in the file
rg "setQ" packages/connect-react/src/components/SelectApp.tsx -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 647
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlInput.tsx (3)
14-24: LGTM! Well-structured theme integration.
The base styles are properly defined using theme values, ensuring consistent styling across the application.
28-41: Improve number input handling as previously suggested.
The current implementation has concerns about number input handling and validation.
Please refer to the previous review comment about using inputMode="numeric" with proper validation constraints.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 30-30: 'prop.type' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 40-40: 'prop.type' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
49-68: Improve prop handling as previously suggested.
The current implementation has concerns about prop spreading and value coercion.
Please refer to the previous review comment about performance and prop handling improvements.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 53-53: 'prop.name' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 58-58: 'prop.min' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 61-61: 'prop.max' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 66-66: 'prop.optional' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
packages/connect-react/src/components/Field.tsx (4)
1-11: LGTM! Clean imports and type definitions.
The imports are well-organized and the FieldProps type is properly defined with appropriate generic constraints.
43-43: Implement error handling as previously suggested.
The error handling implementation is still pending.
62-69: Add accessibility attributes as previously suggested.
The accessibility improvements from the previous review are still relevant.
45-50: Verify app-specific rendering logic.
The conditional rendering based on app.auth_type should be verified with tests.
✅ Verification successful
Let's broaden our search to find relevant test files and usage patterns that might help verify the app-specific rendering logic.
Let's try with simpler patterns to find relevant test files and usage patterns.
App-specific rendering logic is part of the core SDK behavior
The verification reveals that the app.auth_type check is tied to the core SDK's AppAuthType enum and appears to be an intentional part of the authentication flow. The conditional rendering in the Field component aligns with the SDK's type system and authentication patterns.
- The check exists in
packages/connect-react/src/components/Field.tsx - The
AppAuthTypeenum is defined inpackages/sdk/src/shared/index.ts - This is a core authentication-related check, not an arbitrary condition
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for related test files
fd -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx Field
# Look for similar patterns in other components
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($app && !$app.auth_type) {
return null;
}'
Length of output: 105
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files with a broader pattern
fd "field|Field" -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx -e test.ts -e spec.ts
# Look for test cases involving app.auth_type
rg -i "app.*auth.*type" --type=typescript -C 3
# Search for Field component usage patterns
rg "Field\s+\w+\s*=\s*{" --type=typescript -C 2
Length of output: 300
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files
fd "field|Field" -e tsx -e ts
# Look for test cases involving app.auth_type
rg -i "app.*auth.*type"
# Search for Field component usage patterns
rg "Field.*=.*{" -C 2
Length of output: 2581
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlSelect.tsx (1)
16-26: LGTM!
Clean component initialization with proper hook usage and context integration.
packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalComponentForm.tsx (1)
1-12: LGTM! Well-organized imports.
The imports are properly structured with clear separation between React core imports, type definitions, and custom components.
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlApp.tsx (2)
1-14: LGTM! Well-organized imports
The imports are properly structured and include all necessary dependencies for the component's functionality.
26-40: LGTM! Clean component initialization
The component props and hook usage follow React best practices.
.eslintrc (1)
81-81: LGTM: TypeScript React files pattern addition
The addition of "*.tsx" to the TypeScript files pattern ensures proper linting for React TypeScript files.
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/customization-context.tsx (4)
39-42: Rename 'ReactSelectComponents' type to avoid naming conflict
The type name conflicts with the imported ReactSelectComponents from 'react-select'. This could lead to confusion and potential issues.
Apply this diff to rename the type:
-export type ReactSelectComponents = {
+export type CustomReactSelectComponents = {
controlAppSelect: typeof ControlApp;
controlSelect: typeof ControlSelect;
};Remember to update all references to this type throughout the file.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 39-39: Shouldn't redeclare 'ReactSelectComponents'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'ReactSelectComponents' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
74-96: Well-structured type definitions for customization
The configuration types are well-designed, providing type safety and flexibility for both simple and complex customization scenarios.
98-105: LGTM: Context initialization with appropriate defaults
The context is properly initialized with safe default values that prevent undefined behavior.
260-265: LGTM: Clean provider implementation
The provider component is well-implemented with proper type definitions. The prop-types ESLint warning can be safely ignored as TypeScript provides better type safety.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 261-261: 'children' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx (1)
156-166:
Clarify number type validation
The comment questions whether prop.type should be "integer" or "number" and whether floats are supported.
- } else if (prop.type === "integer") { // XXX type should be "number"? we don't support floats otherwise...
+ } else if (prop.type === "number") {
if (typeof value !== "number") {
errs.push("not a number");
} else {
+ if (!Number.isFinite(value)) {
+ errs.push("must be a finite number");
+ }
if (prop.min != null && value < prop.min) {
errs.push("number too small");
}
if (prop.max != null && value > prop.max) {
errs.push("number too big");
}
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| } | ||
| // exclude dynamicPropsId from the key since only affect it should have is to add / remove props but prop by name should not change! | ||
| const { | ||
| dynamicPropsId, ...queryKeyInput |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unused variable dynamicPropsId
The variable dynamicPropsId is assigned but never used, leading to a linting error reported by the static analysis tool.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- dynamicPropsId, ...queryKeyInput
+ ...queryKeyInput📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| dynamicPropsId, ...queryKeyInput | |
| ...queryKeyInput |
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 49-49: 'dynamicPropsId' is assigned a value but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
| export function ComponentForm(props: ComponentFormProps) { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <FormContextProvider props={props}> | ||
| <InternalComponentForm /> | ||
| </FormContextProvider> | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error boundary and prop validation.
While the implementation is clean, consider adding error handling and prop validation for better robustness.
+import { ErrorBoundary } from 'react-error-boundary';
+
+/**
+ * Form component for configuring Pipedream components
+ * @template T - The type of configurable properties
+ */
export function ComponentForm(props: ComponentFormProps) {
+ const { userId, component } = props;
+
+ if (!userId || !component) {
+ throw new Error('ComponentForm requires userId and component props');
+ }
+
return (
- <FormContextProvider props={props}>
- <InternalComponentForm />
- </FormContextProvider>
+ <ErrorBoundary
+ fallback={<div>Something went wrong rendering the form.</div>}
+ onError={(error) => console.error('ComponentForm error:', error)}
+ >
+ <FormContextProvider props={props}>
+ <InternalComponentForm />
+ </FormContextProvider>
+ </ErrorBoundary>
);
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| export type ComponentFormProps<T extends ConfigurableProps = any> = { | ||
| userId: string; | ||
| component: V1Component<T>; | ||
| configuredProps?: ConfiguredProps<T>; // XXX value? | ||
| disableQueryDisabling?: boolean; | ||
| propNames?: string[]; // TODO PropNames<T> | ||
| onSubmit?: (ctx: FormContext) => void | Promise<void>; // if passed, we include button | ||
| onUpdateConfiguredProps?: (v: ConfiguredProps<T>) => void; // XXX onChange? | ||
| hideOptionalProps?: boolean; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance type safety and documentation.
The type definition needs improvements in type safety and documentation. Since this is being prepared for preview release, it's important to address these before publishing.
+/**
+ * Props for the ComponentForm component that handles configuration of Pipedream components
+ * @template T - The type of configurable properties for the component
+ */
export type ComponentFormProps<T extends ConfigurableProps = any> = {
+ /** User ID for the current session */
userId: string;
+ /** Component definition containing configuration schema */
component: V1Component<T>;
- configuredProps?: ConfiguredProps<T>; // XXX value?
+ /** Current configured values for the component properties */
+ configuredProps?: ConfiguredProps<T>;
disableQueryDisabling?: boolean;
- propNames?: string[]; // TODO PropNames<T>
+ /** List of property names to include in the form */
+ propNames?: Array<keyof T>;
+ /** Callback fired when form is submitted. If provided, submit button will be rendered */
onSubmit?: (ctx: FormContext) => void | Promise<void>;
- onUpdateConfiguredProps?: (v: ConfiguredProps<T>) => void; // XXX onChange?
+ /** Callback fired when configured properties change */
+ onChange?: (v: ConfiguredProps<T>) => void;
+ /** Whether to hide optional properties in the form */
hideOptionalProps?: boolean;
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export type ComponentFormProps<T extends ConfigurableProps = any> = { | |
| userId: string; | |
| component: V1Component<T>; | |
| configuredProps?: ConfiguredProps<T>; // XXX value? | |
| disableQueryDisabling?: boolean; | |
| propNames?: string[]; // TODO PropNames<T> | |
| onSubmit?: (ctx: FormContext) => void | Promise<void>; // if passed, we include button | |
| onUpdateConfiguredProps?: (v: ConfiguredProps<T>) => void; // XXX onChange? | |
| hideOptionalProps?: boolean; | |
| }; | |
| /** | |
| * Props for the ComponentForm component that handles configuration of Pipedream components | |
| * @template T - The type of configurable properties for the component | |
| */ | |
| export type ComponentFormProps<T extends ConfigurableProps = any> = { | |
| /** User ID for the current session */ | |
| userId: string; | |
| /** Component definition containing configuration schema */ | |
| component: V1Component<T>; | |
| /** Current configured values for the component properties */ | |
| configuredProps?: ConfiguredProps<T>; | |
| disableQueryDisabling?: boolean; | |
| /** List of property names to include in the form */ | |
| propNames?: Array<keyof T>; | |
| /** Callback fired when form is submitted. If provided, submit button will be rendered */ | |
| onSubmit?: (ctx: FormContext) => void | Promise<void>; | |
| /** Callback fired when configured properties change */ | |
| onChange?: (v: ConfiguredProps<T>) => void; | |
| /** Whether to hide optional properties in the form */ | |
| hideOptionalProps?: boolean; | |
| }; |
| import { | ||
| FormContextProvider, type FormContext, | ||
| } from "../hooks/form-context"; | ||
| import type { | ||
| ConfigurableProps, | ||
| ConfiguredProps, | ||
| V1Component, | ||
| } from "@pipedream/sdk"; | ||
| import { InternalComponentForm } from "./InternalComponentForm"; | ||
|
|
||
| export type ComponentFormProps<T extends ConfigurableProps = any> = { | ||
| userId: string; | ||
| component: V1Component<T>; | ||
| configuredProps?: ConfiguredProps<T>; // XXX value? | ||
| disableQueryDisabling?: boolean; | ||
| propNames?: string[]; // TODO PropNames<T> | ||
| onSubmit?: (ctx: FormContext) => void | Promise<void>; // if passed, we include button | ||
| onUpdateConfiguredProps?: (v: ConfiguredProps<T>) => void; // XXX onChange? | ||
| hideOptionalProps?: boolean; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| export function ComponentForm(props: ComponentFormProps) { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <FormContextProvider props={props}> | ||
| <InternalComponentForm /> | ||
| </FormContextProvider> | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Add test coverage for ComponentForm
Based on the verification results:
- No test files exist in the
packages/connect-reactdirectory - The package.json lacks test configuration and test-related dependencies
- The component is used in multiple places and handles critical form functionality
Required test coverage:
- Basic rendering and prop validation
- Form context integration
- Interaction with InternalComponentForm
- Props update handling
- Form submission behavior
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify and add test coverage.
The component lacks test coverage which is crucial for a package being prepared for preview release.
Consider adding tests for:
- Prop validation
- Form submission
- Error handling
- Configuration updates
- Optional prop rendering
Would you like me to help generate a comprehensive test suite for this component?
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing test files
echo "Checking for test files..."
fd -e test.tsx -e test.ts -e spec.tsx -e spec.ts ComponentForm
# Check component usage for test scenarios
echo -e "\nChecking component usage patterns..."
rg -A 5 "ComponentForm" --type=tsx --type=ts
Length of output: 289
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for test files with broader search
echo "Checking for test files..."
fd "test|spec" packages/connect-react/src
# Check component usage with correct file extensions
echo -e "\nChecking component usage patterns..."
rg -t ts -t tsx "ComponentForm" -A 5
# Check if there are any test setup files
echo -e "\nChecking for test setup..."
fd "jest|vitest" packages/connect-react
Length of output: 371
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Try with ripgrep's default file type detection
echo "Checking component usage and test files..."
rg --type-list | grep -i "typescript\|tsx"
rg "ComponentForm" -A 5
# Look for any test files in the package
echo -e "\nLooking for test files in connect-react..."
find packages/connect-react -type f -name "*.test.*" -o -name "*.spec.*"
# Check package.json for test setup
echo -e "\nChecking package.json for test configuration..."
cat packages/connect-react/package.json
Length of output: 16512
| export type FormFieldContextExtra<T extends ConfigurableProp> = T extends ConfigurablePropApp ? { | ||
| app?: AppInfo; | ||
| } : {}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace empty object type with explicit type.
The empty object type {} is discouraged as it actually means "any non-nullish value". For better type safety and clarity:
export type FormFieldContextExtra<T extends ConfigurableProp> = T extends ConfigurablePropApp ? {
app?: AppInfo;
-} : {};
+} : Record<string, never>;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export type FormFieldContextExtra<T extends ConfigurableProp> = T extends ConfigurablePropApp ? { | |
| app?: AppInfo; | |
| } : {}; | |
| export type FormFieldContextExtra<T extends ConfigurableProp> = T extends ConfigurablePropApp ? { | |
| app?: AppInfo; | |
| } : Record<string, never>; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 10-10: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 10-10: Don't use {} as a type. {} actually means "any non-nullish value".
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want
objectinstead. - If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want
unknowninstead. - If you want a type meaning "empty object", you probably want
Record<string, never>instead. - If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want
NonNullable<unknown>instead.
(@typescript-eslint/ban-types)
| // XXX T and ConfigurableProp should be related | ||
| type ControlSelectProps<T> = { | ||
| isCreatable?: boolean; | ||
| options: {label: string; value: T;}[]; | ||
| selectProps?: ReactSelectProps; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety with constraints and documentation
The type definition needs improvement:
- The XXX comment indicates a potential type safety issue between
TandConfigurableProp. - The generic type
Tis unconstrained, which could allow unsafe values.
Consider applying these changes:
- // XXX T and ConfigurableProp should be related
- type ControlSelectProps<T> = {
+ /**
+ * @template T - The type of the select option values
+ * @remarks T must be compatible with ConfigurableProp value type
+ */
+ type ControlSelectProps<T extends string | number | boolean> = {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // XXX T and ConfigurableProp should be related | |
| type ControlSelectProps<T> = { | |
| isCreatable?: boolean; | |
| options: {label: string; value: T;}[]; | |
| selectProps?: ReactSelectProps; | |
| }; | |
| /** | |
| * @template T - The type of the select option values | |
| * @remarks T must be compatible with ConfigurableProp value type | |
| */ | |
| type ControlSelectProps<T extends string | number | boolean> = { | |
| isCreatable?: boolean; | |
| options: {label: string; value: T;}[]; | |
| selectProps?: ReactSelectProps; | |
| }; |
| export function InternalComponentForm() { | ||
| const formContext = useFormContext(); | ||
| const { | ||
| configurableProps, | ||
| dynamicPropsQueryIsFetching, | ||
| isValid, | ||
| optionalPropIsEnabled, | ||
| optionalPropSetEnabled, | ||
| props, | ||
| setSubmitting, | ||
| } = formContext; | ||
|
|
||
| const { | ||
| hideOptionalProps, onSubmit, | ||
| } = props; | ||
|
|
||
| const { | ||
| getComponents, getProps, theme, | ||
| } = useCustomize(); | ||
| const { OptionalFieldButton } = getComponents(); | ||
| const baseStyles: CSSProperties = { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add TypeScript interface definitions for component props.
The component would benefit from explicit type definitions for its props to improve type safety and documentation.
Consider adding:
interface InternalComponentFormProps {
hideOptionalProps?: boolean;
onSubmit?: (formContext: FormContext) => Promise<void>;
// Add other props as needed
}
export function InternalComponentForm(props: InternalComponentFormProps) {
// ... rest of the component
}🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 26-26: 'hideOptionalProps' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 26-26: 'onSubmit' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
| import { useFrontendClient } from "./frontend-client-context"; | ||
| import type { ComponentFormProps } from "../components/ComponentForm"; | ||
|
|
||
| export type DynamicProps = { id: string; configurable_props: any; }; // TODO |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance type safety by properly typing DynamicProps
The DynamicProps type uses any which reduces type safety.
-export type DynamicProps = { id: string; configurable_props: any; }; // TODO
+export type DynamicProps = {
+ id: string;
+ configurable_props: ConfigurableProp[];
+};Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| export type FormContext = { | ||
| component: V1Component; // XXX <T> | ||
| configurableProps: any[]; // dynamicProps.configurable_props || props.component.configurable_props | ||
| configuredProps: Record<string, any>; // TODO | ||
| dynamicProps?: DynamicProps; // lots of calls require dynamicProps?.id, so need to expose | ||
| dynamicPropsQueryIsFetching?: boolean; | ||
| id: string; | ||
| isValid: boolean; | ||
| optionalPropIsEnabled: (prop: ConfigurableProp) => boolean; | ||
| optionalPropSetEnabled: (prop: ConfigurableProp, enabled: boolean) => void; | ||
| props: ComponentFormProps; | ||
| queryDisabledIdx?: number; | ||
| setConfiguredProp: (idx: number, value: any) => void; // XXX would be nice to have type safety here | ||
| setSubmitting: (submitting: boolean) => void; | ||
| submitting: boolean; | ||
| userId: string; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety in FormContext
The FormContext type contains several any types and an XXX comment about generic types.
export type FormContext = {
- component: V1Component; // XXX <T>
+ component: V1Component<T>;
- configurableProps: any[];
+ configurableProps: ConfigurableProp[];
- configuredProps: Record<string, any>;
+ configuredProps: Record<string, unknown>;
dynamicProps?: DynamicProps;
dynamicPropsQueryIsFetching?: boolean;
id: string;
isValid: boolean;
optionalPropIsEnabled: (prop: ConfigurableProp) => boolean;
optionalPropSetEnabled: (prop: ConfigurableProp, enabled: boolean) => void;
props: ComponentFormProps;
queryDisabledIdx?: number;
- setConfiguredProp: (idx: number, value: any) => void;
+ setConfiguredProp: (idx: number, value: unknown) => void;
setSubmitting: (submitting: boolean) => void;
submitting: boolean;
userId: string;
};Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| const { | ||
| isFetching: dynamicPropsQueryIsFetching, | ||
| // TODO error | ||
| } = useQuery({ | ||
| queryKey: [ | ||
| "dynamicProps", | ||
| ], | ||
| queryFn: async () => { | ||
| const { dynamic_props } = await client.componentReloadProps(componentReloadPropsInput); | ||
| // XXX what about if null? | ||
| // TODO observation errors, etc. | ||
| if (dynamic_props) { | ||
| setDynamicProps(dynamic_props); | ||
| } | ||
| setReloadPropIdx(undefined); | ||
| return []; // XXX ok to mutate above and not look at data? | ||
| }, | ||
| enabled: reloadPropIdx != null, // TODO or props.dynamicPropsId && !dynamicProps | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling in dynamic props query
The error handling for the dynamic props query is incomplete.
const {
isFetching: dynamicPropsQueryIsFetching,
- // TODO error
+ error,
+ isError,
} = useQuery({
queryKey: ["dynamicProps"],
queryFn: async () => {
const { dynamic_props } = await client.componentReloadProps(componentReloadPropsInput);
- // XXX what about if null?
+ if (!dynamic_props) {
+ throw new Error('Failed to load dynamic props');
+ }
if (dynamic_props) {
setDynamicProps(dynamic_props);
}
setReloadPropIdx(undefined);
- return []; // XXX ok to mutate above and not look at data?
+ return dynamic_props;
},
enabled: reloadPropIdx != null,
+ retry: 3,
+ onError: (error) => {
+ console.error('Failed to load dynamic props:', error);
+ setErrors(prev => ({
+ ...prev,
+ dynamicProps: ['Failed to load dynamic props']
+ }));
+ }
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const { | |
| isFetching: dynamicPropsQueryIsFetching, | |
| // TODO error | |
| } = useQuery({ | |
| queryKey: [ | |
| "dynamicProps", | |
| ], | |
| queryFn: async () => { | |
| const { dynamic_props } = await client.componentReloadProps(componentReloadPropsInput); | |
| // XXX what about if null? | |
| // TODO observation errors, etc. | |
| if (dynamic_props) { | |
| setDynamicProps(dynamic_props); | |
| } | |
| setReloadPropIdx(undefined); | |
| return []; // XXX ok to mutate above and not look at data? | |
| }, | |
| enabled: reloadPropIdx != null, // TODO or props.dynamicPropsId && !dynamicProps | |
| }); | |
| const { | |
| isFetching: dynamicPropsQueryIsFetching, | |
| error, | |
| isError, | |
| } = useQuery({ | |
| queryKey: [ | |
| "dynamicProps", | |
| ], | |
| queryFn: async () => { | |
| const { dynamic_props } = await client.componentReloadProps(componentReloadPropsInput); | |
| if (!dynamic_props) { | |
| throw new Error('Failed to load dynamic props'); | |
| } | |
| if (dynamic_props) { | |
| setDynamicProps(dynamic_props); | |
| } | |
| setReloadPropIdx(undefined); | |
| return dynamic_props; | |
| }, | |
| enabled: reloadPropIdx != null, // TODO or props.dynamicPropsId && !dynamicProps | |
| retry: 3, | |
| onError: (error) => { | |
| console.error('Failed to load dynamic props:', error); | |
| setErrors(prev => ({ | |
| ...prev, | |
| dynamicProps: ['Failed to load dynamic props'] | |
| })); | |
| } | |
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/sdk/package.json (1)
61-61: Document TypeScript 5.6 migration impact.Consider adding migration notes to the repository documentation to help downstream consumers handle any breaking changes or new features introduced by TypeScript 5.6.
package.json (1)
59-60: Consider specifying stricter version ranges
- The
putoutversion range>=36is quite permissive and could lead to unexpected updatespnpmis specified both inenginesanddevDependencieswhich might be redundantConsider updating to:
- "pnpm": "^9", - "putout": ">=36", + "putout": "^36.0.0",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
components/rentman/node_modules/@pipedream/platformis excluded by!**/node_modules/**pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
.eslintignore(0 hunks).eslintrc(0 hunks).tool-versions(1 hunks)eslint.config.mjs(1 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/actions.ts(1 hunks)packages/sdk/.eslintignore(1 hunks)packages/sdk/package.json(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- .eslintignore
- .eslintrc
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/sdk/.eslintignore
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/actions.ts
🔇 Additional comments (11)
eslint.config.mjs (8)
14-15: Correct usage of __filename and __dirname in ES modules
Defining __filename and __dirname using fileURLToPath(import.meta.url) and path.dirname(__filename) ensures compatibility with ES modules in Node.js.
23-41: Consider reviewing the ignored file patterns for completeness
The ignore patterns exclude many files and directories from linting. Verify that all unnecessary files are properly excluded, and consider if additional patterns like .gitignore, Dockerfiles, or other asset types should be added to the ignore list.
66-185: Comprehensive set of linting rules enhances code consistency
The defined linting rules cover various aspects of code style and formatting, promoting consistency across the codebase.
198-215: Appropriate application of Pipedream-specific rules
Applying Pipedream-specific linting rules to actions and sources ensures that these components adhere to required properties and conventions.
226-234: Disabling required property rules for common files
The Pipedream-specific required property rules are turned off for common files. Confirm that this is intentional and that common files do not need to adhere to these rules.
278-283: Proper configuration of @typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars
The rule @typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars is correctly configured to ignore variables prefixed with _, following the common convention for unused variables.
284-285: Review disabling of max-len and semi rules for TypeScript files
The max-len and semi rules are disabled for TypeScript files. Ensure this aligns with the project's code style guidelines and that code consistency is maintained.
305-306: Disabling react/react-in-jsx-scope rule for React 17+
Disabling the react/react-in-jsx-scope rule is appropriate since importing React is no longer necessary in JSX files with React 17 and above.
.tool-versions (2)
1-1: LGTM on Node.js update, but review changelog
The Node.js update from 18.17.0 to 18.18.0 is a safe minor version bump within the LTS line. However, it's good practice to review the changelog for any notable changes or deprecations.
✅ Verification successful
Node.js version update is compatible with project requirements
The verification shows that one package.json file specifies >=18.0.0 as the Node.js engine requirement, which is fully compatible with the update to 18.18.0. All other package.json files have no specific Node.js version constraints.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for Node.js version-specific code patterns that might be affected
# Look for potentially affected Node.js features or APIs
rg -l 'node:|engine:|engines:' package.json
# Check for Node.js version constraints in package.json files
fd 'package.json' -x jq -r '.engines.node' {}
Length of output: 11190
2-2: Verify compatibility with pnpm 9.x
The upgrade from pnpm 7.x to 9.x is a major version bump that could introduce breaking changes. Please ensure:
- All build scripts and workflows are compatible
- Package resolution behavior remains consistent
- Lock files are regenerated properly
✅ Verification successful
pnpm 9.x upgrade appears safe and properly configured
The codebase is already set up for pnpm 9.x compatibility:
- Project's
package.jsonexplicitly declares"pnpm": "9.14.2"in engines field - Development dependencies include
"pnpm": "^9" - Workspace configuration is present (
pnpm-workspace.yaml) - Lock files exist in the monorepo structure (root, docs-v2, and connect-react package)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential compatibility issues with pnpm 9.x
# Check for pnpm-specific configurations that might need updates
rg -l 'pnpm-workspace.yaml|.pnpmfile.cjs|.npmrc' .
# Look for custom pnpm scripts in package.json files that might need adjustment
fd 'package.json' -x jq -r '.scripts | select(. != null) | to_entries | .[] | select(.value | contains("pnpm"))' {}
Length of output: 170
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check for pnpm-related configurations and usage
# Check for pnpm-specific files
fd -t f "pnpm|.npmrc"
# Look for package.json files
fd "package.json" -x cat {} \; | grep -B2 -A2 "\"pnpm\""
# Check for pnpm-lock.yaml to understand project structure
fd "pnpm-lock.yaml"
# Look for any CI/CD configurations that might use pnpm
fd -e yml -e yaml | xargs grep -l "pnpm"
Length of output: 640
package.json (1)
40-41: Ensure ESLint configuration is updated for new packages
The addition of @eslint/eslintrc and @eslint/js along with major version updates to ESLint packages suggests a migration to the new flat config system. Ensure that:
- The ESLint configuration file is updated to use the new format
- All ESLint plugins are compatible with ESLint 8
Also applies to: 45-49, 52-53
✅ Verification successful
ESLint configuration is properly updated for the new packages
The codebase is already using the new ESLint flat config system correctly:
- Main config
eslint.config.mjsuses@eslint/jsand@eslint/eslintrcwith flat config format - Docs config
docs-v2/eslint.config.jsalso uses the new format - ESLint v8 is installed, which is compatible with all the configured plugins
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify ESLint configuration and compatibility
# Check for ESLint config files
fd -e js -e cjs -e mjs -e json -g '*eslint*'
# Look for potential ESLint configuration in package.json
grep -A 10 '"eslintConfig"' package.json || echo "No inline ESLint config found"
Length of output: 201
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of ESLint config files to verify if they use the new flat config format
cat eslint.config.mjs
cat docs-v2/eslint.config.js
# Check ESLint version in package.json
grep -A 1 '"eslint":' package.json || echo "ESLint entry not found"
Length of output: 6673
| @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ | |||
| "jest-fetch-mock": "^3.0.3", | |||
| "nodemon": "^3.1.7", | |||
| "ts-jest": "^29.2.5", | |||
| "typescript": "^5.5.2" | |||
| "typescript": "^5.6" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
TypeScript version update needs to be coordinated across packages
The TypeScript version update to ^5.6 in the SDK package is problematic because:
- The root package.json enforces a constraint of
>=4.7.4 <5.7.0 - The platform package uses a significantly older version (^3.5.3)
- Other packages in the monorepo use different ^5.x versions
This update should be part of a coordinated effort to align TypeScript versions across the monorepo, especially given the platform's dependency on an older version.
- Consider updating the platform package first to a compatible TypeScript version
- Align all package versions with the root package.json constraints
- Update the root package.json constraint if higher versions are needed
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify TypeScript 5.6 compatibility.
The TypeScript update to ^5.6 introduces new features and potential breaking changes. Please ensure:
- Compatibility with ts-jest (29.2.5)
- No breaking changes affect the dual build setup (browser/server)
Run the following script to check for potential compatibility issues:
TypeScript version update requires attention to version conflicts
The codebase has multiple TypeScript dependencies with conflicting version ranges:
- Root package.json:
>=4.7.4 <5.7.0 - platform:
^3.5.3 - helpers:
^5.5.2 - sdk:
^5.6 - prompts:
^5.0.4 - types:
^5.2.2 - docs-v2:
^5.5.4
Let's verify if this update is part of a coordinated effort:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check TypeScript compatibility with dependencies
# Check ts-jest compatibility matrix
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kulshekhar/ts-jest/main/README.md | grep -A 5 "| ts-jest | TypeScript |"
# Search for TypeScript-specific configurations that might need updates
rg -g "tsconfig*.json" "compilerOptions|extends"
# Look for potential TypeScript version constraints in dependencies
rg -g "package.json" '"typescript":\s*"[^"]*"'
Length of output: 4910
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any ongoing TypeScript updates in recent commits and PRs
gh pr list --search "typescript" --json title,body,number --limit 5
# Check package.json in platform directory for dependencies that might be affected
rg -g "platform/package.json" "dependencies|devDependencies" -A 10
# Look for TypeScript-specific build scripts that might need updates
rg -g "package.json" "build.*ts"
Length of output: 9931
| "typescript": ">=4.7.4 <5.7.0", | ||
| "typescript-eslint": "^8.15.0" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Narrow down the TypeScript version range for better consistency
The current TypeScript version range >=4.7.4 <5.7.0 is too wide and could lead to compatibility issues. The codebase shows varying TypeScript dependencies across different packages:
- Most packages use TypeScript 5.x (
^5.2.2,^5.5.2,^5.5.4,^5.6) - One legacy package uses TypeScript 3.x (
^3.5.3) - The majority of tsconfig.json files target ES2020
Recommend updating the version constraint to ^5.5.0 to:
- Align with the most commonly used major version in the codebase
- Maintain compatibility with the ES2020 target used across components
- Ensure consistent behavior across installations
- Stay within a reasonable minor version range
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify TypeScript version compatibility
The TypeScript version range >=4.7.4 <5.7.0 is quite wide. This could lead to inconsistent behavior across different installations.
Let me analyze the TypeScript configuration across the codebase to verify version compatibility.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for TypeScript configuration and dependencies
# Look for TypeScript configuration files
fd -e json -g '*tsconfig*'
# Check for packages that depend on TypeScript
grep -r '"typescript":' . -l | grep package.json
Length of output: 19945
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check TypeScript version requirements in package.json files and tsconfig.json compiler options
# Get TypeScript version requirements from package.json files
echo "=== TypeScript Version Requirements ==="
rg '"typescript":\s*"[^"]*"' -g 'package.json' --no-filename
# Check compiler options in tsconfig files
echo -e "\n=== TypeScript Compiler Options ==="
rg '"compilerOptions"' -A 5 -g 'tsconfig.json' --no-filename
Length of output: 16674
| @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ | |||
| "version": "1.2.1", | |||
| "description": "Pipedream Monorepo", | |||
| "engines": { | |||
| "pnpm": "7.33.6" | |||
| "pnpm": "9.14.2" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Upgrade to pnpm 9.14.2 requires attention to workspace configuration and lock files
The verification reveals potential issues that need to be addressed:
- Multiple yarn.lock files exist in component directories while using pnpm as the main package manager
- Both pnpm-workspace.yaml and pnpm-lock.yaml are present, confirming this is a pnpm workspace project
- No Node.js version is specified in package.json, which is important for pnpm compatibility
Action items:
- Remove yarn.lock files from component directories to prevent package manager conflicts
- Ensure all components use pnpm for consistency
- Add Node.js version specification to package.json (pnpm 9.x requires Node.js >=16.14)
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify compatibility with the major pnpm version upgrade
The upgrade from pnpm 7.x to 9.14.2 is a significant jump that may introduce breaking changes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for Node.js version compatibility and workspace configuration
# Check if package-lock.json or yarn.lock exists (shouldn't coexist with pnpm)
fd -e lock
# Check for pnpm-workspace.yaml configuration
fd 'pnpm-workspace.yaml'
# Check Node.js version specification
grep '"node"' package.json || echo "No Node.js version specified"
Length of output: 343
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check pnpm-workspace.yaml content and package.json files in workspaces
cat pnpm-workspace.yaml
# List all package.json files in components directory
fd package.json components/
# Check if there are any pnpm-lock.yaml files
fd 'pnpm-lock.yaml'
# Check the root package.json for any pnpm-specific configurations
grep -A 5 '"scripts"' package.json
Length of output: 76853
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
packages/connect-react/src/components/ComponentForm.tsx (1)
22-28: Consider memoizing the component for better performance.Since this component is likely to be used in forms with frequent updates, consider memoizing it to prevent unnecessary re-renders.
-export function ComponentForm(props: ComponentFormProps) { +export const ComponentForm = React.memo(function ComponentForm(props: ComponentFormProps) { return ( <FormContextProvider props={props}> <InternalComponentForm /> </FormContextProvider> ); -} +});Don't forget to add the React import:
+import React from 'react'; import { FormContextProvider, type FormContext, } from "../hooks/form-context";packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlSelect.tsx (1)
16-18: Add component documentationConsider adding JSDoc documentation to describe the component's purpose, props, and usage:
/** * A customizable select control that supports both single and multi-select modes * with optional creatable functionality. * * @template T The type of the select option values * @param props The component props * @param props.isCreatable Enable creation of new options * @param props.options Array of available options * @param props.selectProps Additional props passed to react-select * @returns A Select or CreatableSelect component */eslint.config.mjs (5)
1-20: Consider grouping related imports.The imports could be better organized by grouping them into categories:
- ESLint core/compatibility
- Plugins
- Parsers
- Node.js built-ins
+// ESLint core/compatibility +import js from "@eslint/js"; +import { FlatCompat } from "@eslint/eslintrc"; + +// Plugins import jsonc from "eslint-plugin-jsonc"; import putout from "eslint-plugin-putout"; import pipedream from "eslint-plugin-pipedream"; import typescriptEslint from "@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin"; import jest from "eslint-plugin-jest"; import globals from "globals"; + +// Parsers import parser from "jsonc-eslint-parser"; import tsParser from "@typescript-eslint/parser"; + +// Node.js built-ins import path from "node:path"; import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url"; -import js from "@eslint/js"; -import { FlatCompat } from "@eslint/eslintrc";
24-41: Consider more specific ignore patterns.Some patterns could be more specific to avoid accidentally ignoring valid files:
**/scriptsmight be too broad- Consider using more specific patterns for documentation files
ignores: [ - "**/scripts", + "**/scripts/build/**", + "**/scripts/deploy/**", "components/**/test-event.mjs", "**/.github", "**/node_modules", "**/package-lock.json", "**/pnpm-lock.yaml", "**/dist/**", - "**/*.md", - "**/*.mdx", + "**/docs/**/*.md", + "**/docs/**/*.mdx", + "**/*.README.md", "**/*.txt",
71-81: Consider relaxing some formatting rules for better maintainability.The current array and object formatting rules are quite strict and might make the code less maintainable:
- Forcing newlines for every array element
- Requiring all object properties on new lines
Consider these adjustments:
"array-bracket-newline": [ "error", { - minItems: 1, + minItems: 3, }, ], "array-element-newline": [ "error", - "always", + "consistent", ], "object-curly-newline": [ "error", { ExportDeclaration: "always", ImportDeclaration: { - minProperties: 2, + minProperties: 3, multiline: true, }, ObjectExpression: { - minProperties: 1, + minProperties: 2, multiline: true, }, ObjectPattern: { minProperties: 2, multiline: true, }, }, ],Also applies to: 141-173
189-192: Include additional JSON file patterns.Consider adding more JSON file patterns that are commonly found in Node.js projects:
files: [ "**/.eslintrc", "**/*.json", + "**/tsconfig.json", + "**/package.json", + "**/composer.json", ],
247-258: Add documentation for component-specific overrides.Consider adding comments to explain why unused vars are disabled for these specific components:
+// Disable unused vars check for component templates +// These files often contain example code or placeholders +// that might not use all declared variables { files: [ "**/components/bash/**/*.*js", "**/components/go/**/*.*js", "**/components/node/**/*.*js", "**/components/python/**/*.*js", ], rules: { "no-unused-vars": "off", }, },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
packages/sdk/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
eslint.config.mjs(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ComponentForm.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlSelect.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ErrorBoundary.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-field-context.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/frontend-client-context.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)packages/sdk/package.json(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- packages/connect-react/src/components/ErrorBoundary.tsx
- packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-field-context.tsx
- packages/connect-react/src/hooks/frontend-client-context.tsx
- packages/sdk/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
packages/connect-react/src/components/ComponentForm.tsx
[error] 11-11: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx
[error] 59-59: 'component' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 59-59: 'configuredProps' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 59-59: 'propNames' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 59-59: 'userId' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 61-61: 'component.key' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 93-93: 'onUpdateConfiguredProps' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 94-94: 'onUpdateConfiguredProps' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 133-133: 'component' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 133-133: 'component.configurable_props' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 134-134: 'propNames.length' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 138-138: 'propNames.findIndex' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 150-150: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)
[error] 181-181: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)
[error] 198-198: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)
[error] 214-214: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)
[error] 251-251: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
packages/connect-react/src/components/ComponentForm.tsx (1)
1-10: LGTM! Well-organized imports.
The imports are properly structured, separating internal and external dependencies, with appropriate use of type imports.
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlSelect.tsx (6)
9-14: Improve type safety of ControlSelectProps
Referencing the previous review comment about improving type safety with constraints and documentation. The XXX comment indicates a known issue that should be addressed.
16-26: LGTM! Clean hooks usage and context integration
The component follows React best practices with proper hooks usage and clean context integration.
27-36: Improve type safety in styles definition
Referencing the previous review comment about avoiding {} as a type. The base parameter in the container style function should use CSSObjectWithLabel type.
37-68: Refactor value transformation logic
Referencing the previous review comment about refactoring duplicated logic for transforming values into { label, value } objects.
Consider improving type narrowing
The type checking logic could be improved using TypeScript type guards:
- const lvOptions = options?.[0] && typeof options[0] === "object";
+ const isLabelValueOption = (opt: unknown): opt is { label: string; value: T } => (
+ typeof opt === "object" && opt !== null && "label" in opt && "value" in opt
+ );
+ const lvOptions = options?.[0] && isLabelValueOption(options[0]);79-79: Add type check for prop.type
Referencing the previous review comment about ensuring prop.type is a string before using endsWith.
84-104: Improve error handling in onChange
Referencing the previous review comment about handling unhandled option types gracefully to prevent runtime errors.
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx (3)
156-156: Clarify numeric type handling
The comment questions whether prop.type should be "integer" or "number".
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can provide a final response as there's enough context to make a determination about the numeric type handling.
Keep "integer" type as it correctly represents the validation intent
The current implementation correctly uses "integer" type as it specifically validates for whole numbers. The code validates that:
- The value is a number (
typeof value !== "number") - The type is specifically "integer" for whole number validation
This aligns with the codebase's patterns where:
- When floating-point numbers are needed, they are explicitly handled using
parseFloat - When integer validation is needed, "integer" type is used (seen in multiple components like
bigmailer,shopify,twenty, etc.) - The distinction between "integer" and "number" types is intentional across the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of integer and number types in the codebase
echo "Searching for integer type usage:"
rg -A 2 'type.*=.*("integer"|"number")'
echo "Searching for float validation:"
rg -A 2 'parseFloat|Number\.isInteger'
Length of output: 29270
175-177:
Implement validation for app type properties
The validation logic for properties of type "app" is incomplete.
} else if (prop.type === "app") {
- // TODO need to know about auth type
+ if (!value || typeof value !== "object") {
+ errs.push("invalid app configuration");
+ } else if (!value.accountId) {
+ errs.push("missing account ID");
+ }
+ // Additional validation based on auth type can be added here
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
112-130:
Implement proper error handling for dynamic props query
The dynamic props query lacks proper error handling and has multiple TODO comments.
const {
isFetching: dynamicPropsQueryIsFetching,
- // TODO error
+ error,
+ isError,
} = useQuery({
queryKey: ["dynamicProps"],
queryFn: async () => {
const { dynamic_props } = await client.componentReloadProps(componentReloadPropsInput);
- // XXX what about if null?
- // TODO observation errors, etc.
+ if (!dynamic_props) {
+ throw new Error("Failed to load dynamic props");
+ }
if (dynamic_props) {
setDynamicProps(dynamic_props);
}
setReloadPropIdx(undefined);
- return []; // XXX ok to mutate above and not look at data?
+ return dynamic_props;
},
enabled: reloadPropIdx != null,
+ onError: (error) => {
+ console.error("Failed to load dynamic props:", error);
+ setErrors(prev => ({
+ ...prev,
+ dynamicProps: ["Failed to load dynamic props"]
+ }));
+ }
});Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| "target": "es6", | ||
| "module": "commonjs", | ||
| "moduleResolution": "bundler", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review module-related compiler options
The current module configuration has some inconsistencies:
"module": "commonjs"is not optimal for a modern React package and conflicts with"moduleResolution": "bundler"- Consider using more modern settings for better tree-shaking and ESM support
Apply this diff to update the module settings:
- "target": "es6",
- "module": "commonjs",
- "moduleResolution": "bundler",
+ "target": "es2020",
+ "module": "esnext",
+ "moduleResolution": "bundler",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "target": "es6", | |
| "module": "commonjs", | |
| "moduleResolution": "bundler", | |
| "target": "es2020", | |
| "module": "esnext", | |
| "moduleResolution": "bundler", |
| "noEmit": true, | ||
| "strict": true, | ||
| "forceConsistentCasingInFileNames": true, | ||
| "resolveJsonModule": true, | ||
| "esModuleInterop": true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add essential compiler options for library publishing
The current configuration is missing crucial options needed for publishing a TypeScript library:
- No declaration file generation
- No output directory configuration
- No source map settings
Add these essential compiler options:
"noEmit": true,
"strict": true,
"forceConsistentCasingInFileNames": true,
"resolveJsonModule": true,
- "esModuleInterop": true
+ "esModuleInterop": true,
+ "declaration": true,
+ "declarationDir": "./dist/types",
+ "outDir": "./dist",
+ "rootDir": "./src",
+ "sourceMap": true,
+ "declarationMap": trueAlso, consider removing "noEmit": true as it prevents generating declaration files needed for library consumers.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| } from "@pipedream/sdk"; | ||
| import { InternalComponentForm } from "./InternalComponentForm"; | ||
|
|
||
| export type ComponentFormProps<T extends ConfigurableProps = any> = { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace any with a more specific default type.
Using any as the default generic type reduces type safety. Consider using a more specific default type that represents the minimum required structure.
-export type ComponentFormProps<T extends ConfigurableProps = any> = {
+export type ComponentFormProps<T extends ConfigurableProps = Record<string, never>> = {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export type ComponentFormProps<T extends ConfigurableProps = any> = { | |
| export type ComponentFormProps<T extends ConfigurableProps = Record<string, never>> = { |
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 11-11: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)
eslint.config.mjs
Outdated
| rules: { | ||
| "@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars": [ | ||
| "error", | ||
| { | ||
| argsIgnorePattern: "^_", | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| "max-len": "off", | ||
| "semi": "off", | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enable additional TypeScript-specific rules.
Consider enabling more TypeScript-specific rules for better type safety:
rules: {
"@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars": [
"error",
{
argsIgnorePattern: "^_",
},
],
+ "@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type": "error",
+ "@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any": "error",
+ "@typescript-eslint/strict-boolean-expressions": "error",
"max-len": "off",
"semi": "off",
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| rules: { | |
| "@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars": [ | |
| "error", | |
| { | |
| argsIgnorePattern: "^_", | |
| }, | |
| ], | |
| "max-len": "off", | |
| "semi": "off", | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| rules: { | |
| "@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars": [ | |
| "error", | |
| { | |
| argsIgnorePattern: "^_", | |
| }, | |
| ], | |
| "@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type": "error", | |
| "@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any": "error", | |
| "@typescript-eslint/strict-boolean-expressions": "error", | |
| "max-len": "off", | |
| "semi": "off", | |
| }, | |
| }, |
| rules: { | ||
| "react/react-in-jsx-scope": "off", | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add more React-specific rules.
Consider adding more React-specific rules for better code quality:
rules: {
"react/react-in-jsx-scope": "off",
+ "react/prop-types": "error",
+ "react/jsx-no-bind": "error",
+ "react/jsx-pascal-case": "error",
+ "react/jsx-no-useless-fragment": "error",
+ "react/hook-use-state": "error",
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| rules: { | |
| "react/react-in-jsx-scope": "off", | |
| }, | |
| rules: { | |
| "react/react-in-jsx-scope": "off", | |
| "react/prop-types": "error", | |
| "react/jsx-no-bind": "error", | |
| "react/jsx-pascal-case": "error", | |
| "react/jsx-no-useless-fragment": "error", | |
| "react/hook-use-state": "error", | |
| }, |
| return errs; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const updateConfiguredPropsQueryDisabledIdx = (configuredProps: Record<string, any>) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace any types with proper type definitions
Multiple function parameters use the any type, which reduces type safety.
-const updateConfiguredPropsQueryDisabledIdx = (configuredProps: Record<string, any>) => {
+const updateConfiguredPropsQueryDisabledIdx = (configuredProps: Partial<ConfiguredProps<T>>) => {
-const updateConfiguredProps = (configuredProps: Record<string, any>) => {
+const updateConfiguredProps = (configuredProps: Partial<ConfiguredProps<T>>) => {
-const newConfiguredProps: Record<string, any> = {};
+const newConfiguredProps: Partial<ConfiguredProps<T>> = {};
-const setConfiguredProp = (idx: number, value: any) => {
+const setConfiguredProp = <K extends keyof ConfiguredProps<T>>(
+ idx: number,
+ value: ConfiguredProps<T>[K] | undefined
+) => {Also applies to: 198-198, 214-214, 251-251
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 181-181: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)
| userId: string; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| export const FormContext = createContext<FormContext<any /* XXX fix */> | undefined>(undefined); // eslint-disable-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove any type from FormContext creation
The context creation uses an explicit any type with an eslint disable comment.
-export const FormContext = createContext<FormContext<any /* XXX fix */> | undefined>(undefined); // eslint-disable-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
+export const FormContext = createContext<FormContext<ConfigurableProps> | undefined>(undefined);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const FormContext = createContext<FormContext<any /* XXX fix */> | undefined>(undefined); // eslint-disable-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any | |
| export const FormContext = createContext<FormContext<ConfigurableProps> | undefined>(undefined); |
| import { useFrontendClient } from "./frontend-client-context"; | ||
| import type { ComponentFormProps } from "../components/ComponentForm"; | ||
|
|
||
| export type DynamicProps<T extends ConfigurableProps> = { id: string; configurable_props: T; }; // TODO |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance type safety for DynamicProps
The DynamicProps type uses a TODO comment and could be more strictly typed.
-export type DynamicProps<T extends ConfigurableProps> = { id: string; configurable_props: T; }; // TODO
+export type DynamicProps<T extends ConfigurableProps> = {
+ id: string;
+ configurable_props: T;
+ errors?: Array<{
+ message: string;
+ code: string;
+ }>;
+};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export type DynamicProps<T extends ConfigurableProps> = { id: string; configurable_props: T; }; // TODO | |
| export type DynamicProps<T extends ConfigurableProps> = { | |
| id: string; | |
| configurable_props: T; | |
| errors?: Array<{ | |
| message: string; | |
| code: string; | |
| }>; | |
| }; |
| optionalPropSetEnabled: (prop: ConfigurableProp, enabled: boolean) => void; | ||
| props: ComponentFormProps; | ||
| queryDisabledIdx?: number; | ||
| setConfiguredProp: (idx: number, value: unknown) => void; // XXX type safety for value (T will rarely be static right?) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety for setConfiguredProp value parameter
The XXX comment indicates a need for better type safety on the value parameter.
- setConfiguredProp: (idx: number, value: unknown) => void; // XXX type safety for value (T will rarely be static right?)
+ setConfiguredProp: <K extends keyof ConfiguredProps<T>>(
+ idx: number,
+ value: ConfiguredProps<T>[K] | undefined
+ ) => void;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| setConfiguredProp: (idx: number, value: unknown) => void; // XXX type safety for value (T will rarely be static right?) | |
| setConfiguredProp: <K extends keyof ConfiguredProps<T>>( | |
| idx: number, | |
| value: ConfiguredProps<T>[K] | undefined | |
| ) => void; |
| type FormContextProviderProps = { | ||
| children: React.ReactNode; | ||
| } & { | ||
| props: ComponentFormProps; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Define proper prop types for FormContextProviderProps
The component props are missing proper type validation as flagged by eslint.
type FormContextProviderProps = {
children: React.ReactNode;
-} & {
- props: ComponentFormProps;
+ props: {
+ component: V1Component<T>;
+ configuredProps?: ConfiguredProps<T>;
+ propNames?: string[];
+ userId: string;
+ onUpdateConfiguredProps?: (props: ConfiguredProps<T>) => void;
+ };
};Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
packages/connect-react/src/components/RemoteOptionsContainer.tsx (2)
9-11: Consider expanding the props interface for better component configuration.The current props interface only includes
queryEnabled. Consider adding props for:
onError?: (error: Error) => voidfor custom error handlingplaceholder?: stringfor custom placeholder textisSearchable?: booleanto control search behavior (referenced in TODO on line 120)
105-112: Improve error display and placeholder logic.The TODO about error display and the complex placeholder logic could be simplified:
- Consider moving error display to a separate error boundary or toast notification
- Simplify placeholder logic using early returns
- const placeholder = error - ? error.message - : disableQueryDisabling - ? "Click to configure" - : !queryEnabled - ? "Configure props above first" - : undefined; + const getPlaceholder = () => { + if (error) return error.message; + if (disableQueryDisabling) return "Click to configure"; + if (!queryEnabled) return "Configure props above first"; + return undefined; + }; + const placeholder = getPlaceholder();packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx (1)
298-298: Remove debug console.log statementDebug statements should not be committed to production code.
- // console.log("***", configurableProps, configuredProps)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/customization-context.tsx (5)
122-122: Address TODO comment about generic type refactoringThe comment indicates a need to refactor the relationship between Key and other generics in this file.
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track this technical debt and propose a solution for improving the generic type relationships?
104-111: Consider using more specific types for contextWhile using
anytypes might be necessary here, consider using a constrained generic type to provide better type safety while maintaining flexibility.Consider this alternative approach:
-export const CustomizationContext = createContext<CustomizationConfig<any, any, any>>({ +export const CustomizationContext = createContext<CustomizationConfig<unknown, boolean, GroupBase<unknown>>>({
153-160: Simplify conditional logic in getClassNamesThe nested conditional checks and type assertions can be simplified for better readability.
Consider this cleaner implementation:
- if (typeof classNames?.container == "function") { - classNames.container = typeof classNames?.container == "function" - ? (...args) => ([ - classNames?.container?.(...args), - baseClassName, - ]).join(" ") - : () => baseClassName; - } + if (typeof classNames?.container === "function") { + const originalContainer = classNames.container; + classNames.container = (...args) => [ + originalContainer(...args), + baseClassName, + ].join(" "); + } else { + classNames.container = () => baseClassName; + }
271-276: Consider memoizing the Provider valueThe Provider's value prop is recreated on every render. Consider memoizing it to prevent unnecessary re-renders of child components.
Consider this optimization:
export const CustomizeProvider: React.FC<CustomizationConfig & { children: React.ReactNode; }> = ({ children, ...customizationProps }) => { + const value = React.useMemo(() => customizationProps, [customizationProps]); - return <CustomizationContext.Provider value={customizationProps}>{children}</CustomizationContext.Provider>; + return <CustomizationContext.Provider value={value}>{children}</CustomizationContext.Provider>; };🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
[error] 272-272: 'children' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
1-3: Add JSDoc documentation for better developer experienceThe file implements a complex customization system. Adding JSDoc documentation would help developers understand its usage better.
Consider adding documentation like this:
/** * A React context for managing component customization. * Provides utilities for customizing styles, class names, and components * for both regular React components and react-select components. * * @example * ```tsx * <CustomizeProvider theme={myTheme}> * <App /> * </CustomizeProvider> * ``` */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
packages/connect-react/src/components/ComponentForm.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlAny.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlApp.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/Errors.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalComponentForm.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/RemoteOptionsContainer.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/customization-context.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- packages/connect-react/src/components/ComponentForm.tsx
- packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlAny.tsx
- packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlApp.tsx
- packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalComponentForm.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/connect-react/src/components/RemoteOptionsContainer.tsx
[error] 51-51: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/customization-context.tsx
[error] 44-44: Shouldn't redeclare 'ReactSelectComponents'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'ReactSelectComponents' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
🪛 eslint (1.23.1)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/customization-context.tsx
[error] 272-272: 'children' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx
[error] 59-59: 'component' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 59-59: 'configuredProps' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 59-59: 'propNames' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 59-59: 'userId' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 61-61: 'component.key' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 93-93: 'onUpdateConfiguredProps' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 94-94: 'onUpdateConfiguredProps' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 133-133: 'component' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 133-133: 'component.configurable_props' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 134-134: 'propNames.length' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 138-138: 'propNames.findIndex' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
packages/connect-react/src/components/Errors.tsx (3)
1-8: LGTM! Well-organized imports.
The imports are clean, necessary, and properly organized with a clear separation between internal and external dependencies.
9-13: LGTM! Well-defined type interface.
The ErrorsProps type definition is precise, type-safe, and properly constrained with generics.
31-32: Consider implementing loading states in FormFieldContext.
The TODO comment raises a valid architectural concern. Based on the codebase analysis from past reviews, implementing loading states at the FormFieldContext level would be more consistent with existing patterns.
Consider:
- Moving loading state management to
FormFieldContext - Using React Query patterns for async operations
- Implementing consistent loading UI patterns
packages/connect-react/src/components/RemoteOptionsContainer.tsx (2)
45-45: Resolve TODO regarding ref.value support.
The TODO comment indicates uncertainty about ref.value support. This needs to be resolved before the code goes to production.
134-138: Optimize refetch logic in onMenuOpen.
The current implementation may cause unnecessary refetches.
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx (2)
175-177:
Implement validation for app type properties
The validation logic for properties of type "app" is missing. This could lead to runtime errors if invalid app configurations are provided.
} else if (prop.type === "app") {
- // TODO need to know about auth type
+ if (!value || typeof value !== "object") {
+ errs.push("invalid app configuration");
+ } else if (!value.accountId) {
+ errs.push("missing account ID");
+ }
+ // Add additional validation based on auth type if needed
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
244-248: Consider adding missing dependencies to the effect
The effect that clears props on user change might need additional dependencies:
useEffect(() => {
updateConfiguredProps({});
}, [
userId,
+ updateConfiguredProps, // Add function dependency
]);| // maybe that should just be handled by FormFieldContext instead of container? | ||
| return ( | ||
| <ul {...getProps("errors", baseStyles, props)}> | ||
| {errors.map((msg) => <li key={msg} {...getProps("error", baseStyles, props)}>{msg}</li>)} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using a more reliable key for list items.
Using the error message as a key (key={msg}) could be problematic if:
- Multiple errors have the same message
- Messages contain HTML or special characters
- Messages change during runtime
Consider using an index-based or generated unique key:
-{errors.map((msg) => <li key={msg} {...getProps("error", baseStyles, props)}>{msg}</li>)}
+{errors.map((msg, index) => (
+ <li
+ key={`${props.field.id}-error-${index}`}
+ {...getProps("error", baseStyles, props)}
+ >
+ {msg}
+ </li>
+))}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| const queryKeyInput = { | ||
| ...componentConfigureInput, | ||
| } | ||
| delete queryKeyInput.dynamicPropsId |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize object creation to avoid delete operator.
Instead of creating an object and then deleting a property, construct the object without the property for better performance.
- const queryKeyInput = {
- ...componentConfigureInput,
- }
- delete queryKeyInput.dynamicPropsId
+ const { dynamicPropsId, ...queryKeyInput } = componentConfigureInput;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const queryKeyInput = { | |
| ...componentConfigureInput, | |
| } | |
| delete queryKeyInput.dynamicPropsId | |
| const { dynamicPropsId, ...queryKeyInput } = componentConfigureInput; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 51-51: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
| queryFn: async () => { | ||
| setError(undefined); | ||
| const res = await client.componentConfigure(componentConfigureInput); | ||
|
|
||
| // console.log("res", res) | ||
| // XXX look at errors in response here too | ||
| const { | ||
| options, string_options: stringOptions, errors, | ||
| } = res; | ||
| if (errors?.length) { | ||
| // TODO field context setError? (for validity, etc.) | ||
| try { | ||
| setError(JSON.parse(errors[0])); | ||
| } catch { | ||
| setError({ | ||
| name: "Error", | ||
| message: errors[0], | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| return []; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance error handling in queryFn.
The error handling implementation has several TODOs and could be improved:
- Consider using a proper error type instead of parsing JSON
- Implement the field context error setting mentioned in the TODO
- Add proper error logging
queryFn: async () => {
setError(undefined);
const res = await client.componentConfigure(componentConfigureInput);
- // XXX look at errors in response here too
const { options, string_options: stringOptions, errors } = res;
if (errors?.length) {
- // TODO field context setError? (for validity, etc.)
+ const error = errors[0];
+ // Log error for debugging
+ console.error('Component configuration error:', error);
+ // Set field error if context method exists
+ fieldContext?.setError?.(error);
try {
- setError(JSON.parse(errors[0]));
+ setError(typeof error === 'string' ? JSON.parse(error) : error);
} catch {
setError({
name: "Error",
- message: errors[0],
+ message: error,
});
}
return [];
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| return ( | ||
| <ControlSelect | ||
| options={data || []} | ||
| // XXX isSearchable if pageQuery? or maybe in all cases? or maybe NOT when pageQuery |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Make isSearchable enabled when useQuery is true
Based on the code analysis, the behavior should be determined by the useQuery prop:
- When
prop.useQueryis true, the component already handles query input and refetching, soisSearchableshould be enabled - When
prop.useQueryis false, the component doesn't need search functionality as it's not querying remote data
Suggested implementation:
isSearchable: prop.useQuery🔗 Analysis chain
Resolve isSearchable behavior TODO.
The comment indicates uncertainty about when the select should be searchable. This should be determined based on the component's requirements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar select components to determine consistent searchable behavior
ast-grep --pattern 'ControlSelect {
$$$
selectProps={{
$$$
isSearchable
$$$
}}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for ControlSelect components and their props
rg -U "ControlSelect.*selectProps" -A 5
# Also search for any comments or code discussing isSearchable behavior
rg "isSearchable"
# Look for the component definition to understand its interface
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
isSearchable
$$$
}'
Length of output: 367
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look at the full context of both files to understand the usage patterns
cat packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlApp.tsx
echo "---"
cat packages/connect-react/src/components/RemoteOptionsContainer.tsx
# Also search for any Select-related props or interfaces
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $name {
$$$
select
$$$
}'
Length of output: 8630
| type FormContextProviderProps<T extends ConfigurableProps> = { | ||
| children: React.ReactNode; | ||
| } & { | ||
| props: ComponentFormProps<T>; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add proper type validation for FormContextProviderProps
The component props need proper type validation. Consider expanding the type definition:
type FormContextProviderProps<T extends ConfigurableProps> = {
children: React.ReactNode;
-} & {
- props: ComponentFormProps<T>;
+ props: {
+ component: V1Component<T>;
+ configuredProps?: ConfiguredProps<T>;
+ propNames?: string[];
+ userId: string;
+ onUpdateConfiguredProps?: (props: ConfiguredProps<T>) => void;
+ };
};Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| _configurableProps.push(prop); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| configurableProps = _configurableProps as unknown as T; // XXX |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid unsafe type casting with unknown
The type casting with unknown could lead to runtime type errors. Consider using a type guard or proper type narrowing instead.
- configurableProps = _configurableProps as unknown as T; // XXX
+ configurableProps = _configurableProps.filter((prop): prop is T[number] => {
+ return prop !== undefined && prop !== null;
+ }) as T;Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| export type ReactSelectComponents = { | ||
| controlAppSelect: typeof ControlApp; | ||
| controlSelect: typeof ControlSelect; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Rename type to avoid naming conflict with react-select import
The type name ReactSelectComponents conflicts with the import from react-select at line 8. This could lead to confusion and potential issues.
Apply this diff to fix the naming conflict:
-export type ReactSelectComponents = {
+export type CustomReactSelectComponents = {
controlAppSelect: typeof ControlApp;
controlSelect: typeof ControlSelect;
};Remember to update all references to this type throughout the file.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export type ReactSelectComponents = { | |
| controlAppSelect: typeof ControlApp; | |
| controlSelect: typeof ControlSelect; | |
| }; | |
| export type CustomReactSelectComponents = { | |
| controlAppSelect: typeof ControlApp; | |
| controlSelect: typeof ControlSelect; | |
| }; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 44-44: Shouldn't redeclare 'ReactSelectComponents'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'ReactSelectComponents' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx (2)
38-39: Enhance error message in useFormContextThe TODO comment indicates that the error message needs improvement. Consider providing more context about the required provider component.
- throw new Error("Must be used inside provider"); + throw new Error("useFormContext must be used within a FormContextProvider component");
301-301: Enhance error state exposureThe comment suggests a need for more detailed error information.
- isValid: !Object.keys(errors).length, // XXX want to expose more from errors + isValid: !Object.keys(errors).length, + errors, + getErrorsForProp: (propName: string) => errors[propName] || [],packages/connect-react/src/hooks/customization-context.tsx (4)
49-102: Add JSDoc comments for complex type definitionsThe type definitions are well-structured but would benefit from documentation explaining their purpose and usage, especially for complex types like
CustomComponentsandCustomizationConfig.Example documentation:
/** * Defines the structure of custom components that can be provided to override defaults * @template Option - The type of option in select components * @template IsMulti - Whether multiple selections are allowed * @template Group - The type of option groups */ export type CustomComponents<Option, IsMulti extends boolean, Group extends GroupBase<Option>> = { // ... existing code }
122-122: Address TODO comment about generic type refactoringThe comment indicates potential improvements needed in the relationship between generic types.
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track this technical debt and propose a solution for improving the generic type relationships?
208-227: Optimize className concatenationConsider using an array-based approach consistently for className concatenation to improve maintainability and reduce string operations.
- return [ - baseClassName, - customClassNames, - ].filter(Boolean).join(" "); + const classes = [baseClassName]; + if (customClassNames) classes.push(customClassNames); + return classes.join(" ");
229-234: Avoid type assertion in getComponentsThe type assertion to
ComponentLibrarycould be replaced with proper type inference.- } as ComponentLibrary; + };Consider defining the return type explicitly in the function signature instead:
function getComponents(): ComponentLibrary { const components: ComponentLibrary = { ...defaultComponents, ...(context?.components ?? {}), }; return components; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlBoolean.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlInput.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/SelectApp.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/customization-context.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlBoolean.tsx
- packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlInput.tsx
- packages/connect-react/src/components/SelectApp.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/customization-context.tsx
[error] 44-44: Shouldn't redeclare 'ReactSelectComponents'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'ReactSelectComponents' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx (1)
156-166: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Clarify number type validation requirements
The code needs to explicitly define whether float values are supported.
- } else if (prop.type === "integer") { // XXX type should be "number"? we don't support floats otherwise...
+ } else if (prop.type === "number") {
if (typeof value !== "number") {
errs.push("not a number");
} else {
+ if (!Number.isInteger(value) && !prop.allowFloat) {
+ errs.push("must be an integer");
+ }
if (prop.min != null && value < prop.min) {
errs.push("number too small");
}packages/connect-react/src/hooks/customization-context.tsx (2)
1-36: LGTM! Well-organized imports
The imports are properly structured and typed, with clear separation between React core, react-select, and custom components.
44-47: Rename type to avoid naming conflict
The type name ReactSelectComponents conflicts with the import from react-select at line 8.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 44-44: Shouldn't redeclare 'ReactSelectComponents'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'ReactSelectComponents' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
| const { dynamic_props } = await client.componentReloadProps(componentReloadPropsInput); | ||
| // XXX what about if null? | ||
| // TODO observation errors, etc. | ||
| if (dynamic_props) { | ||
| setDynamicProps(dynamic_props); | ||
| } | ||
| setReloadPropIdx(undefined); | ||
| return []; // XXX ok to mutate above and not look at data? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve null handling in dynamic props query
The code needs proper null handling for the dynamic_props response.
- // XXX what about if null?
- // TODO observation errors, etc.
- if (dynamic_props) {
- setDynamicProps(dynamic_props);
- }
- setReloadPropIdx(undefined);
- return []; // XXX ok to mutate above and not look at data?
+ if (!dynamic_props) {
+ throw new Error('Dynamic props response is null');
+ }
+ setDynamicProps(dynamic_props);
+ setReloadPropIdx(undefined);
+ return dynamic_props;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const { dynamic_props } = await client.componentReloadProps(componentReloadPropsInput); | |
| // XXX what about if null? | |
| // TODO observation errors, etc. | |
| if (dynamic_props) { | |
| setDynamicProps(dynamic_props); | |
| } | |
| setReloadPropIdx(undefined); | |
| return []; // XXX ok to mutate above and not look at data? | |
| const { dynamic_props } = await client.componentReloadProps(componentReloadPropsInput); | |
| if (!dynamic_props) { | |
| throw new Error('Dynamic props response is null'); | |
| } | |
| setDynamicProps(dynamic_props); | |
| setReloadPropIdx(undefined); | |
| return dynamic_props; |
| const setConfiguredProp = (idx: number, value: unknown) => { | ||
| const prop = configurableProps[idx]; | ||
| const newConfiguredProps = { | ||
| ...configuredProps, | ||
| }; | ||
| if (value === undefined) { | ||
| delete newConfiguredProps[prop.name as keyof ConfiguredProps<T>]; | ||
| } else { | ||
| newConfiguredProps[prop.name as keyof ConfiguredProps<T>] = value as any /* XXX fix prop value type from T */; // eslint-disable-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety in setConfiguredProp
The function uses unsafe type casting and has a comment about argument order.
- const setConfiguredProp = (idx: number, value: unknown) => {
+ const setConfiguredProp = <K extends keyof ConfiguredProps<T>>(
+ idx: number,
+ value: ConfiguredProps<T>[K] | undefined
+ ) => {
const prop = configurableProps[idx];
const newConfiguredProps = {
...configuredProps,
};
if (value === undefined) {
- delete newConfiguredProps[prop.name as keyof ConfiguredProps<T>];
+ delete newConfiguredProps[prop.name];
} else {
- newConfiguredProps[prop.name as keyof ConfiguredProps<T>] = value as any; // eslint-disable-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
+ newConfiguredProps[prop.name] = value;
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
…eam into connect-react-preview
…eam into connect-react-preview
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
packages/sdk/src/shared/component.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-14: Address technical debt indicated by TODO/XXX commentsSeveral comments indicate areas needing improvement:
- Property application needs fixing: "XXX don't actually apply to all, fix"
- Type mapping duplication between
ConfigurablePropAnyandPropValue- Alert types need verification
- Secret support for string arrays needs clarification
Would you like me to help create GitHub issues to track these improvements? I can provide detailed implementation suggestions for each item.
Also applies to: 71-83
27-27: Consider more type-safe alternatives toanyWhile the ESLint directives fix the immediate linting issues, using
anyreduces type safety. Consider these alternatives:
- For
ConfigurablePropAny, consider usingunknownor a specific union type of allowed values- For
PropValue<"any">, consider using a generic type parameter with constraints- For
V1Component's default type, consider usingConfigurablePropsornever[]as the default instead ofanyHere's a potential type-safe refactor:
// Option 1: Use unknown export type ConfigurablePropAny = BaseConfigurableProp & { type: "any"; } & Defaultable<unknown>; // Option 2: Use generic type parameter export type PropValue<T extends ConfigurableProp["type"]> = T extends "alert" ? never : T extends "any" ? unknown : // ... rest of the type definition // Option 3: Use never[] as default export type V1Component<T extends ConfigurableProps = never[]> = { name: string; key: string; version: string; configurable_props: T; };Also applies to: 71-71, 91-91
packages/sdk/src/shared/index.ts (3)
184-184: Consider using more specific types instead ofanyWhile the ESLint disable comments address the immediate linting issues, using
anytype bypasses TypeScript's type checking benefits. Consider these alternatives:
- Use
unknowntype for better type safety- Create a custom type that represents the expected structure
- Use a generic type parameter with constraints
Example implementation:
- configuredProps: any; // eslint-disable-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any + configuredProps: unknown; // Or with a custom type: + type ConfiguredProps = Record<string, unknown>; + configuredProps: ConfiguredProps; // Or with generics: + interface ComponentReloadPropsOpts<T = unknown> { + configuredProps: T; + // ... other properties + }Also applies to: 192-192, 595-595, 606-606
Line range hint
678-683: Improve error handling in URL parsingThe current error handling could be enhanced to:
- Provide more context by including the original error message
- Format the error message more cleanly without template literals containing newlines
- } catch { - throw new Error(` - The provided URL is malformed: "${sanitizedInput}". - Please provide a valid URL. - `); + } catch (error) { + throw new Error( + `The provided URL is malformed: "${sanitizedInput}". ` + + `Please provide a valid URL. Details: ${error.message}` + );
Line range hint
1-824: Consider architectural improvements for better maintainabilityThe code is well-structured, but consider these improvements:
- Create a custom error class for domain-specific errors to standardize error handling
- Extract URL validation logic into a separate utility class
- Consider implementing a retry mechanism for network requests
- Add request/response logging for debugging purposes
Example implementation of a custom error class:
export class PipedreamError extends Error { constructor( message: string, public readonly code: string, public readonly details?: unknown ) { super(message); this.name = 'PipedreamError'; } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/sdk/src/shared/component.ts(4 hunks)packages/sdk/src/shared/index.ts(4 hunks)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
.github/workflows/publish-platform-package.yaml (1)
Line range hint
27-28: Consider enforcing frozen lockfile in CI.The current installation uses
--no-frozen-lockfile, which allows modifications to the lockfile during installation. For CI environments, it's recommended to use--frozen-lockfileto ensure reproducible builds.- name: pnpm install - run: pnpm install -r --no-frozen-lockfile + run: pnpm install -r --frozen-lockfile.github/workflows/publish-marketplace-content.yaml (1)
17-17: Document the major version upgrade of pnpmThe upgrade from pnpm 7.x to 9.x is a major version change that could introduce breaking changes.
Consider:
- Adding a comment explaining the reason for the upgrade
- Documenting any breaking changes in the PR description
- Ensuring all related workflows are updated consistently
.github/workflows/publish-packages.yaml (2)
26-26: LGTM on pnpm version update!The fixed version
9.14.2is good for reproducibility. Consider setting up dependabot or similar automation to keep this updated with future security patches and improvements.
Line range hint
29-31: Update deprecated GitHub Actions syntaxThe
set-outputcommand is deprecated. Replace with the newer$GITHUB_OUTPUTsyntax for better future compatibility.- echo "::set-output name=pnpm_cache_dir::$(pnpm store path)" + echo "pnpm_cache_dir=$(pnpm store path)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT.github/workflows/components-pr.yaml (2)
Line range hint
82-117: Consider refactoring complex bash script into a custom actionThe current bash script for checking compiled TypeScript files is complex and contains a "hacky" workaround (as noted in comments). This could be improved for better maintainability and reliability.
Consider:
- Moving this logic into a separate custom GitHub Action
- Using a more robust approach for file path manipulation (e.g., using Node.js)
- Improving error messages with more context
Example structure:
// .github/actions/verify-ts-components/src/index.ts import * as core from '@actions/core'; import * as glob from '@actions/glob'; import * as path from 'path'; async function run() { try { const changedFiles = core.getInput('changed_files').split(','); const outputFiles = core.getInput('output_files').split('\n'); // Implementation here with proper path handling // and structured error messages } catch (error) { core.setFailed(error.message); } } run();🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.3)
57-57: workflow command "set-output" was deprecated. use
echo "{name}={value}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUTinstead: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions(deprecated-commands)
Line range hint
1-1: Consider workflow optimization opportunities
- The TODO comment suggests combining this with
publish-components.yml. This would be beneficial to reduce maintenance overhead.- There's significant setup duplication between jobs that could be extracted into reusable workflows.
Consider:
- Creating a reusable workflow for the common setup steps (checkout, pnpm, node setup)
- Implementing the TODO to combine with
publish-components.ymlExample structure:
# .github/workflows/reusable-setup.yml name: Reusable Setup on: workflow_call: inputs: pnpm-version: required: true type: string jobs: setup: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: # Common setup steps hereAlso applies to: 12-24
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.3)
57-57: workflow command "set-output" was deprecated. use
echo "{name}={value}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUTinstead: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions(deprecated-commands)
.github/workflows/publish-components.yaml (5)
Line range hint
21-27: Consider using newer GitHub Actions syntaxThe workflow uses the deprecated
::set-outputcommand. GitHub recommends using theGITHUB_OUTPUTenvironment file instead.Replace the cache setup with:
run: | - echo "::set-output name=pnpm_cache_dir::$(pnpm store path)" + echo "pnpm_cache_dir=$(pnpm store path)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.3)
20-20: workflow command "set-output" was deprecated. use
echo "{name}={value}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUTinstead: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions(deprecated-commands)
Line range hint
42-54: Consider using official Pipedream CLI installationThe current CLI installation process downloads from a direct URL. Consider using the official installation method or pinning to a specific version for better security and reliability.
Consider using:
run: | - curl -O https://cli.pipedream.com/linux/amd64/latest/pd.zip - unzip pd.zip + curl -o- https://cli.pipedream.com/install.sh | bash mkdir -p $HOME/.config/pipedream echo "api_key = $PD_API_KEY" > $HOME/.config/pipedream/config echo "org_id = $PD_ORG_ID" >> $HOME/.config/pipedream/config🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.3)
20-20: workflow command "set-output" was deprecated. use
echo "{name}={value}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUTinstead: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions(deprecated-commands)
Line range hint
55-58: Consider using built-in GitHub Actions for changed filesThe workflow uses a third-party action (
Ana06/get-changed-files) for getting changed files. GitHub Actions now provides built-in functionality for this through thegithub.event.push.commitscontext.This would eliminate the dependency on a third-party action and potentially improve security.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.3)
20-20: workflow command "set-output" was deprecated. use
echo "{name}={value}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUTinstead: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions(deprecated-commands)
Line range hint
59-117: Consider breaking down the publish scriptThe publish script is quite long and handles multiple responsibilities. Consider breaking it down into smaller, reusable composite actions or shell scripts for better maintainability.
Key areas that could be separated:
- Component validation logic
- Version checking
- Publishing logic
- Registry update logic
- Error reporting
This would make the workflow easier to maintain and test.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.3)
20-20: workflow command "set-output" was deprecated. use
echo "{name}={value}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUTinstead: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions(deprecated-commands)
Line range hint
165-238: Improve TypeScript component publishing error handlingThe TypeScript component publishing job has similar code to the JavaScript job but with additional complexity for handling compiled output. Consider:
- Adding more detailed error messages for compilation failures
- Adding retry logic for failed publishes
- Improving the output file matching logic
The current matching logic using sed could be made more robust:
- maybe_source_file=$(echo "$f" | sed 's/\/dist\//\//;s/.mjs/\.ts/') + maybe_source_file=$(echo "$f" | sed -E 's/\/dist\/(.+)\.mjs$/\/\1.ts/')🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.3)
20-20: workflow command "set-output" was deprecated. use
echo "{name}={value}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUTinstead: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions(deprecated-commands)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
.github/workflows/components-pr.yaml(2 hunks).github/workflows/publish-components.yaml(2 hunks).github/workflows/publish-marketplace-content.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/publish-packages.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/publish-platform-package.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/pull-request-checks.yaml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/publish-platform-package.yaml (1)
18-18: Verify PNPM version compatibility and update lockfile.
The PNPM version has been updated from 7.33.6 to 9.14.2, which is a major version upgrade. This change might require updating the pnpm-lock.yaml file to maintain consistency.
✅ Verification successful
PNPM version update is compatible with current setup
The verification shows that:
- The pnpm-lock.yaml file exists and uses lockfile version 9.0, which is compatible with PNPM 9.14.2
- All workflow files consistently use pnpm/[email protected]
- The version upgrade from 7.33.6 to 9.14.2 aligns with the lockfile format
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if pnpm-lock.yaml exists and its format version
# Check if pnpm-lock.yaml exists and get its format version
if [ -f "pnpm-lock.yaml" ]; then
echo "pnpm-lock.yaml found. Checking format version..."
grep -m 1 "lockfileVersion:" pnpm-lock.yaml
else
echo "Warning: pnpm-lock.yaml not found"
fi
# Verify Node.js compatibility with PNPM 9.14.2
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pnpm/pnpm/v9.14.2/package.json | jq '.engines.node'
Length of output: 300
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify if there are any other workflow files using pnpm and check their versions
fd -e yaml -e yml . .github/workflows/ --exec grep -l "pnpm" {} \; | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
grep -A 1 "uses: pnpm/action-setup@" "$file" || true
done
# Also check package.json for pnpm-related configurations
if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
echo -e "\n=== package.json pnpm settings ==="
jq -r '.pnpm // .packageManager // empty' package.json
fi
Length of output: 1996
.github/workflows/publish-marketplace-content.yaml (1)
17-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use frozen lockfile for reproducible builds
The workflow uses --no-frozen-lockfile which could lead to inconsistent dependency installations across different environments.
Consider using frozen lockfile for better reliability:
- name: Install dependencies
- run: pnpm install -r --no-frozen-lockfile
+ run: pnpm install -r --frozen-lockfileLikely invalid or redundant comment.
.github/workflows/pull-request-checks.yaml (1)
58-58: Verify the impact of major pnpm version upgrade
The upgrade from pnpm 7.33.6 to 9.14.2 is a major version jump that might have breaking changes.
Let's verify the impact:
Consider:
- Documenting the reason for this major version upgrade in the PR description
- Verifying that the lockfile format is compatible with the new version
- Ensuring all developers update their local pnpm installation
✅ Verification successful
pnpm version upgrade is safe to proceed
The verification shows:
- Root package.json already specifies pnpm 9.14.2 as the engine requirement
- No workspace packages have pnpm-specific engine constraints
- Workspace configuration is standard and version-agnostic
- Only basic pnpm-related scripts are used (build, watch) with no version-specific features
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for pnpm-related configurations and lockfile format
# Check if there are any pnpm-specific config files
echo "Checking for pnpm config files..."
fd -t f "^\.?pnpm" -x echo "Found pnpm config: {}"
# Check if package.json has pnpm-specific configurations
echo "Checking package.json for pnpm configs..."
fd "package.json" -x jq -r '.pnpm? // empty'
# Check if there are any pnpm-workspace.yaml files
echo "Checking for workspace configs..."
fd "pnpm-workspace.yaml"
Length of output: 626
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the workspace configuration and package.json files for potential compatibility issues
# Check workspace configuration
echo "=== Workspace Configuration ==="
cat pnpm-workspace.yaml
# Check root package.json for any version constraints
echo -e "\n=== Root package.json pnpm Engine Requirements ==="
fd "^package.json$" -d 1 -x jq -r '.engines.pnpm? // empty'
# Check all package.json files for pnpm engine requirements
echo -e "\n=== All package.json pnpm Engine Requirements ==="
fd "package.json" -x sh -c 'echo "=== $1 ==="; jq -r ".engines.pnpm? // empty" "$1"' sh {}
# Check if there are any pnpm-specific scripts
echo -e "\n=== pnpm-specific Scripts in package.json Files ==="
fd "package.json" -x jq -r 'select(.scripts != null) | .scripts | to_entries[] | select(.value | contains("pnpm")) | "\(.key): \(.value)"'
Length of output: 99715
.github/workflows/components-pr.yaml (1)
54-54: Verify pnpm major version upgrade impact
The pnpm version has been upgraded from 7.x.x to 9.14.2. While keeping dependencies up-to-date is good practice, major version upgrades may introduce breaking changes.
Also applies to: 143-143
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the specific pnpm versions used across these workflow files to ensure consistency.
✓ pnpm version is consistent across all workflows
The upgrade to pnpm 9.14.2 is consistently applied across all GitHub workflow files in the repository. All workflows are using the same version (9.14.2) with pnpm/action-setup@v4, indicating a coordinated update that maintains version consistency throughout the CI/CD pipeline.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for pnpm version consistency across workflow files
echo "Checking pnpm version consistency across workflow files..."
rg -A 1 "pnpm/action-setup@v4" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 1301
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check pnpm versions specified in workflow files
echo "Checking pnpm versions across workflow files..."
rg -A 2 "pnpm/action-setup@v4" .github/workflows/ | rg "version:"
Length of output: 716
| @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ jobs: | |||
| uses: actions/[email protected] | |||
| - uses: pnpm/[email protected] | |||
| with: | |||
| version: 7.33.6 | |||
| version: 9.14.2 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Verify Node.js compatibility with pnpm 9.14.2
The workflow uses Node.js 14 which might be too old for pnpm 9.x. According to pnpm's documentation, version 9.x requires Node.js 16 or higher.
Consider updating the Node.js version in the workflow:
uses: actions/[email protected]
with:
- node-version: 14
+ node-version: 16Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ jobs: | |||
| uses: actions/[email protected] | |||
| - uses: pnpm/[email protected] | |||
| with: | |||
| version: 7.33.6 | |||
| version: 9.14.2 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Verify Node.js compatibility with pnpm 9.14.2
The workflow uses Node.js 14 with pnpm 9.14.2. According to pnpm's documentation, version 9.x requires Node.js 16 or higher. Consider upgrading the Node.js version to ensure compatibility.
Apply this change to both jobs:
uses: actions/[email protected]
with:
- node-version: 14
+ node-version: 16Also applies to: 125-125
…eam into connect-react-preview
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/pipedream-sdk-test.yaml(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalComponentForm.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalComponentForm.tsx
| run: pnpm install | ||
| working-directory: packages/sdk | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Run tests | ||
| run: npm test | ||
| run: pnpm test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add proper pnpm setup steps before using pnpm commands
While switching to pnpm is good for consistency, the workflow needs additional setup steps to ensure reliable execution.
Add these steps before the "Install dependencies" step:
- name: Set up Node.js
uses: actions/setup-node@v3
with:
node-version: '18'
+ - name: Install pnpm
+ uses: pnpm/action-setup@v2
+ with:
+ version: 9.14.2
+
+ - name: Setup pnpm cache
+ uses: actions/cache@v3
+ with:
+ path: ~/.pnpm-store
+ key: ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-${{ hashFiles('**/pnpm-lock.yaml') }}
+ restore-keys: |
+ ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-
- name: Install dependencies
run: pnpm install
working-directory: packages/sdkThis ensures:
- Consistent pnpm version (9.14.2) across workflows
- Proper caching for faster installations
- Reliable workflow execution
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| run: pnpm install | |
| working-directory: packages/sdk | |
| - name: Run tests | |
| run: npm test | |
| run: pnpm test | |
| - name: Set up Node.js | |
| uses: actions/setup-node@v3 | |
| with: | |
| node-version: '18' | |
| - name: Install pnpm | |
| uses: pnpm/action-setup@v2 | |
| with: | |
| version: 9.14.2 | |
| - name: Setup pnpm cache | |
| uses: actions/cache@v3 | |
| with: | |
| path: ~/.pnpm-store | |
| key: ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-${{ hashFiles('**/pnpm-lock.yaml') }} | |
| restore-keys: | | |
| ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm- | |
| - name: Install dependencies | |
| run: pnpm install | |
| working-directory: packages/sdk | |
| - name: Run tests | |
| run: pnpm test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/pipedream-sdk-test.yaml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.3)
.github/workflows/pipedream-sdk-test.yaml
26-26: workflow command "set-output" was deprecated. use echo "{name}={value}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT instead: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions
(deprecated-commands)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/pipedream-sdk-test.yaml (2)
42-42: LGTM!
The dependency installation step correctly uses pnpm and targets the SDK package directory.
46-46: LGTM!
The test execution step correctly uses pnpm and targets the SDK package directory.
| - uses: pnpm/[email protected] | ||
| with: | ||
| version: 9.14.2 | ||
| - name: Get pnpm store directory | ||
| id: pnpm-cache | ||
| run: | | ||
| echo "::set-output name=pnpm_cache_dir::$(pnpm store path)" | ||
| - uses: actions/cache@v4 | ||
| name: Setup pnpm cache | ||
| with: | ||
| path: ${{ steps.pnpm-cache.outputs.pnpm_cache_dir }} | ||
| key: ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-store-${{ hashFiles('**/pnpm-lock.yaml') }} | ||
| restore-keys: | | ||
| ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-store- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Update deprecated workflow command and optimize cache configuration
- The
set-outputcommand is deprecated. Use the newGITHUB_OUTPUTsyntax instead. - The cache key could be more specific by including the Node.js version.
Apply this diff:
- name: Get pnpm store directory
id: pnpm-cache
run: |
- echo "::set-output name=pnpm_cache_dir::$(pnpm store path)"
+ echo "pnpm_cache_dir=$(pnpm store path)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
- uses: actions/cache@v4
name: Setup pnpm cache
with:
path: ${{ steps.pnpm-cache.outputs.pnpm_cache_dir }}
- key: ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-store-${{ hashFiles('**/pnpm-lock.yaml') }}
+ key: ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-store-${{ matrix.node-version }}-${{ hashFiles('**/pnpm-lock.yaml') }}
restore-keys: |
- ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-store-
+ ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-store-${{ matrix.node-version }}-
+ ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-store-Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.3)
26-26: workflow command "set-output" was deprecated. use echo "{name}={value}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT instead: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions
(deprecated-commands)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx (1)
298-298: Remove commented out console.logRemove the commented out console.log statement as it's a development artifact.
- // console.log("***", configurableProps, configuredProps)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/customization-context.tsx (4)
122-122: Address technical debt commentThe XXX comment indicates needed refactoring of generics. This should be tracked and addressed to improve type safety.
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track this technical debt?
49-102: Consider adding JSDoc comments for complex typesThe customization type system is complex and would benefit from documentation explaining the purpose and usage of each type, especially for
CustomComponents,CustomizationOpts, andCustomizationConfig.Example documentation:
/** * Defines customizable components with support for react-select integration * @template Option - The type of option for select components * @template IsMulti - Whether multiple selection is enabled * @template Group - The group base type for options */ export type CustomComponents<Option, IsMulti extends boolean, Group extends GroupBase<Option>> = { // ... existing code }
148-162: Optimize class name concatenationThe class name concatenation could be optimized by:
- Memoizing the base class name
- Using array join only when necessary
Consider this optimization:
function getClassNames<Key extends keyof ReactSelectComponents>(name: Key): ReactSelectClassNamesConfig { - const baseClassName = `${context?.classNamePrefix ?? "pd-"}${name}`; + const baseClassName = useMemo(() => + `${context?.classNamePrefix ?? "pd-"}${name}`, + [context?.classNamePrefix, name] + ); const classNames: ReactSelectClassNamesConfig = { ...(context.classNames?.[name] ?? {}), }; if (typeof classNames?.container == "function") { - classNames.container = typeof classNames?.container == "function" - ? (...args) => ([ + const originalContainer = classNames.container; + classNames.container = (...args) => + originalContainer + ? `${originalContainer(...args)} ${baseClassName}` + : baseClassName; - classNames?.container?.(...args), - baseClassName, - ]).join(" ") - : () => baseClassName; } return classNames; }
271-276: Consider using more specific types for customization propsThe
CustomizeProvidercomponent usesanytype for its props, which bypasses TypeScript's type checking benefits.Consider making the types more specific:
-}: CustomizationConfig<any, any, any> & { children: ReactNode; }) => { +}: CustomizationConfig<unknown, boolean, GroupBase<unknown>> & { children: ReactNode; }) => {This provides better type safety while maintaining flexibility.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
eslint.config.mjs(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/layout.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlBoolean.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/ErrorBoundary.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalComponentForm.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/customization-context.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx(1 hunks)packages/connect-react/src/hooks/frontend-client-context.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- eslint.config.mjs
- packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/src/app/layout.tsx
- packages/connect-react/src/components/ControlBoolean.tsx
- packages/connect-react/src/components/ErrorBoundary.tsx
- packages/connect-react/src/components/InternalComponentForm.tsx
- packages/connect-react/src/hooks/frontend-client-context.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/customization-context.tsx
[error] 44-44: Shouldn't redeclare 'ReactSelectComponents'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'ReactSelectComponents' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/form-context.tsx (5)
32-32: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove any type from FormContext creation
The context creation should use proper typing instead of any.
-export const FormContext = createContext<FormContext<any /* XXX fix */> | undefined>(undefined); // eslint-disable-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
+export const FormContext = createContext<FormContext<ConfigurableProps> | undefined>(undefined);Likely invalid or redundant comment.
26-26: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety for setConfiguredProp value parameter
The value parameter needs proper typing to ensure type safety.
- setConfiguredProp: (idx: number, value: unknown) => void; // XXX type safety for value (T will rarely be static right?)
+ setConfiguredProp: <K extends keyof ConfiguredProps<T>>(
+ idx: number,
+ value: ConfiguredProps<T>[K] | undefined
+ ) => void;Likely invalid or redundant comment.
251-260: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety in setConfiguredProp
The function uses unsafe type casting and needs proper typing.
- const setConfiguredProp = (idx: number, value: unknown) => {
+ const setConfiguredProp = <K extends keyof ConfiguredProps<T>>(
+ idx: number,
+ value: ConfiguredProps<T>[K] | undefined
+ ) => {
const prop = configurableProps[idx];
const newConfiguredProps = {
...configuredProps,
};
if (value === undefined) {
- delete newConfiguredProps[prop.name as keyof ConfiguredProps<T>];
+ delete newConfiguredProps[prop.name];
} else {
- newConfiguredProps[prop.name as keyof ConfiguredProps<T>] = value as any; // eslint-disable-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
+ newConfiguredProps[prop.name] = value;
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
112-130:
Improve error handling in dynamic props query
The dynamic props query needs proper error handling and null checks.
const {
isFetching: dynamicPropsQueryIsFetching,
- // TODO error
+ error,
+ isError,
} = useQuery({
queryKey: ["dynamicProps"],
queryFn: async () => {
const { dynamic_props } = await client.componentReloadProps(componentReloadPropsInput);
- // XXX what about if null?
- // TODO observation errors, etc.
- if (dynamic_props) {
- setDynamicProps(dynamic_props);
- }
- setReloadPropIdx(undefined);
- return []; // XXX ok to mutate above and not look at data?
+ if (!dynamic_props) {
+ throw new Error('Dynamic props response is null');
+ }
+ setDynamicProps(dynamic_props);
+ setReloadPropIdx(undefined);
+ return dynamic_props;
},
enabled: reloadPropIdx != null,
+ retry: 3,
+ onError: (error) => {
+ console.error('Failed to load dynamic props:', error);
+ setErrors(prev => ({
+ ...prev,
+ dynamicProps: ['Failed to load dynamic props']
+ }));
+ }
});Likely invalid or redundant comment.
12-12: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance type safety for DynamicProps
The DynamicProps type needs proper typing instead of using a TODO comment.
-export type DynamicProps<T extends ConfigurableProps> = { id: string; configurable_props: T; }; // TODO
+export type DynamicProps<T extends ConfigurableProps> = {
+ id: string;
+ configurable_props: T;
+ errors?: Array<{
+ message: string;
+ code: string;
+ }>;
+};Likely invalid or redundant comment.
packages/connect-react/src/hooks/customization-context.tsx (1)
44-47:
Rename type to avoid naming conflict
The type name ReactSelectComponents conflicts with the import from react-select at line 8. This could lead to confusion and potential issues.
Apply this diff to fix the naming conflict:
-export type ReactSelectComponents = {
+export type CustomReactSelectComponents = {
controlAppSelect: typeof ControlApp;
controlSelect: typeof ControlSelect;
};Remember to update all references to this type throughout the file.
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 44-44: Shouldn't redeclare 'ReactSelectComponents'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'ReactSelectComponents' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
| } else if (prop.type === "app") { | ||
| // TODO need to know about auth type | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implement validation for app type properties
The validation logic for properties of type "app" is incomplete.
} else if (prop.type === "app") {
- // TODO need to know about auth type
+ if (!value || typeof value !== "object") {
+ errs.push("invalid app configuration");
+ } else if (!value.accountId) {
+ errs.push("missing account ID");
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| } else if (prop.type === "app") { | |
| // TODO need to know about auth type | |
| } | |
| } else if (prop.type === "app") { | |
| if (!value || typeof value !== "object") { | |
| errs.push("invalid app configuration"); | |
| } else if (!value.accountId) { | |
| errs.push("missing account ID"); | |
| } | |
| } |
| if (!prop.optional) { | ||
| errs.push("required"); | ||
| } | ||
| } else if (prop.type === "integer") { // XXX type should be "number"? we don't support floats otherwise... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Keep integer type and add float validation
The current implementation correctly validates integers by checking if the value is a number and enforcing min/max bounds. However, it doesn't explicitly validate that the number is an integer. To maintain consistency with the codebase where integer type is used across multiple components (as seen in bigmailer, kanbanize, and other components), we should:
- Keep the
type === "integer"check - Add explicit integer validation to reject float values
Example fix:
} else if (prop.type === "integer") {
if (typeof value !== "number") {
errs.push("not a number");
} else if (!Number.isInteger(value)) {
errs.push("not an integer");
} else {
// min/max validation...
}
}🔗 Analysis chain
Clarify number type validation
The comment questions whether prop.type should be "integer" or "number". Please clarify the intended behavior:
- If only integers are supported, ensure validation checks explicitly handle non-integer numbers.
- If floats should be supported, adjust the type checks accordingly.
Let me gather more context about the validation implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for number type usage in the codebase
rg -A 2 'type === "(integer|number)"'
Length of output: 2583
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the validation implementation in form-context.tsx
ast-grep --pattern 'if (prop.type === "integer") {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1998
…eam into connect-react-preview
…eam into connect-react-preview
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
eslint.config.mjs (3)
24-41: Consider more specific ignore patternsSome ignore patterns might be too broad and could unintentionally skip important files:
**/*.mdskips all markdown files, consider using a more specific pattern if you want to lint documentation**/*.yamlmight skip important configuration filesConsider using more specific patterns:
- "**/*.md", + "**/docs/**/*.md", + "**/README.md", - "**/*.yaml", + "!.github/workflows/*.yaml", + "**/test/**/*.yaml",
248-257: Consider a more targeted approach for disablingno-unused-varsCompletely disabling
no-unused-varsfor entire component directories might be too permissive. Consider using inline eslint-disable comments or more specific patterns.- "no-unused-vars": "off", + "no-unused-vars": ["error", { "varsIgnorePattern": "^_", "argsIgnorePattern": "^_" }],
279-279: Address the TODO comment aboutno-undefruleThe comment suggests lifting the
no-undefrule higher. This would improve type checking across all JavaScript files.Would you like me to help implement this change or create an issue to track it?
packages/sdk/src/shared/index.ts (2)
186-186: Consider using a more specific type for configured props.While the use of
anyis currently necessary due to the dynamic nature of component configurations, consider introducing a generic type parameter or a type union of common prop structures to provide better type safety. This could help catch potential type-related issues earlier in development.Example approach:
type ConfiguredProps<T = unknown> = Record<string, T>;However, I understand if this remains as
anydue to the highly dynamic nature of the props.Also applies to: 194-194, 608-608
598-600: TODO comment needs attention.The TODO comment regarding triggers should be addressed. Would you like me to help create an issue to track this enhancement?
tsconfig.json (1)
Remove duplicate project references in tsconfig.json
The following components are duplicated in the project references and should be removed to maintain a clean configuration:
- components/acumbamail
- components/agendor
- components/apex_27
- components/api2pdf
- components/apitemplate_io
- components/autoklose
- components/beehiiv
- components/botbaba
- components/brosix
- components/businesslogic
- components/calendarhero
- components/captaindata
- components/clickmeeting
- components/cloudfill
- components/cohere_platform
- components/craftmypdf
- components/danny_test_app
- components/detrack
- components/digicert
- components/drata
- components/enormail
- components/f15five
- components/facebook_groups
- components/facebook_lead_ads
- components/facebook_pages
- components/geodb_cities
- components/gmail
- components/gmail_custom_oauth
- components/gobio_link
- components/gong
- components/google_ads
- components/google_my_business
- components/linqs_cc
- components/onesaas
- components/paypro
- components/persistiq
- components/picky_assist
- components/pikaso
- components/sellix
- components/stormglass_io
- components/sympla
- components/threescribe
- components/ticket_tailor
- components/tolstoy
- components/unbounce
- components/world_news_api
- components/xendit
- components/xperiencify
- components/zoho_calendar
- components/zoho_expense
- components/zoho_meeting
- components/zoho_people
- components/zoho_subscriptions
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-2765: Check for duplicate project references.There appear to be some duplicate entries in the project references. For example:
facebook_groupsappears multiple timeszoho_subscriptionsappears multiple timeszoho_peopleappears multiple timeszoho_meetingappears multiple timeszoho_expenseappears multiple timeszoho_calendarappears multiple timesgoogle_my_businessappears multiple timesgongappears multiple times🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find duplicate project references in tsconfig.json # Extract paths and count occurrences echo "Duplicate project references:" rg '"path": "([^"]+)"' tsconfig.json -o -r '$1' | sort | uniq -dLength of output: 1308
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/workflows/pull-request-checks.yaml(2 hunks)eslint.config.mjs(1 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)packages/sdk/src/shared/index.ts(5 hunks)tsconfig.json(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- .github/workflows/pull-request-checks.yaml
- package.json
🔇 Additional comments (6)
eslint.config.mjs (2)
1-21: LGTM: Well-structured imports and configuration setup
The imports are well-organized and the FlatCompat setup is correctly implemented for extending ESLint configurations.
1-8: Verify plugin compatibility
Ensure all ESLint plugins are compatible with the flat config format and with each other.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the package.json inspection results, I can verify the plugin compatibility. Let me check the specific ESLint plugin versions and their compatibility with flat config.
All ESLint plugins are compatible with flat config format
The configuration is using ESLint v8 and all the imported plugins (@typescript-eslint, jest, jsonc, pipedream, putout) have been updated to support ESLint's flat config format. The versions being used are:
- @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin: ^7.18.0
- eslint-plugin-jest: ^27.9.0
- eslint-plugin-jsonc: ^2.16.0
- eslint-plugin-pipedream: ^0.2.4
- eslint-plugin-putout: ^22.10.0
These versions are all compatible with ESLint 8.x and support the flat configuration format being used.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential plugin compatibility issues
# Check package.json for plugin versions
fd package.json --exec jq -r '.dependencies | with_entries(select(.key | contains("eslint-plugin"))) + .devDependencies | with_entries(select(.key | contains("eslint-plugin")))'
# Check for any deprecation notices in dependencies
npm ls | grep -i deprecated || true
Length of output: 72478
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check ESLint version and plugin peer dependencies
cat package.json | jq '.dependencies["eslint"], .devDependencies["eslint"]'
# Check if any plugins have flat config related warnings in their READMEs
fd README.md --exec grep -l -i "flat.config\|eslint.*config" {} \;
# Look for any config migration guides in plugin docs
rg -i "migration|flat.config" -g "README*" -g "CHANGELOG*"
Length of output: 749
packages/sdk/src/shared/index.ts (3)
9-9: LGTM! Clear type alias definition.
The addition of the RequestInit type alias provides a clear reference to the global type and improves code maintainability.
Line range hint 680-684: LGTM! Improved error handling.
The simplified error handling with a clear error message is a good improvement. The removal of the unused error variable makes the code cleaner while maintaining the same functionality.
Line range hint 766-766: Clarify client-side auth handling comment.
The TODO comment // TODO How to handle this client side? raises an important architectural question about client-side authentication handling. This should be documented clearly to prevent potential security issues.
tsconfig.json (1)
8-9: LGTM! The compiler options are well configured.
The addition of lib: ["es2020", "dom"] is appropriate for a React package:
es2020provides modern JavaScript featuresdomprovides necessary browser types for React development
| ecmaVersion: 12, | ||
| sourceType: "module", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Update ECMAScript version
The current ECMAVersion (12/ES2021) is outdated. Consider updating to the latest version for access to newer language features.
- ecmaVersion: 12,
+ ecmaVersion: 2024,
sourceType: "module",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| ecmaVersion: 12, | |
| sourceType: "module", | |
| ecmaVersion: 2024, | |
| sourceType: "module", |
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
@pipedream/connect-reactpackage, including installation instructions and usage examples.ComponentFormContainer,FrontendClientProvider,Alert,ControlApp,ControlBoolean,ControlInput,ControlSelect,ControlSubmit,Description,Errors,Field,InternalComponentForm,Label,OptionalFieldButton,RemoteOptionsContainer,SelectApp, andSelectComponent.useAccounts,useApp,useApps,useComponent, anduseComponents.Improvements
README.mdfiles for better guidance on usage and setup.Chores
pnpm..gitignorefile in the Next.js example to maintain a clean repository.