-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 222
skills/cuopt-routing-api-python: update with benchmark details #1333
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ | ||
| # Evaluation Report | ||
|
|
||
| Evaluation of the `cuopt-routing-api-python` skill before publication through NVSkills-Eval. | ||
|
|
||
| This benchmark summarizes 3-Tier Evaluation from NVSkills-Eval results for the skill. The goal is to document whether the skill is safe, discoverable, effective, and useful for agents before it is published for broader workflow use. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Evaluation Summary | ||
|
|
||
| - Skill: `cuopt-routing-api-python` | ||
| - Evaluation date: 2026-05-29 | ||
| - NVSkills-Eval profile: `external` | ||
| - Environment: `local` | ||
| - Dataset: 1 evaluation tasks | ||
| - Attempts per task: 2 | ||
| - Pass threshold: 50% | ||
| - Overall verdict: FAIL | ||
|
|
||
| ## Agents Used | ||
|
|
||
| - `claude-code` | ||
| - `codex` | ||
|
|
||
| ## Metrics Used | ||
|
|
||
| Reported benchmark dimensions: | ||
|
|
||
| - Security: checks whether skill-assisted execution avoids unsafe behavior such as secret leakage, destructive commands, or unauthorized access. | ||
| - Correctness: checks whether the agent follows the expected workflow and produces the correct final output. | ||
| - Discoverability: checks whether the agent loads the skill when relevant and avoids using it when irrelevant. | ||
| - Effectiveness: checks whether the agent performs measurably better with the skill than without it. | ||
| - Efficiency: checks whether the agent uses fewer tokens and avoids redundant work. | ||
|
|
||
| Underlying evaluation signals used in this run: | ||
|
|
||
| - `security` (Security): checks for unsafe operations, secret leakage, and unauthorized access. | ||
| - `skill_execution` (Skill Execution): verifies that the agent loaded the expected skill and workflow. | ||
| - `skill_efficiency` (Efficiency): checks routing quality, decoy avoidance, and redundant tool usage. | ||
| - `accuracy` (Accuracy): grades final-answer correctness against the reference answer. | ||
| - `goal_accuracy` (Goal Accuracy): checks whether the overall user task completed successfully. | ||
| - `behavior_check` (Behavior Check): verifies expected behavior steps, including safety expectations. | ||
| - `token_efficiency` (Token Efficiency): compares token usage with and without the skill. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Test Tasks | ||
|
|
||
| The benchmark dataset contained 1 evaluation tasks: | ||
|
|
||
| - Positive tasks: 1 tasks where the skill was expected to activate. | ||
| - Negative tasks: 0 tasks where no skill was expected. | ||
| - Unlabeled tasks: 0 tasks where positive/negative intent could not be inferred. | ||
|
|
||
| Task composition is derived from the evaluation dataset when possible. Entries with `expected_skill` set are treated as positive skill-activation cases, while entries with `expected_skill: null` are treated as negative activation cases. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Results | ||
|
|
||
| | Dimension | Num | `claude-code` | `codex` | | ||
| |---|---:|---:|---:| | ||
| | Security | 2 | 100% (+0%) | 100% (+0%) | | ||
| | Correctness | 2 | 100% (+0%) | 95% (+3%) | | ||
| | Discoverability | 2 | 100% (+0%) | 70% (-5%) | | ||
| | Effectiveness | 2 | 83% (+14%) | 83% (+12%) | | ||
| | Efficiency | 2 | 93% (-0%) | 56% (-5%) | | ||
|
|
||
| Score values show skill-assisted performance. Values in parentheses show uplift versus the no-skill baseline when baseline data is available. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Tier 1: Static Validation Summary | ||
|
|
||
| Tier 1 validation passed with observations. NVSkills-Eval ran 9 checks and found 8 total findings. | ||
|
|
||
| Top findings: | ||
|
|
||
| - MEDIUM SCHEMA/body_recommended_section: Missing recommended section: '## Instructions' (`skills/cuopt-routing-api-python/SKILL.md`) | ||
| - MEDIUM SECURITY/Unknown (SQP-2): Binding the cuOpt server to 0.0.0.0 exposes it on all network interfaces, making it accessible to any host that can reac (`references/server_examples.md:7`) | ||
| - LOW QUALITY/quality_discoverability: No '## Purpose' section (`skills/cuopt-routing-api-python/SKILL.md`) | ||
| - LOW QUALITY/quality_reliability: No prerequisites/requirements documented (`skills/cuopt-routing-api-python/SKILL.md`) | ||
| - LOW QUALITY/quality_reliability: No limitations documented (`skills/cuopt-routing-api-python/SKILL.md`) | ||
|
|
||
| ## Tier 2: Deduplication Summary | ||
|
|
||
| Tier 2 validation reported findings. NVSkills-Eval ran 2 checks and found 4 total findings. | ||
|
|
||
| Top findings: | ||
|
|
||
| - HIGH DUPLICATE/duplicate: Duplicate content found within references/server_examples.md: | ||
| "# Poll for solution" in references/server_examples.md (lines 45-51) | ||
| vs "# Poll for solution" in references/server_examples.md (lines 156-162) (`references/server_examples.md:45`) | ||
| - HIGH DUPLICATE/duplicate: Duplicate content found across SKILL.md and references/examples.md: | ||
| "# Capacities" in SKILL.md (lines 30-35) | ||
| vs "# Add capacity dimension (name, demand_per_order, capacity_per_vehicle)" in references/examples.md (lines 73-75) | ||
| vs "# Add capacity dimension" in references/examples.md (lines 156-158) (`SKILL.md:30`) | ||
| - HIGH DUPLICATE/duplicate: Duplicate content found across references/examples.md and references/server_examples.md: | ||
| "## Additional References (tested in CI)" in references/examples.md (lines 237-249) | ||
| vs "## Additional References (tested in CI)" in references/server_examples.md (lines 193-204) (`references/examples.md:237`) | ||
| - HIGH DUPLICATE/duplicate: Duplicate content found across assets/pdp_basic/README.md and assets/pdp_basic/model.py: | ||
| "# Pickup-Delivery (PDP)" in assets/pdp_basic/README.md (lines 1-7) | ||
| vs "(module docstring)" in assets/pdp_basic/model.py (lines 1-2) (`assets/pdp_basic/README.md:1`) | ||
|
|
||
| ## Publication Recommendation | ||
|
|
||
| The skill should be reviewed before NVSkills-Eval publication. Skill owners should address the findings above and rerun NVSkills-Eval to refresh this benchmark. | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -3,12 +3,13 @@ Vehicle routing (VRP, TSP, PDP) with cuOpt — Python API only. Use when the use | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This skill is ready for commercial/non-commercial use. <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ## Owner: NVIDIA <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ## Owner | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NVIDIA <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ### License/Terms of Use: <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Apache 2.0 <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Apache-2.0 <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ## Use Case: <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Developers and engineers building or solving vehicle routing problems (VRP, TSP, PDP) using the NVIDIA cuOpt Python API for fleet logistics and delivery optimization. <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Developers and engineers building or solving vehicle routing problems (VRP, TSP, PDP) using the NVIDIA cuOpt Python API. <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ### Deployment Geography for Use: <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Global <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
@@ -18,17 +19,55 @@ Risk: Review before execution as proposals could introduce incorrect or misleadi | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mitigation: Review and scan skill before deployment. <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ## Reference(s): <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - [Routing Python API Examples](references/examples.md) <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - [Routing REST Server Examples](references/server_examples.md) <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - [Python API Examples (VRP, PDP, multi-depot)](references/examples.md) <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - [REST Server Examples](references/server_examples.md) <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - [cuOpt User Guide](https://docs.nvidia.com/cuopt/user-guide/latest/introduction.html) <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - [cuOpt Examples Repository](https://github.com/NVIDIA/cuopt-examples) <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ## Skill Output: <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| **Output Type(s):** [Code, API Calls] <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| **Output Format:** [Markdown with inline Python code blocks] <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| **Output Format:** [Python code with cudf/cuOpt API calls] <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| **Output Parameters:** [1D] <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| **Other Properties Related to Output:** [None] <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ## Evaluation Agents Used: <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - `claude-code` <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - `codex` <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ## Evaluation Tasks: <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 evaluation task (positive skill-activation), 2 attempts per task, pass threshold 50%. <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ## Evaluation Metrics Used: <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reported benchmark dimensions: <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - Security: Checks whether skill-assisted execution avoids unsafe behavior such as secret leakage, destructive commands, or unauthorized access. <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - Correctness: Checks whether the agent follows the expected workflow and produces the correct final output. <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - Discoverability: Checks whether the agent loads the skill when relevant and avoids using it when irrelevant. <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - Effectiveness: Checks whether the agent performs measurably better with the skill than without it. <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - Efficiency: Checks whether the agent uses fewer tokens and avoids redundant work. <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Underlying evaluation signals used in this run: <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - `security`: Checks for unsafe operations, secret leakage, and unauthorized access. <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - `skill_execution`: Verifies that the agent loaded the expected skill and workflow. <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - `skill_efficiency`: Checks routing quality, decoy avoidance, and redundant tool usage. <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - `accuracy`: Grades final-answer correctness against the reference answer. <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - `goal_accuracy`: Checks whether the overall user task completed successfully. <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - `behavior_check`: Verifies expected behavior steps, including safety expectations. <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - `token_efficiency`: Compares token usage with and without the skill. <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ## Evaluation Results: <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | Dimension | Num | `claude-code` | `codex` | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |---|---:|---:|---:| | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | Security | 2 | 100% (+0%) | 100% (+0%) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | Correctness | 2 | 100% (+0%) | 95% (+3%) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | Discoverability | 2 | 100% (+0%) | 70% (-5%) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | Effectiveness | 2 | 83% (+14%) | 83% (+12%) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | Efficiency | 2 | 93% (-0%) | 56% (-5%) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment on lines
+63
to
+70
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Add blank line after the table. The evaluation results table should be followed by a blank line before the next section heading to comply with Markdown formatting standards. 📝 Proposed fix | Effectiveness | 2 | 83% (+14%) | 83% (+12%) |
| Efficiency | 2 | 93% (-0%) | 56% (-5%) |
+
## Skill Version(s): <br>📝 Committable suggestion
Suggested change
🧰 Tools🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.22.1)[warning] 63-63: Tables should be surrounded by blank lines (MD058, blanks-around-tables) 🤖 Prompt for AI Agents |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ## Skill Version(s): <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 26.08.00 (source: frontmatter) <br> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix truncated text.
The finding description is cut off mid-word. "reac" should be "reach".
✏️ Proposed fix
📝 Committable suggestion
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~72-~72: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...king it accessible to any host that can reac (
references/server_examples.md:7) - L...(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents