[Components] chat_data #14041 #14340
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new module for creating chatbots within the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning Rate limit exceeded@lcaresia has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 18 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
components/chat_data/actions/delete-chatbot/delete-chatbot.mjs (2)
3-8: LGTM: Module definition and metadata are well-structured.The module definition follows best practices with a clear key, name, description, version, and type. The inclusion of the API documentation link is helpful.
Consider expanding the description to briefly mention any important considerations or potential impacts of deleting a chatbot.
19-28: LGTM: Run method is well-implemented, but consider adding error handling.The run method correctly uses the app instance to delete the chatbot and provides a helpful summary message.
Consider adding error handling to manage potential API failures gracefully. Here's a suggested implementation:
async run({ $ }) { - const response = await this.app.deleteChatbot({ - $, - chatbotId: this.chatbotId, - }); + try { + const response = await this.app.deleteChatbot({ + $, + chatbotId: this.chatbotId, + }); - $.export("$summary", `Successfully deleted Chatbot with ID '${this.chatbotId}'`); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully deleted Chatbot with ID '${this.chatbotId}'`); - return response; + return response; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Failed to delete Chatbot with ID '${this.chatbotId}'`); + throw error; + } },This change will provide more informative feedback in case of an error and allow for proper error propagation.
components/chat_data/actions/get-chatbot-details/get-chatbot-details.mjs (3)
3-8: LGTM with a minor suggestion: Consider aligning the action key with the file name.The metadata is well-structured and informative. The description provides good context and includes a helpful link to the API documentation.
However, there's a slight discrepancy between the action key ("chat_data-get-chatbot-status") and the file name ("get-chatbot-details"). For consistency, consider updating the action key to "chat_data-get-chatbot-details".
- key: "chat_data-get-chatbot-status", + key: "chat_data-get-chatbot-details",
9-17: LGTM with suggestion: Consider adding type checking and validation for 'chatbotId'.The props definition is well-structured, using a propDefinition for 'chatbotId' which promotes reusability and consistency.
To enhance robustness, consider adding type checking and validation for the 'chatbotId' prop. This could include ensuring it's a non-empty string and possibly validating its format if there's a specific expected structure.
Example implementation:
chatbotId: { propDefinition: [ app, "chatbotId", ], type: "string", validation: (value) => { if (!value || typeof value !== "string") { return "Chatbot ID must be a non-empty string."; } // Add any additional format validation if needed }, },
19-28: LGTM with suggestions: Consider adding error handling and enhancing the summary message.The run method implementation is correct and follows good practices. However, there are two areas for potential improvement:
Error Handling: Consider adding explicit error handling to provide more informative error messages to the user.
Summary Message: The current summary message could be more specific about what status information was retrieved.
Here's an example of how you might implement these suggestions:
async run({ $ }) { try { const response = await this.app.getChatbotStatus({ $, chatbotId: this.chatbotId, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved status '${response.status}' for Chatbot with ID '${this.chatbotId}'`); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to retrieve status for Chatbot with ID '${this.chatbotId}'`); throw error; } },This implementation adds try/catch error handling and assumes the response includes a 'status' field. Adjust the summary message based on the actual structure of the response.
components/chat_data/actions/create-chatbot/create-chatbot.mjs (1)
11-40: Add descriptions to action properties for better clarityCurrently, the properties (
chatbotName,sourceText,urlsToScrape,customBackend,model) do not include descriptions. Adding descriptions to each property enhances readability and helps users understand what each input is for.Apply this diff to add descriptions:
chatbotName: { propDefinition: [ app, "chatbotName", ], + description: "The name of the chatbot to create", }, sourceText: { propDefinition: [ app, "sourceText", ], + description: "Text content to include in the chatbot's knowledge base", }, urlsToScrape: { propDefinition: [ app, "urlsToScrape", ], + description: "List of URLs to scrape content from for the chatbot", }, customBackend: { propDefinition: [ app, "customBackend", ], + description: "Specify a custom backend for the chatbot, if any", }, model: { propDefinition: [ app, "model", ], + description: "The AI model to use for the chatbot", },components/chat_data/chat_data.app.mjs (1)
15-16: RenamechatbotIdstochatbotsfor clarityThe variable
chatbotIdsholds an array of chatbot objects, not just their IDs. Renaming it tochatbotsimproves readability and accurately reflects its content.Apply this diff to rename the variable:
-const chatbotIds = response.chatbots; +const chatbots = response.chatbots; -return chatbotIds.map(({ +return chatbots.map(({
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- components/chat_data/actions/create-chatbot/create-chatbot.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/chat_data/actions/delete-chatbot/delete-chatbot.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/chat_data/actions/get-chatbot-details/get-chatbot-details.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/chat_data/chat_data.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/chat_data/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/chat_data/package.json (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/chat_data/common/constants.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
components/chat_data/package.json (3)
3-3: Version bump looks good, please verify if it accurately reflects the changes.The version has been updated from "0.0.1" to "0.1.0", which indicates a minor version bump. This typically suggests new features have been added in a backwards-compatible manner.
Please confirm that this version bump accurately reflects the nature and scope of changes in this PR. If there are breaking changes, consider a major version bump (1.0.0) instead.
13-14: Publish configuration set to public, please confirm if this is intended.The
publishConfigsection now includes"access": "public", which will make this package publicly accessible when published to npm.Please confirm that making this package public aligns with your intended distribution strategy. If this package contains any sensitive information or is meant for internal use only, consider setting this to
"restricted"instead.
15-17: New dependency added, please verify its necessity and version.A new dependency on
@pipedream/platformversion^3.0.3has been added.Please confirm:
- Is this dependency necessary for the changes in this PR?
- Is version 3.0.3 the appropriate version to use? Consider checking if there's a more recent version available.
- Are there any breaking changes in @pipedream/[email protected] that might affect this component?
You can use the following command to check for the latest version:
components/chat_data/actions/delete-chatbot/delete-chatbot.mjs (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import of the
appmodule from the relative path is appropriate and aligns with the expected project structure.
9-17: LGTM: Props are correctly defined.The props definition is well-structured, using the imported app and referencing a propDefinition for chatbotId.
Please ensure that the "chatbotId" propDefinition exists in the app module. Run the following script to verify:
components/chat_data/actions/get-chatbot-details/get-chatbot-details.mjs (1)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct and properly structured.The import of the
appobject from the relative path is appropriate for this action file within the component structure.components/chat_data/chat_data.app.mjs (1)
53-53: Verify thatconstants.CHATBOT_MODELSis defined and imported correctlyEnsure that the
CHATBOT_MODELSarray is correctly defined in./common/constants.mjsand that it exports the expected values for themodelproperty options.Run the following script to check the contents of
constants.CHATBOT_MODELS:✅ Verification successful
constants.CHATBOT_MODELSis correctly defined and imported.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that CHATBOT_MODELS is defined and exported correctly. # Test: Output the exported CHATBOT_MODELS. Expect: An array of model identifiers. cat ./components/chat_data/common/constants.mjs # If using ES6 exports, you might need to inspect the file directly since dynamic import isn't feasible here.Length of output: 194
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that constants is imported correctly in chat_data.app.mjs. # Test: Output import statements related to constants in chat_data.app.mjs. Expect: Import from './common/constants.mjs'. grep -E "import\s+.*constants.*from\s+['\"]\.\/common\/constants\.mjs['\"];" ./components/chat_data/chat_data.app.mjsLength of output: 171
| label: "Employee ID", | ||
| description: "ID of the Employee", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the label and description for chatbotId property
The chatbotId property has a label and description referring to "Employee ID" and "ID of the Employee", which seems inconsistent with its actual purpose of selecting a chatbot.
Apply this diff to correct the labels:
label: "Employee ID",
description: "ID of the Employee",
+label: "Chatbot ID",
+description: "ID of the Chatbot",Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like you need to fix the text
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jcortes, my apologies for the mistake in my previous comment. Here is the corrected diff:
-label: "Employee ID",
-description: "ID of the Employee",
+label: "Chatbot ID",
+description: "ID of the Chatbot",Thank you for pointing that out.
| label: "Employee ID", | ||
| description: "ID of the Employee", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like you need to fix the text
|
/approve |
components/chat_data/actions/get-chatbot-details/get-chatbot-details.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
components/chat_data/actions/create-chatbot/create-chatbot.mjs (1)
1-57: Consider implementing retry logic for API resilienceGiven that this is a network-dependent operation creating a resource, consider implementing retry logic for transient failures. This could be particularly important for maintaining reliability during network issues or API rate limiting.
Consider using Pipedream's built-in retry mechanisms or implementing exponential backoff for failed requests. This would improve the robustness of the integration.
components/chat_data/chat_data.app.mjs (1)
39-39: Improve the description forurlsToScrapepropertyThe description has grammatical errors and can be improved for clarity. Consider revising it to:
"A list of URLs for text content extraction by Chat Data, e.g.,
https://www.chat-data.com. Relevant only if the model iscustom-data-upload."Apply this diff to correct the description:
- description: "A list of URLs is for text content extraction by Chat Data, i.e.: `https://www.chat-data.com`. Relevant only if the model is custom-data-upload", + description: "A list of URLs for text content extraction by Chat Data, e.g., `https://www.chat-data.com`. Relevant only if the model is `custom-data-upload`",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
components/chat_data/actions/create-chatbot/create-chatbot.mjs(1 hunks)components/chat_data/chat_data.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/chat_data/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/chat_data/common/constants.mjs
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/chat_data/actions/create-chatbot/create-chatbot.mjs (2)
43-56: Add error handling for the createChatbot API call
The action still lacks error handling for the API call, which could lead to unhandled exceptions.
9-41: Verify prop definitions in chat_data.app.mjs
The component references several prop definitions from the app file. Let's verify they are properly defined.
✅ Verification successful
All prop definitions are properly defined in chat_data.app.mjs
The component references 5 props from the app file (chatbotName, sourceText, urlsToScrape, customBackend, and model), and all of them are correctly defined in the app's propDefinitions with appropriate types, labels, descriptions and other required attributes:
chatbotName: string type with label and descriptionsourceText: optional string type with label and descriptionurlsToScrape: optional string array type with label and descriptioncustomBackend: optional string type with label and descriptionmodel: string type with label, description and options from constants
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for prop definitions in the app file
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions: {
$$$
chatbotName: $_,
sourceText: $_,
urlsToScrape: $_,
customBackend: $_,
model: $_,
$$$
}'
Length of output: 146
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for the app file first
fd "chat_data.app.mjs"
# Then let's look for individual prop definitions with more flexible patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'chatbotName: {
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'sourceText: {
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'urlsToScrape: {
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'customBackend: {
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'model: {
$$$
}'
# As a backup, let's also try ripgrep to find these properties
rg "propDefinitions" -A 10
Length of output: 101796
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look specifically for the chat_data app file and its prop definitions
cat components/chat_data/chat_data.app.mjs
# As a backup, let's also search for these specific prop names in the app file
rg "chatbotName|sourceText|urlsToScrape|customBackend|model" components/chat_data/chat_data.app.mjs
Length of output: 3416
components/chat_data/chat_data.app.mjs (2)
10-11: Correct the label and description for chatbotId property
The chatbotId property's label and description refer to "Employee ID" and "The employee ID", which seems inconsistent with its actual purpose of selecting a chatbot.
59-74: Add error handling to _makeRequest method
The _makeRequest method does not handle errors that may occur during API requests. Implementing error handling will improve the reliability of API interactions and provide better feedback in case of failures.
…etails.mjs Co-authored-by: Jorge Cortes <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/chat_data/actions/get-chatbot-details/get-chatbot-details.mjs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/chat_data/actions/get-chatbot-details/get-chatbot-details.mjs (4)
1-2: LGTM: Import statement is correct
The import statement correctly references the chat_data app module using a relative path.
4-4: Update component key format
Previous review already suggested this change.
7-7: Verify the API documentation link
The documentation link needs to be verified to ensure it points to the correct API reference.
✅ Verification successful
API documentation link is accessible and valid
The provided API documentation link https://www.chat-data.com/api-reference#tag/Chatbot-Operations/operation/GetChatbotStatus returns a 200 HTTP status code, confirming that it's accessible and valid.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the API documentation link is valid
# Note: Using curl with -L to follow redirects and -s for silent mode
curl -Ls -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://www.chat-data.com/api-reference#tag/Chatbot-Operations/operation/GetChatbotStatus"
Length of output: 135
21-24: Verify getChatbotStatus method implementation
Ensure that the getChatbotStatus method is properly implemented in the app module.
✅ Verification successful
getChatbotStatus method is properly implemented
The method is correctly implemented in components/chat_data/chat_data.app.mjs. It makes an HTTP request to the endpoint /chatbot/status/${chatbotId}/ with the provided parameters.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify getChatbotStatus method implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'getChatbotStatus({ $, chatbotId }) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different patterns to find the getChatbotStatus implementation
# First, let's search for the method name with ripgrep for a broader context
rg "getChatbotStatus" -A 5
# Also search with a more flexible ast-grep pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'getChatbotStatus($_) {
$$$
}'
# And try to find any class method definition
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
getChatbotStatus($_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1214
| async run({ $ }) { | ||
| const response = await this.app.getChatbotStatus({ | ||
| $, | ||
| chatbotId: this.chatbotId, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved status of the Chatbot with ID '${this.chatbotId}'`); | ||
|
|
||
| return response; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for API calls
The current implementation doesn't handle potential API errors. Consider adding try-catch block to handle errors gracefully.
async run({ $ }) {
+ try {
const response = await this.app.getChatbotStatus({
$,
chatbotId: this.chatbotId,
});
$.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved status of the Chatbot with ID '${this.chatbotId}'`);
return response;
+ } catch (error) {
+ $.export("$summary", `Failed to retrieve Chatbot status: ${error.message}`);
+ throw error;
+ }
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| const response = await this.app.getChatbotStatus({ | |
| $, | |
| chatbotId: this.chatbotId, | |
| }); | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved status of the Chatbot with ID '${this.chatbotId}'`); | |
| return response; | |
| }, | |
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| try { | |
| const response = await this.app.getChatbotStatus({ | |
| $, | |
| chatbotId: this.chatbotId, | |
| }); | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved status of the Chatbot with ID '${this.chatbotId}'`); | |
| return response; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| $.export("$summary", `Failed to retrieve Chatbot status: ${error.message}`); | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| }, |
| chatbotId: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "chatbotId", | ||
| ], | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Property definition found but has incorrect labels
The chatbotId property is defined in the app file but has incorrect labels:
- The label is set to "Employee ID" instead of something related to chatbots
- The description is "The employee ID" which is inconsistent with the property's purpose
These should be updated to reflect that this is a chatbot identifier, especially since:
- The property name is chatbotId
- The options method fetches chatbots and returns chatbotId/chatbotName pairs
- The API endpoints use it as a chatbot identifier
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify chatbotId prop definition in app file
Ensure that the chatbotId property is properly defined in the chat_data app module.
The previous ast-grep pattern might have failed due to syntax. Let's try a different approach by:
- First locating potential app definition files
- Then searching for chatbotId property definition using ripgrep with context
Let's try to:
- First locate the chat_data app file specifically
- Then search for chatbotId property definition in that file
Let's examine the full app file content to locate the chatbotId property definition, as it might be defined in a different format or structure than initially assumed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify chatbotId property definition in app file
ast-grep --pattern 'chatbotId: {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 43
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files that might contain the app definition
fd "app.(m?js|ts)" --type f
# Then search for chatbotId property definition in those files
rg "chatbotId.*type|chatbotId.*description" -A 5
Length of output: 100127
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for chat_data app file
fd "chat_data.app.(m?js|ts)" --type f
# Then search for chatbotId property definition in that file
rg "chatbotId.*type|chatbotId.*description" -A 5 components/chat_data/chat_data.app.mjs
Length of output: 168
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to get the entire content of the app file to find the chatbotId definition
cat components/chat_data/chat_data.app.mjs
# Also search for any prop definitions in the app file
rg "propDefinitions" -A 10 components/chat_data/chat_data.app.mjs
Length of output: 3089
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes