Skip to content

addDriverRunpath: init#269475

Merged
Atemu merged 3 commits intoNixOS:masterfrom
jonringer:addhardwarerunpath-mini
Dec 3, 2023
Merged

addDriverRunpath: init#269475
Atemu merged 3 commits intoNixOS:masterfrom
jonringer:addhardwarerunpath-mini

Conversation

@jonringer
Copy link
Contributor

@jonringer jonringer commented Nov 23, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Description of changes

Less opinionated version of #196174

Allows for usage of addDriverRunapth, this way the setuphook is available to allow for a larger window for people to transition from addOpenGLRunpath setuphook.

Additional Context: rfc #121

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 23.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Priorities

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@mweinelt mweinelt requested a review from Atemu November 23, 2023 18:27
@github-actions github-actions bot added 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 8.has: documentation This PR adds or changes documentation 8.has: changelog This PR adds or changes release notes labels Nov 23, 2023
@jonringer
Copy link
Contributor Author

jonringer commented Nov 23, 2023

should cudaPackages.autoAddOpenGLRunpathHook be promoted to top-level pkgs? I feel like it should

@mweinelt mweinelt requested a review from a team November 23, 2023 19:03
knedlsepp
knedlsepp approved these changes Nov 23, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@knedlsepp knedlsepp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Much more intuitive! 👍

jonringer
jonringer commented Nov 23, 2023
View reviewed changes
jonringer
jonringer commented Nov 23, 2023
View reviewed changes
@ofborg ofborg bot added 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 10.rebuild-linux: 1 This PR causes 1 package to rebuild on Linux. labels Nov 23, 2023
@SomeoneSerge
Copy link
Contributor

SomeoneSerge commented Nov 23, 2023 •
edited
Loading

This is obviously an improvement.

Since we don't change the names too often, I wonder if we do want the new name to suggest that there should be one "merged" path for all of the impure dependencies: be that libgbm, or libcuda, or whatever is the next thing. This means that if we expose something impure to a program, we expose everything at once.

Btw the link to the rendered rfc is now broken

@ofborg ofborg bot removed the 10.rebuild-linux: 1 This PR causes 1 package to rebuild on Linux. label Nov 23, 2023
Atemu
Atemu reviewed Nov 24, 2023
View reviewed changes
@jonringer
Copy link
Contributor Author

jonringer commented Nov 24, 2023

changed the name to addDriverRunpath, as it is more aligned with "this is where the drivers are located" rather than "this is where the hardware is located"

Atemu
Atemu approved these changes Nov 25, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@Atemu Atemu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Diff LGTM!

@delroth delroth added the 12.approvals: 2 This PR was reviewed and approved by two persons. label Nov 25, 2023
samuela
samuela approved these changes Nov 25, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@samuela samuela left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! Thank you so much for spearheading this @jonringer -- an important cleanup!

@delroth delroth added 12.approvals: 3+ This PR was reviewed and approved by three or more persons. and removed 12.approvals: 2 This PR was reviewed and approved by two persons. labels Nov 25, 2023
@jonringer
Copy link
Contributor Author

jonringer commented Nov 30, 2023

cc @infinisil before I start updating the Nixpkgs Manual entries, and doing a treewide rename.

@ConnorBaker ConnorBaker added the 6.topic: cuda Parallel computing platform and API label Nov 30, 2023
@infinisil
Copy link
Member

infinisil commented Dec 2, 2023

Just from a glance this looks fine to me :)

@Atemu
Copy link
Member

Atemu commented Dec 3, 2023

Needs a rebase for the 24.05 manual, then we can merge :)

@Atemu Atemu merged commit fd7f5fd into NixOS:master Dec 3, 2023
@puetzk puetzk mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2023
Merged
13 tasks
@Scrumplex Scrumplex mentioned this pull request Dec 18, 2023
Merged
13 tasks
@SomeoneSerge SomeoneSerge mentioned this pull request Dec 24, 2023
Closed
10 tasks
SomeoneSerge added a commit to SomeoneSerge/nixpkgs that referenced this pull request Dec 25, 2023
@SomeoneSerge
nixos/opengl: rename into generic impure-drivers
899b22c 
In line with NixOS#269475
@infinisil infinisil mentioned this pull request Jan 4, 2024
Closed
minghongx pushed a commit to Dengyu-Wu/snncutoff that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2024
build(flake): add workaround for enabling CUDA on non-NixOS systems
1a2af96 
Bibliography:
- https://discourse.nixos.org/t/on-nixpkgs-and-the-ai-follow-up-to-2023-nix-developer-dialogues/37087
- https://nixos.org/community/teams/cuda
  - https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/27
- https://alternativebit.fr/posts/nixos/nix-opengl-and-ubuntu-integration-nightmare
  - https://lobste.rs/s/7h20zl/nix_opengl_ubuntu_integration_nightmare
- NixOS/nixpkgs#11390 (comment)
  - NixOS/nixpkgs#269475
- tweag/nix-hour#61
minghongx pushed a commit to Dengyu-Wu/snncutoff that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2024
build(flake): add workaround for enabling CUDA on non-NixOS systems
846daca 
Bibliography:
- https://discourse.nixos.org/t/on-nixpkgs-and-the-ai-follow-up-to-2023-nix-developer-dialogues/37087
- https://nixos.org/community/teams/cuda
  - https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/27
- https://alternativebit.fr/posts/nixos/nix-opengl-and-ubuntu-integration-nightmare
  - https://lobste.rs/s/7h20zl/nix_opengl_ubuntu_integration_nightmare
- NixOS/nixpkgs#11390 (comment)
  - NixOS/nixpkgs#269475
- tweag/nix-hour#61
minghongx pushed a commit to Dengyu-Wu/snncutoff that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2024
build(flake): add workaround for enabling CUDA on non-NixOS systems
23aea20 
Bibliography:
- https://discourse.nixos.org/t/on-nixpkgs-and-the-ai-follow-up-to-2023-nix-developer-dialogues/37087
- https://nixos.org/community/teams/cuda
  - https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/27
- https://alternativebit.fr/posts/nixos/nix-opengl-and-ubuntu-integration-nightmare
  - https://lobste.rs/s/7h20zl/nix_opengl_ubuntu_integration_nightmare
- NixOS/nixpkgs#11390 (comment)
  - NixOS/nixpkgs#269475
- tweag/nix-hour#61
minghongx pushed a commit to Dengyu-Wu/snncutoff that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2024
build(flake): add workaround for enabling CUDA on non-NixOS systems
664b906 
Bibliography:
- https://discourse.nixos.org/t/on-nixpkgs-and-the-ai-follow-up-to-2023-nix-developer-dialogues/37087
- https://nixos.org/community/teams/cuda
  - https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/27
- https://alternativebit.fr/posts/nixos/nix-opengl-and-ubuntu-integration-nightmare
  - https://lobste.rs/s/7h20zl/nix_opengl_ubuntu_integration_nightmare
- NixOS/nixpkgs#11390 (comment)
  - NixOS/nixpkgs#269475
- tweag/nix-hour#61
@SomeoneSerge SomeoneSerge mentioned this pull request Apr 3, 2024
Merged
13 tasks
@0david0mp

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Sign in to view
@Atemu

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Sign in to view
@0david0mp

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Sign in to view
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@samuela samuela samuela approved these changes

@Atemu Atemu Atemu approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@knedlsepp knedlsepp knedlsepp approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

6.topic: cuda Parallel computing platform and API 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 8.has: changelog This PR adds or changes release notes 8.has: documentation This PR adds or changes documentation 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 12.approvals: 3+ This PR was reviewed and approved by three or more persons.

Projects

CUDA Team
Status: ✅ Done

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants

@jonringer @SomeoneSerge @infinisil @Atemu @0david0mp @samuela @knedlsepp @delroth @ConnorBaker