surrealist 3.0.8 -> 3.1.9

[MDM23]

• Changelog
• Diff

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[pbsbot]

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 373428

---

x86_64-linux

✅ 1 package built:

• surrealist

[pbsds]

Hi, is it possible to create a nixos test for surrealdb? That would greatly increase confidence when testing bumps :)

[MDM23]

@pbsds You mean like automatically testing some basic functionality of the compiled binary together with surrealdb? I'm not sure if it is possibly, as surrealist currently does not provide any command line interface. What do you got in mind?

[pbsds]

I was mainly thinking of testing the nixos module, checking that it is able to set up a new DB and do some basic operations on it. But if there are no cli interfaces nor any language bindings in nixpkgs than that is a blocker

[MDM23]

For surrealdb alone, it should be doable. So a test of its nixos module would be a great addition! We can issue queries from the CLI.

surrealist however is just a GUI client, so I don't see any possibility for an integration test there.

[pbsds]

ah, my misunderstanding!