docs(coord): fleet handoffs — juicefs-ingest, jetson-combiner, pr-backlog - #2515
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…klog Three coordination handoffs captured from local working-tree state: - doc-coordination-juicefs-ingest — shared JuiceFS doc-ingest layout for the 5090/SPARK/z890 trio (z890 Tailscale IP redacted to the `z890` hostname per the no-literal-IPs rule). - jetson-combiner-archon-assignment — Jetson combiner → Archon assignment. - pr-backlog-conflicts-and-submodule-sync — PR backlog conflict + submodule sync notes. Docs only. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 10 minutes You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 0913eccfcf
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
POWERFULMOVES
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 10, 2026
…itmodules Found while checking this audit's own PR, and it is the most disruptive instance of the same class the audit already documents. At the commit PMOVES.AI@origin/main pins for PMOVES-Archon (1e02907ac3), the repo carries four 160000 gitlinks under external/ and has no .gitmodules file at all. A gitlink with no registration has no URL to clone from, so every recursive checkout of PMOVES.AI fails with exit 128. Not caused by any PR: it reproduces on #2490, #2515 and this audit's own PR, none of which touch submodules. The `emit lifecycle trail` job is what surfaces it. Unlike findings 1-4 this one fails closed rather than silently, which is why it is worth separating. The fix belongs in PMOVES-Archon — register the four external/ gitlinks, or drop them — so it stays out of scope here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… the JuiceFS runbook to #2514 Two corrections to the fleet handoffs. The PR-backlog handoff told whoever picked up #2439 and #2440 to 'let CI run, then admin-merge'. That skips the standing closeout in pmoves/docs/operations/PR_CLOSEOUT.md, which AGENTS.md states is a gate and not autonomous: it also requires every review thread resolved, a passing live-head audit, and a Three-Body ACK where the lane touches production. #2440 is the cookie-SSR auth fix, which is exactly the lane that should not be merged on a green check alone. Now points at the closeout and says passing CI is not sufficient. The jetson-combiner handoff made 'execute JUICEFS_MEDIA_MINIO_REFORMAT_RUNBOOK.md' a prerequisite for the cross-node content FS, but that runbook is on neither this branch nor main -- it arrives with PR #2514. Anyone following the handoff today reaches a step with no procedure behind it, for an operation whose first step destroys a volume. The reference is now a full repo path, marked blocked on #2514, with an explicit warning not to improvise the reformat. Both are documentation-ordering defects, not code. Surfaced by Codex on #2515. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Owner
Author
Trim: both threads correct, both fixed (bd6dfb3)1. Admin-merge bypassed the closeout gate (P1). The handoff told whoever picked up #2439/#2440 to "let CI run, then admin-merge". 2. The referenced JuiceFS runbook did not exist (P2) — and still does not, on So it is not a missing document, it is a cross-PR ordering dependency: it arrives with #2514. Anyone following this handoff today reaches a prerequisite with no procedure behind it, for an operation whose Step 1 destroys a volume. The reference is now a full repo path, marked blocked on #2514, with an explicit warning not to improvise the reformat. That matters more than it looks: I trimmed #2514 in the same pass and found its Step 2 formatted the wrong database and its Step 3 named a make target that does not exist. Improvising from the old text would have been genuinely destructive. The red check
Worth noting the same check also has a passing run on this PR, so the row is ambiguous at a glance; the failing one is the Archon path.
|
POWERFULMOVES
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 12, 2026
The bottleneck stopped being discovery and became the ability to act. This is the artifact for acting: order and dependency as facts, checked against the tree, with no recommendation about what should land. "Ready" means nothing blocks it mechanically, not that it should merge. Every dependency was verified by tree lookup against origin/main and each PR head. No PR body was treated as evidence. The queue is 26 open PRs, not 13. MUST NOT MERGE AS-IS, at the top rather than buried: #2524 — base is feat/dockerfile-copy-anchor, not main. It deletes two entries from a baseline file that does not exist on main. Needs #2521, then retarget, then merge. #2526 — real failures on merge-decision and python-tests. Its purpose is to make python-tests capable of failing, so this may be the ratchet working; that has to be settled by its author, because merging it red turns a required check into permanent noise. #2517 — check-suit-release-notes fails. Not diagnosed. VERIFIED DEPENDENCIES (4): #2521 -> #2524 _known_copy_gaps.yaml absent on main #2514 -> #2515 JUICEFS_MEDIA_MINIO_REFORMAT_RUNBOOK.md absent on main, cited at jetson-combiner-archon-assignment:56 #2501 -> #2502 juicefs-cache-bounds.sh absent on main, cited twice in B850_BRINGBACK_RUNBOOK (:162, :213) #2519 -> future branch-protection-sync trigger work; #2519 adds the 5 missing `branch =` keys, without which the workflow's branch="main" fallback targets a branch 4 of those repos lack One assumed dependency corrected: #2502 -> #2501 is narrower than stated. juicefs-cross-node-setup.sh AND its make target already exist on main (mk/egress.mk:318); only juicefs-cache-bounds.sh is missing. The anchor ratchet would not have flagged it either way. COLLISION MAP: 7 files. Only one is a hard conflict — pmoves/Makefile, edited by #2521, #2523 and #2526 in the same ~20 lines around the validate-* block. #2523 should land first of the three: it is a 9-line deletion with no dependants, and rebasing two insertions onto a deletion is cheap while the reverse is not. Correction to the brief as requested: among currently open PRs only #2526 touches merge-gate.yml. The expected trim-2511 change is not open yet. Two facts that make red checks unreadable right now, stated up front: - `emit lifecycle trail` now fails on pull_request as well as push. Root cause pinned: the Archon commit our gitlink points at (1e02907ac) has seven nested gitlinks and no .gitmodules at all, so any recursive checkout dies at the first one. Archon's defect surfacing through our gitlink, not ours. Unowned. - merging needs an admin override: required_approving_review_count is 1 and the operator authors every PR, so self-approval is impossible. Six operator decisions listed separately from PR dependencies. Also disclosed: a gap in the COPY gate I shipped in #2521. It resolves COPY sources against compose build: contexts only, and never reads .github/workflows/integrations-ghcr.matrix.json — a second source of (dockerfile, context) pairs. Not theoretical: #2524's Dockerfile fix would have broken the a2ui-renderer GHCR publish, and a follow-up commit (8121e95) on that branch had to correct the matrix. The gate did not and could not catch it. Extending it to read the matrix is the follow-up. Anchor ratchet: 435 findings, 435 baselined, 0 new. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
POWERFULMOVES
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 12, 2026
The bottleneck stopped being discovery and became the ability to act. This is the artifact for acting: order and dependency as facts, checked against the tree, with no recommendation about what should land. "Ready" means nothing blocks it mechanically, not that it should merge. Every dependency was verified by tree lookup against origin/main and each PR head. No PR body was treated as evidence. The queue is 26 open PRs, not 13. MUST NOT MERGE AS-IS, at the top rather than buried: #2524 — base is feat/dockerfile-copy-anchor, not main. It deletes two entries from a baseline file that does not exist on main. Needs #2521, then retarget, then merge. #2526 — real failures on merge-decision and python-tests. Its purpose is to make python-tests capable of failing, so this may be the ratchet working; that has to be settled by its author, because merging it red turns a required check into permanent noise. #2517 — check-suit-release-notes fails. Not diagnosed. VERIFIED DEPENDENCIES (4): #2521 -> #2524 _known_copy_gaps.yaml absent on main #2514 -> #2515 JUICEFS_MEDIA_MINIO_REFORMAT_RUNBOOK.md absent on main, cited at jetson-combiner-archon-assignment:56 #2501 -> #2502 juicefs-cache-bounds.sh absent on main, cited twice in B850_BRINGBACK_RUNBOOK (:162, :213) #2519 -> future branch-protection-sync trigger work; #2519 adds the 5 missing `branch =` keys, without which the workflow's branch="main" fallback targets a branch 4 of those repos lack One assumed dependency corrected: #2502 -> #2501 is narrower than stated. juicefs-cross-node-setup.sh AND its make target already exist on main (mk/egress.mk:318); only juicefs-cache-bounds.sh is missing. The anchor ratchet would not have flagged it either way. COLLISION MAP: 7 files. Only one is a hard conflict — pmoves/Makefile, edited by #2521, #2523 and #2526 in the same ~20 lines around the validate-* block. #2523 should land first of the three: it is a 9-line deletion with no dependants, and rebasing two insertions onto a deletion is cheap while the reverse is not. Correction to the brief as requested: among currently open PRs only #2526 touches merge-gate.yml. The expected trim-2511 change is not open yet. Two facts that make red checks unreadable right now, stated up front: - `emit lifecycle trail` now fails on pull_request as well as push. Root cause pinned: the Archon commit our gitlink points at (1e02907ac) has seven nested gitlinks and no .gitmodules at all, so any recursive checkout dies at the first one. Archon's defect surfacing through our gitlink, not ours. Unowned. - merging needs an admin override: required_approving_review_count is 1 and the operator authors every PR, so self-approval is impossible. Six operator decisions listed separately from PR dependencies. Also disclosed: a gap in the COPY gate I shipped in #2521. It resolves COPY sources against compose build: contexts only, and never reads .github/workflows/integrations-ghcr.matrix.json — a second source of (dockerfile, context) pairs. Not theoretical: #2524's Dockerfile fix would have broken the a2ui-renderer GHCR publish, and a follow-up commit (8121e95) on that branch had to correct the matrix. The gate did not and could not catch it. Extending it to read the matrix is the follow-up. Anchor ratchet: 435 findings, 435 baselined, 0 new. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Aug 15, 2026
POWERFULMOVES
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2026
…ted (#2522) * docs(audit): fleet ruleset exposure — 15 of 65 consumed branches ungated Read-only follow-up to PR #2490, which found one live wrong-branch ruleset on PMOVES-hermes-agent. This answers how wide it goes across all 65 registered submodule entries. Every call was a GET; nothing was mutated. The finding is not the count, it is the mechanism. branch-protection-sync.yml is workflow_dispatch-only — no schedule, no trigger on .gitmodules — and last ran 2026-06-10, successfully, failed=0. Protection is a snapshot from that date and nothing refreshes it. Diffing that run's derived fork list against .gitmodules on origin/main accounts for all 15 ungated entries with none left over: 10 were added after the run and have never been covered; 5 were re-pointed to a different branch after it, so the workflow protected a branch the monorepo no longer consumes. Adding or re-pointing a submodule silently removes it from coverage. PMOVES-hermes-agent is worse than PR #2490 recorded. That PR and the baseline doc both describe it as "classic (9 required status checks) + ruleset". Both gates are real and both are on main; the consumed branch PMOVES.AI-Edition-Hardened returns 404 Branch not protected and the ruleset targets ~DEFAULT_BRANCH. Also corrects the "55 of 60" framing this project has been repeating. It is 55 of 65, and only 15 of those 55 have a default branch that differs from the tracked one — for the other 40 the fork's default was moved to the hardened branch, so ~DEFAULT_BRANCH resolves correctly by coincidence. The sentinel bug's blast radius is 15 repos, not 55. Same for Tier 4: not one of the four protected repos got there by a tool resolving the tracked branch; three use a ~ALL wildcard and the fourth is covered only because its default happens to be the hardened branch. Four structural findings, each silent: 5 entries carry no branch key and 4 of those repos have no main branch at all, so the tooling's "main" fallback targets something that does not exist; 3 entries track a branch absent from the remote; 2 repos are registered twice under different entry names; and PMOVES-ollama is registered with no gitlink. No remediation here. That stays behind the Three-Body release gate in BRANCH_PROTECTION_BASELINE.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(audit): add finding 5 — PMOVES-Archon nested gitlinks with no .gitmodules Found while checking this audit's own PR, and it is the most disruptive instance of the same class the audit already documents. At the commit PMOVES.AI@origin/main pins for PMOVES-Archon (1e02907ac3), the repo carries four 160000 gitlinks under external/ and has no .gitmodules file at all. A gitlink with no registration has no URL to clone from, so every recursive checkout of PMOVES.AI fails with exit 128. Not caused by any PR: it reproduces on #2490, #2515 and this audit's own PR, none of which touch submodules. The `emit lifecycle trail` job is what surfaces it. Unlike findings 1-4 this one fails closed rather than silently, which is why it is worth separating. The fix belongs in PMOVES-Archon — register the four external/ gitlinks, or drop them — so it stays out of scope here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(audit): correct finding 5 — the CI failure is intermittent, the gap is not My previous commit claimed the PMOVES-Archon registration gap "reproduces on every open PR whose workflow checks out with submodules: recursive". That was too strong, and the next run falsified it: the same job passed on a re-run of this audit's own PR minutes after failing. What is actually verified, and unchanged: at the pinned commit, PMOVES-Archon carries four 160000 gitlinks under external/ and has no .gitmodules. That gap is unconditional. What is conditional: whether CI trips over it. All three runs were on ephemeral self-hosted runners; the failing ones had a workspace already containing a PMOVES-Archon checkout, so actions/checkout cleaned the leftover tree and then descended recursively into it. A fresh workspace never reaches the nested descent. The distinction changes triage — an operator reading "breaking CI right now" would prioritise differently than "a flake whose rate depends on runner workspace reuse" — so the section now states both, and warns explicitly that a green `emit lifecycle trail` is not evidence the gap is fixed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(audit): answer the generalisation question plainly, at the top The team lead asked: if most consumed branches turn out to be unprotected, say so at the top rather than burying it. The answer cuts both ways, so the doc now states both explicitly instead of leaving the reader to infer it from the tier tables. No, "most consumed branches are unprotected" is false. 50 of 65 are gated by something, and classic protection carries 46 of them. branch-protection-sync did its job on the forks it saw; the 15 exposed are the ones it has not seen since 2026-06-10, not ones it got wrong. Yes, within the ruleset layer the hermes shape is the norm. Of the 8 entries carrying any ruleset, 4 cover the consumed branch and 4 miss it — and not one of the 4 hits is a hit by branch resolution. Three are ~ALL wildcards and the fourth is ~DEFAULT_BRANCH on a repo whose default happens to be the hardened branch. Zero cases where a tool resolved the tracked branch and wrote a ruleset to it. So the correct reading is not "the fleet is unprotected" but "classic is doing all the real work, and the ruleset layer has a 50% miss rate across the handful of repos it has touched". Before #2490's sentinel fix a correct hit was not even possible — only a wildcard or a coincidence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(audit): split live exposure from registry breakage; the refresh does not close all 15 Four review findings, all verified against the live API before acting. None changes a measurement — every one is the headline failing to reflect evidence the body already contains. 1. 15 is the right count of ungated REGISTERED ENTRIES, but only 11 are live exposure. Three track a branch that does not exist on the remote (verified: 404 on PMOVES.AI-Edition-Hardened for PMOVES-jcodemunch-mcp, pmoves-hirag-mcp and PM-Spark-video-search-and-summarization), and PMOVES-ollama has no gitlink. "Anyone with write access can force-push or delete the exact branch the monorepo pins" is not true of a branch that does not exist or a submodule that is not pinned. Sections 2 and 4 already said so; the headline did not. Split, with the 11 flagged as the priority. 2. "All 15 have one cause" was wrong for four of them, and the doc contained its own disproof in section 1. PMOVES-obico-server, PMOVES-moonraker-obico, PMOVES-OctoPrint-Obico and PMOVES-fluidd have no branch key, so git follows remote HEAD to release/master/master/develop -- but the workflow hard-codes a missing key to main, and none of those four repos has a main. Verified live: PMOVES-obico-server default=release main=404 PMOVES-moonraker-obico default=master main=404 PMOVES-OctoPrint-Obico default=master main=404 PMOVES-fluidd default=develop main=404 PMOVES-OrcaSlicer default=main main=main <- resolves, by luck A refresh targets a branch that does not exist, takes a per-fork 404 the loop swallows, and leaves the real branch ungated indefinitely. That is a branch-resolution defect in the workflow, not a stale snapshot. Eleven are the snapshot class; four are not, and the root-cause section now says which. 3. The remediation suggested giving the workflow a schedule/push trigger. Taken literally that is dangerous and the reviewer is right: DRY_RUN comes only from inputs.dry_run, and only the exact string "true" skips the PUT to /branches/{branch}/protection. A push or schedule run carries no dispatch inputs, so DRY_RUN is empty, the test fails, and every matching event writes branch protection across the fleet unattended -- converting an audit-by-default tool into an automatic writer and bypassing claim -> work -> sign -> release. The suggestion now carries that as a blocking caveat with the two safe shapes. 4. branch_protection.py, drift_check, per_repo_overrides and pmoves.branch_protection.drift.v1 were cited in the present tense but live on PR #2490, which is still open -- confirmed absent from this tree and present on feat/branch-protection-tooling. Every reference now says so, including the resolve_branch and module-docstring citations, and the remediation states plainly that #2490 must land first. Still read-only: every call in this audit is a GET, and this change edits prose only. No counts moved -- 15 ungated entries, 11 of them live. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
POWERFULMOVES
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2026
…08-18) The claim register's last SPARK-KIMI entry was 2026-05-27; this session landed eight lanes that were never registered. One CLAIM+RELEASE entry registers them with live-main merge verification for each: - Hermes unblock chain (fork sync #3 + gitlink #2511) - P7 legacy stanza fix #2549 (+ pr-monitor bot classifier fix) - PMOVES-crush visual ecosystem (#10/#11 + promotion #2571) - pmoves-keygen adoption (fork #1 OPEN, parent #2591) — closes the pending-ml signing-card gap (24/25 cards h-only) - #2515 fleet handoffs docs - Hygiene: 86-commit stack proven landed and retired; 10 worktrees + 5 stashes cleared; cipher-mcp deletion corrected-to-restore - ~100GB disk recovery - P7 migrated to canonical service (13 rooms, NATS connected) Open follow-ups listed unclaimed for the next lane owners. 💘 Generated with Crush
POWERFULMOVES
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2026
…08-18) The claim register's last SPARK-KIMI entry was 2026-05-27; this session landed eight lanes that were never registered. One CLAIM+RELEASE entry registers them with live-main merge verification for each: - Hermes unblock chain (fork sync #3 + gitlink #2511) - P7 legacy stanza fix #2549 (+ pr-monitor bot classifier fix) - PMOVES-crush visual ecosystem (#10/#11 + promotion #2571) - pmoves-keygen adoption (fork #1 OPEN, parent #2591) — closes the pending-ml signing-card gap (24/25 cards h-only) - #2515 fleet handoffs docs - Hygiene: 86-commit stack proven landed and retired; 10 worktrees + 5 stashes cleared; cipher-mcp deletion corrected-to-restore - ~100GB disk recovery - P7 migrated to canonical service (13 rooms, NATS connected) Open follow-ups listed unclaimed for the next lane owners. 💘 Generated with Crush
POWERFULMOVES
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2026
…08-18) (#2596) * docs(agents): register the SPARK-KIMI convergence wave (2026-08-10 → 08-18) The claim register's last SPARK-KIMI entry was 2026-05-27; this session landed eight lanes that were never registered. One CLAIM+RELEASE entry registers them with live-main merge verification for each: - Hermes unblock chain (fork sync #3 + gitlink #2511) - P7 legacy stanza fix #2549 (+ pr-monitor bot classifier fix) - PMOVES-crush visual ecosystem (#10/#11 + promotion #2571) - pmoves-keygen adoption (fork #1 OPEN, parent #2591) — closes the pending-ml signing-card gap (24/25 cards h-only) - #2515 fleet handoffs docs - Hygiene: 86-commit stack proven landed and retired; 10 worktrees + 5 stashes cleared; cipher-mcp deletion corrected-to-restore - ~100GB disk recovery - P7 migrated to canonical service (13 rooms, NATS connected) Open follow-ups listed unclaimed for the next lane owners. 💘 Generated with Crush * docs(agnote): SPARK-KIMI lane refresh — coordination split acknowledged, stale VSS claim released Claims the active SPARK lanes under the operator's merge/fix split (4090 merges, Z890 tools, SPARK reviews + registers), and releases the stale feature/spark-vss-submodule-wiring claim after verifying it landed via squash #2277. Generated with Crush * docs(agnote): correct the Hermes commit count and the SPARK registration gap Two review findings on the register entry, both verified against source. Hermes fork-sync #3 advanced 42 upstream commits, not 49. The promotion commit f6c7936 corrects this in its own body ("42 commits advance on the hardened branch"); 49 was the original PR title. A provenance register that preserves a superseded count disagrees with the commit it summarizes. The "last SPARK-KIMI entry was 2026-05-27" claim was false. The same register already holds a SPARK-KIMI claim on 2026-06-01, a CLAIM/RELEASE pair on 2026-07-13, and KIMI-SPARK activity through 2026-07-29. The real unregistered interval is 2026-07-29 -> 2026-08-18. Overstating it by two months would have made lane reconciliation unreliable in exactly the direction that causes duplicate work. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Agent Zero <agent.zero@pmoves.ai> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Three coordination handoff docs captured from local working-tree state. Docs only.
z890hostname per the no-literal-IPs-in-committed-docs rule.🤖 Generated with Claude Code