Adopting stochastic physics changes from ufs-community regional workflow#381
Merged
Merged
Conversation
chunhuazhou
requested review from
CurtisAlexander-NOAA,
JeffBeck-NOAA,
TrevorAlcott-NOAA,
christinaholtNOAA,
guoqing-noaa,
hu5970 and
terraladwig
as code owners
Collaborator
Author
|
Tests passed on Jet for ensemble forecast with SPP turned on. |
hu5970
approved these changes
May 6, 2022
guoqing-noaa
pushed a commit
to guoqing-noaa/regional_workflow
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2024
…L#381) Co-authored-by: benjamin blake <benjamin.blake@clogin07.cactus.wcoss2.ncep.noaa.gov>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES:
Adopting stochastic physics changes from ufs-community regional workflow.
TESTS CONDUCTED:
Testing being conducted on Jet
DEPENDENCIES:
DOCUMENTATION:
Related PRs/Issues (list a few here):
ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#978
ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#982
ufs-community#685
ufs-community#466
ISSUE (optional):
CONTRIBUTORS (optional):
@JeffBeck-NOAA Thanks much for the changes in ufs-community workflow and thank you for reviewing this PR!