-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improved integer square root. #4403
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
26 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
171e5c2
Improved integer square root.
chgorman beec057
Small updates to sqrt function.
chgorman a48fda8
Merge branch 'master' into master
Amxx b6c29b1
Fixed variable naming.
chgorman 0d2bbb3
Added some comments to help clarify the algorithm.
chgorman 1c8e8ab
Updated edge case for clarity.
chgorman 8e2ab78
Made small improvements.
chgorman 77db52d
Merge branch 'master' into master
chgorman 8b3f15f
Added additional comments to include associated proof.
chgorman dc098e8
Merge branch 'master' into master
ernestognw bd9d969
Reduce sqrt comments
ernestognw dfe2fbc
Lint
ernestognw a53d378
Correcting return logic
chgorman 6c74012
remove overflow check (early) in favor of overflow save math at the e…
Amxx fe8abc3
format
Amxx 382ab6f
Iterate on comments
ernestognw c60542b
Iterate on comments
ernestognw ddea292
Lint
ernestognw 360f65d
Codespell
ernestognw 4288c74
Iterate on comments
ernestognw 256189a
rewrite most comments of the sqrt function
Amxx 6d00bbd
improve
Amxx 6c8be26
shift notation e+1 → e
Amxx 67d0328
complete proof
Amxx 85a56d6
improvement
Amxx e748bfc
remove reference to Heron's method to avoid confusion
Amxx File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a risk of overflow ? Can you document which part is succeptible ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using this specific method and return logic, it is possible to overflow when computing
result**2
during the checkresult**2 <= a
, because it may be thatresult == 2**128
; thus,result**2 == 0
because this isunchecked
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
interresting. I guess this is not necessary if you do
min(result, a/result)
so the current version is good in that regard.I'd rewrite that as:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if the cost of that test outweight the cost of the
min
at the end.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The current version has no proof of correctness. This proposed change does. See Appendix B.4.3. Have you looked at that report?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code was updated with suggestion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For reference, the overflow check (
if (a >= uint256(type(uint128).max)**2) { return type(uint128).max; }
) costs 23 gas.