RRFS cloud base/top: diagnose using cloud fraction#791
Conversation
… the identified mid-point location.
|
The UPP RT on Hera indicate the following changes: |
|
@jaymes-kenyon I would think all changes from my UPP RT (see above) are expected results. You may access the test case for RRFS on Hera at |
|
@BinLiu-NOAA and @LinZhu-NOAA There will be changes in cloud top temperature for hafs products with updates of cloud base/top height calculation for all regional FV3 models (See my testing above) in this PR. Please let me know if you have concerns. |
|
Thanks, @WenMeng-NOAA — these results would be expected. Indeed, changes in cloud-top height (via the |
@jaymes-kenyon Thanks for confirming. |
|
@FernandoAndrade-NOAA I completed the UPP RT on Hera at /scratch1/NCEPDEV/stmp2/Wen.Meng. You may copy the new baselines for Hera and start the RT on Orion. |
Understood thank you. I'll get started on updating Hera BLs. Orion is currently down for maintenance, I'll run RTs when it's available later this afternoon. |
|
Orion RTs have completed with the same changes in results for 3drtma, fv3r, and hafs, baselines will be updated for these tests on Orion. Hera BLs have been updated. |
|
This PR is ready for merging. |
This code updates the cloud-base and cloud-top height (and pressure) diagnostics for RRFS applications, addressing issue #790. Rather than using explicit (grid-scale) cloud water and ice, the proposed code uses the cloud fraction provided by the model.
This code has been tested in a RRFS case and produces satisfactory results. Thanks to @joeolson42 (NOAA / GSL / EPAD / Model Physics Branch) for the collaboration.