Skip to content

fix(public): remove internal editorial and submission-prep copy from the four app pages - #28

Merged
nish3451 merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
fix/public-app-copy-internal-notes
Aug 9, 2026
Merged

fix(public): remove internal editorial and submission-prep copy from the four app pages#28
nish3451 merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
fix/public-app-copy-internal-notes

Conversation

@nish3451

@nish3451 nish3451 commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

What

Internal editorial and submission-prep notes were live as visible copy on the four public app pages. Visitors could read notes meant for the studio's own planning: launch notes, App Store Connect / submission-readiness language, and self-referential editorial commentary ("already", "current build", "in the meantime", "what this page already does").

Changed pages

Page Internal note removed
/promptly/ "Launch note" block, "What this page already does" aside, "already positioned … can slot into that story later", "current build data already points to", "What Promptly already centers"
/drishti/ "Launch note" block, "stable enough for submission", "already feels like a real product", "current product definition / app data already", "What Drishti already emphasizes", "Practice layers in the current build"
/promptly/support/ "already public and easy to use", "App Store support destination", "ready now", "Useful before launch and after it", "already stable enough for App Store Connect"
/drishti/support/ "in place before launch day", "Use this page as the public support URL", "in the meantime", "Ready for real support traffic", "Everything a launch page needs nearby", "already works for submission … after launch"

Each passage is rewritten as visitor-facing copy describing the product or the support route, keeping the site's truthful no-launch-claims stance. No titles, meta descriptions, heading levels, links, or JSON-LD changed.

Out of scope by design: the /contact/ page's "internal measurement marker" disclosure is a deliberate, test-enforced privacy disclosure (test-public-conversion-signal.mjs pins it), and the shared footer tagline ("clean public foundation before launch") is identical studio copy across all twelve pages.

Verification

  • npm test — exit 0 (full repo gate)
  • test-public-heading-hierarchy — 18 checks, 0 failures
  • test-public-link-targets — 74 checks, 0 failures
  • test-public-structured-data — 31 checks, 0 failures
  • test-public-conversion-signal — 126 checks, 0 failures
  • git diff --check — clean

…he four app pages

Promptly and Drishti product and support pages carried internal
submission-prep notes as visible copy: launch notes, App Store
Connect/submission readiness language, and editorial self-commentary
("already", "current build", "in the meantime", "what this page
already does").

Rewrite those passages as visitor-facing copy that describes the
product and the support route without referencing the internal
submission process. Heading levels, links, meta tags, and JSON-LD
are unchanged.

@greptile-apps greptile-apps Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nish3451 has reached the 50-credit limit for trial accounts. To continue receiving code reviews, upgrade your plan.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@nish3451, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 26 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: ecb581c0-a24a-4468-bbfd-43575e87a02f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9165305 and d41495f.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • public/drishti/index.html
  • public/drishti/support/index.html
  • public/promptly/index.html
  • public/promptly/support/index.html

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@greptile-apps greptile-apps Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nish3451 has reached the 50-credit limit for trial accounts. To continue receiving code reviews, upgrade your plan.

…nternal-notes

# Conflicts:
#	public/drishti/support/index.html

@greptile-apps greptile-apps Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nish3451 has reached the 50-credit limit for trial accounts. To continue receiving code reviews, upgrade your plan.

@nish3451
nish3451 merged commit e71a689 into main Aug 9, 2026
3 checks passed
nish3451 added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2026
… support and contact pages (#31)

The Studio-level /support/ and /contact/ pages still carried
submission-prep notes as visible copy after the app pages were
cleaned in #28: references to App Store Connect URLs, App Store
submission readiness, app store reviewers, and launch-page staging
rules.

Rewrite those passages as visitor-facing copy that describes the
support inbox, the app-specific pages, and the contact routes
without referencing the internal submission process. Heading
levels, links, meta tags, and JSON-LD are unchanged.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant