Conversation
|
Result of 1 package built:
|
|
Thanks for updating the package! The beta/development/canary version is using a different namespace, so it does not use the existing data (login, installed games). stable: That is by design: itchio/itch#1906 So it seem better to create a new package for the canary version to not confuse users. kitch is the official name: https://itchio.itch.io/kitch which is also used by AUR. Mention the different location in the package description. Otherwiese the meta from the stable package can be used. Program works fine. Tested with games: |
|
The idea of having both itch and kitch in nixpkgs doesn't convince me... |
We have beta versions for other packages, like browsers. But it's an additional package for a different audience. If they offer it to users, why not package it?
This package has to be updated to the next stable version to keep working as the user expects. |
|
I am trying to build it but |
|
Reopening because Itch is now not working at all. With this, it works again. |
|
This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/2880 |
|
Anything missing for this to be merged? |
|
This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/2922 |
Description of changes
While this new version is still a beta (some of the icons will be blue), the Electron version is not insecure anymore, with the number literally doubled (from 11 to 22).
Closes #220844 for real.
Closes #252457.
Things done
sandbox = trueset innix.conf? (See Nix manual)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)