Skip to content

docs(evidence): re-verify broken external links finding 78fcaed682fa on current head and live (2026-08-20) - #258

Merged
nish3451 merged 31 commits into
mainfrom
docs/broken-external-links-rereverify-2026-08-20
Aug 21, 2026
Merged

docs(evidence): re-verify broken external links finding 78fcaed682fa on current head and live (2026-08-20)#258
nish3451 merged 31 commits into
mainfrom
docs/broken-external-links-rereverify-2026-08-20

Conversation

@nish3451

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Re-verification receipt for dogfood finding 78fcaed682fa — "Broken external links on /audit.html" (audit run 20260808T074205Z-msk2fl3n, issue-19), against current origin/main (0540cf9) and the live deployment.

Verdict

Closed — no broken external link found, no code change needed. Evidence only, in the established pattern of the 2026-08-11 closeout (PR #33) and the 2026-08-12/14/15 re-verifications.

What was verified

  • npm run check passes — the 78fcaed682fa guard still rejects any App Store family citation URL without an app id, and the embedded audit-page bundle still matches the fixtures byte-for-byte.
  • npm test passes (exit 0).
  • Live https://tinystudio.io/audit and https://tinystudio.io/audit.html both serve HTTP 200.
  • All 15 unique citation URLs on the live page resolve 200 (redirects followed).
  • The App Store citation is the id-carrying form (.../us/app/tinystudio/id6448954288) and resolves 200.
  • Baseline: the dead bare-slug https://apps.apple.com/app/tinystudio still returns 404 and remains absent from both the served bundle and the fixture.

Note

The live deployment currently serves the 2026-08-12 evidence set (15 runs) while current main carries the 2026-08-15 controlled re-run (16 runs, PR #227) — a deployment lag, not a regression. No dead link exists on either surface; the source guard re-locks bundle=fixture equality on the next deploy.

Full method and measurements in the receipt.

…on current head and live (2026-08-20)

Co-authored-by: CommandCodeBot <noreply@commandcode.ai>
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@nish3451, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 31 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

Wait for the limit to reset, then comment @coderabbitai review or push new commits to the PR.

An organization admin can change what happens after included review limits in Billing.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits within each organization.

For paid Pro and Pro+ reviews, CodeRabbit uses a developer's included PR review attempts over the past 7 days to set the current hourly allowance. At typical activity levels, the full plan allowance applies. Higher sustained activity can lower the allowance until earlier attempts leave the 7-day window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Free

Run ID: 7d1cb65e-e86b-45f6-98f5-4cc292f98643

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 163c0b4 and 0330862.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .lane/reports/docs-broken-external-links-rereverify-2026-08-20.md

Note

🎁 Summarized by CodeRabbit Free

Your organization is on the Free plan. CodeRabbit will generate a high-level summary and a walkthrough for each pull request. For a comprehensive line-by-line review, please upgrade your subscription to CodeRabbit Pro by visiting https://app.coderabbit.ai/settings/billing.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@nish3451
nish3451 merged commit aba2e5b into main Aug 21, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant