Conversation
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThis change introduces comprehensive unit tests for the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~15 minutes Assessment against linked issues
Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. ✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
frontend/src/components/AnimatedCounter.test.tsx (1)
6-70: Consolidate duplicate describe blocks.Having two separate
describe('AnimatedCounter', ...)blocks is confusing. Consider consolidating them into a single describe block with nested describe blocks for different test scenarios.describe('AnimatedCounter', () => { + describe('with real timers', () => { it('renders the counter with the correct value after animation', async () => { // existing test }); + }); + + describe('with fake timers', () => { beforeEach(() => { jest.useFakeTimers(); }); // rest of fake timer tests + }); }); - -describe('AnimatedCounter', () => { - // duplicate describe block -});frontend/src/components/AnimatedCounter.tsx (2)
36-42: Consider memoizing the onEnd callback to prevent unnecessary re-renders.Including
onEndin the dependency array could cause the animation to restart if the callback function is recreated on each render.Consider advising users to wrap the
onEndcallback withuseCallback:// In parent component const handleAnimationEnd = useCallback(() => { // callback logic }, [/* dependencies */]);Or document this requirement in the component's TypeScript interface.
47-49: Consider a more descriptive default aria-label.The default aria-label "animated counter" is generic. Consider using the end value to make it more descriptive.
- aria-label={ariaLabel || 'animated counter'} + aria-label={ariaLabel || `counter animating to ${millify(end)}`}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
backend/poetry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lockfrontend/pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yamlpnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
frontend/package.json(5 hunks)frontend/src/components/AnimatedCounter.test.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/AnimatedCounter.tsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/sentry.server.config.ts(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: when testing react page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be teste...
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
Applied to files:
frontend/src/components/AnimatedCounter.test.tsx
📚 Learning: the react-apexcharts chart component does not support aria attributes like aria-label and role as di...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1633
File: frontend/src/components/GradientRadialChart.tsx:67-116
Timestamp: 2025-06-21T12:21:32.372Z
Learning: The react-apexcharts Chart component does not support ARIA attributes like aria-label and role as direct props. To add accessibility attributes to ApexCharts in React, wrap the Chart component in a container div with the appropriate ARIA attributes.
Applied to files:
frontend/src/components/AnimatedCounter.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (4)
frontend/src/sentry.server.config.ts (1)
4-4: LGTM!Good formatting improvement - the blank line enhances readability by separating imports from the configuration logic.
frontend/src/components/AnimatedCounter.tsx (1)
8-9: LGTM! Good accessibility and callback additions.The addition of
aria-labelandonEndprops enhances both accessibility and functionality of the component.frontend/package.json (2)
14-16: LGTM! Good addition of cross-env for environment management.The test script improvements with
cross-envfor settingNODE_OPTIONSwill ensure consistent behavior across different operating systems.
87-87: Cross-env package version and compatibility verified
- The added dependency
"cross-env": "^10.0.0"matches the latest stable release.- No known security advisories affect this package.
- Version 10+ moved to ESM-only and requires Node.js ≥ 20; your
engines.node: "22"satisfies this.All checks pass—no changes needed.
| "typescript-eslint": "^8.38.0", | ||
| "util": "^0.12.5" | ||
| "util": "^0.12.5", | ||
| "which": "^2.0.2" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Version mismatch for 'which' package.
The which package version in frontend/package.json is ^2.0.2, but the root package.json specifies ^5.0.0. This inconsistency could lead to conflicts.
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential conflicts between which package versions
echo "Checking 'which' package versions and compatibility..."
npm view which versions --json | jq '.[-10:]'
echo ""
echo "Checking for breaking changes between v2 and v5..."
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/which | jq '.versions["2.0.2"], .versions["5.0.0"]' 2>/dev/null || echo "Could not fetch version details"Consider standardizing on one version across both package.json files.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/package.json at line 113, the version of the 'which' package is set
to ^2.0.2, which conflicts with the root package.json that uses ^5.0.0. To fix
this, update the 'which' package version in frontend/package.json to ^5.0.0 to
ensure consistency and avoid potential conflicts across the project.
| describe('AnimatedCounter', () => { | ||
| it('renders the counter with the correct value after animation', async () => { | ||
| render(<AnimatedCounter end={42} duration={0.1} />); | ||
|
|
||
| const counterElement = screen.getByRole('status', { name: /animated counter/i }); | ||
| expect(counterElement).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
|
|
||
| await waitFor(() => { | ||
| expect(counterElement.textContent).toBe('42'); | ||
| }, { timeout: 500 }); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the unimplemented waitFor function.
This test uses waitFor but the function is not imported and the stub implementation at the bottom throws an error.
+import { render, screen, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react';
-import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';Also remove the stub function at lines 71-73.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/src/components/AnimatedCounter.test.tsx around lines 6 to 17, the
test uses the waitFor function but it is not imported, and there is a stub
implementation at lines 71-73 that throws an error. Fix this by importing
waitFor from the testing library at the top of the file and remove the stub
waitFor function at lines 71-73 to ensure the test runs correctly.
| it('does not animate if start and end are equal', () => { | ||
| render(<AnimatedCounter end={50} duration={1000} />); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText('50')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the test logic for equal start and end values.
The test "does not animate if start and end are equal" is incorrect. The component starts at 0 and animates to the end value (50), so it will animate.
- it('does not animate if start and end are equal', () => {
- render(<AnimatedCounter end={50} duration={1000} />);
- expect(screen.getByText('50')).toBeInTheDocument();
- });
+ it('does not animate if start and end are equal', () => {
+ render(<AnimatedCounter end={0} duration={1000} />);
+ expect(screen.getByText('0')).toBeInTheDocument();
+ });🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/src/components/AnimatedCounter.test.tsx around lines 60 to 63, the
test incorrectly assumes no animation occurs when start and end values are
equal, but the component always animates from 0 to the end value. Update the
test to reflect that animation happens even if start equals end by either
removing the test or adjusting it to check for animation behavior starting from
0 to the end value.
| function waitFor(arg0: () => void, arg1: { timeout: number; }) { | ||
| throw new Error('Function not implemented.'); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove the stub waitFor function.
This stub function will cause runtime errors and is unnecessary if you import waitFor from @testing-library/react.
-function waitFor(arg0: () => void, arg1: { timeout: number; }) {
- throw new Error('Function not implemented.');
-}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function waitFor(arg0: () => void, arg1: { timeout: number; }) { | |
| throw new Error('Function not implemented.'); | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/src/components/AnimatedCounter.test.tsx around lines 71 to 73,
remove the stub implementation of the waitFor function entirely. Instead, import
waitFor from '@testing-library/react' at the top of the test file to avoid
runtime errors and use the proper testing utility.
| { | ||
| "devDependencies": { | ||
| "which": "^5.0.0" | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Clarify the purpose of this standalone package.json.
This minimal package.json with only a which devDependency seems unusual, especially since which is also added to frontend/package.json. Consider whether this separate file is necessary or if it could be consolidated.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if this is part of a workspace setup and verify package security
echo "Checking for workspace configuration..."
find . -name "package.json" -exec echo "Found: {}" \;
echo ""
echo "Checking for yarn/npm workspace files..."
ls -la | grep -E "(yarn\.lock|package-lock\.json|pnpm-lock\.yaml|\.yarnrc|\.npmrc)"
echo ""
echo "Verifying 'which' package security advisories..."
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/which | jq '.versions | keys | .[-5:]'Length of output: 737
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
echo "Root package.json content (first 50 lines):"
sed -n '1,50p' package.json
echo ""
echo "Checking for workspaces field in root package.json:"
grep -n '"workspaces"' package.json || echo "No workspaces field found"Length of output: 396
Remove or consolidate the redundant root package.json
The root package.json isn’t configured as a workspace (no workspaces field) and only pulls in the which devDependency—yet you also declare which in frontend/package.json. This standalone file appears unused and could be safely consolidated or removed.
• No workspaces field in package.json
• Root contains only "which": "^5.0.0" under devDependencies
• pnpm-lock.yaml lives at the repo root but no workspace config is present
• frontend/package.json already includes the same which dependency
Suggested action: either delete this root package.json (and rely on frontend/package.json for dev tooling) or fold its devDependencies into your workspace root if you intend to manage shared tooling there.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In package.json lines 1 to 5, the root package.json is redundant as it only
declares the "which" devDependency already present in frontend/package.json and
lacks a workspaces field. To fix this, either delete the root package.json
entirely to rely solely on frontend/package.json for dependencies, or if you
want a shared workspace root, add a "workspaces" field and consolidate
devDependencies there, removing duplicates from frontend/package.json.
|
@gaurigupta0604 please remove all irrelevant files. The PR should only have the test file in it. And the conflicts are still there - please do not change any setup files. Also, do not create new PRs to push requested changes - update your original PR. This is not a cleaner way to handle any PR comments. All changes should be applied in the same original PR. |



Proposed change
This PR cleans up the
AnimatedCounter.test.tsxfile by:actusageChecklist
make check-testlocally; all checks and tests passed.Linked Issue
Resolves #1829