Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Components - tldr #14499

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 5, 2024
Merged

New Components - tldr #14499

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

luancazarine
Copy link
Collaborator

@luancazarine luancazarine commented Nov 4, 2024

Resolves #14496.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a "Summarize Text" action, allowing users to summarize text with customizable options for tone and length.
    • Enhanced API interaction methods to streamline text summarization requests.
  • Version Updates

    • Updated the version of the @pipedream/tldr component from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0.
  • Dependencies

    • Added dependency on @pipedream/platform to improve functionality.

@luancazarine luancazarine added the ai-assisted Content generated by AI, with human refinement and modification label Nov 4, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 4, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 4, 2024 2:29pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Nov 4, 2024 2:29pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Nov 4, 2024 2:29pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Walkthrough

A new module for text summarization has been added to the project, allowing users to input text and receive a summarized version based on customizable parameters such as response style and length. Additionally, the package.json file has been updated to reflect a new version and added dependencies. Significant changes to the tldr application component include the introduction of private methods for managing API requests and the removal of the propDefinitions object.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
components/tldr/actions/summarize-text/summarize-text.mjs New module created for text summarization with customizable options and a new action exported.
components/tldr/package.json Version updated to 0.1.0, new dependency added for @pipedream/platform, and publishConfig modified.
components/tldr/tldr.app.mjs Removal of propDefinitions, addition of private methods for headers, base URL, and request handling, plus a new summarize method.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Reads in a piece of text and distills the main points (Issue #14496)
Required props include the text to be summarized (Issue #14496)
Optional props are: responseStyle and responseLength (Issue #14496)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

action

Suggested reviewers

  • michelle0927

Poem

In a world of words, we now can find,
A way to summarize, oh so refined.
With styles and lengths, a custom delight,
Our text transformed, concise and bright!
Hooray for the changes, let’s give a cheer,
For summarizing magic, now finally here! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@luancazarine luancazarine marked this pull request as ready for review November 4, 2024 16:22
Copy link
Collaborator

@jcortes jcortes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @luancazarine lgtm! Ready for QA!

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
components/tldr/tldr.app.mjs (1)

7-15: Consider making the base URL configurable and adding error handling.

While the implementation is functional, consider these improvements:

  1. The base URL could be moved to configuration or environment variables for easier maintenance
  2. Add validation for missing API key to fail fast with a clear error message
 _headers() {
+  if (!this.$auth.api_key) {
+    throw new Error("API key is required");
+  }
   return {
     "Authorization": `Bearer ${this.$auth.api_key}`,
     "Content-Type": "application/json",
   };
 },
 _baseUrl() {
-  return "https://runtldr.com/apis/v1";
+  return this.$auth.base_url || "https://runtldr.com/apis/v1";
 },
components/tldr/actions/summarize-text/summarize-text.mjs (1)

1-40: Consider performance optimizations.

To improve the scalability and performance of the text summarization service, consider:

  1. Implementing rate limiting to prevent API abuse
  2. Adding a caching layer for frequently summarized texts
  3. Implementing request queuing for long texts

These improvements would help manage API costs and improve user experience.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9a24ee0 and 009fc3c.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • components/tldr/actions/summarize-text/summarize-text.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/tldr/package.json (2 hunks)
  • components/tldr/tldr.app.mjs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
components/tldr/package.json (2)

3-3: LGTM! Version bump and package configuration are appropriate.

The version bump to 0.1.0 correctly reflects the addition of new features, and the public access configuration is properly set.

Also applies to: 14-14


15-18: Verify the @pipedream/platform dependency version.

The dependency on @pipedream/platform is correctly added. However, let's verify if version 3.0.3 is the minimum required version for the features being used.

✅ Verification successful

@pipedream/platform version 3.0.3 is acceptable for the current usage

The code only uses the basic axios import from @pipedream/platform, which is a core feature available across all recent versions. The implementation shows simple HTTP requests without any advanced platform features that might require a specific version. The current version (3.0.3) is appropriate for this use case.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the new summarization features require this specific version
# of @pipedream/platform by examining imports and usage

# Search for platform imports and their usage in the related files
echo "Checking platform imports and usage:"
rg -A 5 "from '@pipedream/platform'" components/tldr/

Length of output: 144


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find platform imports
# First, let's check for any require statements
echo "Checking for require statements:"
rg -l "require.*@pipedream/platform" components/tldr/

# Also check for ES6 imports with different quote styles
echo -e "\nChecking for ES6 imports:"
rg -l "from ['\"]@pipedream/platform['\"]" components/tldr/

# Let's also check the app file to understand the component structure
echo -e "\nChecking app file content:"
cat components/tldr/app/tldr.app.js

# Check for any platform-specific features being used
echo -e "\nChecking for platform-specific features:"
rg -l "app\.(helper|platform|propDefinitions)" components/tldr/

Length of output: 626


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of tldr.app.mjs to see how @pipedream/platform is used
echo "Checking tldr.app.mjs content:"
cat components/tldr/tldr.app.mjs

# Let's also check for any other .mjs files that might use platform features
echo -e "\nChecking other .mjs files:"
fd -e mjs . components/tldr/ --exec cat {}

Length of output: 2656

components/tldr/tldr.app.mjs (1)

1-6: LGTM! Clean and standard app setup.

The import statement and app definition follow the recommended structure.

components/tldr/actions/summarize-text/summarize-text.mjs (2)

1-2: LGTM! Clean import statement.


3-8: Verify the documentation link accessibility.

The configuration looks good, but let's ensure the documentation link is accessible.

✅ Verification successful

Documentation link is accessible and working

The documentation link at https://runtldr.com/documentation returns a 200 HTTP status code, confirming it's accessible. The configuration is properly set up.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the documentation URL is accessible
curl -I https://runtldr.com/documentation

Length of output: 1365

Comment on lines +25 to +30
summarize(opts = {}) {
return this._makeRequest({
method: "POST",
path: "/summarize",
...opts,
});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add input validation and JSDoc documentation.

The summarize method should validate required parameters and include documentation about expected options.

+/**
+ * Summarize text using TLDR API
+ * @param {Object} opts - Options for summarization
+ * @param {string} opts.text - Text to summarize
+ * @param {string} [opts.style] - Response style (optional)
+ * @param {number} [opts.length] - Response length (optional)
+ * @returns {Promise<Object>} Summarization response
+ */
 summarize(opts = {}) {
+  if (!opts.text) {
+    throw new Error("Text parameter is required");
+  }
   return this._makeRequest({
     method: "POST",
     path: "/summarize",
     ...opts,
   });
 },
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
summarize(opts = {}) {
return this._makeRequest({
method: "POST",
path: "/summarize",
...opts,
});
/**
* Summarize text using TLDR API
* @param {Object} opts - Options for summarization
* @param {string} opts.text - Text to summarize
* @param {string} [opts.style] - Response style (optional)
* @param {number} [opts.length] - Response length (optional)
* @returns {Promise<Object>} Summarization response
*/
summarize(opts = {}) {
if (!opts.text) {
throw new Error("Text parameter is required");
}
return this._makeRequest({
method: "POST",
path: "/summarize",
...opts,
});
}

Comment on lines +16 to +24
_makeRequest({
$ = this, path, ...opts
}) {
return axios($, {
url: this._baseUrl() + path,
headers: this._headers(),
...opts,
});
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling and request timeout.

The request method should include error handling and a timeout to prevent hanging requests.

 _makeRequest({
   $ = this, path, ...opts
 }) {
   return axios($, {
     url: this._baseUrl() + path,
     headers: this._headers(),
+    timeout: 30000, // 30 seconds timeout
     ...opts,
-  });
+  }).catch(err => {
+    const status = err.response?.status;
+    const message = err.response?.data?.message || err.message;
+    throw new Error(`Request failed with status ${status}: ${message}`);
+  });
 },
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
_makeRequest({
$ = this, path, ...opts
}) {
return axios($, {
url: this._baseUrl() + path,
headers: this._headers(),
...opts,
});
},
_makeRequest({
$ = this, path, ...opts
}) {
return axios($, {
url: this._baseUrl() + path,
headers: this._headers(),
timeout: 30000, // 30 seconds timeout
...opts,
}).catch(err => {
const status = err.response?.status;
const message = err.response?.data?.message || err.message;
throw new Error(`Request failed with status ${status}: ${message}`);
});
},

Comment on lines 1 to 33
import { axios } from "@pipedream/platform";

export default {
type: "app",
app: "tldr",
propDefinitions: {},
methods: {
// this.$auth contains connected account data
authKeys() {
console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
_headers() {
return {
"Authorization": `Bearer ${this.$auth.api_key}`,
"Content-Type": "application/json",
};
},
_baseUrl() {
return "https://runtldr.com/apis/v1";
},
_makeRequest({
$ = this, path, ...opts
}) {
return axios($, {
url: this._baseUrl() + path,
headers: this._headers(),
...opts,
});
},
summarize(opts = {}) {
return this._makeRequest({
method: "POST",
path: "/summarize",
...opts,
});
},
},
};
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Required properties are missing in the implementation

The current implementation lacks the required property definitions mentioned in issue #14496:

  • No property definition for the required text input
  • Missing optional properties for response_style and response_length

The implementation only provides the base API integration through the summarize method, but doesn't define the necessary properties that should be validated and passed to the API.

🔗 Analysis chain

Verify implementation against requirements.

The implementation needs verification against the requirements from issue #14496:

  1. Support for required text property
  2. Support for optional response style
  3. Support for optional response length
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for action implementation to verify property handling
ast-grep --pattern 'export default {
  $$$
  props: {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 76


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for files that might contain the action implementation
fd "tldr" --type f

# Then let's look for any files containing props or property definitions
rg -l "props:|property:" $(fd "tldr" --type f)

# Finally, let's examine the content of any action files
fd "tldr.*actions?.*(js|mjs|ts)" --type f --exec cat {}

Length of output: 183


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the app file to see if props are defined elsewhere
cat components/tldr/tldr.app.mjs

# Let's also search for any summarize action implementations
rg -A 10 "summarize" components/tldr/tldr.app.mjs

Length of output: 902


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any action files that might contain the property definitions
fd "tldr.*\.(js|mjs|ts)" --type f --exec cat {}

# Also search for any files referencing the tldr app or summarize action
rg -l "app: \"tldr\"" .

Length of output: 770

Comment on lines +9 to +26
props: {
tldr,
inputText: {
type: "string",
label: "Text to Summarize",
description: "The text that needs to be summarized.",
},
responseStyle: {
type: "string",
label: "Response Style",
description: "Style of the response (e.g., Funny, Serious).",
},
responseLength: {
type: "integer",
label: "Response Length",
description: "Length of the response summary.",
},
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add validation constraints to props.

Consider adding the following improvements to make the props more robust:

  1. Add options to responseStyle to limit valid values (e.g., ["Funny", "Serious"])
  2. Add min and max to responseLength to prevent unreasonable values
  3. Add min and max length constraints to inputText
 responseStyle: {
   type: "string",
   label: "Response Style",
   description: "Style of the response (e.g., Funny, Serious).",
+  options: ["Funny", "Serious", "Professional", "Casual"],
+  optional: true,
+  default: "Professional",
 },
 responseLength: {
   type: "integer",
   label: "Response Length",
   description: "Length of the response summary.",
+  min: 50,
+  max: 500,
+  optional: true,
+  default: 200,
 },
 inputText: {
   type: "string",
   label: "Text to Summarize",
   description: "The text that needs to be summarized.",
+  min: 1,
+  max: 5000,
 },
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
props: {
tldr,
inputText: {
type: "string",
label: "Text to Summarize",
description: "The text that needs to be summarized.",
},
responseStyle: {
type: "string",
label: "Response Style",
description: "Style of the response (e.g., Funny, Serious).",
},
responseLength: {
type: "integer",
label: "Response Length",
description: "Length of the response summary.",
},
},
props: {
tldr,
inputText: {
type: "string",
label: "Text to Summarize",
description: "The text that needs to be summarized.",
min: 1,
max: 5000,
},
responseStyle: {
type: "string",
label: "Response Style",
description: "Style of the response (e.g., Funny, Serious).",
options: ["Funny", "Serious", "Professional", "Casual"],
optional: true,
default: "Professional",
},
responseLength: {
type: "integer",
label: "Response Length",
description: "Length of the response summary.",
min: 50,
max: 500,
optional: true,
default: 200,
},
},

Comment on lines +27 to +39
async run({ $ }) {
const response = await this.tldr.summarize({
$,
data: {
inputText: this.inputText,
responseLength: this.responseLength,
responseStyle: this.responseStyle,
},
});

$.export("$summary", `Successfully summarized the text with the following input: "${this.inputText}"`);
return response;
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add error handling and input validation.

The run method needs the following improvements:

  1. Add try-catch block for API call
  2. Validate inputs before making the API call
  3. Include more details in the success message
 async run({ $ }) {
+  // Validate inputs
+  if (!this.inputText?.trim()) {
+    throw new Error("Input text cannot be empty");
+  }
+
+  try {
     const response = await this.tldr.summarize({
       $,
       data: {
         inputText: this.inputText,
         responseLength: this.responseLength,
         responseStyle: this.responseStyle,
       },
     });
 
-    $.export("$summary", `Successfully summarized the text with the following input: "${this.inputText}"`);
+    const truncatedInput = this.inputText.slice(0, 50) + (this.inputText.length > 50 ? "..." : "");
+    $.export("$summary", `Successfully summarized ${this.inputText.length} characters of text. Preview: "${truncatedInput}"`);
     return response;
+  } catch (error) {
+    throw new Error(`Failed to summarize text: ${error.message}`);
+  }
 },
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
async run({ $ }) {
const response = await this.tldr.summarize({
$,
data: {
inputText: this.inputText,
responseLength: this.responseLength,
responseStyle: this.responseStyle,
},
});
$.export("$summary", `Successfully summarized the text with the following input: "${this.inputText}"`);
return response;
},
async run({ $ }) {
// Validate inputs
if (!this.inputText?.trim()) {
throw new Error("Input text cannot be empty");
}
try {
const response = await this.tldr.summarize({
$,
data: {
inputText: this.inputText,
responseLength: this.responseLength,
responseStyle: this.responseStyle,
},
});
const truncatedInput = this.inputText.slice(0, 50) + (this.inputText.length > 50 ? "..." : "");
$.export("$summary", `Successfully summarized ${this.inputText.length} characters of text. Preview: "${truncatedInput}"`);
return response;
} catch (error) {
throw new Error(`Failed to summarize text: ${error.message}`);
}
},

@luancazarine luancazarine merged commit 129369a into master Nov 5, 2024
12 checks passed
@luancazarine luancazarine deleted the issue-14496 branch November 5, 2024 13:23
lcaresia pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
* tldr init

* [Components] tldr #14496
Actions
 - Summarize Text

* pnpm update
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ai-assisted Content generated by AI, with human refinement and modification
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Components] tldr
2 participants