New Components - highergov #14066
New Components - highergov #14066
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
luancazarine
added
the
ai-assisted
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces enhancements to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Sources - New Pusuit Added (Instant)
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
components/highergov/highergov.app.mjs (5)
10-16: LGTM: Headers method is well-implemented, with a minor suggestion.The
_headers()method correctly sets the necessary headers for API requests, including the API key from the authentication data.Consider using the shorthand property notation for the "Accept" header since the key and value are the same:
_headers() { return { "Content-Type": "application/json", - "Accept": "application/json", + Accept: "application/json", "X-API-KEY": this.$auth.api_key, }; },
17-25: LGTM: Request method is well-implemented, with a suggestion for error handling.The
_makeRequest()method effectively encapsulates the common logic for making API requests, using the base URL and headers from other private methods. The use of default parameters and rest syntax provides flexibility and ease of use.Consider adding basic error handling to provide more context in case of API errors:
_makeRequest({ $ = this, path, ...opts }) { - return axios($, { - url: this._baseUrl() + path, - headers: this._headers(), - ...opts, - }); + return axios($, { + url: this._baseUrl() + path, + headers: this._headers(), + ...opts, + }).catch(err => { + throw new Error(`HigherGov API request failed: ${err.message}`); + }); },This will wrap any axios errors with a more specific error message, making debugging easier.
26-32: LGTM: Webhook subscription method is correctly implemented.The
subscribeWebhook()method aligns with the PR objectives and uses the_makeRequest()method for consistent request handling.Consider adding JSDoc comments to improve documentation:
+/** + * Subscribe to webhook events. + * @param {Object} opts - Additional options to pass to the request. + * @returns {Promise} The API response. + */ subscribeWebhook(opts = {}) { return this._makeRequest({ method: "POST", path: "/pipeline/subscribe/", ...opts, }); },This will provide better context for developers using this method.
33-38: LGTM: Webhook unsubscription method is correctly implemented.The
unsubscribeWebhook()method aligns with the PR objectives and uses the_makeRequest()method for consistent request handling.Consider adding JSDoc comments to improve documentation:
+/** + * Unsubscribe from webhook events. + * @param {Object} opts - Additional options to pass to the request. + * @returns {Promise} The API response. + */ unsubscribeWebhook(opts = {}) { return this._makeRequest({ method: "POST", path: "/pipeline/unsubscribe/", ...opts, }); },This will provide better context for developers using this method.
1-41: Overall implementation looks good, with some suggestions for improvement.The
highergov.app.mjsfile successfully implements the webhook subscription and unsubscription functionality as outlined in the PR objectives. The code structure is clean, consistent, and follows good practices such as encapsulation and reusability.Consider the following improvements to enhance the robustness and maintainability of the code:
- Add input validation for the
optsparameter insubscribeWebhook()andunsubscribeWebhook()methods.- Implement more comprehensive error handling, especially for network errors or unexpected API responses.
- Add unit tests to ensure the correct functionality of each method, particularly the public methods.
- Consider implementing a rate limiting mechanism or retry logic for API requests to handle potential API restrictions or temporary failures.
These suggestions will help improve the overall reliability and maintainability of the module.
components/highergov/sources/new-pursuit-added-instant/test-event.mjs (3)
2-8: Consider enhancing test data and adding comments for clarity.The basic event information structure looks good. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Use more realistic sample data instead of "string" placeholders to better represent actual event data.
- Add a brief comment explaining the purpose of the
source_id_versionfield.Example:
"title": "New Grant Opportunity for Clean Energy Research", "description_text": "The Department of Energy is seeking proposals for innovative clean energy solutions.", "source_id": "DOE-2023-CleanEnergy-001", "source_id_version": "1.0", // Version of the source document or API response "captured_date": "2023-09-15T10:30:00Z", "posted_date": "2023-09-14T09:00:00Z", "due_date": "2023-12-31T23:59:59Z",
9-15: Clarify the 'path' field in the agency object.The agency information structure is well-defined. However, the purpose of the
pathfield is not immediately clear. Consider adding a comment to explain its usage or provide an example value.Example:
"agency": { "agency_key": "DOE", "agency_name": "Department of Energy", "agency_abbreviation": "DOE", "agency_type": "Federal", "path": "/agencies/doe" // API path or internal reference to the agency },
1-46: Align test event structure with webhook functionality and improve overall clarity.The test event structure is comprehensive and covers various aspects of a new pursuit. However, there are a few overall suggestions to improve its effectiveness and align it with the PR objectives:
Add a comment at the beginning of the file explaining its purpose as a test event for the "new-pursuit-added-instant" webhook.
Consider adding a
webhook_event_typefield to explicitly identify this as a "new-pursuit-added" event, aligning with the webhook source mentioned in the PR objectives.Implement the suggestions from previous comments to improve clarity, remove redundancies, and use more realistic sample data.
Add JSDoc comments for the main object to provide clear documentation of its structure and purpose.
Example of improved structure start:
/** * Test event for the "new-pursuit-added-instant" webhook. * This represents the payload that would be sent when a new pursuit is added to the pipeline. * @see https://docs.highergov.com/import-and-export/api */ export default { "webhook_event_type": "new-pursuit-added", "title": "New Grant Opportunity for Clean Energy Research", // ... (rest of the improved structure) }These changes will make the test event more representative of actual webhook functionality and improve its overall clarity and usefulness for development and testing purposes.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (4)
- components/highergov/highergov.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/highergov/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/highergov/sources/new-pursuit-added-instant/new-pursuit-added-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/highergov/sources/new-pursuit-added-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (10)
components/highergov/package.json (3)
3-3: Version update looks good.The version increment from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 is appropriate for adding new features like the webhook source mentioned in the PR objectives. This change follows semantic versioning principles.
15-17: Dependencies section added correctly.The addition of the @pipedream/platform dependency is appropriate for implementing new features like the webhook source. The version constraint "^3.0.1" allows for compatible updates, which is a good practice.
Line range hint
1-18: Package.json updates align with PR objectives, but implementation details are missing.The changes to package.json are appropriate for setting up the infrastructure for new components. However, the actual implementation of the "new-pursuit-added-instant" webhook source mentioned in the PR objectives is not visible in this file.
To ensure the webhook implementation is present, please run the following script:
This will help verify that the webhook implementation files exist and the specific webhook is defined somewhere in the codebase.
components/highergov/highergov.app.mjs (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import of
axiosfrom "@pipedream/platform" is appropriate for making HTTP requests in this module.
7-9: LGTM: Base URL method is correctly implemented.The
_baseUrl()method returns the correct URL as specified in the PR objectives. Using a method for this purpose allows for easier maintenance if the URL needs to be changed in the future.components/highergov/sources/new-pursuit-added-instant/new-pursuit-added-instant.mjs (5)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and consistent.The imports for the highergov app and the sample event emitter are correctly implemented and align with the module's purpose.
4-18: LGTM: Module definition is well-structured.The module definition includes all necessary properties and is correctly implemented for a source type module.
17-17: Please clarify the usage of $.service.db.The
dbprop is set to$.service.db, which is an uncommon pattern. Could you provide more context on why this specific service is used and how it's intended to be utilized in this module?
19-27: LGTM: emitEvent method is well-implemented.The
emitEventmethod correctly formats and emits the event with all necessary details. The use ofDate.parsefor timestamp conversion is appropriate.
48-48: LGTM: sampleEmit is correctly assigned.The
sampleEmitimport is properly assigned to the module, which is useful for testing purposes.
components/highergov/sources/new-pursuit-added-instant/new-pursuit-added-instant.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/highergov/sources/new-pursuit-added-instant/new-pursuit-added-instant.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/highergov/sources/new-pursuit-added-instant/new-pursuit-added-instant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/highergov/sources/new-pursuit-added-instant/new-pursuit-added-instant.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/highergov/sources/new-pursuit-added-instant/new-pursuit-added-instant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Resolves #14050.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
subscribeWebhook()andunsubscribeWebhook()methods.Updates
0.1.0and added dependency on@pipedream/platform.