oneDNN_2: reintroduce and unbreak, rocmPackages.migraphx: use oneDNN_2#448964
oneDNN_2: reintroduce and unbreak, rocmPackages.migraphx: use oneDNN_2#448964dotlambda merged 4 commits intoNixOS:masterfrom
Conversation
|
|
@Sigmanificient
|
|
@LunNova Seems like you are editing quite heavy packages 🙃 |
Least resource-intensive ROCm package |
| oneDNN' = oneDNN.overrideAttrs rec { | ||
| # TODO(@LunNova): stop overriding here once oneDNN 3 is supported | ||
| # Upstream issue: https://github.com/ROCm/AMDMIGraphX/issues/4351 | ||
| oneDNN' = oneDNN.overrideAttrs (old: rec { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In light of #421201, we should probably introduce a package oneDNN_2.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I remember asking not to drop oneDNN_2 in #416821 (comment) 😭
I guess that's cleaner, I'll revert the drop and set the team to rocm rather than the old maintainers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry about that! I definitely like that it's the ROCm team who's responsible for oneDNN_2 now.
This reverts commit f596809. let's revert to reduce risk of future oneDNN_2 breakage in migraphx.
3bf5f9c to
50e6f6f
Compare
50e6f6f to
f315061
Compare
Flakebi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Didn’t try to build, but the change looks good
|
@dotlambda I'd appreciate if you can merge this PR |
Reintroducing oneDNN_2 for compliance with #421201 and fixing its build with CMake 4 (#445447).
Upstream issue for oneDNN 3 compat in migraphx: ROCm/AMDMIGraphX#4351
Things done
passthru.tests.nixpkgs-reviewon this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage../result/bin/.Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.