Skip to content

fix(gateway): prune stale SessionStore entries to bound memory + disk - #11789

Merged
teknium1 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/session-store-prune
Apr 17, 2026
Merged

fix(gateway): prune stale SessionStore entries to bound memory + disk#11789
teknium1 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/session-store-prune

Conversation

@teknium1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What this PR does (zoomed out)

SessionStore._entries grew unbounded. Every unique (platform, chat_id, thread_id, user_id) tuple ever seen was kept in RAM and rewritten to sessions.json on every message. Nothing trimmed this — no TTL, no cap, no eviction path. A Discord bot living in 100 servers × 100 channels × ~100 rotating users accumulates ~10^5 entries over a few months; each sessions.json write becomes an O(n) fsync.

The fix

SessionStore.prune_old_entries(max_age_days)

Drops entries whose updated_at is older than the cutoff. Preserves:

  • Entries marked suspended — user paused them via /stop for later resume.
  • Entries with an active background process attached — the user may still be waiting on output.

Pruning is functionally identical to a natural reset-policy expiry: the SQLite transcript stays, the session_key → session_id mapping is dropped, and a returning user gets a fresh session. So the UX cost is zero beyond what they'd already experience from any reset policy.

GatewayConfig.session_store_max_age_days

New field, default 90, 0 disables. Serialized in to_dict/from_dict; coerces bad types and negatives to safe defaults. No migration needed — a missing field loads as 90 days.

Watcher hook

_session_expiry_watcher calls prune_old_entries once per hour (first tick runs immediately since _last_prune_ts starts at 0). Uses the existing watcher loop — no new background task.

Why 90 days and not more aggressive

Long enough that legitimate long-idle users (seasonal, vacation, users who check in once a quarter) aren't surprised. Pruning just means they get a fresh session on return — same outcome any reset policy would give. Admins can lower it via config; 0 disables.

Tests

tests/gateway/test_session_store_prune.py — 17 cases:

  • Age decision uses updated_at, not created_at (long-lived sessions that are still active aren't pruned)
  • max_age_days=0 disables; negative coerces to 0
  • suspended entries preserved
  • Entries with active processes preserved (via has_active_processes_fn)
  • _save() only fires when something was actually removed
  • sessions.json on disk matches the post-prune dict
  • Thread safety — prune runs under _lock, safe against concurrent readers
  • GatewayConfig.session_store_max_age_days roundtrips + falls back gracefully on bad values
  • Watcher gate logic (first tick fires immediately, subsequent within 1h skip)
pytest tests/gateway/test_session_store_prune.py           17 passed
pytest tests/gateway/ -k 'config or gateway_config'       230 passed
pytest tests/gateway/test_session_* test_agent_cache.py   119 passed

Context

Part of the memory-leak audit series.

SessionStore._entries grew unbounded.  Every unique
(platform, chat_id, thread_id, user_id) tuple ever seen was kept in
RAM and rewritten to sessions.json on every message.  A Discord bot
in 100 servers x 100 channels x ~100 rotating users accumulates on
the order of 10^5 entries after a few months; each sessions.json
write becomes an O(n) fsync.  Nothing trimmed this — there was no
TTL, no cap, no eviction path.

Changes
-------
* SessionStore.prune_old_entries(max_age_days) — drops entries whose
  updated_at is older than the cutoff.  Preserves:
    - suspended entries (user paused them via /stop for later resume)
    - entries with an active background process attached
  Pruning is functionally identical to a natural reset-policy expiry:
  SQLite transcript stays, session_key -> session_id mapping dropped,
  returning user gets a fresh session.

* GatewayConfig.session_store_max_age_days (default 90; 0 disables).
  Serialized in to_dict/from_dict, coerced from bad types / negatives
  to safe defaults.  No migration needed — missing field -> 90 days.

* _session_expiry_watcher calls prune_old_entries once per hour
  (first tick is immediate).  Uses the existing watcher loop so no
  new background task is created.

Why not more aggressive
-----------------------
90 days is long enough that legitimate long-idle users (seasonal,
vacation, etc.) aren't surprised — pruning just means they get a
fresh session on return, same outcome they'd get from any other
reset-policy trigger.  Admins can lower it via config; 0 disables.

Tests
-----
tests/gateway/test_session_store_prune.py — 17 cases covering:
  * entry age based on updated_at, not created_at
  * max_age_days=0 disables; negative coerces to 0
  * suspended + active-process entries are skipped
  * _save fires iff something was removed
  * disk JSON reflects post-prune state
  * thread safety against concurrent readers
  * config field roundtrips + graceful fallback on bad values
  * watcher gate logic (first tick prunes, subsequent within 1h don't)

119 broader session/gateway tests remain green.
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

⚠️ Supply Chain Risk Detected

This PR contains patterns commonly associated with supply chain attacks. This does not mean the PR is malicious — but these patterns require careful human review before merging.

⚠️ WARNING: Dependency manifest files modified

Changes to dependency files can introduce new packages or change version pins. Verify all dependency changes are intentional and from trusted sources.

Files:

pyproject.toml

Automated scan triggered by supply-chain-audit. If this is a false positive, a maintainer can approve after manual review.

@teknium1
teknium1 merged commit eb07c05 into main Apr 17, 2026
5 checks passed
@teknium1
teknium1 deleted the fix/session-store-prune branch April 17, 2026 20:48
aj-nt pushed a commit to aj-nt/hermes-agent that referenced this pull request May 1, 2026
…NousResearch#11789)

SessionStore._entries grew unbounded.  Every unique
(platform, chat_id, thread_id, user_id) tuple ever seen was kept in
RAM and rewritten to sessions.json on every message.  A Discord bot
in 100 servers x 100 channels x ~100 rotating users accumulates on
the order of 10^5 entries after a few months; each sessions.json
write becomes an O(n) fsync.  Nothing trimmed this — there was no
TTL, no cap, no eviction path.

Changes
-------
* SessionStore.prune_old_entries(max_age_days) — drops entries whose
  updated_at is older than the cutoff.  Preserves:
    - suspended entries (user paused them via /stop for later resume)
    - entries with an active background process attached
  Pruning is functionally identical to a natural reset-policy expiry:
  SQLite transcript stays, session_key -> session_id mapping dropped,
  returning user gets a fresh session.

* GatewayConfig.session_store_max_age_days (default 90; 0 disables).
  Serialized in to_dict/from_dict, coerced from bad types / negatives
  to safe defaults.  No migration needed — missing field -> 90 days.

* _session_expiry_watcher calls prune_old_entries once per hour
  (first tick is immediate).  Uses the existing watcher loop so no
  new background task is created.

Why not more aggressive
-----------------------
90 days is long enough that legitimate long-idle users (seasonal,
vacation, etc.) aren't surprised — pruning just means they get a
fresh session on return, same outcome they'd get from any other
reset-policy trigger.  Admins can lower it via config; 0 disables.

Tests
-----
tests/gateway/test_session_store_prune.py — 17 cases covering:
  * entry age based on updated_at, not created_at
  * max_age_days=0 disables; negative coerces to 0
  * suspended + active-process entries are skipped
  * _save fires iff something was removed
  * disk JSON reflects post-prune state
  * thread safety against concurrent readers
  * config field roundtrips + graceful fallback on bad values
  * watcher gate logic (first tick prunes, subsequent within 1h don't)

119 broader session/gateway tests remain green.
02356abc pushed a commit to 02356abc/hermes-agent that referenced this pull request May 14, 2026
…NousResearch#11789)

SessionStore._entries grew unbounded.  Every unique
(platform, chat_id, thread_id, user_id) tuple ever seen was kept in
RAM and rewritten to sessions.json on every message.  A Discord bot
in 100 servers x 100 channels x ~100 rotating users accumulates on
the order of 10^5 entries after a few months; each sessions.json
write becomes an O(n) fsync.  Nothing trimmed this — there was no
TTL, no cap, no eviction path.

Changes
-------
* SessionStore.prune_old_entries(max_age_days) — drops entries whose
  updated_at is older than the cutoff.  Preserves:
    - suspended entries (user paused them via /stop for later resume)
    - entries with an active background process attached
  Pruning is functionally identical to a natural reset-policy expiry:
  SQLite transcript stays, session_key -> session_id mapping dropped,
  returning user gets a fresh session.

* GatewayConfig.session_store_max_age_days (default 90; 0 disables).
  Serialized in to_dict/from_dict, coerced from bad types / negatives
  to safe defaults.  No migration needed — missing field -> 90 days.

* _session_expiry_watcher calls prune_old_entries once per hour
  (first tick is immediate).  Uses the existing watcher loop so no
  new background task is created.

Why not more aggressive
-----------------------
90 days is long enough that legitimate long-idle users (seasonal,
vacation, etc.) aren't surprised — pruning just means they get a
fresh session on return, same outcome they'd get from any other
reset-policy trigger.  Admins can lower it via config; 0 disables.

Tests
-----
tests/gateway/test_session_store_prune.py — 17 cases covering:
  * entry age based on updated_at, not created_at
  * max_age_days=0 disables; negative coerces to 0
  * suspended + active-process entries are skipped
  * _save fires iff something was removed
  * disk JSON reflects post-prune state
  * thread safety against concurrent readers
  * config field roundtrips + graceful fallback on bad values
  * watcher gate logic (first tick prunes, subsequent within 1h don't)

119 broader session/gateway tests remain green.
gweeteve pushed a commit to gweeteve/hermes-agent that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
…NousResearch#11789)

SessionStore._entries grew unbounded.  Every unique
(platform, chat_id, thread_id, user_id) tuple ever seen was kept in
RAM and rewritten to sessions.json on every message.  A Discord bot
in 100 servers x 100 channels x ~100 rotating users accumulates on
the order of 10^5 entries after a few months; each sessions.json
write becomes an O(n) fsync.  Nothing trimmed this — there was no
TTL, no cap, no eviction path.

Changes
-------
* SessionStore.prune_old_entries(max_age_days) — drops entries whose
  updated_at is older than the cutoff.  Preserves:
    - suspended entries (user paused them via /stop for later resume)
    - entries with an active background process attached
  Pruning is functionally identical to a natural reset-policy expiry:
  SQLite transcript stays, session_key -> session_id mapping dropped,
  returning user gets a fresh session.

* GatewayConfig.session_store_max_age_days (default 90; 0 disables).
  Serialized in to_dict/from_dict, coerced from bad types / negatives
  to safe defaults.  No migration needed — missing field -> 90 days.

* _session_expiry_watcher calls prune_old_entries once per hour
  (first tick is immediate).  Uses the existing watcher loop so no
  new background task is created.

Why not more aggressive
-----------------------
90 days is long enough that legitimate long-idle users (seasonal,
vacation, etc.) aren't surprised — pruning just means they get a
fresh session on return, same outcome they'd get from any other
reset-policy trigger.  Admins can lower it via config; 0 disables.

Tests
-----
tests/gateway/test_session_store_prune.py — 17 cases covering:
  * entry age based on updated_at, not created_at
  * max_age_days=0 disables; negative coerces to 0
  * suspended + active-process entries are skipped
  * _save fires iff something was removed
  * disk JSON reflects post-prune state
  * thread safety against concurrent readers
  * config field roundtrips + graceful fallback on bad values
  * watcher gate logic (first tick prunes, subsequent within 1h don't)

119 broader session/gateway tests remain green.
waefrebeorn pushed a commit to waefrebeorn/slermes that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2026
…NousResearch#11789)

SessionStore._entries grew unbounded.  Every unique
(platform, chat_id, thread_id, user_id) tuple ever seen was kept in
RAM and rewritten to sessions.json on every message.  A Discord bot
in 100 servers x 100 channels x ~100 rotating users accumulates on
the order of 10^5 entries after a few months; each sessions.json
write becomes an O(n) fsync.  Nothing trimmed this — there was no
TTL, no cap, no eviction path.

Changes
-------
* SessionStore.prune_old_entries(max_age_days) — drops entries whose
  updated_at is older than the cutoff.  Preserves:
    - suspended entries (user paused them via /stop for later resume)
    - entries with an active background process attached
  Pruning is functionally identical to a natural reset-policy expiry:
  SQLite transcript stays, session_key -> session_id mapping dropped,
  returning user gets a fresh session.

* GatewayConfig.session_store_max_age_days (default 90; 0 disables).
  Serialized in to_dict/from_dict, coerced from bad types / negatives
  to safe defaults.  No migration needed — missing field -> 90 days.

* _session_expiry_watcher calls prune_old_entries once per hour
  (first tick is immediate).  Uses the existing watcher loop so no
  new background task is created.

Why not more aggressive
-----------------------
90 days is long enough that legitimate long-idle users (seasonal,
vacation, etc.) aren't surprised — pruning just means they get a
fresh session on return, same outcome they'd get from any other
reset-policy trigger.  Admins can lower it via config; 0 disables.

Tests
-----
tests/gateway/test_session_store_prune.py — 17 cases covering:
  * entry age based on updated_at, not created_at
  * max_age_days=0 disables; negative coerces to 0
  * suspended + active-process entries are skipped
  * _save fires iff something was removed
  * disk JSON reflects post-prune state
  * thread safety against concurrent readers
  * config field roundtrips + graceful fallback on bad values
  * watcher gate logic (first tick prunes, subsequent within 1h don't)

119 broader session/gateway tests remain green.
prmartinow pushed a commit to prmartinow/hermes-agent that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2026
…NousResearch#11789)

SessionStore._entries grew unbounded.  Every unique
(platform, chat_id, thread_id, user_id) tuple ever seen was kept in
RAM and rewritten to sessions.json on every message.  A Discord bot
in 100 servers x 100 channels x ~100 rotating users accumulates on
the order of 10^5 entries after a few months; each sessions.json
write becomes an O(n) fsync.  Nothing trimmed this — there was no
TTL, no cap, no eviction path.

Changes
-------
* SessionStore.prune_old_entries(max_age_days) — drops entries whose
  updated_at is older than the cutoff.  Preserves:
    - suspended entries (user paused them via /stop for later resume)
    - entries with an active background process attached
  Pruning is functionally identical to a natural reset-policy expiry:
  SQLite transcript stays, session_key -> session_id mapping dropped,
  returning user gets a fresh session.

* GatewayConfig.session_store_max_age_days (default 90; 0 disables).
  Serialized in to_dict/from_dict, coerced from bad types / negatives
  to safe defaults.  No migration needed — missing field -> 90 days.

* _session_expiry_watcher calls prune_old_entries once per hour
  (first tick is immediate).  Uses the existing watcher loop so no
  new background task is created.

Why not more aggressive
-----------------------
90 days is long enough that legitimate long-idle users (seasonal,
vacation, etc.) aren't surprised — pruning just means they get a
fresh session on return, same outcome they'd get from any other
reset-policy trigger.  Admins can lower it via config; 0 disables.

Tests
-----
tests/gateway/test_session_store_prune.py — 17 cases covering:
  * entry age based on updated_at, not created_at
  * max_age_days=0 disables; negative coerces to 0
  * suspended + active-process entries are skipped
  * _save fires iff something was removed
  * disk JSON reflects post-prune state
  * thread safety against concurrent readers
  * config field roundtrips + graceful fallback on bad values
  * watcher gate logic (first tick prunes, subsequent within 1h don't)

119 broader session/gateway tests remain green.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant