Conversation
|
|
@Prince213 I'm not at my laptop, so checking this is difficult, but this is the first time I've noticed that the backport label is on. What version is uv in 25.05 at, and have there been any breaking changes to the CLI between these versions? |
|
@Prince213 alright, checking commit messages on origin/release-25.05 states that |
I see no reason for not doing it. If you have some spare time, please go for it. |
|
Wait a second, doesn't this backport break the Python module? @GaetanLepage @Prince213 In |
bengsparks
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR looks fine, backport requires more discussion at this moment.
|
Backport failed for Please cherry-pick the changes locally and resolve any conflicts. git fetch origin release-25.05
git worktree add -d .worktree/backport-419921-to-release-25.05 origin/release-25.05
cd .worktree/backport-419921-to-release-25.05
git switch --create backport-419921-to-release-25.05
git cherry-pick -x f2729d852c04e595b3e7051f87f65403b695a8bf |
|
Hi @bengsparks and @GaetanLepage thanks for the merge. Until recently I've been paying little efforts into backporting PRs as I'm a {nixos,nixpkgs}-unstable user, even for those that are acceptable for releases and I'm trying to change that. A quick search for the word `break' didn't find any results so it should be okay to backport the changes. I see that #420015 has been merged already. What else needs to be done? |
Now we should be able to backport the updates indeed. |
|
Okay I'll handle the backports. |
Release notes: https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/releases/tag/0.7.15
Things done
nix.conf? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxedsandbox = truenix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.