Skip to content

Comments

Fix regex for chapter leader#1118

Merged
arkid15r merged 2 commits intoOWASP:mainfrom
Naveen-Pal:Improve-entity-leaders-fetching
Mar 15, 2025
Merged

Fix regex for chapter leader#1118
arkid15r merged 2 commits intoOWASP:mainfrom
Naveen-Pal:Improve-entity-leaders-fetching

Conversation

@Naveen-Pal
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves #1115

Required Test Cases passed
image

@Naveen-Pal Naveen-Pal requested a review from arkid15r as a code owner March 15, 2025 20:02
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 15, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved the extraction of leader names for more accurate recognition and display, even when extra spaces are present.
  • Tests
    • Updated test cases to verify the enhanced leader name extraction, ensuring consistency and clarity in the output.

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the logic for extracting leader names from markdown content. The regular expression in the get_leaders method has been modified to better handle whitespace inside the brackets and more accurately capture names without extra parentheses. Additionally, the corresponding unit tests have been adjusted—with differences in bullet formatting and leader name details—to align with the updated extraction logic. No changes have been made to public entity declarations.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
backend/apps/.../common.py Updated the regex in the get_leaders method to include additional whitespace handling and improve name capturing. Error handling remains unchanged.
backend/tests/.../common_test.py Modified test cases for test_get_leaders: changed bullet style and updated leader name content and expected outputs.

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
    - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4898ca8 and ecd1c2e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • backend/apps/owasp/models/common.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • backend/apps/owasp/models/common.py

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Naveen-Pal Naveen-Pal changed the title fix-regex-for-chapter-leader Fix regex for chapter leader Mar 15, 2025
arkid15r
arkid15r previously approved these changes Mar 15, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@arkid15r arkid15r left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nicely done, LGTM 👍

@arkid15r arkid15r added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 15, 2025
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1 Security Hotspot

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Merged via the queue into OWASP:main with commit d536356 Mar 15, 2025
2 of 4 checks passed
shdwcodr pushed a commit to shdwcodr/Nest that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve entity leaders fetching process

2 participants