lixPackageSets.stable.lix: 2.91 -> 2.92

[ipetkov]

The lixPackageSets.stable bump to 2.92 was blocked on https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/issues/662 which appears to be resolved with #396200

cc @lf- in case this is incorrect!

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[9999years]

#396200 is not quite in master yet, but soon!

https://nixpk.gs/pr-tracker.html?pr=396200

[ipetkov]

Ah thank you, I missed that it was targeting staging 😅

[acid-bong]

v2.93.0 is already out, is there a point in this PR?

[ipetkov]

1. This PR was opened before the new release was announced
2. The 2.93 release has not been packaged yet, so there's still a point to landing this in the meantime.

[RaitoBezarius]

I'm still in favor of skipping 2.92 for now and just package 2.93 for the simplicity of maintenance.

[ipetkov]

Alternatively I could have this MR re-target staging instead and let the changes rollout as they roll out in case there are other delays packaging 2.93. But I'll defer to the Lix maintainers here, just let me know whether to close this or keep waiting for #396200 to hit master!

[ipetkov]

Based on the conversation in #398141 looks like there's a regression in 2.93 which prevents it from being considered stable. Until it is resolved I still think there is value in bumping stable to 2.92

[ipetkov]

Closing based on: #426260 (comment)