Feat: updated chat related functionality to work with the updated chat schema #2286
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request enhance the GraphQL schema and related components to support new chat functionalities. New types and inputs for chats and messages are introduced, along with mutations for creating chats and sending messages. Queries for retrieving chats by ID and user ID are added, and real-time message updates are facilitated through subscriptions. Additionally, the user interface components and tests are updated to reflect these changes, streamlining chat handling and improving user interactions. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2286 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 97.62% 97.96% +0.34%
===========================================
Files 250 250
Lines 7188 7136 -52
Branches 2069 2040 -29
===========================================
- Hits 7017 6991 -26
+ Misses 159 135 -24
+ Partials 12 10 -2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
This pull request did not get any activity in the past 10 days and will be closed in 180 days if no update occurs. Please verify it has no conflicts with the develop branch and rebase if needed. Mention it now if you need help or give permission to other people to finish your work. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 36
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (21)
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx (1)
47-47: Approve the change with a minor suggestion.The addition of optional chaining to
avatar?.toString()is a good defensive programming practice. It prevents potential runtime errors ifavataris null or undefined.However, to make the component more robust, consider handling the case where
svgmight be undefined:const svg = avatar?.toString() ?? '';This ensures that
svgis always a string, which might prevent issues further down in the component's render method.src/components/UserPortal/ContactCard/ContactCard.tsx (1)
Line range hint
32-78: LGTM! Consider minor refactor for consistency.The changes in the
contactCardfunction align well with the interface modifications. The removal ofsubtitleandtype-related logic simplifies the component, which is good for maintainability.For consistency with the interface changes, consider updating the JSX to use the new
isGroupproperty if needed. For example:<div className={styles.contactNameContainer}> <b>{props.title}</b> + {props.isGroup && <span> (Group)</span>} </div>This change would visually indicate whether a contact is a group or not, which might be useful depending on your UI requirements.
src/components/UserPortal/ContactCard/ContactCard.test.tsx (1)
99-99: LGTM: Testing group contact scenarioSetting
isGrouptotruein this test case is a good addition. It ensures that the component's behavior is tested for both individual and group contacts when selected.Consider adding a separate test case for group contacts to isolate the testing of group-specific behavior. This would improve the test structure and make it easier to identify issues specific to group contacts in the future.
src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.module.css (1)
Line range hint
1-200: Suggestions for improving overall CSS structure.While the current structure is functional, consider the following improvements:
- Avoid using
!importantflags where possible. Instead, use more specific selectors to override styles.- Consider consolidating redundant styles. For example, the
::-webkit-scrollbarproperty is set todisplay: nonein multiple places.- Enhance responsive design by using more flexible units (e.g.,
rem,%) instead of fixed pixel values where appropriate.- Consider using CSS variables for commonly used values (like colors and dimensions) to improve maintainability.
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these suggestions?
src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.module.css (3)
87-110: LGTM: New reply styling enhances chat functionalityThe addition of
.replyToand.replyToMessageclasses provides clear styling for a reply feature in the chat. The use of borders and background colors effectively differentiates reply messages from regular ones.Consider using CSS variables for colors (e.g.,
--reply-border-color: pink;) to improve maintainability and consistency across the stylesheet.
170-218: LGTM: New interactive elements enhance user experienceThe addition of
.customToggleand.closeBtnclasses, along with their associated styles, introduces new interactive elements to the chat interface. The hover effects and icon styling contribute to a more engaging user experience.Consider adding a transition property to the hover effects for a smoother user experience. For example:
.customToggle, .closeBtn { transition: background-color 0.2s ease; }
225-244: LGTM: Targeted message animation improves navigationThe addition of an animation for targeted messages is a great feature that improves user navigation within the chat. The use of
scroll-margin-topensures the targeted message is fully visible.Consider reducing the animation duration for a snappier effect. A duration of 0.5s might provide a better balance between visibility and responsiveness:
.messageSent:target, .messageReceived:target { animation-duration: 0.5s; }src/GraphQl/Queries/PlugInQueries.ts (1)
223-229: Add theimageField tousersfor ConsistencyIn the
CHAT_BY_IDquery, theusersfield includes user details but omits theimagefield. However, in theCHATS_LISTquery (lines 304-309), theusersfield includes theimageattribute.For consistency and to provide a richer set of user data, consider including the
imagefield in theusersobject within theCHAT_BY_IDquery.src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.tsx (2)
189-189: Remove debugging console statementsThe
console.log(organizations);statement at line 189 appears to be used for debugging purposes. It's recommended to remove such statements from production code to maintain cleanliness and avoid unintended console output.Apply this diff to remove the debugging statement:
- console.log(organizations);
206-227: Clean up code by removing commented-out sectionsThere's a block of commented-out code between lines 206 and 227. To keep the codebase clean and maintainable, consider removing unused code instead of commenting it out.
Apply this diff to remove the commented-out code:
- {/* <FormControl fullWidth> - <InputLabel id="select-org">Select Organization</InputLabel> - <Select - labelId="select-org" - id="select-org" - data-testid="orgSelect" - label="Select Organization" - value={selectedOrganization} - onChange={(e) => handleChange(e)} - > - {organizations?.length && - organizations.map((organization: InterfaceOrganization) => ( - <MenuItem - data-testid="selectOptions" - key={organization._id} - value={organization._id} - > - {`${organization.name}(${organization.address?.city},${organization.address?.state},${organization.address?.countryCode})`} - </MenuItem> - ))} - </Select> - </FormControl> */}src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.test.tsx (1)
Line range hint
784-1039: Refactor duplicated mock definitions to improve maintainabilityThere is significant duplication in the mock data definitions for
CHAT_BY_ID_QUERY_MOCK,GROUP_CHAT_BY_ID_QUERY_MOCK, andCHATS_LIST_MOCK. Refactoring these into reusable functions or mock generators can reduce code redundancy and enhance maintainability.Consider creating a helper function to generate chat mocks:
function createChatMock(id, isGroup, users, messages) { return { request: { query: CHAT_BY_ID, variables: { id }, }, result: { data: { chatById: { _id: id, isGroup, users, messages, // ...other fields }, }, }, }; }Use this function to generate your mocks:
const CHAT_BY_ID_QUERY_MOCK = [ createChatMock('1', false, usersArray, messagesArray), // ...other mocks ];src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.test.tsx (2)
Line range hint
352-364: Inconsistent mock data: 'messageSentToGroupChat' should be 'messageSentToChat'In the mocks at lines 352-364 and 378-390, the query is
MESSAGE_SENT_TO_CHAT, but the result data key ismessageSentToGroupChat. This inconsistency may cause the tests to fail or behave unexpectedly. Please updatemessageSentToGroupChattomessageSentToChatin the result data to align with the updated schema.Apply this diff to fix the inconsistency:
# At lines 359 and 389 - messageSentToGroupChat: { + messageSentToChat: {Also applies to: 378-390
Line range hint
1444-1446: Await 'waitFor' to ensure proper async handlingAt lines 1444-1446, the
waitForfunction is called but not awaited. SincewaitForreturns a promise, it should be awaited to ensure the assertion inside is correctly handled.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- waitFor(() => { + await waitFor(() => { expect(addBtn[0]).toBeInTheDocument(); });src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.test.tsx (3)
Line range hint
694-706: Inconsistent field name in mock responseIn the
MESSAGE_SENT_TO_CHAT_MOCKarray, the second mock's result incorrectly usesmessageSentToGroupChatinstead ofmessageSentToChat. This inconsistency may cause tests to fail or not behave as expected.Apply this diff to fix the inconsistency:
result: { data: { - messageSentToGroupChat: { + messageSentToChat: { _id: '668ec1f1df364e03ac47a151',
Line range hint
720-732: Inconsistent field name in mock responseSimilarly, in the third mock within
MESSAGE_SENT_TO_CHAT_MOCK, the result usesmessageSentToGroupChatinstead ofmessageSentToChat. This inconsistency may lead to unexpected test behaviors.Apply this diff to correct the field name:
result: { data: { - messageSentToGroupChat: { + messageSentToChat: { _id: '668ec1f13603ac4697a151',
1715-1722: Simplify conditional check in the testIn the "sidebar" test, the conditional check for
closeMenuBtnmay be unnecessary sincefindByTestIdwill throw an exception if the element is not found.You can simplify the code by removing the
ifstatement:const closeMenuBtn = await screen.findByTestId('closeMenu'); expect(closeMenuBtn).toBeInTheDocument(); - if (closeMenuBtn) { closeMenuBtn.click(); - } else { - throw new Error('Close menu button not found'); - }src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.test.tsx (3)
2332-2360: Nitpick: Remove commented-out code and debugging statementsThe code contains several commented-out sections and a
console.logstatement. Cleaning up these sections enhances code readability and maintainability.Apply this diff to remove unnecessary code:
const selectLabel = /select organization/i; const orgSelect = await screen.findByLabelText('Select Organization'); -// console.log(prettyDOM(document)); -// act(() => { -// fireEvent.change(orgSelect, { -// target: { value: '6401ff65ce8e8406b8f07af2' }, -// }); -// }) -// fireEvent.change(orgSelect, { -// target: { value: '6401ff65ce8e8406b8f07af2' }, -// }); userEvent.click(orgSelect); const optionsPopupEl = await screen.findByRole('listbox', { name: selectLabel, }); userEvent.click(within(optionsPopupEl).getByText(/any organization/i)); -// }); -// await waitFor(async () => { -// const option = await screen.findAllByText('Any Organization'); -// console.log("option", option); -// });
2376-2378: Nitpick: Remove obsolete commented-out assertionsThere's an unused
await waitFor()block that's commented out. Removing obsolete code prevents confusion and keeps the test code clean.Apply this diff to clean up the code:
-// await waitFor(() => { -// expect(createBtn).not.toBeInTheDocument(); -// });
⚠️ Deprecated message mocks still in useFound remaining references to
MESSAGE_SENT_TO_DIRECT_CHATandMESSAGE_SENT_TO_GROUP_CHATin the following files:
src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.test.tsxsrc/GraphQl/Mutations/OrganizationMutations.tssrc/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.test.tsxPlease update these instances to use
MESSAGE_SENT_TO_CHATto align with the updated schema.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1213-1275: Verify: ConfirmMESSAGE_SENT_TO_CHATaligns with updated schemaEnsure that replacing
MESSAGE_SENT_TO_DIRECT_CHATandMESSAGE_SENT_TO_GROUP_CHATwithMESSAGE_SENT_TO_CHATcorrectly reflects the updated chat schema and that subscriptions or queries relying on these mocks are updated accordingly.Run the following script to find usages of
MESSAGE_SENT_TO_DIRECT_CHATandMESSAGE_SENT_TO_GROUP_CHAT:This script searches for any remaining references to the deprecated mocks. Ensure that all such references are updated to use
MESSAGE_SENT_TO_CHAT.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find references to deprecated message mocks # Search for deprecated mocks in the codebase rg 'MESSAGE_SENT_TO_(DIRECT|GROUP)_CHAT' # Verify that these are replaced with `MESSAGE_SENT_TO_CHAT`Length of output: 510
src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsx (2)
204-205: Lines not covered by testsThe logic determining the chat title for direct chats (lines 204-205) is not covered by tests. This could lead to unnoticed bugs if the logic changes in the future.
Consider adding unit tests to cover these scenarios, ensuring that the correct user names are displayed for direct chats.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 204-205: src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsx#L204-L205
Added lines #L204 - L205 were not covered by tests
211-211: Line not covered by testsThe assignment of the
imageproperty for chats (line 211) lacks test coverage. Ensuring this line is tested can prevent potential issues with displaying user images.Add tests to verify that the correct user images are displayed in both direct and group chats.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 211-211: src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsx#L211
Added line #L211 was not covered by tests
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
- schema.graphql (6 hunks)
- src/GraphQl/Mutations/OrganizationMutations.ts (3 hunks)
- src/GraphQl/Queries/PlugInQueries.ts (4 hunks)
- src/components/Avatar/Avatar.module.css (1 hunks)
- src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.module.css (5 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.test.tsx (16 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.tsx (5 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/ContactCard/ContactCard.test.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/ContactCard/ContactCard.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.test.tsx (13 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.tsx (6 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.test.tsx (22 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.tsx (10 hunks)
- src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.module.css (1 hunks)
- src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.test.tsx (18 hunks)
- src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsx (4 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/components/Avatar/Avatar.module.css
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.tsx
[warning] 223-223: src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.tsx#L223
Added line #L223 was not covered by tests
[warning] 229-229: src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.tsx#L229
Added line #L229 was not covered by tests
[warning] 255-255: src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.tsx#L255
Added line #L255 was not covered by tests
[warning] 262-262: src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.tsx#L262
Added line #L262 was not covered by testssrc/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsx
[warning] 204-205: src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsx#L204-L205
Added lines #L204 - L205 were not covered by tests
[warning] 211-211: src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsx#L211
Added line #L211 was not covered by tests
🪛 Biome
src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.tsx
[error] 238-239: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (33)
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-62: Request clarification on PR objectives alignment.While the change in this file is a good improvement for error prevention, it doesn't seem to directly address the PR's stated objective of updating chat-related functionality to work with a new chat schema.
Could you please clarify:
- How this change relates to the chat schema update mentioned in the PR description?
- Are there other files not included in this review that contain the main changes for the chat functionality update?
This will help ensure that the PR fully addresses its intended objectives.
To help verify the scope of changes related to chat functionality, you could run the following command:
This will show all TypeScript and JavaScript files that contain the word 'chat' and have been changed in this PR.
src/components/UserPortal/ContactCard/ContactCard.tsx (2)
11-11: LGTM! Verify usage in parent components.The addition of
isGroup: booleanto theInterfaceContactCardPropsinterface aligns with the PR objective to update chat functionality for the new schema. The removal ofsubtitle,type, andsetSelectedChatTypeproperties (as mentioned in the AI summary) suggests a simplification of the component's props.To ensure these changes don't break existing functionality, please verify the usage of this component in parent components. Run the following script to check for any remaining usage of the removed properties:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of removed properties in parent components # Test: Search for usage of removed properties echo "Searching for usage of removed properties:" rg --type typescript --type tsx 'subtitle|type|setSelectedChatType' src
Line range hint
13-29: Update component documentation and verify layout.The component's documentation comments haven't been updated to reflect the changes in the props. This could lead to confusion for other developers working on this component.
Please update the documentation to remove references to removed props (
subtitle,type,setSelectedChatType) and add information about the newisGroupprop.Also, verify that the removal of the
subtitlerendering doesn't negatively impact the component's layout or appearance. You may want to add a visual test or snapshot test to ensure the layout remains correct.If no tests are found, consider adding appropriate tests to ensure the layout remains correct after these changes.
✅ Verification successful
Visual or snapshot tests for ContactCard are present.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for existing visual or snapshot tests # Test: Search for visual or snapshot tests related to ContactCard echo "Searching for existing visual or snapshot tests for ContactCard:" rg --type typescript --type tsx 'test|spec|snapshot.*ContactCard' srcLength of output: 297
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for existing visual or snapshot tests for ContactCard echo "Searching for existing visual or snapshot tests for ContactCard:" rg --glob '*.test.tsx' --glob '*.spec.tsx' --glob '*snapshot*ContactCard*' 'ContactCard' srcLength of output: 979
src/components/UserPortal/ContactCard/ContactCard.test.tsx (2)
29-29: LGTM: Addition ofisGrouppropertyThe addition of the
isGroupproperty to thepropsobject is consistent with the PR objective to update chat-related functionality. This new property will allow for differentiation between individual and group contacts in the tests, which is crucial for ensuring the component behaves correctly in both scenarios.
Line range hint
1-120: Summary of ContactCard.test.tsx changesThe changes to this test file align well with the PR objectives to update chat-related functionality for the new schema. Key points:
- The addition of the
isGroupproperty enhances test coverage by allowing differentiation between individual and group contacts.- The test cases now cover both individual and group contact scenarios, which is crucial for ensuring the component behaves correctly in all cases.
- There's an inconsistency regarding the
selectedContactproperty that needs clarification.Overall, these changes improve the test suite. Once the
selectedContactinconsistency is resolved, the updates will provide a more comprehensive test coverage for the ContactCard component.To ensure all changes are properly reflected, please run the following script:
This will help us confirm all intended changes are present and correctly implemented.
src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.module.css (1)
81-85: LGTM: New.contactCardContainerclass looks good.The new
.contactCardContainerclass is well-structured and consistent with the AI summary's mention of renaming from.contactListContainer. The flex container setup with appropriate padding and gap is suitable for displaying contact cards.src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.module.css (8)
27-27: LGTM: Improved spacing in user info sectionThe addition of
gap: 10px;to the.userInfoclass enhances the spacing between child elements, improving the overall layout and readability of the user information section.
57-59: LGTM: Enhanced layout for received messagesThe changes to
.messageReceivedimprove the layout and alignment of received messages. The flex display and space-between justification allow for better control over the message content and metadata.Please verify that setting
padding-bottom: 0;doesn't negatively impact the vertical spacing between messages. If it does, consider adding a margin to the bottom instead.
72-74: LGTM: Consistent layout improvements for sent messagesThe changes to
.messageSentmirror those made to.messageReceived, ensuring a consistent layout for both sent and received messages. This improves the overall chat interface consistency.
76-85: LGTM: New user details styling enhances chat interfaceThe addition of the
.userDetailsclass and its associated styles improves the presentation of user information in the chat interface. The consistent use ofgapfor spacing and the defined dimensions for the user image contribute to a more polished look.
122-122: LGTM: Improved spacing for message timestampThe addition of
margin-left: 6px;to the.messageTimeclass enhances the separation between the message content and the timestamp, improving overall readability.
126-130: LGTM: Enhanced message content layoutThe additions to the
.messageContentclass improve the layout and alignment of elements within each message. The use of flexbox properties ensures proper stacking and centering of content, consistent with the overall styling approach in the file.
163-168: LGTM: New message attributes styling improves layoutThe addition of the
.messageAttributesclass provides a structured layout for message metadata or actions. The use of flexbox properties ensures proper vertical stacking and alignment, consistent with the overall chat interface design.
Line range hint
1-249: Summary: Chat interface improvements align well with PR objectivesThe changes to this CSS module file significantly enhance the chat interface's layout, interactivity, and user experience. The additions of new classes and styles for features like message replies, interactive elements, and targeted message highlighting align well with the PR objectives of updating chat-related functionality to work with the updated chat schema.
These improvements contribute to a more robust and user-friendly chat experience, which is likely to positively impact the overall application. The consistent use of flexbox for layout management and the addition of interactive elements demonstrate a thoughtful approach to updating the chat functionality.
To further improve the code:
- Consider using CSS variables for colors and repeated values to enhance maintainability.
- Ensure that all new classes are being utilized in the corresponding React components.
- If not already done, consider adding responsive design rules to ensure the new layout works well on various screen sizes.
src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.tsx (4)
28-28: Consistent renaming of prop tochatsListRefetch.The prop
contactRefetchhas been renamed tochatsListRefetch, which accurately reflects its purpose of refreshing the chats list. This enhances code readability and maintainability.
63-66: Function name updated for clarity.Renaming the component function to
createDirectChatModalaligns with the component's functionality of creating a direct chat modal. This improves code clarity and consistency with the file name.
78-78: Updated to useCREATE_CHATmutation.Switching from
CREATE_DIRECT_CHATtoCREATE_CHATensures compatibility with the updated chat schema. This aligns the frontend mutation with the backend changes.
81-85: Correctly settingisGrouptofalsein mutation variables.Including
isGroup: falseexplicitly specifies that a direct chat is being created, which is essential for the backend to process the chat appropriately.src/GraphQl/Queries/PlugInQueries.ts (2)
144-162: Verify Alignment with the Updated Chat SchemaThe PR aims to update chat functionalities to work with the updated chat schema. It's essential to ensure that all queries reflect the latest schema changes, including field names, structures, and nested relationships.
To confirm that the queries align with the updated schema, consider the following steps:
- Review the Updated Schema: Check the updated chat schema definitions to verify that all the fields used in the queries are correct.
- Validate Queries Against the Schema: Use a GraphQL validation tool or linter to ensure that the queries are compatible with the schema.
If the schema is available in the codebase, you can run this script to validate the queries:
Also applies to: 188-231, 243-254, 274-312
274-312: Confirm the Necessity of thetypeField in MessagesThe
CHATS_LISTquery includes thetypefield withinmessages(line 289~), which may be crucial for distinguishing between message types (e.g., text, image, file). However, this field is not present in other queries likeDIRECT_CHAT_BY_IDandGROUP_CHAT_BY_ID.Ensure that the inclusion of the
typefield is intentional and consistently applied across all queries that retrieve messages. This will help prevent potential runtime errors and simplify client-side logic.To verify where the
typefield is used and ensure consistency, you can run the following script:src/GraphQl/Mutations/OrganizationMutations.ts (2)
108-143: LGTMThe
SEND_MESSAGE_TO_CHATmutation is correctly defined and structured, supporting the necessary parameters and returning the expected data.
267-296: LGTMThe
MESSAGE_SENT_TO_CHATsubscription is properly implemented, allowing clients to subscribe to messages sent to any chat and receive necessary message details, including replies and sender information.src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.tsx (1)
33-33: Ensure all references togroupChatListRefetchare updated tochatsListRefetchThe property
groupChatListRefetchhas been renamed tochatsListRefetchin theInterfaceCreateGroupChatPropsinterface. Please ensure that all instances ofgroupChatListRefetchare updated throughout the codebase to maintain consistency and prevent errors.Run the following script to find any remaining references:
src/components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/ChatRoom.tsx (1)
116-116: EnsurereplyTois correctly handled when null.In the
variablesobject for thesendMessageToChatmutation, you're usingreplyTo: replyToDirectMessage?._id. Make sure that whenreplyToDirectMessageisnull, thereplyTovariable is either omitted or explicitly set tonull, as required by the GraphQL API.Run the following script to verify if
replyTocan benullin theSEND_MESSAGE_TO_CHATmutation:✅ Verification successful
replyTohandles null values correctly.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the 'replyTo' variable in the SEND_MESSAGE_TO_CHAT mutation allows null values. # Test: Search for the SEND_MESSAGE_TO_CHAT mutation definition in the codebase. Expect: 'replyTo' parameter accepts null values. rg --type graphql 'mutation SEND_MESSAGE_TO_CHAT' -A 10 # Alternatively, if using TypeScript definitions rg --type ts 'SEND_MESSAGE_TO_CHAT' -A 10Length of output: 11802
schema.graphql (1)
1617-1622: Ensurenameis required whenisGroupistrueinchatInputIn the
chatInputtype, thenamefield is optional. However, for group chats (isGroup: true), anameis likely required to identify the group chat. Consider enforcing this requirement through input validation in your resolver logic.src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.test.tsx (4)
Line range hint
1740-1744: EnsureresizeWindowfunction simulates resize events correctlyThe
resizeWindowfunction manipulateswindow.innerWidthand dispatches a resize event. Verify that this correctly triggers any resize listeners in your component, as jsdom might not fully simulate layout changes.Consider using
window.matchMediamocks for responsive testing if necessary.
Line range hint
809-869: Potential duplication inCHAT_BY_ID_QUERY_MOCKThe
CHAT_BY_ID_QUERY_MOCKarray appears to contain two mocks with the sameidvalue of'1'. Verify if both mocks are necessary or if this is unintended duplication.Check if both mocks serve different purposes or if one can be removed to simplify the test setup.
22-23: Verify correct import paths for mutations and queriesEnsure that the import paths for
MESSAGE_SENT_TO_CHAT,CHATS_LIST, andCHAT_BY_IDare correct and reflect the updated schema structure.Run the following script to confirm that these files exist at the specified paths:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the import paths point to existing files. # Check if the mutation file exists test -f "./src/GraphQl/Mutations/OrganizationMutations.tsx" && echo "OrganizationMutations.tsx exists" || echo "OrganizationMutations.tsx not found" # Check if the queries file exists test -f "./src/GraphQl/Queries/PlugInQueries.tsx" && echo "PlugInQueries.tsx exists" || echo "PlugInQueries.tsx not found"
1655-1657: Possible unnecessary duplication of mocksIn the "Test create new group chat" test, consider reviewing the inclusion of
MESSAGE_SENT_TO_CHAT_MOCKandUserConnectionListMock. Verify if both are required or if there is an unintended duplication.Run the following script to list the entries in the
mockarray and check for duplicates:src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.test.tsx (2)
5-9: Approved: Added imports enhance testing capabilitiesThe addition of
prettyDOM,within, anduserEventimports from@testing-library/reactand@testing-library/user-eventimproves the testing capabilities by providing more utilities for DOM inspection and simulating user interactions.
40-40: Approved:userEventimport aligns with best practicesImporting
userEventenhances the simulation of user interactions in tests, providing a more accurate representation of how users interact with the application.src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsx (2)
237-237: Confirm 'chatsListRefetch' prop usage in 'CreateGroupChat' and 'CreateDirectChat'The
chatsListRefetchfunction is passed toCreateGroupChatandCreateDirectChatcomponents. Ensure these components accept this prop and utilize it to refresh the chat list after a new chat is created.Use the following script to confirm that
chatsListRefetchis handled in these components:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify 'chatsListRefetch' prop usage # Check in 'CreateGroupChat' component rg 'function CreateGroupChat' -A 20 -- 'components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/' rg 'props.chatsListRefetch' -A 5 -- 'components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/' # Check in 'CreateDirectChat' component rg 'function CreateDirectChat' -A 20 -- 'components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/' rg 'props.chatsListRefetch' -A 5 -- 'components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/'Ensure that both components include
chatsListRefetchin their props and call it appropriately after creating a new chat.Also applies to: 244-244
229-229: Ensure 'ChatRoom' functions without 'selectedChatType' propThe
ChatRoomcomponent is now rendered without theselectedChatTypeprop. Verify thatChatRoomhas been updated accordingly and that no references toselectedChatTyperemain within the component.Run the following script to check for references to
selectedChatType:✅ Verification successful
'ChatRoom' functions correctly without the
selectedChatTypepropAll references to
selectedChatTypehave been successfully removed from theChatRoomcomponent.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for 'selectedChatType' references in 'ChatRoom' component # Expected result: No occurrences of 'selectedChatType' in 'ChatRoom' component files rg 'selectedChatType' -A 5 -F -- 'components/UserPortal/ChatRoom/'Length of output: 630
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate ChatRoom component files and search for 'selectedChatType' # Find all ChatRoom component files (e.g., ChatRoom.tsx, ChatRoom.jsx) chatroom_files=$(fd 'ChatRoom\.(tsx|jsx|ts|js)$') if [ -z "$chatroom_files" ]; then echo "No ChatRoom component files found." exit 1 fi # Search for 'selectedChatType' in the located ChatRoom component files rg 'selectedChatType' -A 5 -F -- $chatroom_filesLength of output: 241
| .messageSent:hover, | ||
| .messageReceived:hover { | ||
| padding: 0px 6px; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider alternative hover effect to avoid layout shifts
The current hover effect changes the padding of messages, which could cause disruptive layout shifts. Consider an alternative approach that doesn't affect the message dimensions, such as a subtle background color change or a border effect.
Here's an alternative implementation that avoids layout shifts:
.messageSent:hover,
.messageReceived:hover {
background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05);
transition: background-color 0.2s ease;
}| await createChat({ | ||
| variables: { | ||
| organizationId, | ||
| userIds: [userId, id], | ||
| isGroup: false, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| contactRefetch(); | ||
| await chatsListRefetch(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for the createChat mutation.
Currently, errors from the createChat mutation are not being handled. This could lead to unhandled exceptions or a poor user experience if the mutation fails. Consider adding error handling to manage potential failures gracefully.
You can modify the function as follows:
const handleCreateDirectChat = async (id: string): Promise<void> => {
+ try {
await createChat({
variables: {
organizationId,
userIds: [userId, id],
isGroup: false,
},
});
await chatsListRefetch();
toggleCreateDirectChatModal();
+ } catch (error) {
+ // Handle error, e.g., display a notification to the user
+ console.error('Error creating chat:', error);
+ }
};Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| replyTo { | ||
| _id | ||
| createdAt | ||
| messageContent | ||
| receiver { | ||
| _id | ||
| firstName | ||
| lastName | ||
| image | ||
| } | ||
| sender { | ||
| _id | ||
| firstName | ||
| lastName | ||
| image | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure Consistency in the replyTo Structure
In the DIRECT_CHAT_BY_ID query, the replyTo field within messages includes both receiver and sender details. However, in other queries like CHAT_BY_ID and GROUP_CHAT_BY_ID, the replyTo field only includes the sender information, and sometimes includes a type field.
For consistency and to prevent potential data handling issues, consider standardizing the replyTo structure across all chat-related queries. This will ensure that the client can handle the replyTo field uniformly regardless of the chat type.
| export const CHAT_BY_ID = gql` | ||
| query chatById($id: ID!) { | ||
| chatById(id: $id) { | ||
| _id | ||
| isGroup | ||
| name | ||
| organization { | ||
| _id | ||
| } | ||
| createdAt | ||
| messages { | ||
| _id | ||
| createdAt | ||
| messageContent | ||
| replyTo { | ||
| _id | ||
| createdAt | ||
| messageContent | ||
| type | ||
| sender { | ||
| _id | ||
| firstName | ||
| lastName | ||
| image | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| sender { | ||
| _id | ||
| firstName | ||
| lastName | ||
| image | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| users { | ||
| _id | ||
| firstName | ||
| lastName | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| `; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Include the type Field in replyTo Across All Queries
In the CHAT_BY_ID query, the replyTo field includes a type field (line 206~), which specifies the message type. However, this field is not included in the replyTo structures of the DIRECT_CHAT_BY_ID and GROUP_CHAT_BY_ID queries.
To maintain consistency and provide complete information about the replied message, consider adding the type field to the replyTo structure in the DIRECT_CHAT_BY_ID and GROUP_CHAT_BY_ID queries as well.
| replyTo { | ||
| _id | ||
| createdAt | ||
| messageContent | ||
| sender { | ||
| _id | ||
| firstName | ||
| lastName | ||
| image | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure replyTo Includes type in GROUP_CHAT_BY_ID Query
In the GROUP_CHAT_BY_ID query, the replyTo field within messages does not include the type field. Since the CHAT_BY_ID query includes type in the replyTo structure, adding it here will maintain consistency across different chat types and aid in client-side message handling.
| CREATE_CHAT, | ||
| CREATE_GROUP_CHAT, | ||
| MESSAGE_SENT_TO_CHAT, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor imports to remove deprecated CREATE_GROUP_CHAT
The CREATE_GROUP_CHAT mutation appears to be deprecated in favor of CREATE_CHAT. It's advisable to remove CREATE_GROUP_CHAT from the imports to avoid confusion and ensure that only the updated mutations are used.
Apply this diff to remove the deprecated import:
import {
CREATE_CHAT,
- CREATE_GROUP_CHAT,
MESSAGE_SENT_TO_CHAT,
MESSAGE_SENT_TO_DIRECT_CHAT,
MESSAGE_SENT_TO_GROUP_CHAT,
} from 'GraphQl/Mutations/OrganizationMutations';Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| test('Test add and remove user ', async () => { | ||
| setItem('userId', '1'); | ||
| const mock = [ | ||
| ...USER_JOINED_ORG_MOCK, | ||
| ...CREATE_GROUP_CHAT_MOCK, | ||
| ...GROUP_CHAT_BY_ID_QUERY_MOCK, | ||
| ...DIRECT_CHAT_BY_ID_QUERY_MOCK, | ||
| ...MESSAGE_SENT_TO_DIRECT_CHAT_MOCK, | ||
| ...MESSAGE_SENT_TO_GROUP_CHAT_MOCK, | ||
| ...MESSAGE_SENT_TO_CHAT_MOCK, | ||
| ...CHAT_BY_ID_QUERY_MOCK, | ||
| ...CHATS_LIST_MOCK, | ||
| ...UserConnectionListMock, | ||
| ...MOCKS, | ||
| ...CREATE_CHAT_MUTATION, | ||
| ...CHATS_LIST_MOCK, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Duplicate Mocks Found in CreateGroupChat.test.tsx
...CHATS_LIST_MOCKis included multiple times in themockarray. Please remove the duplicate to prevent unexpected test behavior.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify: Ensure all necessary mocks are included without duplication
It's important to verify that the mock array includes all necessary mocks without duplicates to prevent unexpected test behavior.
Run the following script to check for duplicate mocks:
This script searches for mock arrays in TypeScript test files and counts the number of times each mock is included. Review the output to ensure that mocks are not duplicated.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find duplicate entries in mock arrays within test files
# Find all `const mock = [` declarations and list their contents
rg --type ts 'const mock = \[' -A 50
# Count occurrences of each mock inclusion
rg --type ts '\.\.\.[A-Z_]+,' | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
Length of output: 39465
| @@ -59,6 +55,10 @@ | |||
| const { t: tCommon } = useTranslation('common'); | |||
|
|
|||
| const [hideDrawer, setHideDrawer] = useState<boolean | null>(null); | |||
| const [chats, setChats] = useState<any>([]); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid using 'any' type in useState for 'chats'
Using any in useState<any>([]) bypasses TypeScript's type checking, reducing code reliability. Consider defining a specific type for the chats state to enhance type safety and catch potential bugs at compile time.
Define an interface for the chat objects and update the state declaration:
interface Chat {
_id: string;
name?: string;
isGroup: boolean;
users: Array<{
_id: string;
firstName: string;
lastName: string;
image: string;
}>;
image?: string;
// Add other relevant properties
}
const [chats, setChats] = useState<Chat[]>([]);| title: !chat.isGroup | ||
| ? chat.users[0]?._id === userId | ||
| ? `${chat.users[1]?.firstName} ${chat.users[1]?.lastName}` | ||
| : `${chat.users[0]?.firstName} ${chat.users[0]?.lastName}` | ||
| : chat.name, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor nested ternary operators in 'title' property for readability and safety
The nested ternary operators in the title property reduce readability and may cause errors if chat.users doesn't have the expected number of users. There's also a risk of accessing undefined properties if chat.users is empty or incomplete.
Consider simplifying the logic by identifying the other user in the chat:
let title = '';
if (!chat.isGroup) {
const otherUser = chat.users.find((user: any) => user._id !== userId);
if (otherUser) {
title = `${otherUser.firstName} ${otherUser.lastName}`;
}
} else {
title = chat.name;
}
// Assign title to cardPropsUpdate the cardProps assignment:
const cardProps: InterfaceContactCardProps = {
id: chat._id,
title,
image: /* similar refactoring as needed */,
setSelectedContact,
selectedContact,
isGroup: chat.isGroup,
};🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 204-205: src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsx#L204-L205
Added lines #L204 - L205 were not covered by tests
| image: chat.isGroup | ||
| ? userId | ||
| ? chat.users[1]?.image | ||
| : chat.users[0]?.image | ||
| : chat.image, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct conditional logic in 'image' property
The conditional expression for the image property uses userId as a boolean, which may not work as intended. Additionally, it doesn't correctly identify the other user's image in a direct chat.
Refactor the logic to properly select the other user's image in direct chats and handle group chats appropriately:
let image = '';
if (!chat.isGroup) {
const otherUser = chat.users.find((user: any) => user._id !== userId);
image = otherUser?.image || '';
} else {
image = chat.image;
}
// Assign image to cardPropsUpdate the cardProps assignment:
const cardProps: InterfaceContactCardProps = {
id: chat._id,
title: /* as refactored above */,
image,
setSelectedContact,
selectedContact,
isGroup: chat.isGroup,
};🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 211-211: src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsx#L211
Added line #L211 was not covered by tests
|
This pull request did not get any activity in the past 10 days and will be closed in 180 days if no update occurs. Please verify it has no conflicts with the develop branch and rebase if needed. Mention it now if you need help or give permission to other people to finish your work. |
|
@disha1202 Please fix the conflicting files. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- schema.graphql (6 hunks)
- src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsx (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsx (2)
23-23: Addition of 'isGroup' property to interface is appropriateAdding the
isGroupproperty toInterfaceContactCardPropsappropriately supports distinguishing between group chats and direct chats.
237-237: Verify 'chatsListRefetch' prop implementation in modal componentsPlease ensure that the
CreateGroupChatandCreateDirectChatcomponents accept thechatsListRefetchprop and utilize it to refresh the chat list after creating a new chat.Run the following script to confirm the prop is used correctly:
Also applies to: 244-244
✅ Verification successful
ChatsListRefetch prop is correctly implemented and utilized in both
CreateGroupChatandCreateDirectChatcomponents.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that 'chatsListRefetch' is a prop in 'CreateGroupChat' and 'CreateDirectChat' components and is used within them. # Search for the 'CreateGroupChat' component definition and check for 'chatsListRefetch' in its props rg --type tsx "function CreateGroupChat" -A 10 | rg "chatsListRefetch" # Search for usage of 'chatsListRefetch' within 'CreateGroupChat' rg --type tsx "CreateGroupChat" -A 100 | rg "chatsListRefetch" # Repeat the process for 'CreateDirectChat' rg --type tsx "function CreateDirectChat" -A 10 | rg "chatsListRefetch" rg --type tsx "CreateDirectChat" -A 100 | rg "chatsListRefetch"Length of output: 377
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that 'chatsListRefetch' is a prop in 'CreateGroupChat' and 'CreateDirectChat' components and is used within them. # Search for the 'CreateGroupChat' component definition in .tsx files rg -g "*.tsx" "function CreateGroupChat" -A 10 | rg "chatsListRefetch" # Search for usage of 'chatsListRefetch' within 'CreateGroupChat' rg -g "*.tsx" "CreateGroupChat" -A 100 | rg "chatsListRefetch" # Search for the 'CreateDirectChat' component definition in .tsx files rg -g "*.tsx" "function CreateDirectChat" -A 10 | rg "chatsListRefetch" # Search for usage of 'chatsListRefetch' within 'CreateDirectChat' rg -g "*.tsx" "CreateDirectChat" -A 100 | rg "chatsListRefetch"Length of output: 1331
| import styles from './Chat.module.css'; | ||
| import UserSidebar from 'components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar'; | ||
| import { GROUP_CHAT_LIST } from 'GraphQl/Queries/PlugInQueries'; | ||
| import { CHATS_LIST } from 'GraphQl/Queries/PlugInQueries'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the casing in the import path 'GraphQl'
The import path uses 'GraphQl', which may not match the actual directory name. Ensure that the casing of 'GraphQL' is consistent to prevent module resolution issues.
Apply this diff to fix the import statement:
-import { CHATS_LIST } from 'GraphQl/Queries/PlugInQueries';
+import { CHATS_LIST } from 'GraphQL/Queries/PlugInQueries';📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import { CHATS_LIST } from 'GraphQl/Queries/PlugInQueries'; | |
| import { CHATS_LIST } from 'GraphQL/Queries/PlugInQueries'; |
| React.useEffect(() => { | ||
| if (chatsListData) { | ||
| setChats(chatsListData.chatsByUserId); | ||
| } | ||
| }, [chatsListData]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use 'useEffect' instead of 'React.useEffect' for consistency
Since useEffect is imported directly, use it without the React. prefix for consistency with the rest of the code.
Apply this diff to correct the usage:
- React.useEffect(() => {
+ useEffect(() => {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| React.useEffect(() => { | |
| if (chatsListData) { | |
| setChats(chatsListData.chatsByUserId); | |
| } | |
| }, [chatsListData]); | |
| useEffect(() => { | |
| if (chatsListData) { | |
| setChats(chatsListData.chatsByUserId); | |
| } | |
| }, [chatsListData]); |
| input chatInput { | ||
| isGroup: Boolean! | ||
| organizationId: ID | ||
| userIds: [ID!]! | ||
| name: String | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure the name field is required when isGroup is true
In the chatInput type, the name field is currently optional. However, when creating a group chat (isGroup: true), a name is essential for identification and user experience. Consider enforcing this by making the name field non-nullable or implementing validation logic to ensure a name is provided when isGroup is true.
|
Hi @palisadoes |
DMills27
merged commit 036b92e
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Issue Number:
Fixes #2285
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Style
Tests
Chores