Skip to content

Conversation

@simonLeary42
Copy link
Contributor

@simonLeary42 simonLeary42 commented Jul 28, 2025

Closes #894.

This branch is rebased off of #890, so "remove queue from AccountInfo" should be ignored. Here is the actual diff when comparing against the right branch. Marked as draft until 890 is merged so this can be rebased again to master.

Comment on lines 15 to 16
# The cluster this account is associated with.
attr_reader :cluster
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe we should still embed cluster here in the information object. It seems to me like it's just a convenience thing depending on how you query and loop through clusters.

In any case, I don't think the extra information is detrimental even if it's duplicate or already known.

@johrstrom
Copy link
Contributor

Just let me know if you have time to continue this or if you need me to pick it up.

@simonLeary42
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll rebase and fix the merge conflicts, but I don't have time for much else.

@simonLeary42
Copy link
Contributor Author

Broke PR, linked to new one. Cherry-picked 90825cc onto master and there were no merge conflicts.

@OSC OSC locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 17, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

auto_accounts requires all slurm clusters to share the same database

2 participants