Skip to content

Conversation

@niukuo
Copy link
Collaborator

@niukuo niukuo commented Jul 18, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Expanded the list of authorized GitHub usernames permitted to trigger specific bot commands in the workflow.

Description

Test CodeRabbit <- This line should exist after rebasing.

Test Coverage

GitHub Bot Help

/bot [-h] ['run', 'kill', 'skip', 'reuse-pipeline'] ...

Provide a user friendly way for developers to interact with a Jenkins server.

Run /bot [-h|--help] to print this help message.

See details below for each supported subcommand.

run [--disable-fail-fast --skip-test --stage-list "A10-1, xxx" --gpu-type "A30, H100_PCIe" --add-multi-gpu-test --only-multi-gpu-test --disable-multi-gpu-test --post-merge --extra-stage "H100_PCIe-[Post-Merge]-1, xxx"]

Launch build/test pipelines. All previously running jobs will be killed.

--disable-fail-fast (OPTIONAL) : Disable fail fast on build/tests/infra failures.

--skip-test (OPTIONAL) : Skip all test stages, but still run build stages, package stages and sanity check stages. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--stage-list "A10-1, xxx" (OPTIONAL) : Only run the specified test stages. Examples: "A10-1, xxx". Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--gpu-type "A30, H100_PCIe" (OPTIONAL) : Only run the test stages on the specified GPU types. Examples: "A30, H100_PCIe". Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--only-multi-gpu-test (OPTIONAL) : Only run the multi-GPU tests. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--disable-multi-gpu-test (OPTIONAL) : Disable the multi-GPU tests. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.

--add-multi-gpu-test (OPTIONAL) : Force run the multi-GPU tests. Will also run L0 pre-merge pipeline.

--post-merge (OPTIONAL) : Run the L0 post-merge pipeline instead of the ordinary L0 pre-merge pipeline.

--extra-stage "H100_PCIe-[Post-Merge]-1, xxx" (OPTIONAL) : Run the ordinary L0 pre-merge pipeline and specified test stages. Examples: --extra-stage "H100_PCIe-[Post-Merge]-1, xxx".

For guidance on mapping tests to stage names, see docs/source/reference/ci-overview.md.

kill

kill

Kill all running builds associated with pull request.

skip

skip --comment COMMENT

Skip testing for latest commit on pull request. --comment "Reason for skipping build/test" is required. IMPORTANT NOTE: This is dangerous since lack of user care and validation can cause top of tree to break.

reuse-pipeline

reuse-pipeline

Reuse a previous pipeline to validate current commit. This action will also kill all currently running builds associated with the pull request. IMPORTANT NOTE: This is dangerous since lack of user care and validation can cause top of tree to break.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 18, 2025

Walkthrough

The update modifies the Blossom-CI GitHub Actions workflow by expanding the list of authorized GitHub usernames permitted to trigger specific bot commands. No changes were made to the workflow's logic or structure; only additional usernames were appended to the authorization check.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/blossom-ci.yml Expanded the array of authorized GitHub usernames for bot command authorization in the CI workflow.

Poem

In the garden of code, the list grew long,
More friends may now sing the workflow song.
With each new name, permissions bloom,
The CI dances, dispelling gloom.
🐇✨

Welcome, all, to the blossom room!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 814704d and 3604824.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/blossom-ci.yml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/blossom-ci.yml

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/blossom-ci.yml (2)

43-44: Duplicate usernames – eliminate redundancy

"ixlmar" appears three times in the array. While harmless at runtime, it clutters the allow-list.

- ... "ixlmar", ... "ixlmar", ...
+ ... "ixlmar", ...

43-44: Allow-list is now hard to read & maintain

The ever-growing single-line JSON string (~4 kB) mixes spacing styles. Consider:

  1. Moving the usernames to a separate file (e.g. .github/allowed-users.json) and loading it in a prior step, or
  2. Replacing the hard-coded list with a GitHub team/organization membership check.

Either approach improves readability and avoids future merge conflicts.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 812243b and 814704d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/blossom-ci.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/blossom-ci.yml (1)

43-44: Close to GitHub Actions 10 kB expression limit

GitHub limits conditional expressions to 10 kB. With the current growth rate, the fromJson(...) string may soon exceed this cap and break the workflow.

Please verify the current size and plan a refactor before it becomes an operational issue.

@niukuo niukuo requested a review from chzblych July 18, 2025 06:18
Signed-off-by: tensorrt-cicd <[email protected]>
@chzblych
Copy link
Collaborator

/bot skip --comment "Not tested by L0"

@chzblych chzblych changed the title update namelist [None][infra] Update the allow list of CI trigger+ Jul 18, 2025
@chzblych chzblych changed the title [None][infra] Update the allow list of CI trigger+ [None][infra] Update the allow list of CI trigger Jul 18, 2025
@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #12292 [ skip ] triggered by Bot

@tensorrt-cicd
Copy link
Collaborator

PR_Github #12292 [ skip ] completed with state SUCCESS
Skipping testing for commit 3604824

@chzblych chzblych merged commit 519a211 into NVIDIA:main Jul 18, 2025
3 checks passed
reasonsolo pushed a commit to reasonsolo/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2025
timlee0212 pushed a commit to timlee0212/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2025
NVShreyas pushed a commit to NVShreyas/TensorRT-LLM that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2025
Signed-off-by: tensorrt-cicd <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: tensorrt-cicd <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shreyas Misra <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants