Cloud cover parameter changes for GFSv17#1027
Conversation
|
@RuiyuSun Please add corresponding ccpp-physics PR as a dependency |
|
@DusanJovic-NOAA @gspetro-NOAA The dependency has been added. |
|
Could we get approvals on this PR so that we can process its high-priority GFSv17 parent WM PR#2940 by the end of the week? Thanks! :) |
|
@RuiyuSun The ccpp-physics PR was merged. This is ready to revert .gitmodules and point to the latest ufs/dev commit of ccpp-physics: ufs-community/ccpp-physics@291b4aa |
I see it is pointing to the correct ccpp/physics and branch |
Jong had gone ahead and updated the hash. This just needs to get merged into the UFSATM now that everything is approved and updated. @DusanJovic-NOAA @BrianCurtis-NOAA |
Description
There is a low cloud bias in the current version of the GFSv17. The formula used in the cloud cover calculation is based Xu/Randall (1996). To increase the cloud cover in the GFSv17, a different set of parameters is used in the formulation. The increase in the cloud cover will also help to reduce the downward SW at the surface.
Issue(s) addressed
This PR
Testing
How were these changes tested?
This change has been used in a GFSv17 RETRO-like experiment on WCOSS2. RT tests are being conducted on the URSA.
What compilers / HPCs was it tested with?
Intel
Are the changes covered by regression tests?
YES
Have the ufs-weather-model regression test been run? On what platform?
The RT tests were conducted on the URSA.
This change will change the baseline.
BASELINE DIRECTORY: /scratch4/NAGAPE/epic/role-epic/UFS-WM_RT/NEMSfv3gfs/develop-20251007
DONE.
Dependencies
If testing this branch requires non-default branches in other repositories, list them.
Those branches should have matching names (ideally)
https://github.com/RuiyuSun/ccpp-physics/tree/moorthi_cover
ufs-community/ccpp-physics#325