New Components - heroku #14601
New Components - heroku #14601
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce new functionalities and constants related to Heroku applications. A new constant Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
components/heroku/common/constants.mjs (1)
1-42: Add JSDoc documentation and group related events.The implementation correctly defines all major Heroku webhook event types with clear descriptions. Consider these improvements for better maintainability:
+/** + * @typedef {Object} HerokuEntity + * @property {string} value - The webhook event identifier + * @property {string} label - Human-readable description of the event + */ +/** + * Supported Heroku webhook event types + * @type {HerokuEntity[]} + */ const ENTITIES = [ + // Add-on related events { value: "api:addon-attachment", label: "addon-attachment - An add-on has been attached or removed from the app", }, { value: "api:addon", label: "addon - An add-on for the app has been newly provisioned or deleted, or its details have been modified", }, + // Application and build events { value: "api:app", label: "app - The app itself has been provisioned or deleted, or its details have been modified", }, // ... rest of the eventscomponents/heroku/sources/new-webhook-event-instant/new-webhook-event-instant.mjs (1)
11-27: Consider adding validation for required props.While the props are well-structured, consider adding explicit
required: trueto theappIdprop definition since it's essential for webhook subscription.appId: { propDefinition: [ heroku, "appId", + { + required: true, + }, ], },components/heroku/sources/new-webhook-event-instant/test-event.mjs (3)
1-2: Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the test event structure.The event metadata follows Heroku's webhook format correctly. However, adding documentation would help developers understand the purpose and structure of this test event.
+/** + * Sample Heroku webhook event for testing. + * Represents an app update event with minimal test data. + * @see https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/app-webhooks#events + */ export default {Also applies to: 42-48
3-37: Enhance test data quality for better testing coverage.While sensitive fields are properly sanitized, consider:
- Using realistic test values for non-sensitive fields (e.g.,
name,region,stack)- Adding comments to indicate which fields are intentionally empty
"data": { "id": "9a4eaeed-24cc-4b23-a8ca-7867b251eaf3", "acm": false, - "name": "", + "name": "test-app-123", // Example test app name "team": null, "owner": { "id": "7b25912d-b147-48d6-b03d-f0fc72be381b", - "email": "" + "email": "" // Intentionally empty for privacy },
49-53: Document the purpose of previous_data.The structure correctly tracks changed fields, but it would be helpful to document why only these specific fields are included.
+ // Track changes to key fields for testing update scenarios "previous_data": {components/heroku/heroku.app.mjs (3)
33-35: Simplify parameter destructuring in_makeRequestmethodThe default parameter
$ = thiswithin the destructuring assignment may reduce readability for some developers.Consider restructuring the parameter assignment for clarity:
_makeRequest(opts = {}) { + const { path, ...otherOpts } = opts; + const $ = opts.$ || this; const { - $ = this, - path, - ...otherOpts } = opts;
52-60: Add parameter validation increateWebhookSubscriptionmethodThe
createWebhookSubscriptionmethod assumes thatappIdis provided. Adding a check to validate thatappIdis present can prevent potential runtime errors.Consider adding a parameter validation:
createWebhookSubscription({ appId, ...opts }) { + if (!appId) { + throw new Error("appId is required to create a webhook subscription."); + } return this._makeRequest({ method: "POST", path: `/apps/${appId}/webhooks`, ...opts, }); },
61-68: Add parameter validation indeleteWebhookSubscriptionmethodSimilarly, ensure that both
appIdandhookIdare provided in thedeleteWebhookSubscriptionmethod to prevent errors when deleting a webhook.Consider adding validation for these parameters:
deleteWebhookSubscription({ appId, hookId, ...opts }) { + if (!appId || !hookId) { + throw new Error("Both appId and hookId are required to delete a webhook subscription."); + } return this._makeRequest({ method: "DELETE", path: `/apps/${appId}/webhooks/${hookId}`, ...opts, }); },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
components/heroku/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/heroku/heroku.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/heroku/package.json(1 hunks)components/heroku/sources/new-webhook-event-instant/new-webhook-event-instant.mjs(1 hunks)components/heroku/sources/new-webhook-event-instant/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/heroku/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (8)
components/heroku/common/constants.mjs (2)
44-46: LGTM! Export pattern is clean and extensible.
The export implementation follows modern ES module patterns and allows for easy addition of more constants in the future.
1-46: Verify the integration with dependent components.
Let's ensure the ENTITIES constant is properly integrated with the app and webhook components.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the webhook component usage to ensure complete verification.
Let me try one final verification with a different approach to check the webhook component's implementation.
Integration verified with proper usage in dependent components
The ENTITIES constant is correctly integrated:
- In
heroku.app.mjs: Imported and used as prop options (constants.ENTITIES) - In webhook component: Properly referenced through
herokuapp's propDefinition for theentitiesprop - The webhook implementation correctly uses the entity value in the webhook subscription creation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of ENTITIES constant in related files
# Test 1: Check if ENTITIES is imported and used in the app component
echo "Checking app component integration..."
rg -l "import.*constants" components/heroku/heroku.app.mjs
rg "ENTITIES" components/heroku/heroku.app.mjs
# Test 2: Check if ENTITIES values are used in webhook component
echo "Checking webhook component integration..."
rg "api:[a-z-]+" components/heroku/sources/new-webhook-event-instant/
Length of output: 519
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the webhook component implementation for ENTITIES import and usage
echo "Checking webhook component imports and implementation..."
rg -l "import.*constants" components/heroku/sources/new-webhook-event-instant/
rg "ENTITIES" components/heroku/sources/new-webhook-event-instant/ -A 2
# Check if there are any other files using these constants
echo "Checking other potential usages..."
rg "api:(addon-attachment|addon|app|build|collaborator|domain|dyno|formation|release|sni-endpoint)" --type js
Length of output: 466
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the webhook component's source code
echo "Examining webhook component implementation..."
cat components/heroku/sources/new-webhook-event-instant/new-webhook-event-instant.mjs
# Check if there are any prop type validations
echo "Checking for prop types or schema validations..."
rg "prop-types|schema" components/heroku/sources/new-webhook-event-instant/ -A 3
Length of output: 2607
components/heroku/sources/new-webhook-event-instant/new-webhook-event-instant.mjs (2)
1-10: LGTM! Component metadata is well-structured.
The component is properly configured with appropriate metadata, documentation link, and event deduplication.
13-13: Verify HTTP endpoint security configuration.
Ensure that the HTTP interface is properly configured with security measures such as:
- Rate limiting
- IP allowlisting for Heroku webhook IPs
- Request size limits
components/heroku/sources/new-webhook-event-instant/test-event.mjs (2)
38-41: LGTM! Proper handling of sensitive information.
The actor object correctly sanitizes the email field while maintaining a valid structure for testing.
54-68: Verify webhook metadata structure against Heroku's documentation.
The webhook metadata structure looks correct, but let's verify it matches Heroku's latest webhook delivery format.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response. The webhook metadata structure in the test event matches Heroku's webhook delivery format, as evidenced by:
- The usage in the codebase shows consistent handling of this structure in
new-webhook-event-instant.mjs - The metadata contains all required fields for Heroku webhooks: attempt ID, delivery ID, event ID (with include type), and webhook ID
- The structure is being actively used in the component to generate event metadata using
event.webhook_metadata.event.include
The webhook metadata structure is correctly implemented and matches Heroku's webhook delivery format.
The structure contains all required tracking IDs and event type information needed for proper webhook event handling and follows Heroku's webhook schema.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for other test events to ensure consistent structure
# and verify against Heroku's documentation patterns
# Test: Look for other webhook test events in the codebase
fd -e mjs -e js 'test-event' -x rg -l 'webhook_metadata'
# Test: Search for webhook structure documentation
rg -i 'webhook.*metadata|delivery.*metadata' README.md docs/
Length of output: 232
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any webhook-related patterns in the codebase to understand the structure
rg -A 5 -B 5 'webhook.*metadata|delivery.*metadata' --type js --type mjs
# Also search for any webhook documentation or schema definitions
fd -e json -e schema.mjs 'webhook|schema' -x cat {}
Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for webhook patterns in the codebase, including the file extension explicitly
rg -A 5 -B 5 'webhook.*metadata|delivery.*metadata' -g '*.{js,mjs}'
# Look for any schema or type definitions related to webhooks
rg -A 10 'webhook.*interface|webhook.*type|webhook.*schema' -g '*.{js,mjs,ts}'
# Search specifically in the Heroku component directory for webhook-related files
fd . components/heroku -x cat {} | rg -A 5 -B 5 'webhook'
Length of output: 30183
components/heroku/heroku.app.mjs (2)
41-41: Ensure proper access to authentication token
Verify that this.$auth.oauth_access_token correctly retrieves the OAuth access token. Proper authentication is crucial for API requests to Heroku.
To confirm that this.$auth.oauth_access_token is accessible and contains the expected token, you can check its usage in the context of your code.
24-24: Verify that constants.ENTITIES is defined and imported correctly
The entities property relies on constants.ENTITIES for its options. Ensure that ENTITIES is defined in your constants.mjs file and that it exports the correct array of entity options.
To confirm that ENTITIES is properly defined, you can run:
✅ Verification successful
constants.ENTITIES is properly defined and imported
The verification confirms that ENTITIES is correctly defined in components/heroku/common/constants.mjs and properly imported in heroku.app.mjs. The constant contains an array of Heroku entity options used for webhook subscriptions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that 'ENTITIES' is exported from 'constants.mjs'
# Search for the export of 'ENTITIES' in 'constants.mjs'
rg 'export\s+const\s+ENTITIES' ./common/constants.mjs
Length of output: 118
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find where constants.mjs might be located
fd -e mjs -e js constants
# Then search for ENTITIES export in all JS/MJS files
rg -l "export.*ENTITIES" --type js
Length of output: 27781
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the Heroku component's constants file
cat components/heroku/common/constants.mjs
# Also check if ENTITIES is defined in the file being reviewed
cat components/heroku/heroku.app.mjs
Length of output: 3199
components/heroku/sources/new-webhook-event-instant/new-webhook-event-instant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/heroku/sources/new-webhook-event-instant/new-webhook-event-instant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/heroku/sources/new-webhook-event-instant/new-webhook-event-instant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/heroku/sources/new-webhook-event-instant/new-webhook-event-instant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Resolves #14585
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
ENTITIESfor Heroku application events.@pipedream/herokuwith version0.0.1.Bug Fixes
Documentation