docs(evidence): re-verify product-contract round-1 harvest against current main and live (2026-08-20, lane 1)

[nish3451]

Re-verifies the abandoned product-contract round-1 candidate work (tracker item f168b00e05 — 'repository product contract still identifies the retired Agent Desk as current') against the current origin/main (d0daea9) and live (2026-08-20), so the tracker item stays closed against drift and cannot re-open.

No code change. The closeout receipt is at:

• docs/evidence/product-contract-round1-harvest-2026-08-20.md
• .lane/reports/docs-evidence-product-contract-round1-harvest-2026-08-20.md

This extends the 2026-08-17 re-verification (PR #240) onto the current main. The contract is intact: specs/004-website-appraisal/plan.md opens with Status: CURRENT, specs 001/002 carry Status: HISTORICAL — retired, spec 003 carries Status: SUPERSEDED — historical campaign plan, and README.md / MEMORY.md / package.json mirror the Website Appraisal truth. The product-contract guard (scripts/test-product-contract.mjs) passes 8/8 against the current head, and https://tinystudio.io/, /llms.txt, and /offer.md all return HTTP 200 with the correct current-offer framing.

Greptile Summary

The PR adds a documentation receipt and matching lane report re-verifying that the Website Appraisal remains the current product contract and that the retired Agent Desk framing has not returned.

• Records current plan-status markers and top-level repository descriptors.
• Records product-contract and site-check results.
• Records live-site checks and the boundary of the verification.
• Repeats worktree-harvest continuity claims whose cited source is not committed.

Confidence Score: 4/5

The documentation-only PR appears safe to merge, with a non-blocking reproducibility gap in the worktree-harvest evidence.

The checked current-contract, test-wiring, and status-marker claims agree with the repository, but maintainers cannot independently verify the historical worktree claims because the cited continuity record is absent.

Files Needing Attention: docs/evidence/product-contract-round1-harvest-2026-08-20.md; .lane/reports/docs-evidence-product-contract-round1-harvest-2026-08-20.md

Important Files Changed

Filename	Overview
docs/evidence/product-contract-round1-harvest-2026-08-20.md	Adds the primary re-verification receipt; its current-contract claims match the repository, but its worktree history depends on an unavailable continuity file.
.lane/reports/docs-evidence-product-contract-round1-harvest-2026-08-20.md	Adds the corresponding lane report and repeats the same non-reproducible continuity citation.

Prompt To Fix All With AI

### Issue 1
docs/evidence/product-contract-round1-harvest-2026-08-20.md:16-17
**Uncommitted continuity source**

The receipt attributes its eight-worktree inventory and no-work-left conclusion to `agent-state/tinystudio-io-improvement-loop/retired-cycles.md`, but that path is absent from the repository. Commit the source or explicitly identify and preserve the external evidence so maintainers can independently reproduce this portion of the closeout.

---

For each issue above, determine whether it is valid and should be fixed. If so, fix it directly.

_{Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "docs(evidence): re-verify product-contra..." | Re-trigger Greptile}

Greptile also left 1 inline comment on this PR.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@nish3451, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 26 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

Wait for the limit to reset, then comment @coderabbitai review or push new commits to the PR.

An organization admin can change what happens after included review limits in Billing.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits within each organization.

For paid Pro and Pro+ reviews, CodeRabbit uses a developer's included PR review attempts over the past 7 days to set the current hourly allowance. At typical activity levels, the full plan allowance applies. Higher sustained activity can lower the allowance until earlier attempts leave the 7-day window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Free

Run ID: 1e13e670-5aa4-4fad-96ff-2b7f72f63140

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d0daea9 and 8bc4f69.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .lane/reports/docs-evidence-product-contract-round1-harvest-2026-08-20.md
• docs/evidence/product-contract-round1-harvest-2026-08-20.md

---

Note

🎁 Summarized by CodeRabbit Free

Your organization is on the Free plan. CodeRabbit will generate a high-level summary and a walkthrough for each pull request. For a comprehensive line-by-line review, please upgrade your subscription to CodeRabbit Pro by visiting https://app.coderabbit.ai/login.

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[greptile-apps]

Uncommitted continuity source

The receipt attributes its eight-worktree inventory and no-work-left conclusion to agent-state/tinystudio-io-improvement-loop/retired-cycles.md, but that path is absent from the repository. Commit the source or explicitly identify and preserve the external evidence so maintainers can independently reproduce this portion of the closeout.

Prompt To Fix With AI

This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: docs/evidence/product-contract-round1-harvest-2026-08-20.md
Line: 16-17

Comment:
**Uncommitted continuity source**

The receipt attributes its eight-worktree inventory and no-work-left conclusion to `agent-state/tinystudio-io-improvement-loop/retired-cycles.md`, but that path is absent from the repository. Commit the source or explicitly identify and preserve the external evidence so maintainers can independently reproduce this portion of the closeout.

---

For each issue above, determine whether it is valid and should be fixed. If so, fix it directly.