Skip to content

evidence(OMN-15337): rebind infra PR 2665 current head - #6182

Merged
jonahgabriel merged 3 commits into
devfrom
codex/omn-15337-occ-pr2665-rehead
Aug 9, 2026
Merged

jonahgabriel merged 3 commits into
devfrom
codex/omn-15337-occ-pr2665-rehead

Conversation

@jonahgabriel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Validation

  • LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 pre-commit run --files contracts/OMN-15337.yaml drift/dod_receipts/OMN-15337/dod-OmniNode-ai-omnibase_infra-pr-2665-daf53881/command.yaml drift/dod_receipts/OMN-15337/dod-source-proof-pr-2665-daf53881/command.yaml
  • uv run python scripts/validation/check_receipt_hardening.py --repo OmniNode-ai/omnibase_infra --pr 2665 --workspace .
  • uv run pytest tests/test_evidence_admissibility.py -q
  • uv run python scripts/ci/receipt_gate.py --repo OmniNode-ai/omnibase_infra --pr 2665 --workspace .

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in: 10 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 459a7d38-ecbe-4c69-9f31-277458061dbb

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4ecf0af and f7281df.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • contracts/OMN-15337.yaml
  • drift/dod_receipts/OMN-15337/dod-OmniNode-ai-omnibase_infra-pr-2665-daf53881/command.yaml
  • drift/dod_receipts/OMN-15337/dod-source-proof-pr-2665-daf53881/command.yaml
  • drift/dod_receipts/OMN-15337/occ-self-bind-pr-6182/command.yaml

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@jonahgabriel
jonahgabriel enabled auto-merge (squash) August 8, 2026 07:32
jonahgabriel added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2026
…starvation false-fails (#6230)

* fix(OMN-15765): raise check-bot-authored-authz-guard timeout to stop starvation false-fails

check-bot-authored-authz-guard was firing red on 12/17 open D-cluster PRs,
including 5 human-authored (occ#6172/#6175/#6176/#6182/#6188). Pulled the
failing job logs for occ#6176 and occ#6182: both die inside
actions/checkout@v7 (fetch-depth: 0) / the setup-uv composite with
conclusion=cancelled at the job's timeout-minutes: 5 wall, never reaching the
guard's own decision-logic step. CI Summary's fail-closed != success
comparison then scores that cancellation as an authz REJECT.

This is CI-scheduling starvation, not a matcher defect -- the identity/path
matcher (evaluate() in check_bot_authored_authz_guard.py) is already
unit-tested correct in both directions and is unchanged here. Corroborated by
OMN-15722/PR #6173, which raised nine sibling ci-summary jobs on the same
preamble-latency evidence (checkout observed up to 22m38s in one run).

Raises only check-bot-authored-authz-guard's timeout-minutes 5 -> 45
(matching OMN-15722's floor) and adds a regression test
(test_bot_authored_authz_guard_timeout_omn15765.py) pinning the floor,
proven red-before (fails at 5) / green-after (passes at 45).

OMN-15765

* evidence(OMN-15765): DoD receipts for authz-guard timeout fix

Adds PASS receipts for both dod_evidence items in contracts/OMN-15765.yaml
(dod-authz-guard-timeout-raised, dod-authz-guard-matcher-unchanged-both-dirs),
required for occ-preflight eligibility on this PR.

OMN-15765

* fix(OMN-15765): reword ci.yml comment to clear the runner-label naming gate

The prior comment's wording ("contended self-hosted omnibase-ci fleet")
literally embedded the two centralized runner-selector labels outside the
fromJSON(vars.OMNI_TRUSTED_CI_RUNS_ON_JSON || ...) form, which trips
omni-standards-compliance.yml's hard-coded-runner-label scan (CI Naming
Convention). Reworded to describe the same fact without repeating the
literal label strings. No behavior change.

OMN-15765
@jonahgabriel jonahgabriel added the ci:ready Full CI runs on this PR (OMN-15731 label-gated CI pilot) label Aug 9, 2026
@jonahgabriel
jonahgabriel merged commit 06c3d3e into dev Aug 9, 2026
99 of 100 checks passed
@jonahgabriel
jonahgabriel deleted the codex/omn-15337-occ-pr2665-rehead branch August 9, 2026 16:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci:ready Full CI runs on this PR (OMN-15731 label-gated CI pilot)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant