mtkclient: init at 2.0.1

[kintrix007]

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[kintrix007]

Currently running nixpkgs-review
Ran successfully.

[jackyliu16]

I'm not a expert, but there is a little bit weird, which you are trying to contains a cpp pkgs in python.

I have a couple of guesses about this illogical operation:

1. You mistook python package keystone into pkgs.keystone, for this guess, we could prove the hypothesis via open requirement. You might want to use keystone-engine or python-keystoneclient to fix it.
2. You actually want to contains pkgs.keystone in your project

[kintrix007]

Yes, you are 100% right. I accidentally left it in there. It was meant to only include keystone-engine.

[FliegendeWurst]

Why are you not using python3Packages.buildPythonApplication?

[kintrix007]

Why are you not using python3Packages.buildPythonApplication?

Sorry for the very late reply. I was trying to make it work with it but something was going wrong and I also did not know how to change the derivation to actually work. So instead I wrote it in a way that I understood.

I unfortunately do not remember what exactly was going wrong.

[shymega]

This can be closed in favour of #432318, which is now in-tree.