Conversation
|
(I'm afraid I don't have capacity.) |
Mindavi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This seems to make sense to me and is well explained in the comments.
This includes NixOS/nixpkgs#380325 and should fix the nix-qemu-esp32c3-rust-example.
|
Bisect says 5e2e98f It fails both on |
|
On current nixpkgs master we would work around this by --- a/pkgs/by-name/cl/claws-mail/package.nix
+++ b/pkgs/by-name/cl/claws-mail/package.nix
@@ -331,6 +331,12 @@ stdenv.mkDerivation rec {
feature: map (flag: lib.strings.enableFeature feature.enabled flag) feature.flags
) features);
+ # FIXME: ugly hack for https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/389009
+ postConfigure = ''
+ substituteInPlace libtool \
+ --replace 'for search_ext in .la $std_shrext .so .a' 'for search_ext in $std_shrext .so .a'
+ '';
+
enableParallelBuilding = true;
preFixup = ''I didn't push this one, as the package won't build anyway, for a different reason. |
|
And on current staging we have a general fix. |
Along with |
Tested
nix build .#pkgsCross.mingw32.libarchive .#pkgsCross.aarch64-multiplatform.libarchive .#gccgo .#libgccjit .#loadlibrary.Things done
nix.conf? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxedsandbox = truenix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.