add PlanetiQ YAM-8 data with SAID 768#966
Conversation
|
@RussTreadon-NOAA Could you please add @ADCollard and @HaixiaLiu-NOAA as the reviewers? Thank you! |
|
Confirm that global_enkf fails when run from The anavinfo file in this PR does not work with GFS v16. |
|
@RussTreadon-NOAA I have created a GSI-fix PR and updated my GSI branch. Please let me know if there's anything else I need to do. |
|
Thank you @XuanliLi-NOAA for the updates in GSI-fix and GSI. GSI-fix PR #58 has been approved and merged into GSI-fix The |
|
@RussTreadon-NOAA fix/ has been updated. Thank you! |
|
@XuanliLi-NOAA , while we can run GSI ctests for this PR, tests may / will fail because this is a develop-v16 branch. A more important test is to run a cycle using Do you have a parallel in which you have been testing |
|
Yes, a parallel experiment, do5_allpiq (archive dir: /lfs/h2/emc/da/noscrub/[xuanli.li/archive/do5_allpiq), was completed using gfs v16.3.26, in which we assimilated all operational data plus gps 768. Compared to the operational run, gsistat for the first cycle at 2025091518 shows differences only for gpsro piq 768: < o-g 01 gps asm 768 0000 count 24 507 858 3083 4635 3072 2003 2343 2884 3653 5572 53022
< o-g 01 gps asm 768 0000 bias -0.411E+00 0.167E+00 -0.133E+00 -0.543E+00 -0.198E+00 -0.147E+00 -0.143E+00 -0.182E+00 -0.995E-01 0.176E-01 -0.486E-01 -0.960E-01
< o-g 01 gps asm 768 0000 rms 0.454E+01 0.444E+01 0.471E+01 0.456E+01 0.281E+01 0.138E+01 0.127E+01 0.119E+01 0.130E+01 0.142E+01 0.161E+01 0.212E+01
< o-g 01 gps asm 768 0000 cpen 0.123E+00 0.207E+00 0.332E+00 0.409E+00 0.221E+00 0.278E+00 0.535E+00 0.497E+00 0.572E+00 0.671E+00 0.830E+00 0.387E+00
< o-g 01 gps asm 768 0000 qcpen 0.123E+00 0.207E+00 0.332E+00 0.409E+00 0.221E+00 0.278E+00 0.535E+00 0.497E+00 0.572E+00 0.671E+00 0.830E+00 0.387E+00
< o-g 01 asm all count 163 4098 8598 33113 50709 34705 21950 25416 30758 38045 59021 617122
< o-g 01 asm all bias -0.168E+01 -0.560E+00 0.282E+00 -0.307E+00 -0.291E+00 -0.160E+00 -0.129E+00 -0.173E+00 -0.924E-01 -0.485E-01 0.989E-01 -0.346E-01
< o-g 01 asm all rms 0.535E+01 0.549E+01 0.582E+01 0.568E+01 0.345E+01 0.157E+01 0.128E+01 0.120E+01 0.125E+01 0.148E+01 0.171E+01 0.286E+01
< o-g 01 asm all cpen 0.257E+00 0.286E+00 0.347E+00 0.432E+00 0.308E+00 0.365E+00 0.537E+00 0.499E+00 0.526E+00 0.735E+00 0.951E+00 0.401E+00
< o-g 01 asm all qcpen 0.257E+00 0.286E+00 0.347E+00 0.432E+00 0.308E+00 0.365E+00 0.537E+00 0.499E+00 0.526E+00 0.735E+00 0.951E+00 0.401E+00
> o-g 01 asm all count 139 3591 7740 30030 46074 31633 19947 23073 27874 34392 53449 564100
> o-g 01 asm all bias -0.190E+01 -0.662E+00 0.328E+00 -0.282E+00 -0.300E+00 -0.161E+00 -0.128E+00 -0.172E+00 -0.916E-01 -0.555E-01 0.114E+00 -0.288E-01
> o-g 01 asm all rms 0.548E+01 0.562E+01 0.593E+01 0.579E+01 0.351E+01 0.159E+01 0.128E+01 0.121E+01 0.124E+01 0.149E+01 0.172E+01 0.292E+01
> o-g 01 asm all cpen 0.280E+00 0.297E+00 0.349E+00 0.434E+00 0.317E+00 0.374E+00 0.537E+00 0.499E+00 0.521E+00 0.742E+00 0.963E+00 0.402E+00
> o-g 01 asm all qcpen 0.280E+00 0.297E+00 0.349E+00 0.434E+00 0.317E+00 0.374E+00 0.537E+00 0.499E+00 0.521E+00 0.742E+00 0.963E+00 0.402E+00
< o-g 01 gps rej 768 0000 count 38 439 526 863 986 492 75 33 25 46 178 19663
< o-g 01 gps rej 768 0000 bias -0.670E+01 -0.694E+01 -0.694E+01 -0.607E+01 -0.186E+01 -0.644E+00 0.654E+00 -0.300E+00 -0.319E+01 -0.206E+01 -0.108E+01 -0.820E+01
< o-g 01 gps rej 768 0000 rms 0.146E+02 0.181E+02 0.218E+02 0.214E+02 0.123E+02 0.521E+01 0.383E+01 0.436E+01 0.551E+01 0.590E+01 0.653E+01 0.530E+03
< o-g 01 gps rej 768 0000 cpen 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
< o-g 01 gps rej 768 0000 qcpen 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
< o-g 01 rej all count 516 6255 6534 10704 10153 4385 446 223 306 503 1613 166787
< o-g 01 rej all bias -0.607E+01 -0.538E+01 -0.417E+01 -0.595E+01 -0.278E+01 -0.449E+00 0.101E+01 0.141E+01 0.433E+00 0.124E+01 0.951E-01 -0.787E+01
< o-g 01 rej all rms 0.149E+02 0.163E+02 0.200E+02 0.226E+02 0.153E+02 0.631E+01 0.536E+01 0.721E+01 0.753E+01 0.837E+01 0.774E+01 0.266E+03
> o-g 01 rej all count 478 5816 6008 9841 9167 3893 371 190 281 457 1435 147124
> o-g 01 rej all bias -0.602E+01 -0.526E+01 -0.392E+01 -0.594E+01 -0.288E+01 -0.425E+00 0.108E+01 0.171E+01 0.755E+00 0.158E+01 0.240E+00 -0.783E+01
> o-g 01 rej all rms 0.150E+02 0.162E+02 0.198E+02 0.227E+02 0.156E+02 0.643E+01 0.562E+01 0.760E+01 0.769E+01 0.858E+01 0.787E+01 0.206E+03```Code changes in read_obs.F90 and setupbend.f90 under /lfs/h2/emc/da/noscrub/[xuanli.li/git/do5/gfs_v16/gfs.v16.3.26/sorc/gsi-allpiq.fd/src/gsi are the same as these in XuanliLi-NOAA:v16_piq768. |
ADCollard
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good and test in a cycled run is as expected
|
operational A Files or directories only in one or the other NCO's placement of Differences in files Summary
|
HaixiaLiu-NOAA
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the changes added in read_obs.F90 and setupbend.f90 to handle the new RO data from YAM-8 with a satID=768 look good to me.
|
Dogwood test Rerun the operational 20251218 00Z GDAS with the operational
|
|
Thank you @HaixiaLiu-NOAA for your review. When you have time would you please complete your review by approving the PR. |
|
@RussTreadon-NOAA Thank you so much for taking the time to run the tests and carefully check the results. I really appreciate it. |
|
Thank you @HaixiaLiu-NOAA for the approval. @XuanliLi-NOAA : I'll work with the GSI Handling Review team to get this PR merged. |
|
@RussTreadon-NOAA Thank you so much! |
Description
This PR is the continue of the closed PR 930.
This PR addresses issue #928 by adding satellite ID 768 commercial PlanetiQ YAM8 RO data to GSI v16. setupbend.f90 and read_obs.F90 have been updated to apply the commercial RO QC filters for this data, and the print statement for the number of RO obs considered and accepted has been turned off.
Resolves #928.
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
How Has This Been Tested?
GSI regression test against the develop-v16 branch (262ce16) was run on WCOSS2. All tests passed.
Test project /lfs/h2/emc/da/noscrub/xuanli.li/git/v16_768/gsi/GSI/buildStart 6: global_enkfStart 1: global_4denvarStart 4: hafs_4denvar_glbensStart 5: hafs_3denvar_hybensStart 2: rtmaStart 3: rrfs_3denvar_rdasens1/6 Test #3: rrfs_3denvar_rdasens ............. Passed 918.86 sec2/6 Test #2: rtma ............................. Passed 1343.99 sec3/6 Test #5: hafs_3denvar_hybens .............. Passed 1419.25 sec4/6 Test #4: hafs_4denvar_glbens .............. Passed 1545.86 sec5/6 Test #6: global_enkf ...................... Passed 1786.39 sec6/6 Test #1: global_4denvar ................... Passed 2228.87 sec100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 6.Checklist