Add configurable models for memory and skill background reviews - #13647
Add configurable models for memory and skill background reviews#13647gregoryschlepper wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
This PR addresses the first half of the review-cost problem. What is already concretely improved:
What is not yet instrumented:
Those likely improve as a consequence, but I am intentionally not overstating that without dedicated review-level telemetry. I split the optimization work so review-model selection and review-size reduction can be discussed independently. |
|
Follow-up note: I also did a static verification pass on the current What is statically confirmed:
So code-wise, the override path is wired through as intended. What is still not separately instrumented:
|
|
Thanks for the focused work on lowering background-review cost. This automated hermes-sweeper review found that current
This supersedes the |
Adds optional memory.review.* and skills.review.* overrides so background reviews can use a different model/provider than the main agent. Default behavior remains unchanged.