python312Packages.textual: 0.72.0 -> 0.75.0

[greg-hellings]

Description of changes

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[greg-hellings]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 332289 run on x86_64-linux 1
8 packages failed to build:
38 packages built:

Those 8 failures are not a result of this change, but rather of this PR.

I have already created a separate PR to address the graphrag failure and another to address the browsr failure.

textual-paint uses an internally pinned version of textual as well, pinned to an antique version, in order to satisfy its upstream requirements.txt pins. Therefore, this change does not impact it, either.

[drupol]

Please pass the file through nixfmt-rfc-style

[greg-hellings]

Please pass the file through nixfmt-rfc-style

I have. No change.

[natsukium]

Please also check the diff.
It is obvious that the hash has not been updated and the change in optional-dependencies is inappropriate without explanation.

[drupol]

My mistake on this. I did this review on the phone and I should pay more attention. Sorry for the trouble.

[natsukium]

Never mind. Thanks for all your reviews.