Repository navigation
chore(receipts): add OMN-9837 migration receipt - #557
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR expands evidence requirements for ticket OMN-9837 to verify an enlarged set of omnibase_core contract files instead of only seven specific IDs. A command-type receipt is introduced to validate the presence of these contract YAML files through a shell-based existence check. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning Review ran into problems🔥 ProblemsGit: Failed to clone repository. Please run the Review rate limit: 0/5 reviews remaining, refill in 2 minutes and 50 seconds. Comment |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@contracts/OMN-9837.yaml`:
- Around line 12-13: The shell loop string `for f in OMN-9537 OMN-9572 ...; do
test -f contracts/$f.yaml; done` can return 0 even if some iterations fail;
update the loop to fail fast by making each test enforce exit on failure (e.g.
`for f in ...; do test -f contracts/$f.yaml || { echo "missing $f"; exit 1; };
done`) or enable strict mode before the loop (`set -euo pipefail`) so any
missing contract file causes a non-zero exit; apply the same change to the other
occurrence of this loop (the similar `for` command around lines 27-29).
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: fb463821-8d43-4edf-ac93-513c69d706dd
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
contracts/OMN-9837.yamldrift/dod_receipts/OMN-9837/dod-001/command.yaml
Summary
Verification
uv run validate-yaml contracts/OMN-9837.yamluv run python - <<'PY' ... ModelDodReceipt.model_validate(...)for f in OMN-9537 OMN-9572 OMN-9574 OMN-9592 OMN-9601 OMN-9623 OMN-9624 OMN-9637 OMN-10211 OMN-10212 OMN-10213 OMN-10215 OMN-10217 OMN-10219 OMN-10244; do test -f contracts/.yaml; donePart of OMN-9837.
Summary by CodeRabbit