systemd: 246.6 -> 247

[Mic92]

Motivation for this change

Things done

• Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
• Built on platform(s)
  • NixOS
  • macOS
  • other Linux distributions
• Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
• Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
• Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
• Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[Mic92]

@flokli @arianvp feel free to push on top. Build is fixed but I have not booted from it yet.

[Mic92]

I upstreamed systemd/systemd#17580 which means a big patch less between nixos-systemd and upstream. This is included in rc2.

[arianvp]

We should make sure all our udev rules of all our packages are compatible before we can merge this. Due to the breaking changes in the handling of bind and unbind events.

[flokli]

[…] all our udev rules of all our packages are compatible before we can merge this […]

I'd say that's a bit ambitions, if not unrealistic, as this is all manual testing - or is there a easy search pattern to spot these incompatibilities?

Before merging, we should do a much more thorough testing of all the GUI VM tests, to spot regressions (and it'd help to have a Hydra jobset for this, so more people can test), but "Unstable" is the right place to track some of these regressions in less-popular components.

[flokli]

247 was released, I updated this PR to drop systemd/systemd#17608 included in the final release, and reflowed the patches once more.

[flokli]

This needed another rebase apparently.

@Mic92 what's your take on this? Should we let this cook in staging a bit? I ran a bunch of tests, but can't rebuild the world ;-)

[Mic92]

This needed another rebase apparently.

@Mic92 what's your take on this? Should we let this cook in staging a bit? I ran a bunch of tests, but can't rebuild the world ;-)

I am using this on my laptop for a while now.

[TredwellGit]

#105850 (comment)
#105747 (comment)
Reverting ef050bc unbreaks the packages.

[andersk]

This seems to have broken the channel-blocking networking.networkd.privacy test: #106858.

[FRidh]

#106858

Friday evening I intend to revert the systemd upgrade unless there is a tested fix before then.