Skip to content

evidence(OMN-14804): add deploy scope proof for omnibase_infra#2348 - #4445

Merged
jonahgabriel merged 1 commit into
devfrom
codex-letter/omn-14804-2348-deploy-evidence
Jul 19, 2026
Merged

jonahgabriel merged 1 commit into
devfrom
codex-letter/omn-14804-2348-deploy-evidence

Conversation

@jonahgabriel

@jonahgabriel jonahgabriel commented Jul 19, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Evidence-Ticket: OMN-14804

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added deployment-scope evidence for the related change.
    • Documented that validation covers only the canonical dispatch entrypoint.
    • Clarified that no live deployment, container execution, or production topic creation is authorized by this evidence.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 19, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in: 47 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: d218b1c1-338d-4865-8b77-447a1cccbde2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7f76bda and 5d16ca4.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • contracts/OMN-14804.yaml
  • drift/dod_receipts/OMN-14804/dod-omnibase-infra-pr-2348-deploy-scope/command.yaml
  • drift/dod_receipts/OMN-14804/occ-self-bind-pr-4445/command.yaml
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds OMN-14804 deploy-scope evidence covering the canonical dispatch entrypoint and records a passing command receipt for omnibase_infra PR #2348.

Changes

Deploy-scope evidence

Layer / File(s) Summary
Deploy-scope contract and receipt
contracts/OMN-14804.yaml, drift/dod_receipts/OMN-14804/.../command.yaml
Defines deploy-gate scope restrictions and records the corresponding PASS probe, metadata, output, PR number, and branch.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Possibly related PRs

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately summarizes the main change: adding deploy-scope evidence for OMN-14804 tied to omnibase_infra#2348.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex-letter/omn-14804-2348-deploy-evidence

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@jonahgabriel
jonahgabriel force-pushed the codex-letter/omn-14804-2348-deploy-evidence branch from 7f76bda to 522ca45 Compare July 19, 2026 21:50

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@contracts/OMN-14804.yaml`:
- Around line 44-47: Replace the prose deploy-scope check_value in
contracts/OMN-14804.yaml lines 44-47 with a runnable printf self-attestation
command, then update
drift/dod_receipts/OMN-14804/dod-omnibase-infra-pr-2348-deploy-scope/command.yaml
lines 6-8 to contain the exact same command value.

In
`@drift/dod_receipts/OMN-14804/dod-omnibase-infra-pr-2348-deploy-scope/command.yaml`:
- Around line 9-10: Regenerate the contract_entry_sha256 value in the receipt
using the canonical entry-hash tool for the final OMN-14804 contract and entry
dod-omnibase-infra-pr-2348-deploy-scope, then replace only the stale hash while
preserving contract_sha256.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: c58c3a53-97ca-402d-b82a-42d64d93838f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7cce633 and 7f76bda.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • contracts/OMN-14804.yaml
  • drift/dod_receipts/OMN-14804/dod-omnibase-infra-pr-2348-deploy-scope/command.yaml

Comment thread contracts/OMN-14804.yaml Outdated
Comment on lines +44 to +47
- check_type: "command"
check_value: >-
deploy scope assessed for omnibase_infra#2348 runtime handler path; no live deploy, docker exec,
or rpk topic produce is authorized by this evidence repair

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

Use one runnable deploy-scope command across the contract and receipt.

The contract defines a command check as prose, and the receipt copies that same non-runnable value. Replace it with an executable self-attestation such as printf, then keep both values identical.

  • contracts/OMN-14804.yaml#L44-L47: change the deploy-scope check_value to a runnable command.
  • drift/dod_receipts/OMN-14804/dod-omnibase-infra-pr-2348-deploy-scope/command.yaml#L6-L8: mirror the corrected command exactly.

Based on learnings, self-attesting dod-deploy-* evidence should use a runnable printf check.

📍 Affects 2 files
  • contracts/OMN-14804.yaml#L44-L47 (this comment)
  • drift/dod_receipts/OMN-14804/dod-omnibase-infra-pr-2348-deploy-scope/command.yaml#L6-L8
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@contracts/OMN-14804.yaml` around lines 44 - 47, Replace the prose
deploy-scope check_value in contracts/OMN-14804.yaml lines 44-47 with a runnable
printf self-attestation command, then update
drift/dod_receipts/OMN-14804/dod-omnibase-infra-pr-2348-deploy-scope/command.yaml
lines 6-8 to contain the exact same command value.

Source: Learnings

Comment thread drift/dod_receipts/OMN-14804/dod-omnibase-infra-pr-2348-deploy-scope/command.yaml Outdated
@jonahgabriel
jonahgabriel force-pushed the codex-letter/omn-14804-2348-deploy-evidence branch from 522ca45 to 5d16ca4 Compare July 19, 2026 21:59
@jonahgabriel
jonahgabriel merged commit 5aecd5d into dev Jul 19, 2026
49 checks passed
@jonahgabriel
jonahgabriel deleted the codex-letter/omn-14804-2348-deploy-evidence branch July 19, 2026 22:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant