victoriametrics: 1.123.0 -> 1.124.0#434803
Conversation
ryan4yin
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nixpkgs-review result
Generated using nixpkgs-review.
Command: nixpkgs-review pr 434803 --package victoriametrics.passthru.tests
Commit: 30db5ac53228dace25ce1a55ca179dc608eabbac
x86_64-linux
✅ 3 packages built:
- victoriametrics.passthru.tests.victoriametrics.external-promscrape-config
- victoriametrics.passthru.tests.victoriametrics.remote-write
- victoriametrics.passthru.tests.victoriametrics.vmalert
Shawn8901
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tested on my aarch64 that runs a victoriametrics and vmagent setup
| # Allow older go versions | ||
| substituteInPlace go.mod \ | ||
| --replace-fail "go 1.24.6" "go ${finalAttrs.passthru.go.version}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
FYI: The go bump from 1.24.5 to 1.24.6 is currently included on staging-next.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we wait for that then and update this PR once -next is merged? Otherwise this will fail to build after the -next merge.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
On the last staging cycle we merged victoria-metrics/-logs bumps to staging-next.
I have no hard opinions on that topic if we should merge to staging-next and drop this, or merge to master and drop it if the have the go bump, or keep it at all and update it with every tool chain bump from upstream.
My intention here was just to let people know that the tool chain bump is currently sitting on the current staging cycle and waits for regression fixes (on other topics)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's fine IMO. grafana does something similar and we're not bound to staging-next cycles which annoys me tbh.
I tested that
substituteInPlace go.mod \
--replace-fail "go 1.24.5" "go 1.24.5"
works too.
Release notes: https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/releases/tag/v1.124.0
Full changelog: VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics@v1.123.0...v1.124.0
Things done
passthru.tests.nixpkgs-reviewon this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage../result/bin/.Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.