Skip to content

receipt(OMN-13674): omnimarket #1572 orchestrator-coverage OCC receipt - #3475

Merged
jonahgabriel merged 1 commit into
devfrom
jonah/omn-13674-occ-pr-1572
Jul 2, 2026
Merged

jonahgabriel merged 1 commit into
devfrom
jonah/omn-13674-occ-pr-1572

Conversation

@jonahgabriel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Evidence-Ticket: OMN-13674

Summary

Adds the dod-omnimarket-pr-1572 evidence item + PASS receipt to the OMN-13674 contract, binding it to omnimarket PR #1572 (pr_lifecycle_pipeline cluster, cov wave B, archetype orchestrator). This carries the receipt onto dev so downstream omnimarket PR #1572 can pass its required verify / verify (OCC merge eligibility) gate.

  • New evidence item dod-omnimarket-pr-1572 (mirrors the pr-1567 precedent) + drift/dod_receipts/OMN-13674/dod-omnimarket-pr-1572/command.yaml (status PASS, pr_number 1572, commit_sha adf46213…).
  • Rehashed all OMN-13674 receipts' contract_sha256 to the new contract hash (sha256:09a878dd…) after the added evidence item, keeping every receipt hash-bound.
  • Rebound dod-occ-self to this OCC PR for self-eligibility.

Local proof: validator_occ_merge_eligibility for omnimarket PR #1572 against this branch → eligible: true, reason: eligible.

dod_evidence

Evidence-only change; no runtime/deploy surface touched.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in: 12 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 93ca666e-1ff8-4b92-adf0-160196a4e391

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d4296ed and 415bf2d.

📒 Files selected for processing (10)
  • contracts/OMN-13674.yaml
  • drift/dod_receipts/OMN-13674/dod-deploy-assessment/command.yaml
  • drift/dod_receipts/OMN-13674/dod-occ-self/command.yaml
  • drift/dod_receipts/OMN-13674/dod-omnimarket-pr-1560/command.yaml
  • drift/dod_receipts/OMN-13674/dod-omnimarket-pr-1565/command.yaml
  • drift/dod_receipts/OMN-13674/dod-omnimarket-pr-1566/command.yaml
  • drift/dod_receipts/OMN-13674/dod-omnimarket-pr-1567/command.yaml
  • drift/dod_receipts/OMN-13674/dod-omnimarket-pr-1570/command.yaml
  • drift/dod_receipts/OMN-13674/dod-omnimarket-pr-1571/command.yaml
  • drift/dod_receipts/OMN-13674/dod-omnimarket-pr-1572/command.yaml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch jonah/omn-13674-occ-pr-1572

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@jonahgabriel
jonahgabriel enabled auto-merge July 2, 2026 13:54
@jonahgabriel
jonahgabriel force-pushed the jonah/omn-13674-occ-pr-1572 branch from 88d9ee8 to 71d3597 Compare July 2, 2026 13:55
@jonahgabriel
jonahgabriel added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 2, 2026
@jonahgabriel
jonahgabriel removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Jul 2, 2026
@jonahgabriel
jonahgabriel added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 2, 2026
@github-merge-queue
github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a conflict with the base branch Jul 2, 2026
@jonahgabriel
jonahgabriel force-pushed the jonah/omn-13674-occ-pr-1572 branch from 71d3597 to 0268a35 Compare July 2, 2026 14:04
jonahgabriel added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2026
…t (rebased on dev)

Adds dod-omnimarket-pr-1572 evidence item + PASS receipt binding OMN-13674 to
omnimarket PR #1572 (pr_lifecycle_pipeline cluster, cov wave B, orchestrator).
Rehashes all OMN-13674 receipts to the new contract sha256 and rebinds occ-self
to OCC PR #3475. Rebased on current dev.

Evidence-only change; no runtime/deploy surface touched.
@jonahgabriel
jonahgabriel force-pushed the jonah/omn-13674-occ-pr-1572 branch from 0268a35 to fe314a2 Compare July 2, 2026 14:04
@jonahgabriel
jonahgabriel enabled auto-merge July 2, 2026 14:05
…t (rebased on dev)

Adds dod-omnimarket-pr-1572 evidence item + PASS receipt binding OMN-13674 to
omnimarket PR #1572 (pr_lifecycle_pipeline cluster, cov wave B, orchestrator).
yamlfmt-canonicalizes the contract and rehashes all OMN-13674 receipts to the
new contract sha256, rebinds occ-self to OCC PR #3475. Rebased on current dev.

Evidence-only change; no runtime/deploy surface touched.
@jonahgabriel
jonahgabriel force-pushed the jonah/omn-13674-occ-pr-1572 branch from 2af0525 to 415bf2d Compare July 2, 2026 14:11
@jonahgabriel
jonahgabriel added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 2, 2026
Merged via the queue into dev with commit c6afc64 Jul 2, 2026
40 checks passed
@jonahgabriel
jonahgabriel deleted the jonah/omn-13674-occ-pr-1572 branch July 2, 2026 14:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant