Skip to content

docs(evidence): re-verify product-contract round-1 harvest against current main and live (2026-08-17, lane 1) - #240

Merged
nish3451 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/evidence-product-contract-round1-harvest-2026-08-17
Aug 17, 2026
Merged

docs(evidence): re-verify product-contract round-1 harvest against current main and live (2026-08-17, lane 1)#240
nish3451 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/evidence-product-contract-round1-harvest-2026-08-17

Conversation

@nish3451

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Re-verifies the abandoned f168b00e05 candidate round (seven candidate worktrees plus the lane-1 worktree at 96a10b3) against origin/main 5ca6241 and live.

Outcome: nothing further to change; the abandoned round-1 candidate work is fully represented in current main and live:

  • repository product contract: README, MEMORY, package.json name The Website Appraisal as the current offer; specs 001/002 carry Status: HISTORICAL - retired.; spec 003 carries Status: SUPERSEDED - historical campaign plan.; spec 004 carries Status: CURRENT.
  • /api/signups storage disclosure in specs/004-website-appraisal/plan.md Boundaries (line 38) is byte-identical to the abandoned draft.
  • review-gap contract-guard refinements from the abandoned uncommitted draft are landed in scripts/test-product-contract.mjs: bounded leading-banner status declaration (hasLeadingStatus), per-claim AGENT_DESK_ACTIVE_PATTERNS evaluation iterating matchAll, negation-precedes-term guarantee check (clause.slice(0, term.index)), and WEBSITE_STORED / WEBSITE_NOT_STORED disclosure guards.
  • node --test scripts/test-product-contract.mjs -> 8/8 pass (including the known bad shape fixtures and the WEBSITE_STORED boundary-disclosure assertion).
  • node scripts/check-site.mjs -> TinyStudio.io checks passed.
  • Live (2026-08-17): https://tinystudio.io/, /llms.txt, /offer.md all HTTP 200, names The Website Appraisal, and the demotion line (is demoted and is not the current offer) is intact.
  • Repository-descriptor drift between PR docs(contract): make the Website Appraisal the active repo truth #58 (11864a7) and current main: only toolchain/feature commits (wrangler ^4.120.1, 2026-08-17 favicon SVG landing, GoodFirms/Clutch/render-blocking/apple-touch-icon/AI-search/pipeline-bridge re-verifications, retired-Agent-Desk canonical fix, appraisal autocomplete=email patch); zero contract drift.

Tracker item f168b00e05 (repository product contract still identifies the retired Agent Desk as current) can be ticked with reason: round-1 candidate work harvested through PR #58 and re-verified against 5ca6241 and live on 2026-08-17; nothing further to change.

…rrent main and live (2026-08-17, lane 1)

Re-verifies the abandoned f168b00e05 candidate round (seven candidate
worktrees plus the lane-1 worktree at 96a10b3) against origin/main
5ca6241 and live: the Website Appraisal remains the current repo truth,
specs 001/002 HISTORICAL and 003 SUPERSEDED, the uncommitted guard
refinements from the abandoned draft are landed in main, and the
deterministic contract guard passes 8/8.

Outcome: nothing further to change; tracker item f168b00e05 stays
closed against drift on the current head and live.
@nish3451 nish3451 added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Aug 17, 2026
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@greptile-apps greptile-apps Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your trial has ended. Reactivate Greptile to resume code reviews.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@nish3451, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 29 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used all 1 included review currently available under your plan.

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Free

Run ID: 982d5645-720d-402d-a0c5-c5cb62789623

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b4631a3 and 5a6f449.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .lane/reports/docs-evidence-product-contract-round1-harvest-2026-08-17.md
  • docs/evidence/product-contract-round1-harvest-2026-08-17.md

Note

🎁 Summarized by CodeRabbit Free

Your organization is on the Free plan. CodeRabbit will generate a high-level summary and a walkthrough for each pull request. For a comprehensive line-by-line review, please upgrade your subscription to CodeRabbit Pro by visiting https://app.coderabbit.ai/login.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@greptile-apps greptile-apps Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your trial has ended. Reactivate Greptile to resume code reviews.

@nish3451
nish3451 merged commit 3dc5856 into main Aug 17, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant