Reply functionality for Group Chat and DirectChat #2142
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the chat room interface by introducing new CSS styles, improving layout and hover effects, and refining the message handling logic in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (4)
src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.tsx (1)
1-31: Ensure all imports are necessary and used.The following imports are not used in the code and should be removed to keep the code clean:
FormControlFormControlLabelFormHelperTextInputLabelMenuItemRadioGroupSelectFormLabelTableBodyRadioAnalysis chain
Ensure all imports are necessary and used.
Verify that all newly added imports are necessary and used in the code. Unused imports can be removed to keep the code clean.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all newly added imports are used in the code. # Test: Search for the usage of each imported module. Expect: All modules are used in the code. rg --type tsx 'FormControl|FormControlLabel|FormHelperText|InputLabel|MenuItem|Paper|RadioGroup|Select|FormLabel|TableBody|Radio|SelectChangeEvent|Button|Form|Modal|styles|ApolloQueryResult|useMutation|useQuery|USER_JOINED_ORGANIZATIONS|useLocalStorage|CREATE_GROUP_CHAT|Table|TableCell|TableContainer|TableHead|TableRow|styled|InterfaceQueryUserListItem|USERS_CONNECTION_LIST|Loader|LocalPoliceTwoTone|Search|style|useTranslation' src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.tsxLength of output: 523
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all newly added imports are used in the code. # Test: Search for the usage of each imported module. Expect: All modules are used in the code. rg 'FormControl|FormControlLabel|FormHelperText|InputLabel|MenuItem|Paper|RadioGroup|Select|FormLabel|TableBody|Radio|SelectChangeEvent|Button|Form|Modal|styles|ApolloQueryResult|useMutation|useQuery|USER_JOINED_ORGANIZATIONS|useLocalStorage|CREATE_GROUP_CHAT|Table|TableCell|TableContainer|TableHead|TableRow|styled|InterfaceQueryUserListItem|USERS_CONNECTION_LIST|Loader|LocalPoliceTwoTone|Search|style|useTranslation' src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.tsxLength of output: 6326
src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.test.tsx (2)
242-243: Add more specific test descriptions.The test description "Test open and close create new direct chat modal" can be more specific to describe the exact behavior being tested.
- test('Test open and close create new direct chat modal', async () => { + test('Open and close the create new direct chat modal successfully', async () => {
292-293: Add more specific test descriptions.The test description "Test create new direct chat" can be more specific to describe the exact behavior being tested.
- test('Test create new direct chat', async () => { + test('Create a new direct chat successfully', async () => {src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.test.tsx (1)
2577-2776: LGTM! Test cases are comprehensive and well-structured.The test cases cover the main functionalities of the CreateGroupChat component. Consider adding comments to each test case for better readability.
+ // Test case for opening and closing the create new direct chat modal test('Test open and close create new direct chat modal', async () => { ... }); + // Test case for creating a new group chat test('Test create new group chat', async () => { ... }); + // Test case for adding and removing a user test('Test add and remove user', async () => { ... });
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
src/assets/svgs/chat.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgsrc/assets/svgs/newChat.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
Files selected for processing (28)
- public/locales/en/translation.json (2 hunks)
- schema.graphql (6 hunks)
- src/App.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/GraphQl/Mutations/OrganizationMutations.ts (1 hunks)
- src/GraphQl/Queries/PlugInQueries.ts (2 hunks)
- src/GraphQl/Queries/Queries.ts (2 hunks)
- src/assets/css/app.css (1 hunks)
- src/components/Avatar/Avatar.module.css (1 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.module.css (2 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.test.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/ContactCard/ContactCard.module.css (1 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/ContactCard/ContactCard.test.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/ContactCard/ContactCard.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.module.css (1 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.test.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.module.css (1 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.test.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.module.css (2 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.module.css (1 hunks)
- src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.test.tsx (8 hunks)
- src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.module.css (2 hunks)
- src/screens/UserPortal/Settings/Settings.module.css (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- src/assets/css/app.css
- src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.module.css
- src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.module.css
- src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.module.css
- src/index.tsx
- src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.module.css
Additional context used
Biome
src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.tsx
[error] 209-210: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Additional comments not posted (112)
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.module.css (1)
2-6: Enhanced responsiveness and alignment.The changes to the
.imageContainerclass improve the responsiveness and alignment of the avatar component by usingfit-contentfor width and height, andflexfor display with centered alignment.src/components/UserPortal/ContactCard/ContactCard.module.css (4)
4-8: Verify visual impact of reduced padding and commented properties.The reduced padding and commented out margin-bottom and border properties may affect the spacing and appearance of the contact card elements. Ensure these changes align with the desired design.
12-17: Improved image alignment and presentation.The changes to the
.contactImageclass prioritize the image size and enhance the alignment and presentation of the image within its container.
24-24: Improved visual hierarchy and layout.The addition of
justify-content: centerto the.contactNameContainerclass improves the visual hierarchy and layout of the contact name display.
31-32: Verify visual impact of color scheme change.The change from
.bgGreyto.bgGreenalters the color scheme and may influence the overall aesthetic and user experience of the contact card. Ensure this change aligns with the desired design.src/components/UserPortal/ContactCard/ContactCard.tsx (4)
7-13: Verify impact of restructured interface.The restructuring of the
InterfaceContactCardPropsinterface alters the data model for contact cards. Ensure these changes align with the desired functionality and update any dependent components or logic accordingly.
19-19: Verify impact of updatedhandleSelectedContactChangefunction.The update to the
handleSelectedContactChangefunction ensures that the selected contact type is correctly set. Ensure these changes align with the desired functionality and update any dependent components or logic accordingly.
34-34: Verify visual impact of background color change.The change in background color from grey to green when the contact is selected alters the visual representation of the selected contact. Ensure this change aligns with the desired design.
42-54: Verify impact of updated displayed properties.The update to display
titleandsubtitleinstead of name and email streamlines the information presented. Ensure these changes align with the desired functionality and update any dependent components or logic accordingly.src/screens/UserPortal/Settings/Settings.module.css (1)
119-119: LGTM! Simplified width calculation.The change simplifies the width calculation for the
.collapseSidebarButtonclass, which should enhance maintainability.src/components/UserPortal/ContactCard/ContactCard.test.tsx (1)
26-33: LGTM! Enhanced specificity and modified interaction.The changes to the
propsobject improve the specificity of contact representation and modify the interaction with the contact selection mechanism in the tests.src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.tsx (1)
91-112: LGTM! Added chat navigation link.The addition of the chat button enhances the user experience by providing direct access to chat features. The dynamic styling based on the active state improves visual feedback for users.
src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.module.css (9)
1-3: LGTM! Consistent height across different viewport sizes.The changes ensure that the chat interface remains user-friendly on various devices.
6-9: LGTM! Sidebar expansion with animation.The addition of the
.expandclass enhances the dynamic feel of the interface.
11-14: LGTM! Sidebar contraction with animation.The addition of the
.contractclass enhances the dynamic feel of the interface.
16-26: LGTM! Fixed positioning for sidebar controls.The addition of the
.collapseSidebarButtonclass enhances accessibility and usability.
28-32: LGTM! Hover effects for better visual feedback.The hover effects improve visual feedback for user interactions.
33-49: LGTM! Polished appearance for the chat interface.The updates to the
.mainContainerclass create a more polished appearance for the chat interface.
53-61: LGTM! Polished appearance for the chat interface.The updates to the
.chatContainerclass create a more polished appearance for the chat interface.
137-144: LGTM! Transition effects for better visual feedback.The transition effects enhance the dynamic feel of the interface.
170-207: LGTM! Responsive design for smaller screens.The media queries ensure that the interface remains functional and aesthetically pleasing at different resolutions.
src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.module.css (9)
4-4: LGTM! Background color commented out.Commenting out the background color of the
.chatAreaContainerclass indicates a potential shift in visual design or functionality.
15-19: LGTM! Sticky header styling.The addition of the
.headerclass enhances the usability of the chat interface.
21-27: LGTM! Improved structure and readability of user information.The addition of the
.userInfoclass improves the structure and readability of the user information section.
38-46: LGTM! Enhanced layout for sent and received messages.The addition of the
.messageSentContainerand.messageReceivedContainerclasses enhances the visual distinction and layout of sent and received messages.
48-73: LGTM! Enhanced visual distinction for sent and received messages.The updates to the
.messageSentand.messageReceivedclasses enhance the visual distinction and readability of sent and received messages.
87-110: LGTM! Improved structure and readability of reply-to messages.The addition of the
.replyToand.replyToMessageclasses improves the structure and readability of reply-to messages.
116-123: LGTM! Enhanced readability of message timestamps.The addition of the
.messageTimeclass enhances the readability of message timestamps.
125-131: LGTM! Improved structure and readability of message content.The addition of the
.messageContentclass improves the structure and readability of message content.
170-210: LGTM! Enhanced usability and visual feedback for toggle and close buttons.The addition of the
.customToggleand.closeBtnclasses enhances the usability and visual feedback of the toggle and close buttons.src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.tsx (5)
1-21: LGTM! Necessary imports for functionality.The imports are necessary for the functionality of the component.
22-32: LGTM! Improved type safety and readability.The addition of the
InterfaceCreateDirectChatPropsinterface improves the type safety and readability of the component.
34-48: LGTM! Enhanced visual appearance of the table.The addition of the
StyledTableCellandStyledTableRowcomponents enhances the visual appearance of the table.
50-50: LGTM! Appropriate use ofuseLocalStoragehook.The use of the
useLocalStoragehook is appropriate for retrieving the user ID.
52-202: LGTM! Well-structured component function.The
groupChatfunction is well-structured and handles the necessary logic for creating direct chats.src/GraphQl/Mutations/OrganizationMutations.ts (4)
77-86: LGTM!The modification to accept an optional
organizationIdparameter allows for more flexible usage of theCREATE_DIRECT_CHATmutation.
168-184: LGTM!The
CREATE_MESSAGE_CHATmutation includes a detailed return structure and seems correct.
186-208: LGTM!The
MESSAGE_SENT_TO_DIRECT_CHATsubscription includes a detailed return structure and seems correct.
210-227: LGTM!The
MESSAGE_SENT_TO_GROUP_CHATsubscription includes a detailed return structure and seems correct.src/App.tsx (1)
38-38: LGTM!The addition of the
Chatcomponent to the import statements and the new route path/user/chatenhances the application's routing functionality.Also applies to: 167-167
src/GraphQl/Queries/PlugInQueries.ts (4)
109-133: LGTM!The
DIRECT_CHAT_MESSAGES_BY_CHAT_IDquery includes a detailed return structure and seems correct.
135-186: LGTM!The
DIRECT_CHAT_BY_IDquery includes a detailed return structure and seems correct.
188-227: LGTM!The
GROUP_CHAT_BY_IDquery includes a detailed return structure and seems correct.
294-329: LGTM!The
GROUP_CHAT_LISTquery includes a detailed return structure and seems correct.src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsx (11)
21-27: InterfaceInterfaceContactCardPropsupdated.The interface now includes
title,subtitle,type, andsetSelectedChatType. Ensure these properties are correctly used in theContactCardcomponent.
52-64: Ensure correct initialization and usage of state variables.Verify that state variables for
selectedContact,contacts,groupChats,selectChatType, and modal states are correctly initialized and used.
66-77: Ensure correct handling of modal toggle functions.The functions
toggleCreateDirectChatModalandtoggleCreateGroupChatModaltoggle the respective modal states. Ensure these functions work as expected.
119-127: Ensure correct data handling in useEffect hooks.The
useEffecthooks update the state variablescontactsandgroupChatsbased on the fetched data. Ensure that the data handling logic is correct.
131-151: Ensure correct handling of sidebar toggle buttons.The sidebar toggle buttons update the
hideDrawerstate. Ensure that these buttons work as expected and provide a smooth user experience.
154-184: Verify dropdown menu for initiating new chats.The dropdown menu provides options for starting new direct chats and group chats. Ensure that the dropdown menu is correctly implemented and functions as expected.
187-260: Ensure correct implementation of accordion layout for displaying chats.The accordion layout organizes direct and group chats. Ensure that the accordion layout is correctly implemented and enhances user experience.
264-285: Verify modal components for creating new chats.The modal components for creating new direct and group chats should function as expected. Ensure that the modals are correctly implemented and enhance user experience.
1-17: Ensure all imports are necessary and used.Verify that all newly added imports are necessary and used in the code. Unused imports can be removed to keep the code clean.
Verification successful
All imports are necessary and used.
The verification confirms that all the newly added imports are necessary and used in the code.
DIRECT_CHATS_LISTGROUP_CHAT_LISTuseQueryuseTranslationButtonDropdownSearchOutlinedSearchHourglassBottomIconContactCardChatRoomuseLocalStorageNewChatAccordionstylesUserSidebarCreateGroupChatCreateDirectChatScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all newly added imports are used in the code. # Test: Search for the usage of each imported module. Expect: All modules are used in the code. rg --type tsx 'DIRECT_CHATS_LIST|GROUP_CHAT_LIST|useQuery|useTranslation|Button|Dropdown|SearchOutlined|Search|HourglassBottomIcon|ContactCard|ChatRoom|useLocalStorage|NewChat|Accordion|styles|UserSidebar|CreateGroupChat|CreateDirectChat' src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsxLength of output: 305
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all newly added imports are used in the code. # Test: Search for the usage of each imported module. Expect: All modules are used in the code. rg --glob '*.tsx' 'DIRECT_CHATS_LIST|GROUP_CHAT_LIST|useQuery|useTranslation|Button|Dropdown|SearchOutlined|Search|HourglassBottomIcon|ContactCard|ChatRoom|useLocalStorage|NewChat|Accordion|styles|UserSidebar|CreateGroupChat|CreateDirectChat' src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsxLength of output: 5011
32-50: Ensure correct handling of window resize events.The
handleResizefunction toggles thehideDrawerstate based on window width. Ensure this logic works as expected and does not cause unwanted side effects.
84-98: Verify GraphQL queries and data handling.The
useQueryhooks forDIRECT_CHATS_LISTandGROUP_CHAT_LISTfetch data and update state variables. Ensure that the queries are correct and data handling is appropriate.Verification successful
GraphQL queries and data handling are correct.
The
useQueryhooks forDIRECT_CHATS_LISTandGROUP_CHAT_LISTinChat.tsxare correctly defined and appropriately handle the data.
DIRECT_CHATS_LISTis defined to fetch direct chat details by user ID.GROUP_CHAT_LISTis defined to fetch group chat details by user ID.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of GraphQL queries and data handling. # Test: Search for the usage of `DIRECT_CHATS_LIST` and `GROUP_CHAT_LIST` queries. Expect: Queries are correct and data handling is appropriate. rg --type tsx 'DIRECT_CHATS_LIST|GROUP_CHAT_LIST' src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsxLength of output: 116
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of GraphQL queries and data handling. # Test: Search for the usage of `DIRECT_CHATS_LIST` and `GROUP_CHAT_LIST` queries in the Chat.tsx file. rg 'DIRECT_CHATS_LIST|GROUP_CHAT_LIST' src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsx # Test: Search for the definitions of `DIRECT_CHATS_LIST` and `GROUP_CHAT_LIST` in the codebase. rg 'DIRECT_CHATS_LIST|GROUP_CHAT_LIST'Length of output: 3360
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the definitions of DIRECT_CHATS_LIST and GROUP_CHAT_LIST from the respective files. # Extract the definition of DIRECT_CHATS_LIST rg 'export const DIRECT_CHATS_LIST = gql`' -A 10 src/GraphQl/Queries/PlugInQueries.ts # Extract the definition of GROUP_CHAT_LIST rg 'export const GROUP_CHAT_LIST = gql`' -A 10 src/GraphQl/Queries/PlugInQueries.tsLength of output: 614
src/GraphQl/Queries/Queries.ts (1)
Line range hint
209-210:
Ensure removal ofevent_title_containsparameter does not affect functionality.The
event_title_containsparameter has been removed from theORGANIZATIONS_MEMBER_CONNECTION_LISTquery. Verify that the removal does not affect the functionality of the query.Verification successful
Removal of
event_title_containsparameter does not affect functionality.The
event_title_containsparameter was not found in any of the usages of theORGANIZATIONS_MEMBER_CONNECTION_LISTquery. Therefore, its removal does not impact the functionality of the query.
- No further action required.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the removal of the `event_title_contains` parameter does not affect the functionality of the `ORGANIZATIONS_MEMBER_CONNECTION_LIST` query. # Test: Search for the usage of the `ORGANIZATIONS_MEMBER_CONNECTION_LIST` query. Expect: The query is still valid and functions as expected. rg --type ts 'ORGANIZATIONS_MEMBER_CONNECTION_LIST' src/GraphQl/Queries/Queries.tsLength of output: 139
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the usage of the `ORGANIZATIONS_MEMBER_CONNECTION_LIST` query across the codebase to verify the impact of removing the `event_title_contains` parameter. # Find all occurrences of `ORGANIZATIONS_MEMBER_CONNECTION_LIST` in the codebase. rg 'ORGANIZATIONS_MEMBER_CONNECTION_LIST' --type tsLength of output: 2274
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract relevant lines from files to inspect the usage of the `ORGANIZATIONS_MEMBER_CONNECTION_LIST` query and check for the `event_title_contains` parameter. # Extract lines from the files where `ORGANIZATIONS_MEMBER_CONNECTION_LIST` is used. rg 'ORGANIZATIONS_MEMBER_CONNECTION_LIST' --type ts -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 19829
src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.tsx (8)
36-70: InterfaceInterfaceCreateGroupChatPropsandInterfaceOrganizationdefined.The interfaces define the props for the
CreateGroupChatcomponent and the structure of an organization object. Ensure these interfaces are correctly used in the component.
88-116: Ensure correct initialization and usage of state variables.Verify that state variables for managing organizations, selected organization, group chat title, user IDs, and modal states are correctly initialized and used.
121-126: Ensure correct handling ofuseQueryfor joined organizations.The
useQueryhook fetches the organizations joined by the user. Ensure that the query is correct and data handling is appropriate.
128-133: Ensure correct reset logic.The
resetfunction clears the state variables. Ensure that the reset logic works as expected.
135-137: Ensure correct handling ofuserIdsstate variable.The
useEffecthook updates theuserIdsstate variable. Ensure that the data handling logic is correct.
139-151: Ensure correct implementation ofhandleCreateGroupChatfunction.The
handleCreateGroupChatfunction creates a new group chat and updates the state. Ensure that the function works as expected.
191-270: Verify modal component for creating group chats.The modal component provides a form for selecting an organization and entering a group chat title. Ensure that the modal is correctly implemented and functions as expected.
Tools
Biome
[error] 209-210: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
272-388: Verify modal component for adding users to group chat.The modal component provides a form for searching and adding users to the group chat. Ensure that the modal is correctly implemented and functions as expected.
src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.tsx (15)
1-21: Ensure all necessary imports are used.The import statements look correct and necessary for the functionality. Ensure that all imported modules are used in the code.
24-25: LGTM! Interface updates are appropriate.The
InterfaceChatRoomPropsinterface correctly includesselectedContactandselectedChatType.
28-61: LGTM! Type definitions are appropriate.The
DirectMessageandChattypes are well-defined and enhance type safety and clarity.
73-84: Ensure cleanup inuseEffect.The
useEffecthook correctly setsisMountedRef.currenttofalseon component unmount. This helps prevent memory leaks.
85-93: LGTM! State management is appropriate.The state variables are well-defined and necessary for managing chat data and user interactions.
94-100: Handle input change correctly.The
handleNewMessageChangefunction correctly updates thenewMessagestate based on user input.
101-115: Ensure mutation variables are correctly set.The
sendMessageToDirectChatandsendMessageToGroupChatmutations correctly set the variables needed for sending messages.
117-135: Ensure queries are correctly set.The
useQueryhooks forDIRECT_CHAT_BY_IDandGROUP_CHAT_BY_IDcorrectly set the variables needed for fetching chat data.
137-143: Ensure data refetch on contact change.The
useEffecthook correctly refetches chat data when the selected contact or chat type changes.
145-161: Ensure direct chat data handling is correct.The
useEffecthook correctly handles setting the direct chat data and updating the chat title and subtitle based on the selected contact.
163-174: Ensure group chat data handling is correct.The
useEffecthook correctly handles setting the group chat data and updating the chat title and subtitle based on the selected contact.
176-187: Ensure message sending logic is correct.The
sendMessagefunction correctly handles sending messages to direct and group chats, refetching chat data, and resetting thenewMessagestate.
189-229: Ensure subscription handling is correct.The
useSubscriptionhooks correctly handle receiving new messages in direct and group chats, updating the chat view in real-time.
231-235: Ensure chat area scrolls to the latest message.The
useEffecthook correctly scrolls the chat area to the latest message.
Line range hint
238-505: Ensure rendering logic is correct.The rendering logic correctly displays the chat messages, handles replies, and provides the input for sending new messages.
schema.graphql (5)
466-466: LGTM! Addition oftitlefield is appropriate.The
titlefield has been added to theGroupChattype, enhancing the identification of group chats.
1060-1062: LGTM! Additions toQuerytype are appropriate.The new fields
directChatById,groupChatById, andgroupChatsByUserIdenhance the querying capabilities for retrieving specific chat instances and lists based on user IDs.
1158-1159: LGTM! Modifications toSubscriptiontype are appropriate.The modifications to
messageSentToDirectChatandmessageSentToGroupChatto require auserIdargument enhance the relevance of messages received by users in real-time.
1554-1554: LGTM! Modification tocreateChatInputis appropriate.The
organizationIdfield has been made optional, allowing for greater flexibility when creating chat instances.
Line range hint
1053-1053: Ensure removal oforganizationfield is intentional.The
organizationfield has been removed from theDirectChattype. Verify that this removal is intentional and does not affect other parts of the schema.Verification successful
Ensure removal of
organizationfield is intentional.The
organizationfield has been removed from theDirectChattype. The search results confirm that there are no references toorganizationwithin theDirectChattype in theschema.graphqlfile. Thus, the removal appears to be intentional and does not affect other parts of the schema.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing the `organization` field from the `DirectChat` type. # Test: Search for the usage of the `organization` field in the codebase. Expect: No occurrences or necessary adjustments. rg --type graphql -A 5 $'organization'Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing the `organization` field from the `DirectChat` type. # Test: Search for the usage of the `organization` field in the codebase. Expect: No occurrences or necessary adjustments. rg 'organization' -g '*.graphql' -A 5Length of output: 9808
public/locales/en/translation.json (2)
723-728: LGTM! New keys are appropriate.The new keys under the main object enhance the user-related functionalities within the application.
875-876: LGTM! New keys inuserChatsection are appropriate.The new keys for
searchandmessagesfurther enrich the chat functionality by providing users with options to search and view messages.src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.test.tsx (6)
3-9: Imports look good.The imports from
@testing-library/reactand theChatRoomcomponent are appropriate for the testing framework.Also applies to: 29-29
44-169: Mock definitions are comprehensive.The mock definitions for GraphQL queries and mutations cover various scenarios for direct and group chats, ensuring thorough test coverage.
Also applies to: 171-297, 299-545, 547-927, 929-1414
1419-1438: Test case for fallback content looks good.The test case ensures that the ChatRoom component correctly displays fallback content when no chat is active.
Line range hint
1441-1462:
Test case for direct chat looks good.The test case ensures that the ChatRoom component correctly renders when a direct chat contact is selected.
1463-1545: Test case for sending a message in direct chat looks good.The test case comprehensively tests the functionality of sending and replying to messages in direct chat.
1547-1566: Test cases for group chat and removing reply message look good.The test cases ensure that the ChatRoom component correctly handles group chat interactions and the removal of reply messages.
Also applies to: 1568-1647, 1649-1725
src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.test.tsx (2)
217-223: LGTM!The utility function
waitis correctly implemented and used.
2236-2236: LGTM!The file ends correctly after the test cases.
src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.test.tsx (16)
2-4: LGTM! Import statements are correct.The new imports for GraphQL queries and mutations are necessary and correctly used in the file.
Also applies to: 6-10, 16-25
27-29: LGTM! Mock data initialization is correct.The initialization of the
useLocalStoragehook is correct.
31-113: LGTM! Mock data for group and direct chats is correctly structured.The mock data for group and direct chats is well-structured and covers various scenarios, including messages with and without replies.
Also applies to: 115-207, 209-291, 293-417, 419-545, 547-671, 673-1084, 1086-1311
1313-1389: LGTM! Mock data for messages and chat queries is correctly structured.The mock data for messages sent to group and direct chats, as well as the queries for fetching chat data by ID, is well-structured and covers various scenarios.
Also applies to: 1391-1485, 1487-1751, 1760-2106
2108-2111: LGTM! Helper functions are correctly implemented.The
resizeWindowandwaitfunctions are correctly implemented and useful for the test cases.Also applies to: 2113-2119
Line range hint
2121-2138:
LGTM! Test case for rendering the chat screen is correctly structured.The test case for rendering the chat screen is well-structured and uses the mock data appropriately.
2139-2150: LGTM! Mock data usage in test case is correct.The usage of mock data in the test case for rendering the chat screen is correct.
2164-2175: LGTM! Test case for selecting a contact is correctly structured.The test case for selecting a contact is well-structured and uses the mock data appropriately.
Line range hint
2175-2195:
LGTM! Mock data usage in test case is correct.The usage of mock data in the test case for selecting a contact is correct.
2197-2207: LGTM! Test case for creating a new direct chat is correctly structured.The test case for creating a new direct chat is well-structured and uses the mock data appropriately.
2208-2217: LGTM! Mock data usage in test case is correct.The usage of mock data in the test case for creating a new direct chat is correct.
2237-2248: LGTM! Test case for creating a new group chat is correctly structured.The test case for creating a new group chat is well-structured and uses the mock data appropriately.
Line range hint
2248-2271:
LGTM! Mock data usage in test case is correct.The usage of mock data in the test case for creating a new group chat is correct.
2274-2287: LGTM! Test case for the sidebar is correctly structured.The test case for the sidebar is well-structured and uses the mock data appropriately.
Line range hint
2287-2306:
LGTM! Mock data usage in test case is correct.The usage of mock data in the test case for the sidebar is correct.
2308-2337: LGTM! Test case for the sidebar on small screens is correctly structured.The test case for the sidebar on small screens is well-structured and uses the mock data appropriately.
src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.test.tsx (2)
1-34: LGTM! Import statements are appropriate.The import statements are well-organized and necessary for the tests.
35-2575: LGTM! Mock data and utility functions are well-defined.The mock data arrays cover various scenarios and the wait function uses
actcorrectly.
src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.test.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.test.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…awa-admin into reply-functionality
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/GraphQl/Queries/PlugInQueries.ts (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/GraphQl/Queries/PlugInQueries.ts
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2142 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 97.94% 97.98% +0.04%
===========================================
Files 244 244
Lines 6958 6949 -9
Branches 2010 1998 -12
===========================================
- Hits 6815 6809 -6
+ Misses 133 130 -3
Partials 10 10 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
reply.mov |
disha1202
changed the title
|
This pull request did not get any activity in the past 10 days and will be closed in 180 days if no update occurs. Please verify it has no conflicts with the develop branch and rebase if needed. Mention it now if you need help or give permission to other people to finish your work. |
|
@disha1202 Please resolve the conflicting files. |
disha1202
dismissed stale reviews from DMills27 and coderabbitai[bot]
via
9dbc555
…lawa-admin into reply-functionality
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.module.css (2)
Line range hint
77-81: LGTM! Consider adding a text color for better accessibility.The new
.userDetailsclass improves the layout of user information in the chat interface. The use of flexbox for alignment is a good practice.Consider adding a
colorproperty to ensure sufficient contrast with the background for better accessibility. For example:.userDetails { /* existing properties */ color: #333; /* or any color that provides good contrast */ }
Additional Changes Detected
The shell script execution confirmed the presence of
.contactImage,.messageSent:hover,.messageReceived:hover, and@keyframes testinChatRoom.module.css. Please ensure these changes are included in the review snippet.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-1: Verify completeness of changes.The AI summary mentioned additional changes to this file, such as updates to
.contactImage, hover effects for.messageSentand.messageReceived, and the addition of@keyframes test. However, these changes are not visible in the provided annotated code. Could you please confirm if there are any other changes to this file that should be reviewed?To help verify the changes, please run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify changes in ChatRoom.module.css # Test: Check for changes related to .contactImage, hover effects, and @keyframes rg -n '\.contactImage|\.messageSent:hover|\.messageReceived:hover|@keyframes test' src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.module.cssLength of output: 335
src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.tsx (3)
Line range hint
180-185: Avoid callingchatRefetchwithout a dependency array inuseEffect.The
useEffectthat scrolls the chat area into view does not have a dependency array, causing it to run after every render, which may lead to performance issues.Consider adding a dependency array:
useEffect(() => { document .getElementById('chat-area') ?.lastElementChild?.scrollIntoView({ block: 'end' }); - }); + }, [chat]);
Line range hint
183-183: Handle potential null references when scrolling.Ensure that
document.getElementById('chat-area')and its child elements exist before attempting to scroll, to prevent runtime errors.Add a safety check:
useEffect(() => { - document + const chatArea = document.getElementById('chat-area'); + if (chatArea && chatArea.lastElementChild) { chatArea.lastElementChild.scrollIntoView({ block: 'end' }); + } }, [chat]);
Line range hint
216-221: Improve accessibility by addingaria-labelto interactive elements.The reply button lacks an
aria-label, which can hinder accessibility for users using screen readers.Add an
aria-labelto the button:<Dropdown.Item onClick={() => { setReplyToDirectMessage(message); }} data-testid="replyBtn" + aria-label="Reply" > Reply </Dropdown.Item>src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.test.tsx (5)
1221-1221: Remove unnecessaryconsole.logstatement in testsThe
console.logstatement can clutter test output and is generally unnecessary in committed code. Consider removing it to keep the test output clean.Apply this diff to remove the console log:
- console.log('MESSAGES', messages);
1306-1306: Remove unnecessaryconsole.logstatement in testsSimilar to a previous comment, remove this
console.logstatement to avoid cluttering the test output.Apply this diff:
- console.log('MESSAGES', messages);
Line range hint
1262-1344: Define missing mock data for consistencyIn the test
'send message direct chat when userId is different', there are references to mocks likeSEND_MESSAGE_TO_DIRECT_CHAT_MOCKandDIRECT_CHAT_BY_ID_QUERY_MOCKwhich are not defined in the provided code. This could cause the test to fail.Ensure that these mock data arrays are defined similarly to the other mocks, or adjust the test to use existing mocks.
Line range hint
1455-1510: Reduce code duplication in testsThere is repetitive code in setting up mocks and rendering the
ChatRoomcomponent across multiple tests. Consider refactoring to use helper functions orbeforeEachblocks to DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) up the tests.Create common functions for rendering and mock setup to make the tests more maintainable.
Line range hint
212-272: Consolidate redundant mock dataThe mock responses for
CHAT_BY_IDwith variables{ id: '' }and{ id: '1' }seem to have similar data structures. Evaluate if all these mocks are necessary or if they can be combined to simplify the test setup.Streamline the mocks to reduce redundancy and make the tests easier to manage.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.module.css (1 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.test.tsx (12 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.tsx (1)
36-36: Approve type change and verify its impact.The change from
anytostringfor theidproperty improves type safety. This is a positive enhancement that will help prevent potential type-related errors and improve code reliability.To ensure this change doesn't cause any issues elsewhere in the codebase, please run the following script to check for any occurrences of
chatsListRefetchbeing called with a non-stringid:Review the results to ensure all calls to
chatsListRefetchprovide a string (or undefined) for theidproperty.src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.tsx (1)
170-174: Ensure correct subscription data property access.Double-check the property path
messageSubscriptionData?.data.data.messageSentToChat.chatMessageBelongsTo['_id']. Ensure thatmessageSentToChatcontainschatMessageBelongsToand that this is the correct way to access the chat ID.Run the following script to verify the structure of the subscription data:
src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.test.tsx (2)
Line range hint
152-272: Verify uniqueness of_idfields in mock dataThe
_idfields for messages within theCHAT_BY_ID_QUERY_MOCKare all set to'4'. If uniqueness is important for the tests, consider assigning different_idvalues to each message.Double-check if the tests depend on unique message IDs and update the mock data accordingly.
1156-1164:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure
MockSubscriptionLinkis correctly integratedWhile using
MockSubscriptionLinkwithMockedProvider, ensure that it is properly configured to simulate subscription behavior in your tests. Verify that the link is correctly passed and that any required setup for subscriptions is included.Confirm that the subscriptions are working as intended in the test environment. If you encounter issues, consider using
MockLinkor updating your testing approach.
| @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ export default function chatRoom(props: InterfaceChatRoomProps): JSX.Element { | |||
| }, | |||
| }); | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Handle loading and error states for useQuery.
Currently, the useQuery hook does not handle loading and error conditions. Adding these will enhance the user experience and improve the robustness of your component.
Consider updating the code as follows:
const { data: chatData, refetch: chatRefetch, loading, error } = useQuery(CHAT_BY_ID, {
variables: {
id: props.selectedContact,
},
});
+ if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>;
+ if (error) return <p>Error: {error.message}</p>;Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| } else { | ||
| chatRefetch({ | ||
| id: directMessageSubscriptionData?.data.data.messageSentToDirectChat | ||
| .directChatMessageBelongsTo['_id'], | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the use of an undefined variable directMessageSubscriptionData.
The variable directMessageSubscriptionData is not defined in this scope. You likely intended to use messageSubscriptionData instead, as that's the parameter provided by the onData callback.
Apply this diff to correct the variable name:
} else {
chatRefetch({
- id: directMessageSubscriptionData?.data.data.messageSentToDirectChat
+ id: messageSubscriptionData?.data.data.messageSentToChat
.chatMessageBelongsTo['_id'],
});
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| @@ -1185,8 +1183,94 @@ describe('Testing Chatroom Component [User Portal]', () => { | |||
| ...GROUP_CHAT_BY_ID_QUERY_MOCK, | |||
| ...SEND_MESSAGE_TO_CHAT_MOCK, | |||
| ]; | |||
| const link2 = new StaticMockLink(mocks, true); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
StaticMockLink is not a standard testing utility
The StaticMockLink class used here is not a standard utility provided by @apollo/react-testing or @apollo/client/testing. Ensure that StaticMockLink is properly defined or imported. If it is a custom implementation, include its definition or import statement.
If StaticMockLink is intended to be a custom link, make sure to import it from the appropriate module or define it within the test file.
| ...SEND_MESSAGE_TO_CHAT_MOCK, | ||
| ]; | ||
| const link2 = new StaticMockLink(mocks, true); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
StaticMockLink may not be defined
The use of StaticMockLink here may cause issues if it is not properly defined or imported. Ensure that StaticMockLink is available and correctly used in your tests.
If StaticMockLink is a custom implementation, include its definition or make sure it is correctly imported.
| @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ | |||
| fireEvent, | |||
| waitFor, | |||
| } from '@testing-library/react'; | |||
| import { MockedProvider } from '@apollo/react-testing'; | |||
| import { MockSubscriptionLink, MockedProvider } from '@apollo/react-testing'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update import to use @apollo/client/testing
The import statement is using @apollo/react-testing, which is deprecated. The testing utilities have been moved to @apollo/client/testing in newer versions of Apollo Client. Updating the import will ensure compatibility with the latest versions.
Apply this diff to update the import:
- import { MockSubscriptionLink, MockedProvider } from '@apollo/react-testing';
+ import { MockSubscriptionLink, MockedProvider } from '@apollo/client/testing';📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import { MockSubscriptionLink, MockedProvider } from '@apollo/react-testing'; | |
| import { MockSubscriptionLink, MockedProvider } from '@apollo/client/testing'; |
| const link2 = new StaticMockLink(mocks, true); | ||
| render( | ||
| <MockedProvider addTypename={false} mocks={mocks}> | ||
| <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={link2}> | ||
| <BrowserRouter> | ||
| <Provider store={store}> | ||
| <I18nextProvider i18n={i18nForTest}> | ||
| <ChatRoom selectedContact="1" selectedChatType="direct" /> | ||
| </I18nextProvider> | ||
| </Provider> | ||
| </BrowserRouter> | ||
| </MockedProvider>, | ||
| ); | ||
| await wait(); | ||
|
|
||
| const input = (await screen.findByTestId( | ||
| 'messageInput', | ||
| )) as HTMLInputElement; | ||
|
|
||
| act(() => { | ||
| fireEvent.change(input, { target: { value: 'Hello' } }); | ||
| }); | ||
| expect(input.value).toBe('Hello'); | ||
|
|
||
| const sendBtn = await screen.findByTestId('sendMessage'); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(sendBtn).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| act(() => { | ||
| fireEvent.click(sendBtn); | ||
| }); | ||
| await waitFor(() => { | ||
| expect(input.value).toBeFalsy(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const messages = await screen.findAllByTestId('directChatMsg'); | ||
|
|
||
| console.log('MESSAGES', messages); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(messages.length).not.toBe(0); | ||
|
|
||
| act(() => { | ||
| fireEvent.mouseOver(messages[0]); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| await waitFor(async () => { | ||
| expect(await screen.findByTestId('moreOptions')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const moreOptionsBtn = await screen.findByTestId('dropdown'); | ||
| act(() => { | ||
| fireEvent.click(moreOptionsBtn); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const replyBtn = await screen.findByTestId('replyBtn'); | ||
|
|
||
| act(() => { | ||
| fireEvent.click(replyBtn); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const replyMsg = await screen.findByTestId('replyMsg'); | ||
|
|
||
| await waitFor(() => { | ||
| expect(replyMsg).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| act(() => { | ||
| fireEvent.change(input, { target: { value: 'Test reply message' } }); | ||
| }); | ||
| expect(input.value).toBe('Test reply message'); | ||
|
|
||
| act(() => { | ||
| fireEvent.click(sendBtn); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| await wait(400); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wrap asynchronous operations in act
When testing components that involve asynchronous state changes, it's important to wrap these operations in act to ensure that all updates are processed before making assertions. This helps maintain the integrity of the test and prevents warnings.
For example, wrap your asynchronous code like this:
- render(
+ await act(async () => {
+ render(
// existing render code
- );
+ );
+ });And ensure that any awaiting of operations is properly handled.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.test.tsx (3)
Line range hint
1216-1234: Enhance subscription testing in 'Selected contact is direct chat' testThe test now uses MockSubscriptionLink, which is good for testing subscription-based functionality. However, consider adding specific assertions to verify the subscription behavior.
Consider adding assertions like:
// After triggering an action that should cause a subscription update await waitFor(() => { expect(link.operations.length).toBeGreaterThan(0); expect(link.operations[0].query).toEqual(MESSAGE_SENT_TO_CHAT); });
1246-1320: Improve 'send message direct chat' testThe test has been enhanced with more detailed assertions and interactions, which is great for improving coverage. However, there are a couple of points to address:
- Remove the console.log statement used for debugging.
- Consider adding more specific assertions for the reply functionality.
Apply this diff to remove the console.log:
- console.log('MESSAGES', messages);Also, consider adding more specific assertions for the reply functionality, such as:
const replyMessage = await screen.findByText('Test reply message'); expect(replyMessage).toBeInTheDocument();
Line range hint
1322-1404: Refactor duplicate code in chat testsThe new test 'send message direct chat when userId is different' contains logic similar to the previous 'send message direct chat' test. Consider refactoring common test logic into a separate function to improve maintainability and reduce code duplication.
Create a helper function for common test logic:
async function testSendMessageAndReply(userId) { setItem('userId', userId); // ... (common setup code) const input = await screen.findByTestId('messageInput'); const sendBtn = await screen.findByTestId('sendMessage'); // Test sending message fireEvent.change(input, { target: { value: 'Hello' } }); fireEvent.click(sendBtn); await waitFor(() => expect(input.value).toBeFalsy()); // Test replying to message const messages = await screen.findAllByTestId('message'); fireEvent.mouseOver(messages[0]); const moreOptionsBtn = await screen.findByTestId('dropdown'); fireEvent.click(moreOptionsBtn); const replyBtn = await screen.findByTestId('replyBtn'); fireEvent.click(replyBtn); // ... (common assertions) } // Use the helper function in both tests test('send message direct chat', async () => { await testSendMessageAndReply('2'); }); test('send message direct chat when userId is different', async () => { await testSendMessageAndReply('8'); });src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.test.tsx (5)
Line range hint
2231-2267: Improve test coverage and accuracy for modal opening/closingThe test case for opening and closing the create new group chat modal could be enhanced:
- Update the test name to accurately reflect that it's testing the group chat modal, not direct chat.
- Add an assertion to verify that the modal is open before attempting to close it.
- Add an assertion to confirm that the modal is closed after clicking the close button.
Consider applying these changes:
- test('open and close create new direct chat modal', async () => { + test('open and close create new group chat modal', async () => { // ... existing setup code ... fireEvent.click(newGroupChatBtn); + + const modal = await screen.findByTestId('createGroupChatModal'); + expect(modal).toBeInTheDocument(); const closeButton = screen.getByRole('button', { name: /close/i }); expect(closeButton).toBeInTheDocument(); fireEvent.click(closeButton); + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(screen.queryByTestId('createGroupChatModal')).not.toBeInTheDocument(); + }); });
Line range hint
2269-2367: Refactor and improve the "create new group chat" testThis test case could benefit from some cleanup and additional assertions:
- Remove commented-out code and console.log statements to improve readability.
- Add assertions to verify the final state after creating the group chat.
- Optimize the use of act() and waitFor() for better test stability.
Apply these changes to improve the test:
- Remove commented-out code and console.log statements.
- Add an assertion to verify that the modal is closed after creating the group chat.
- Add an assertion to check if the new group chat appears in the chat list.
Here's a simplified version of how you could structure the test:
test('create new group chat', async () => { // ... existing setup code ... // Open the modal const dropdown = await screen.findByTestId('dropdown'); userEvent.click(dropdown); const newGroupChatBtn = await screen.findByTestId('newGroupChat'); userEvent.click(newGroupChatBtn); // Fill in the form const modal = await screen.findByTestId('createGroupChatModal'); const groupTitleInput = within(modal).getByLabelText('Group name'); userEvent.type(groupTitleInput, 'Test Group'); const orgSelect = within(modal).getByLabelText('Select Organization'); userEvent.click(orgSelect); const optionsPopupEl = await screen.findByRole('listbox', { name: /select organization/i }); userEvent.click(within(optionsPopupEl).getByText(/any organization/i)); // Navigate to the next step and create the group const nextBtn = within(modal).getByTestId('nextBtn'); userEvent.click(nextBtn); const createBtn = await within(modal).findByTestId('createBtn'); userEvent.click(createBtn); // Assert that the modal is closed and the new group chat appears in the list await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.queryByTestId('createGroupChatModal')).not.toBeInTheDocument(); }); const newGroupChatElement = await screen.findByText('Test Group'); expect(newGroupChatElement).toBeInTheDocument(); });This structure simplifies the test, removes unnecessary waits, and adds important assertions to verify the outcome of creating a new group chat.
Line range hint
2369-2461: Enhance "add and remove user" test with additional assertionsThe test case for adding and removing users could be improved to provide better coverage and more meaningful assertions:
- Add assertions to verify the state of the user list after adding and removing users.
- Verify the results of the user search functionality.
- Assert the effects of the submit action.
Consider applying these changes to improve the test:
test('add and remove user', async () => { setItem('userId', '1'); // ... existing setup code ... // Open the modal and navigate to the user selection step const dropdown = await screen.findByTestId('dropdown'); userEvent.click(dropdown); const newGroupChatBtn = await screen.findByTestId('newGroupChat'); userEvent.click(newGroupChatBtn); const nextBtn = await screen.findByTestId('nextBtn'); userEvent.click(nextBtn); // Add a user const addBtns = await screen.findAllByTestId('addBtn'); const firstUserName = await screen.findByText(/Deanne Marks/); userEvent.click(addBtns[0]); // Assert that the user is added to the selected list const removeBtn = await screen.findByText('Remove'); expect(removeBtn).toBeInTheDocument(); expect(firstUserName).toBeInTheDocument(); // Remove the user userEvent.click(removeBtn); await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.queryByText('Remove')).not.toBeInTheDocument(); }); expect(addBtns[0]).toBeInTheDocument(); // Test search functionality const searchInput = screen.getByTestId('searchUser'); userEvent.type(searchInput, 'Disha'); // Assert that search results are updated await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.getByText(/Disha/)).toBeInTheDocument(); expect(screen.queryByText(/Deanne Marks/)).not.toBeInTheDocument(); }); // Submit the form const submitBtn = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); userEvent.click(submitBtn); // Assert that the modal is closed after submission await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.queryByTestId('createGroupChatModal')).not.toBeInTheDocument(); }); // Optionally, assert that the new group chat appears in the list // This depends on how your component updates the UI after creating a group // const newGroupChatElement = await screen.findByText('Test Group'); // expect(newGroupChatElement).toBeInTheDocument(); });These changes will make the test more robust by verifying the state changes after each action and ensuring that the search and submit functionalities work as expected.
Line range hint
1-2461: Improve overall test structure and reduce redundancyThe test file for CreateGroupChat component is comprehensive but could benefit from some structural improvements:
- Consider extracting common setup code into a separate function or using
beforeEachto reduce redundancy across tests.- Standardize the use of
act()andwaitFor()across all tests for consistency.- Consider adding more specific test cases for edge scenarios, such as validation errors or network failures.
Here's an example of how you could structure the common setup:
describe('CreateGroupChat', () => { const renderComponent = () => { const mock = [ ...USER_JOINED_ORG_MOCK, ...GROUP_CHAT_BY_ID_QUERY_MOCK, ...MESSAGE_SENT_TO_CHAT_MOCK, ...CHAT_BY_ID_QUERY_MOCK, ...CHATS_LIST_MOCK, ...UserConnectionListMock, ...CREATE_CHAT_MUTATION, ]; return render( <MockedProvider addTypename={false} mocks={mock}> <BrowserRouter> <Provider store={store}> <I18nextProvider i18n={i18nForTest}> <Chat /> </I18nextProvider> </Provider> </BrowserRouter> </MockedProvider> ); }; const openCreateGroupChatModal = async () => { const dropdown = await screen.findByTestId('dropdown'); userEvent.click(dropdown); const newGroupChatBtn = await screen.findByTestId('newGroupChat'); userEvent.click(newGroupChatBtn); }; // Your test cases here, using renderComponent() and openCreateGroupChatModal() });This structure will make your tests more maintainable and easier to read. Additionally, consider adding tests for error handling and edge cases to increase your test coverage.
Line range hint
1-2461: Optimize test utilities and setupThe test file includes some custom utilities and mocks that could be optimized:
- The custom
waitfunction could be replaced with more standard testing utilities.- The
window.matchMediamock could be moved to a separate setup file for better reusability.Consider these improvements:
- Replace the custom
waitfunction withwaitForfrom@testing-library/react:import { waitFor } from '@testing-library/react'; // Instead of: // await wait(); // Use: await waitFor(() => { // Your expectations here });
- Move the
window.matchMediamock to a separate setup file (e.g.,setupTests.js):// setupTests.js Object.defineProperty(window, 'matchMedia', { writable: true, value: jest.fn().mockImplementation(query => ({ matches: false, media: query, onchange: null, addListener: jest.fn(), removeListener: jest.fn(), addEventListener: jest.fn(), removeEventListener: jest.fn(), dispatchEvent: jest.fn(), })), });Then, in your Jest configuration (usually in
package.jsonorjest.config.js), add:{ "setupFiles": ["./setupTests.js"] }These changes will make your tests more maintainable and aligned with testing best practices.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- src/GraphQl/Mutations/OrganizationMutations.ts (0 hunks)
- src/GraphQl/Queries/PlugInQueries.ts (0 hunks)
- src/GraphQl/Queries/Queries.ts (0 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.test.tsx (13 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.test.tsx (4 hunks)
- src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.test.tsx (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- src/GraphQl/Mutations/OrganizationMutations.ts
- src/GraphQl/Queries/PlugInQueries.ts
- src/GraphQl/Queries/Queries.ts
- src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.test.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.test.tsx (3)
149-149: Verify consistency of mock data changesThe _id fields in various mock data objects have been updated. Ensure that these changes are consistent across all mocks and that they don't unintentionally break existing tests or affect the behavior of the component under test.
Run the following script to check for consistency in mock data IDs:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check consistency of mock data IDs # Test: Look for inconsistencies in mock data IDs rg -A 5 '_id: .(1|2|4|345678).' src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.test.tsxAlso applies to: 208-208, 267-267, 803-803, 886-886, 969-969
1026-1106: Verify usage of new SEND_MESSAGE_TO_CHAT_MOCK casesNew mock cases have been added to SEND_MESSAGE_TO_CHAT_MOCK for different reply scenarios. Ensure that these new cases are utilized in the tests and that they cover all relevant use cases for replying to messages.
Run the following script to check the usage of new mock cases in tests:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of new SEND_MESSAGE_TO_CHAT_MOCK cases in tests # Test: Look for test cases using the new mock scenarios rg -A 5 'Test reply message' src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.test.tsx
10-10:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate Apollo Client testing import
The import statement is using
@apollo/react-testing, which is deprecated. Consider updating to the latest Apollo Client testing utilities.Apply this diff to update the import:
- import { MockSubscriptionLink, MockedProvider } from '@apollo/react-testing'; + import { MockSubscriptionLink, MockedProvider } from '@apollo/client/testing';Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| const link2 = new StaticMockLink(mocks, true); | ||
| render( | ||
| <MockedProvider addTypename={false} mocks={mocks}> | ||
| <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={link2}> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance 'reply to message' test
The test now uses StaticMockLink, which provides better control over mock responses. However, consider the following improvements:
- Use the previously suggested helper function to reduce code duplication.
- Add more specific assertions for the reply functionality.
Refactor the test to use the helper function:
test('reply to message', async () => {
await testSendMessageAndReply('1');
// Add specific assertions for reply functionality
const replyMessage = await screen.findByText('Test reply message');
expect(replyMessage).toBeInTheDocument();
// Verify that the reply is associated with the original message
const originalMessage = await screen.findByText('Test message');
expect(originalMessage).toHaveAttribute('data-testid', 'original-message');
expect(replyMessage).toHaveAttribute('data-testid', 'reply-to-message');
});| @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ | |||
| } from 'GraphQl/Mutations/OrganizationMutations'; | |||
| import ChatRoom from './ChatRoom'; | |||
| import { useLocalStorage } from 'utils/useLocalstorage'; | |||
| import { StaticMockLink } from 'utils/StaticMockLink'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
StaticMockLink.ts File Missing
The utils/StaticMockLink.ts file imported in ChatRoom.test.tsx does not exist. Please verify the file's location or update the import path accordingly.
- File: src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.test.tsx
- Line: 23
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify StaticMockLink implementation
Ensure that the StaticMockLink utility is properly implemented in the utils/StaticMockLink file and that it provides the necessary functionality for these tests.
Run the following script to check the implementation of StaticMockLink:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of StaticMockLink
# Test: Check if the StaticMockLink file exists and contains the expected class
rg -A 5 'class StaticMockLink' utils/StaticMockLink.ts
Length of output: 1415
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and export of StaticMockLink in utils/StaticMockLink.ts
# Check if the StaticMockLink.ts file exists
if [ -f utils/StaticMockLink.ts ]; then
echo "utils/StaticMockLink.ts exists."
# Search for any export named StaticMockLink
rg 'export\s+(class|const|function|default\s+class)\s+StaticMockLink' utils/StaticMockLink.ts
else
echo "utils/StaticMockLink.ts does not exist."
exit 1
fi
Length of output: 134
DMills27
merged commit ca7c569
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Issue Number:
Fixes #2103
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Style
Tests