-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 211
Update ufs-weather-model #3784
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
aerorahul
merged 8 commits into
NOAA-EMC:develop
from
JessicaMeixner-NOAA:updatemodel20250606
Jun 12, 2025
Merged
Update ufs-weather-model #3784
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1887804
update /dev paths that were missed
JessicaMeixner-NOAA 045c527
updates for FV3 namelists
JessicaMeixner-NOAA 88f3356
Merge remote-tracking branch 'EMC/develop' into updatemodel20250606
JessicaMeixner-NOAA 98f81fb
update model
JessicaMeixner-NOAA bcdc830
Merge branch 'NOAA-EMC:develop' into updatemodel20250606
JessicaMeixner-NOAA c524c2d
Merge branch 'develop' into updatemodel20250606
aerorahul 214cd0a
Merge branch 'develop' into updatemodel20250606
aerorahul f839dc4
Merge branch 'develop' into updatemodel20250606
aerorahul File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Submodule ufs_model.fd
updated
94 files
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would suggest set 0 as default for SKEBINT, SPPTINT and SHUMINT to be consistent with the stochastic physics model code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did i mis-update based on what's being done in the ufs-wetaher-model regression tests? (comparison diffs: ufs-community/ufs-weather-model@aba31a4...9193010)
What I saw was that the default value before was hard-coded to 1800 and this is what is now being set in default vars in the rt.sh system.
We need updates to ufs-weather-model regression tests if this needs to be changed as well I think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here are the relevant screen shots of the code diffs:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
adding @NickSzapiro-NOAA to the conversation. Nick, can we update the default value to 0 for SKEBINT/SPPTINT/SHUMINT in regression test?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bingfu-NOAA - can this be a separate issue from this PR? This PR is not changing any default values. If we need to add variables to the GEFS configuration files here in this PR I can do that, otherwise, perhaps this can be handled via follow-up PRs? @RuiyuSun has confirmed that the values we have here are what the physics team is expecting for GFS, but I am happy to change GEFS configs to add it there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@JessicaMeixner-NOAA @NickSzapiro-NOAA What we need is set the default to 0 for these parameters, Othewise, gefs configuration file in g-w need to be added these parameters and reset these values to 0. GEFS are using 300s (atm time step, which is triggered when these parameters are set to 0) for these parameters.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am in favor of merging this PR now that tests have passed. If there are updates needed in the defaults, that need a PR in the ufs-weather-model, then let that be in the next PR. We shouldn't hold this one up. my 2c.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bingfu-NOAA, please open a PR in the g-w, with changes in
dev/parm/config/gefs/config.efcsproviding the necessary exports.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This shouldn't have even changed anything from the GEFS configuration in develop branch from what i can tell. So I agree this shouldn't delay this PR moving forward. I think work in both ufs-weather-model and g-w need updates for the GEFS side of things -- but just my 2c.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@aerorahul I agree we should let it go. We can fix this later.