hyprpaper: 0.5.0 -> 0.6.0

[fufexan]

Description of changes

• hyprlang: init at 0.2.1 (new dependency of hyprpaper)
• hyprpaper: 0.5.0 -> 0.6.0

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[geri1701]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 278364 run on x86_64-linux 1

3 packages built:

• hyprlang
• hyprlang.dev
• hyprpaper

[ghost]

remove the changes in pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix and rebase when #278784 merges.

[ghost]

i believe this needs to get rebased off master to pull in #278784
not sure why it is not registering a merge-conflict with the changes to pkgs/by-name/hy/hyprlang/package.nix and pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix

[edit] seems this might be ok if the changes are identical to what is in master.

[fufexan]

The hyprlang commit is the same, I made sure of that. Probably why it doesn't trigger a conflict.

[ghost]

The hyprlang commit is the same, I made sure of that. Probably why it doesn't trigger a conflict.

ok -- nixpkgs-review did the right thing too -- no merge conflicts.

however, the aarch64-linux build is failing

/nix/store/wjkn3fmykn68rbpnamj9kzgw263xcga2-binutils-2.40/bin/ld: /nix/store/hddv2aciqs8k8pza6nsrhxki3ri60n1p-hyprlang-0.2.1/lib/libhyprlang.so: undefined reference to `std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_replace_cold(char*, unsigned long, char const*, unsigned long, unsigned long)@GLIBCXX_3.4.31'

[fufexan]

My bad, syncing through github does a merge instead of rebase. I'm in the middle of a pretty big rebase (9000+ commits) in nixpkgs currently, so I'll do this rebase after that's done.

[ghost]

however, the aarch64-linux build is failing

/nix/store/wjkn3fmykn68rbpnamj9kzgw263xcga2-binutils-2.40/bin/ld: /nix/store/hddv2aciqs8k8pza6nsrhxki3ri60n1p-hyprlang-0.2.1/lib/libhyprlang.so: undefined reference to `std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_replace_cold(char*, unsigned long, char const*, unsigned long, unsigned long)@GLIBCXX_3.4.31'

i think this link error is due to using gcc13 for libhyprlang but hyprpaper is gcc12 on aarch64-linux, so you'll have to add the gcc13stdev to hyprpaper in all-packages.nix too.

[edit] looks like #272674 is in staging-next, so whenever that merges in to master (1 month?) gcc13 will be the default for aarch64-linux as well.

[ghost]

@ofborg build hyprpaper