libsForQt5.qca-qt5_2_3_2: drop

[NickCao]

Description of changes

There seems to be no reference to it now.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 22.11 Release Notes (or backporting 22.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[ajs124]

We should also drop the file then. Actually, you might be able to just revert 252458b.

This was introduced in #168506, but a search with git log -p -Gqca-qt5_2_3_2 does not show that it was ever used in nixpkgs.

cc @ttuegel @willcohen

[willcohen]

The packages that might have used this are still broken on my end, so you correctly note it's not actually used anymore. I don't even have an intel mac anymore, so the SDK being held back doesn't affect me as much as it once did -- if I can get things working on aarch and qt 5.15+, I think that's enough. In a worst case scenario, I suppose it can be re-added again down the line.