SDL_compat: mark broken on darwin

[willcohen]

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[willcohen]

Noted during nixpkgs-review of #380263. Already broken on master, but darwin still tries to rebuild unsuccessfully on bump of binaryen and emscripten.

[willcohen]

Relevant for #403336

[Rhys-T]

If this is about the install_name_tool failure, I just tracked that down and submitted a fix in #405464 (not reviewed yet).

Edit: And then realized that #405305 makes it redundant.

[LordGrimmauld]

I'll close this in favor of #405305. No good reason to mark something broken that can be fixed.

[willcohen]

Thank you — sorry for missing.

[LordGrimmauld]

All good, the fix was opened after the mark-broken was opened. And even if that weren't the case, you broke nothing.